Returning to life activities after hematopoietic cell transplantation in older adults

Survivorship Experiences of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Survivors: A Qualitative Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The number of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) survivors is increasing globally. Although qualitative studies in this population are reported, clear understanding of how allo-HSCT survivors experience survivorship is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify, appraise, and synthesize evidence from qualitative research on survivorship experience among allo-HSCT survivors.

METHODS

A qualitative systematic review was conducted. A literature search of 9 databases and OpenGrey, Google Scholar, and Google was performed from inception to February 2023. Two reviewers independently screened and assessed the eligibility of each study. Descriptive information was extracted from the studies by one reviewer and checked by another. Findings were extracted and analyzed using thematic synthesis.

RESULTS

Seventeen articles were included. Four themes and 12 subthemes regarding allo-HSCT survivors' experiences emerged: (1) recovery as being a longer process than they thought (influenced by long-term physical symptoms, disturbed by survivorship uncertainty); (2) experiencing a restricted survivorship life (shrunken social world, forced dietary limitations, centered around hospitals); (3) suffering from stigma and discrimination (perceived as a burden, seen differently by others, difficulties establishing and maintaining romantic relationships and marriage, limited opportunities in work); and (4) realizing something positive obtained during survivorship (enriched survivorship self-management skills, enhanced personal growth, developed positive relationships).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings reveal the challenges, needs, and growth that allo-HSCT survivors experienced during survivorship. Some understudied areas were identified, which warrant further exploration.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Targeted survivor-centered care should be provided to allo-HSCT survivors, and interventions to resolve issues experienced during survivorship should be developed.

Preconditioning Frailty Phenotype Influences Survival and Relapse for Older Allogeneic Transplantation Recipients

Hematologic malignancies disproportionately affect older adults. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is potentially curative, but poor overall survival (OS) has limited its use in older adults. Fried's frailty phenotype (FFP) is a geriatric assessment tool that combines objective and subjective performance measures: gait speed, grip strength, activity level, exhaustion, and weight loss. People meeting ≥3 criteria are classified as frail; 1 or 2 criteria, as pre-frail; and 0 criteria, as fit. To evaluate the association of pre-HCT FFP with post-HCT outcomes, we assessed FFP prior to conditioning for 280 HCT recipients age ≥60 years with acute leukemia or a myeloid neoplasm at 3 institutions. When analyzing survival by age group, patients age ≥70 years had inferior OS compared to patients age 60 to 69 years (P = .002), with corresponding OS estimates of 38.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 27.8% to 49.9%) and 59.3% (95% CI, 51.9% to 65.9%). Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) also was significantly higher in the older patients (P = .0005); the 2-year cumulative incidences of NRM were 38.5% (95% CI, 27.5% to 49.2%) and 17.2% (95% CI, 12.3% to 22.8%), for older and younger recipients, respectively. The cumulative incidences of relapse did not differ by age group (P = .3435). Roughly one-third (35.5%) of the patients were fit, 57.5% were pre-frail, and 7.5% were frail, with corresponding 2-year OS estimates of 68.4% (95% CI, 57.9% to 76.8%), 45.5% (95% CI, 37.4% to 53.2%), and 45.8% (95% CI, 23.4% to 65.8%) (P = .013). FFP was not significantly associated with NRM, but being frail or pre-frail was associated with a higher rate of disease-related deaths (33.3% and 27.3%, respectively, compared with 17.4% for fit patients; P = .043). In univariate modeling of restricted mean survival time with a 3-year horizon (RMST_3y), the factors that were significantly associated were FFP, age, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), Disease Risk Index (DRI), and HCT-specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI). Of those factors, only FFP (P = .006), age (P = .006), KPS (P = .004), and DRI (P = .005) were significantly associated in multivariate modeling of RMST_3y. Estimates of RMST_3y were computed and 5 risk-groups were created with survival ranging from 31.4 months for those who were age 60 to 69 years, fit, had KPS 90 to 100, and low/intermediate-risk DRI compared to 10.5 months for those who had high-risk features for all the evaluated factors. In univariate and multivariate analyses for restricted mean time to relapse with a 3-year horizon (RMRT_3y), FFP (pre-frail versus fit, P = .007; frail versus fit, P = .061) and DRI (P = .001) were the only significant factors. Predicted RMRT_3y was longest (30.6 months) for those who were fit and had low/intermediate-risk DRI scores and shortest (19.1 months) for those who were frail and had high-risk or very high-risk DRI scores. Both age and FFP impact survival after HCT. Incorporation of FFP into pre-HCT evaluations may improve decision-making and counseling regarding HCT risk for older adults. Our findings support future trials designed to reverse frailty, such as pre-HCT supervised exercise programs, and correlative analyses to unravel the connection of frailty and relapse to generate future targets for intervention. Finally, exploration of novel HCT platforms to reduce relapse in pre-frail and frail patients, as well as reduce NRM in adults age >70 years, are warranted.

Patients' reflections on undergoing non-myeloablative allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and participating in a multimodal interdisciplinary rehabilitation programme: A qualitative study

PURPOSE

To explore participants' experiences and perspectives on the relevance and meaning of participating in the multimodal interdisciplinary rehabilitation programme named 'HAPPY', and the programme's influence on their handling of everyday life during and after non-myeloablative allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

METHOD

A qualitative interview study using Thorne's interpretive description methodology. A semi-structured interview guide and the analysis were inspired by symbolic interactionism. From April to July 2020, individual interviews were conducted with 24 patients who had participated in HAPPY while undergoing non-myeloablative haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

RESULTS

HAPPY contributed to the patients' knowledge building on the basis of three themes: Social Solidarity and Comparison, Processing Mind and Body, and Balancing Disease and Life. HAPPY supported the participants in maintaining their physical functioning and induced a perception of empowerment. Moreover, HAPPY supported patients in their efforts to familiarise themselves with their changed life conditions after the stem cell transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Our findings showed that participation in HAPPY empowered patients to manage and cope with the stresses of everyday life and restore balance in their lives whilst undergoing treatment and confronting their cancer diagnosis. The findings underline the importance of elements of peer support and continuous support and facilitation from the specialist team, and the possibility to rethink the use of online technology to support and ensure a balance between disease and life and to minimise hospital visits.