New treatment opportunities for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia and the increasing importance of frailty assessment - An oncogeriatric perspective

The Evolution of Treatment Policies and Outcomes for Patients Aged 60 and Older with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Population-Based Analysis over Two Decades

BACKGROUND

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a malignancy of the bone marrow with a median age at diagnosis of 70 years. AML is difficult to treat, especially in older patients, among whom outcomes have historically been poor. Over the last two decades, a greater understanding of the molecular mechanisms of the pathology has led to the development of new drugs and multiple updates to treatment guidelines.

METHODS

A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted for all patients aged 60 and older who were newly diagnosed with AML (n = 370) as defined by the European Leukemia Net 2022 criteria in Friesland, a Dutch province, between 2005 and 2023.

RESULTS

In this cohort of patients with a median age of 73 years, complete bone marrow analysis to classify the AML according to ELN increased in time from 49% (2005-2011) to 86% (2022-2023). The rate of patients receiving antileukemic therapy increased over time (2005-2011: 19%; 2012-2016: 64%; 2017-2021: 75%; 2022-2023: 74%), mainly driven by the introduction of hypomethylating agents. Over these time periods, the use of intensive chemotherapy (13%, 27%, 27%, and 5%) and rates of stem cell transplantation (3%, 9%, 27%, and 14%) underwent similar development as more patients were deemed eligible for these interventions from 2012 onwards, but usage declined again after the introduction of venetoclax in 2022. The median overall survival was 3.7, 7.3, 8.0, and 9.4 months over the four time periods, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates how outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed AML aged 60 and older improved over the last two decades.

Adapting the Fitness Criteria for Non-Intensive Treatments in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia to the Use of Venetoclax-Hypomethylating Agents Combination-Practical Considerations from the Real-Life Experience of the Hematologists of the Rete Ematologica Lombarda

A retrospective survey was conducted in hematologic centres of the Rete Ematologica Lombarda (REL) on 529 older AML patients seen between 2020-2022. Compared to 2008-2016, the use of intensive chemotherapy (ICT) decreased from 40% to 18.1% and of hypomethylating agents (HMAs) from 19.5% to 13%, whereas the combination of Venetoclax/HMA, initially not available, increased from 0% to 36.7%. Objective treatment-specific fitness criteria proposed by SIE/SIES/GITMO in 2013 allow an appropriate choice between ICT and HMAs by balancing their efficacy and toxicity. Venetoclax/HMA, registered for patients unfit to ICT, has a unique toxicity profile because of prolonged granulocytopenia and increased infectious risk. Aiming at defining specific fitness criteria for the safe use of Venetoclax/HMA, a preliminary investigation was conducted among expert REL hematologists, asking for modifications of SIE/SIES/GITMO criteria they used to select candidates for Venetoclax/HMA. While opinions among experts varied, a general consensus emerged on restricting SIE/SIES/GITMO criteria for ICT-unfit patients to an age limit of 80-85, cardiac function > 40%, and absence of recurrent lung infections, bronchiectasis, or exacerbating COPD. Also, the presence of an adequate caregiver was considered mandatory. Such expert opinions may be clinically useful and may be considered when treatment-specific fitness criteria are updated to include Venetoclax/HMA.