1
|
Lafont C, Paillaud E, Bertolus C, Baron M, Caillet P, Bouvard E, Laurent M, Salvan D, Chaumette L, de Decker L, Piot B, Barry B, Raynaud-Simon A, Sauvaget E, Minard A, Anota A, Panjo H, Brugel L, Canouï-Poitrine F. Geriatric assessment and quality of life for 2 years in older patients with head and neck cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024; 116:758-763. [PMID: 38335935 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Due to the location and toxicity of treatments, head and neck cancer (HNC) has a major impact on quality of life (QoL). Objective: to assess the effects of geriatric-assessment (GA)-driven interventions on QoL over 2 years in older adults with HNC.EGeSOR was a randomized study of HNC patients aged ≥65, receiving a pretreatment GA, a geriatric intervention and follow-up (intervention) or standard of care (control). The primary endpoint was QoL score using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer's (EORTC QLQ-C30) and HNC (QLQ-HN35) QoL questionnaires over 24 months.In total, 475 patients were included (median age: 75.3; women: 31%; oral cancer: 44%). QoL scores improved over 24 months with various trajectories, without significant differences between the groups. A total of 74% of patients (interventional group) did not receive the complete intervention. Cancer characteristics, functional status, and risk of frailty were associated with change in the Global Health Status QoL score.There is a need to develop an alternative model of implementation such as patient-centered health-care pathways. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02025062.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Lafont
- Univ Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, Creteil, France
- Service de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Henri-Mondor, Creteil, France
| | - Elena Paillaud
- Univ Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, Creteil, France
- Département de Gériatrie, AP-HP, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Chloe Bertolus
- Service de Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Melany Baron
- Service de Soins de Suites et de Réadaptation Gériatrique, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Ivry sur Seine, France
| | - Philippe Caillet
- Univ Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, Creteil, France
- Département de Gériatrie, AP-HP, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Eric Bouvard
- Service de Gériatrie, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - Marie Laurent
- Univ Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, Creteil, France
- Département de Gériatrie, AP-HP, Hôpital Henri-Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Didier Salvan
- Service ORL et Cervico-Facial, Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien, Corbeil-Essonnes, France
| | - Laurence Chaumette
- Service de Court Sejour Gériatrique, Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien, Corbeil-Essonnes, France
| | - Laure de Decker
- Service de Gériatrie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Benoit Piot
- Service de Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale et Stomatologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Beatrix Barry
- Service ORL et Chirurgie Cervico-Faciale, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France
| | | | - Elisabeth Sauvaget
- Service ORL et Chirurgie Cervico-Faciale, Groupe Hospitalier Paris-Saint Joseph, Paris, France
| | | | - Amélie Anota
- Clinical Research and Innovation Department and Department of Human and Social Sciences, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- French National Platform Quality of Life and Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Henri Panjo
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP, Villejuif, France
| | - Lydia Brugel
- Service d'ORL et Chirurgie Cervico-Faciale, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France
| | - Florence Canouï-Poitrine
- Univ Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, Creteil, France
- Service de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Henri-Mondor, Creteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alibhai SMH, Puts M, Jin R, Godhwani K, Antonio M, Abdallah S, Feng G, Krzyzanowska MK, Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Papadopoulos E, Mach C, Nasiri F, Sridhar SS, Glicksman R, Moody L, Bender J, Clarke H, Matthew A, McIntosh D, Klass W, Emmenegger U. TOward a comPrehensive supportive Care intervention for Older men with metastatic Prostate cancer (TOPCOP3): A pilot randomized controlled trial and process evaluation. J Geriatr Oncol 2024:101750. [PMID: 38521641 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Current management of metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) includes androgen receptor axis-targeted therapy (ARATs), which is associated with substantial toxicity in older adults. Geriatric assessment and management and remote symptom monitoring have been shown to reduce toxicity and improve quality of life in patients undergoing chemotherapy, but their efficacy in patients being treated with ARATs has not been explored. The purpose of this study is to examine whether these interventions, alone or in combination, can improve treatment tolerability and quality of life (QOL) for older adults with metastatic prostate cancer on ARATs. MATERIALS AND METHODS TOPCOP3 is a multi-centre, factorial pilot