Impact des nouveaux critères de dépistage sur la prévalence du diabète gestationnel

Determination of the Contributing Factors and HbA1c Cutoff Leading to Glucose Tolerance Abnormalities Following Gestational Diabetes

The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has been steadily increasing over the past years. It is a major risk factor for glucose intolerance and type 2 DM (T2DM). The American Diabetes Association recommends that women whose pregnancy was complicated by GDM be screened for persistent glucose abnormalities at six to 12 weeks postpartum with either a fasting plasma glucose test alone or with a fasting 75-g, two-hour oral glucose tolerance test. This study aimed to identify the main predictive factors of glucose tolerance disorders in early postpartum women with a recent history of GDM. In this retrospective descriptive study, we identified 400 women who met the eligibility criteria for the study. The mean age was 34.54 ± 5.51 years. A total of 70% had a family history of DM, 16% had a personal history of GDM, and 23% had fetal macrosomia in previous pregnancies. The overall incidence of postpartum carbohydrate tolerance disorders was 36.4%, including 12% prediabetes and 24.4% DM. The prevalence of prediabetes and T2DM after delivery was higher with older maternal age, multigravidity, a higher BMI, a history of GDM, and fetal macrosomia in previous pregnancies. Furthermore, the persistence of this impaired glucose tolerance in postpartum was associated with a higher term of diagnosis, a higher glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) percentage (the discriminant cutoff value with the best sensitivity/specificity ratio was 5.25%), the use of insulin therapy, cesarean section delivery, and fetal macrosomia. After adjusting for confounders, only prior GDM, a higher HbA1c level, macrosomia, and gestational term were found to significantly affect postpartum glucose tolerance. Although postpartum screening for T2DM is recommended for all women with GDM, a significant number of patients fail it. A better knowledge of predictive factors for this outcome is therefore needed for a more effective and targeted medical intervention.

Incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus in the United Arab Emirates; comparison of six diagnostic criteria: The Mutaba'ah Study

Background

For more than half a century, there has been much research and controversies on how to accurately screen for and diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). There is a paucity of updated research among the Emirati population in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The lack of a uniform GDM diagnostic criteria results in the inability to accurately combine or compare the disease burden worldwide and locally. This study aimed to compare the incidence of GDM in the Emirati population using six diagnostic criteria for GDM.

Methods

The Mutaba'ah study is the largest multi-center mother and child cohort study in the UAE with an 18-year follow-up. We included singleton pregnancies from the Mutaba'ah cohort screened with the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 24-32 weeks from May 2017 to March 2021. We excluded patients with known diabetes and with newly diagnosed diabetes. GDM cumulative incidence was determined using the six specified criteria. GDM risk factors were compared using chi-square and t-tests. Agreements among the six criteria were assessed using kappa statistics.

Results

A total of 2,546 women were included with a mean age of 30.5 ± 6.0 years. Mean gravidity was 3.5 ± 2.1, and mean body mass index (BMI) at booking was 27.7 ± 5.6 kg/m2. GDM incidence as diagnosed by any of the six criteria collectively was 27.1%. It ranged from 8.4% according to the EASD 1996 criteria to 21.5% according to the NICE 2015 criteria. The two most inclusive criteria were the NICE 2015 and the IADPSG criteria with GDM incidence rates of 21.5% (95% CI: 19.9, 23.1) and 21.3% (95% CI: 19.8, 23.0), respectively. Agreement between the two criteria was moderate (k = 0.66; p < 0.001). The least inclusive was the EASD 1996 criteria [8.4% (95% CI: 7.3, 9.6)]. The locally recommended IADPSG/WHO 2013 criteria had weak to moderate agreement with the other criteria, with Cohen's kappa coefficient ranging from (k = 0.51; p < 0.001) to (k = 0.71; p < 0.001). Most of the GDM risk factors assessed were significantly higher among those with GDM (p < 0.005) identified by all criteria.

