[Laparoscopic promontofixation: defining early morbidity using a standardized method].
ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2014;
42:378-82. [PMID:
24852907 DOI:
10.1016/j.gyobfe.2014.04.002]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2014] [Accepted: 04/10/2014] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Adverse event reporting for laparoscopic promontofixation is highly variable and non-standardized in the literature. The aim of this study was to better characterize early postoperative complications of laparoscopic promontofixation for genital prolapse using a standardized reporting methodology.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
A retrospective study was conducted on 174 women with genital prolapse undergoing laparoscopic promontofixation from January 2008 to January 2013. Complications arising during the first month after surgery were reviewed according to the Clavien and Dindo classification.
RESULTS
At least one postoperative adverse event was reported in 57 out of 174 (33 %) women, grade 1 in 22 patients (13 %), grade 2 in 31 patients (18 %) and grade 3 in 4 patients (2 %). No patient experienced a grade 4 or 5 complication. Fifty-three out of 57 (93 %) complications were grade 1 or 2. The most frequently reported adverse event (n=24; 14 %) was constipation (grade 2).
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
Laparoscopic promontofixation is a safe procedure with almost exclusively benign (grade 1 or 2) early complications. The hypothesis of induction or increasing constipation by this type of genital prolapse surgery should be further evaluated.
Collapse