clinical trial coupled with an embedded process evaluation. The study includes four treatment arms: geriatric assessment and management (GA + M); remote symptom monitoring (RSM); geriatric assessment and management plus remote symptom monitoring; and usual care and will be followed for six months. The aim is to recruit 168 patients between two cancer centres in Toronto, Canada. Eligible participants will be randomized equally via REDCap. Participants in all arms will complete a comprehensive baseline assessment upon enrollment following the Geriatric Core dataset, as well as follow-up assessments at 1.5, 3, 4.5, and 6 months. The co-primary outcomes will be grade 3-5 toxicity and QOL. Toxicities will be graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. QOL will be measured by patient self-reporting using the EuroQol 5 dimensions of health questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include fatigue, insomnia, and depression. Finally, four process evaluation outcomes will also be observed, namely feasibility, fidelity, and acceptability, along with implementation barriers and facilitators. DISCUSSION Data will be collected to observe the effects of GA + M and RSM on QOL and toxicities experienced by older adults receiving ARATs for metastatic prostate cancer. Data will also be collected to help the design and conduct of a definitive multicentre phase III randomized controlled trial. This study will extend supportive care interventions for older adults with cancer into new areas and inform the design of larger trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (registration number: NCT05582772).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shabbir M H Alibhai
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Martine Puts
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rana Jin
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kian Godhwani
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maryjo Antonio
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Soha Abdallah
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gregory Feng
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Monika K Krzyzanowska
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis
- Department of Geriatrics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Calvin Mach
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ferozah Nasiri
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Srikala S Sridhar
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachel Glicksman
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Lesley Moody
- Varian Medical Systems, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Jacqueline Bender
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hance Clarke
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Matthew
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Urban Emmenegger
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tolstrup LK, Ditzel HM, Giger AKW, Jørgensen TL, Ryg J, Dieperink KB. Determinants of poor quality of life in older patients with cancer: A longitudinal mixed methods study (PROGNOSIS-Q). J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101500. [PMID: 37084630 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient-reported outcomes are becoming more employed in oncologic research because many older patients with cancer prioritize preserved health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over prolonged survival. However, few studies have examined the determinants of poor HRQoL in older patients with cancer. This study aims to determine whether HRQoL findings are truly reflective of cancer disease and treatment, as opposed to external factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS This longitudinal, mixed-methods study included outpatients, age 70 years or more, with a solid cancer, who reported poor HRQoL (EORTC QLQ-C30 Global health status/QoL (GHS) score ≤ 33.3), at treatment initiation. A convergent design was employed, in which HRQoL survey data and telephone interview data was collected in parallel at baseline and three-months follow-up. Survey and interview data was analyzed separately and subsequently compared. Thematic analysis of interview data was conducted according to Braun & Clarke, and changes in patients GHS score were calculated using mixed model regression. RESULTS Twenty-one patients with a mean age of 74.7 years were included (12 men and 9 women) and data saturation was achieved at both time intervals. Baseline interviews (n = 21) showed that poor HRQoL at cancer treatment initiation was primarily reflective of participants' initial shock upon receiving their cancer diagnosis and their change in circumstance and sudden functional independence. At three months, three participants were lost to follow-up and two provided only partial data. Most participants experienced an increase in HRQoL, with 60% showing a clinically significant improvement in GHS scores. Interviews showed that this was due to lessening functional dependency and disease acceptance achieved by mental and physical adjustment. HRQoL measures were less reflective of cancer disease and treatment in older patients with preexisting highly disabling comorbidity. DISCUSSION This study showed good alignment between survey responses and in-depth interviews, demonstrating that both methodologies are highly relevant measures during oncologic treatment. However, for patients with severe comorbidity, HRQoL findings are often more reflective of the steady state of their disabling comorbidity. Response shift may play a part in how participants adjusted to their new circumstances. Promoting caregiver involvement from the time of diagnosis may increase patients´ coping strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lærke Kjær Tolstrup