Conclusions

The findings indicate discrepancies among the diagnostic criteria in identifying GDM cases. This emphasizes the need to unify GDM diagnostic criteria in this population to provide accurate and reliable incidence estimates for healthcare planning, especially because the agreement with the recommended criteria was not optimal.

Understanding the Adoption and Diffusion of a Telemonitoring Solution in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Qualitative Study

Background

Women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) require regular follow-ups and overall management to normalize maternal blood glucose and improve pregnancy outcomes. With the advancements made in the digital field, telemedicine is gaining popularity over traditional health care approaches in different medical fields. As for GDM, telemonitoring solutions seem to improve women’s quality of life and enhance self-management.

Objective

The aim of this study is to understand, from patients’ and health care professionals’ (HCPs) perspectives, what drives the adoption and diffusion of a telemonitoring solution (myDiabby) in a context where telemonitoring activities are still not compensated like traditional follow-ups.

Methods

The study was conducted in 12 diabetes services in France using myDiabby for monitoring and managing patients with GDM. A qualitative research approach was adopted for collecting and analyzing data. A total of 20 semistructured interviews were conducted with HCPs working in different health structures in France, and 15 semistructured interviews were conducted with patients who had been using myDiabby. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach.

Results

Different determinants need to be taken into consideration when adopting an innovative health technology. By drawing on the diffusion of innovation theory, a set of factors associated with the technology (the relative advantages, compatibility, ease of use, testability, and observability of the telemedicine platform) has been identified as affecting the adoption and diffusion of telemonitoring solutions in French diabetes services. In addition, data analysis shows a set of environmental factors (the demographic situation of HCPs, the health care access in rural communities, and the economic and political context in France) that also influences the spread and adoption of telemonitoring systems in French hospitals.

Conclusions

Even though telemonitoring activities are still not remunerated as traditional follow-ups, many French HCPs support and encourage the adoption of telemonitoring systems in GDM. As for patients, telemonitoring systems are perceived as a useful and easy way to monitor their GDM. This study contributes to recognizing the value of telemonitoring interventions in managing GDM and considering the expansion of telemonitoring to other chronic conditions.

Complications of pregnancy in morbidly obese patients: What is the impact of gestational diabetes mellitus?

OBJECTIVES

The synergistic role of severe obesity and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) on pregnancy complications has been poorly studied. We aim to analyze the impact of GDM on pregnancy complications in women with class III obesity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

we performed a retrospective monocentric study including women with a pregestational BMI≥40kg/m2 with a singleton pregnancy from January 1996 to December 2014. We compared the risks of maternal, fetal and neonatal complications between patients with GDM and those without GDM.

RESULTS

We included 354 patients, 121 (34.3%) had GDM and 63 needed insulin treatment (52.9% of the GDM women). Patients with GDM were older (30.4±5.1 vs 28.9±4.8 years,p=0.008) and had more frequently a history of GDM (24.8% vs 6.1%; p<0.0001). Patients with GDM were more often hospitalized (47.8% vs 29.8%, p=0.001) and were more likely to have premature birth (11.7% vs. 5.3%, p=0.031). Neonates from mothers with GDM were more frequently large for gestational age (31.6% vs 19.4%, p=0.011), and had a higher rate of transfers to neonatal intensive unit (9.2% vs 4.0%, p=0.047). There was no difference for preeclampsia, C-section, shoulder dystocia, neonatal hypoglycemia or postpartum complications. Outcomes were comparable in women with or without insulin therapy.

CONCLUSION

The rate of GDM is particularly high in class III obese women. Morbidly obese women with GDM were more at risk for complications and needed more often insulin therapy. Our results suggest to pay a particular attention in this high-risk population.

The post-HAPO situation with gestational diabetes: the bright and dark sides

AIM

In 2010, in light of the data coming from the HAPO study, the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) proposed a new detection strategy and diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes based on a one-step approach with a 75 g OGTT. This review analyzes and discusses the bright and dark sides of their application.