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; OPEN- Odense Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Helena Møgelbjerg Ditzel
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; OPEN- Odense Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Ann-Kristine Weber Giger
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; OPEN- Odense Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Trine Lembrecht Jørgensen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jesper Ryg
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Karin Brochstedt Dieperink
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Deldycke A, Denys H, Decruyenaere A, Velghe A, Naert E. Clinical decision-making in older patients with cancer: a cross-sectional single-centre study to assess the impact of clinical judgement and patient preferences. Acta Clin Belg 2023; 78:103-111. [PMID: 36879530 DOI: 10.1080/17843286.2022.2074702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The heterogeneity in the population of older patients with cancer makes clinical decision-making difficult. We investigated the agreement between the G8 score and clinical judgment in frailty assessments, determined the impact of a life-expectancy calculator, and explored patient and caregiver preferences towards the treatment goal. METHODS Patients aged ≥75 years in need of new oncological treatment were prospectively enrolled between June 2020 and February 2021. Frailty was estimated by the oncologist and caregiver and compared to the G8 estimation. We examined whether the oncologist changed the fit/frail estimation based on life expectancy calculated using the ePrognosis tool. The main treatment goals, either longevity or quality of life (QoL), from the patient's and caregiver's perspective were noted and compared. RESULTS Forty-nine patients were included in the analysis. Comparison of the oncologist's and the caregiver's frailty estimation with the G8 assessment showed agreement and a Kappa coefficient of 58.3% (0.231) and 60% (0.255), respectively. The ePrognosis score and the odds of change in the frailty estimation by the oncologist showed no correlation. Regarding preferences, 28 (57.1%) and 17 (34.7%) patients and eighteen (47.3%) and seventeen (44.7%) caregivers chose longevity and QoL, respectively. The observed agreement and Kappa coefficient were 78.8% and 0.578. CONCLUSION Compared to the G8 assessment, frailty was underestimated by both oncologists and caregivers. Most of the patients chose longevity over QoL, and the preferences between the patient and the caregiver matched in the majority of cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annelies Deldycke
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hannelore Denys
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Anja Velghe
- Geriatrics Department, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Eline Naert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jespersen E, Minet LR, Nissen N. Symptoms of total pain experienced by older people with advanced gastrointestinal cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2022; 31:e13674. [PMID: 35973729 PMCID: PMC9788272 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Little is known about concurrent physical, psychological, social and spiritual distress experienced by older patients during early stages of advanced cancer while receiving life-prolonging treatment. Drawing on the concept of total pain, this study explored the multi-faceted symptoms of pain in older patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer while receiving palliative chemotherapy. METHODS A total of 14 in-depth interviews with seven participants were conducted, one interview at the beginning and one after completion of chemotherapy. Participants were ≥70 years, diagnosed with advanced gastrointestinal cancer and receiving palliative chemotherapy. RESULTS Thematic analysis revealed four themes: variability and inevitability of physical pain, ways of coping with psychological pain, mitigating social pain through contributions to social life and the anticipation of existential pain in old age. Conducting two interviews with each participant foregrounded the changing nature of the participants' experienced symptoms and life perspectives while receiving palliative chemotherapy. Further, old age was experienced as integral to how participants described their situation and indicated an acceptance of old age. CONCLUSION Older adults with advanced cancer are affected by multiple-faceted symptoms resulting from cancer and its treatment. The concept of total pain is suggested to guide interdisciplinary palliative care in earlier stages of advanced cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Jespersen
- Department of OncologyAcademy of Geriatric Cancer Research, AgeCare, Odense University HospitalOdenseDenmark,Department of Clinical ResearchUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
| | - Lisbeth Rosenbek Minet
- Geriatric Research Unit, Department of Clinical ResearchUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
| | | |
Collapse
|