METHODS

The assessment of these recommendations by the international organizations involved in the care of gestational diabetes and a series of observational, retrospective and prospective studies that have been published since 2010 regarding the use of the IADPSG recommendations have been evaluated.

RESULTS

The different international associations involved in the care of pregnancy and of pregnancy complicated by diabetes have not taken an univocal position some of which have accepted them, while others have criticized them. Then, the actual application of the approach recommended by the IADPSG for detecting and diagnosing GDM varies, even at centers that reportedly accept the new diagnostic criteria.

CONCLUSION

So the challenge lies in making every effort to achieve a global standardization of the strategies for detecting, diagnosing and treating GDM.

Diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus: implications of recent changes in diagnostic criteria and role of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM; approximately 5% of pregnancies) represents the most important risk factor for development of later-onset diabetes mellitus. We examined concordance between GDM diagnosis defined using the original 1999 World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and the more recent 2013 WHO criteria and 2015 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) criteria. We studied two groups: a case-control group of 257 GDM positive and 266 GDM negative cases, and an incident cohort 699 GDM positive and 6,231 GDM negative cases. In the incident cohort, GDM prevalence was 3.7% (WHO 1999 criteria), 11.4% (NICE 2015 criteria) and 13.7% (WHO 2013 criteria). Our results showed that a significant number of additional cases are detected using the more recent NICE and WHO criteria than the original 1999 WHO criteria, but these additional cases represent an intermediate group with 'moderate' dysglycaemia (abnormal blood glucose levels). Our results also show that use of these newer criteria misses a similar group of intermediate cases that were defined as GDM by the 1999 WHO criteria and that glycated haemoglobin in isolation is unlikely to replace the oral glucose tolerance test in GDM diagnosis.

[Clinical audit of screening for gestational diabetes among 848 pregnant women in 23 maternity units of the Pays de la Loire, 2014]

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines for screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) were published in 2010. An audit of the maternity units of the Pays de la Loire network sought to determine the adherence rate and to study the factors affecting it in order to propose corrective measures to improve it.

METHODS

The perinatal network in Pays de la Loire provided obstetricians of the 23 participating maternity units with a set of criteria to be collected from the files of women giving birth. The methodology of the audit was designed to enable calculation of the adherence rate overall and according to indications (risk factors, hyperglycemia, and macrosomia): adherence, non-adherence, and over-adherence (screening in the absence of an indication). To obtain around 900 pregnancies, the audit was planned to cover a week of deliveries in June 2014.

RESULTS

The analysis included 848 pregnancies and 872 newborns. Risk factors were found for 46.6% of the women (43.2 to 49.9): 13.2% for maternal age≥35years and 30.8% for BMI≥25kg/m². GDM was diagnosed for 14.6% (12.4 to 17.2). The adherence rate for screening was 45.5% (42.2 to 49.9), the non-adherence rate 27.6% (24.7 to 30.7), and the over-adherence rate 26.9% (24.0 to 30.0). Among the factors potentially associated with adherence, we observed only the second-trimester factor (macrosomia); there was no "professional" effect on adherence criteria. No evidence of overmanagement was observed for the pregnancies/deliveries/newborns with overdiagnosis. Oral glucose tolerance tests were performed in accordance with the guidelines (95.9%). Follow-up of women with GDM by specialists was satisfactory (84.6%).

DISCUSSION

This audit showed that adherence to the guidelines was insufficient in the Pays de la Loire network. The reasons for this are numerous: ignorance of the guidelines, in part due to their relative recency, the change in the blood sugar levels defining GDM (perceived as too low), and the absence of strong evidence about these thresholds from publications and practices in other countries, the need to select women for risk factors, and sometimes the late onset of prenatal care at the maternity unit.

CONCLUSION

In view of this audit, the Perinatal Network of Pays de la Loire must work to improve the knowledge and screening practices for GDM among its professionals, by the repeated dissemination of these guidelines and chart review sessions.

[Gestational diabetes mellitus]

While the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) was estimated between 5 and 10% in 2010, the application of new thresholds recommended by IADPSG and adopted in 2010 by CNGOF seems to significantly increase the number of patients affected by this pathology. A prospective single-center French study estimated in 2014 the prevalence of gestational diabetes at 14% with these criteria, making it one of the most frequent complications during pregnancy. However, to date, there is no published study using these criteria to show a benefit to the health of women and children. If a diagnosis of GDM or type 2 diabetes during pregnancy is definitively an important risk factor for maternal as well as newborn and child complications, it is probably not the case for moderate hyperglycemia discovered during pregnancy.

[Screening for gestational diabetes: Still many unsolved issues]

For many years, there is a debate on gestational diabetes screening, including what screening test and thresholds to use. The purpose of this literature review is to determine whether gestational diabetes screening in France meets the 10 definition criteria of the WHO. The DG is a public health problem, with a natural history partially known and detectable at an early stage. Currently, there is no data showing that there is a benefit to treat patient screens by the new criteria. The one-step approach-screening test can only detect fetal complications and not maternal complications. It seems to be acceptable for the population of pregnant women. The diagnostic test and treatment also seem to be acceptable to us. To this day, its reproducibility is uncertain. Screening leads to an increase in obstetric interventions. Several studies found that screening for gestational diabetes is cost-effective but in a different context of care than in France.

Prevalence of and risk factors for gestational diabetes using 1999, 2013 WHO and IADPSG criteria upon implementation of a universal one-step screening and diagnostic strategy in a sub-Saharan African population

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the impact of the new consensus diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of gestational diabetes, evaluate risk factors, and missed opportunities for diagnosis if selective screening strategy was employed.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective observational data of 1059 women with singleton pregnancy screened for gestational diabetes between 24 and 32 weeks gestation in a universal one-step screening and diagnostic strategy using 75-g oral glucose tolerance testing in an obstetric unit in Nigeria. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for GDM.

RESULTS

The prevalence of gestational diabetes in accordance with 1999 WHO, new 2013 WHO modified IADPSG and IADPSG criteria was 3.8%, 8.1%, 7.5%, and 8.6%, respectively. Overt diabetes was diagnosed in 1.03% of the study population. Using the new consensus criteria, approximately 20% of GDM cases would have been missed if selective screening strategy was employed. Using multivariable analysis, glycosuria [aOR 8.60 (3.29-22.46)] and previous poor obstetric outcome [aOR 3.01 (1.23-7.37)] were significantly associated with GDM on 1999 WHO criteria. Glycosuria [aOR 2.54 (1.10-6.42)] was the only risk significantly associated with increased risk of developing GDM diagnosed based on new 2013 and IADPSG criteria.

CONCLUSION

Using the new consensus screening and diagnostic guidelines, gestational diabetes is prevalent in our obstetric population. Missed opportunities exist with selective screening approach.

Early universal screening for gestational diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE

To study the prevalence of Gestational diabetes mellitus and to assess the impact of early universal screening to detect Gestational diabetes mellitus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive 1106 pregnant women were screened for Gestational diabetes mellitus at their first prenatal visit during the study period of February 2012 to January 2013. All the women were screened with a initial 50 gram one hour glucose challenge test (GCT) and those women who tested positive were subjected to a standardized 75 gram oral glucose tolerance test(OGTT). The prevalence of Gestational diabetes mellitus and its association with age, infertility, obesity, hypertension, family history of diabetes was studied. The impact of early universal screening for GDM was assessed. American diabetic association (ADA) and International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) criteria for diagnosis of Gestational diabetes mellitus was used in our study.

RESULTS

Of the total 1106 pregnant women who were screened with the initial 50 gram one hour glucose challenge test (GCT), 458 (41.4%) had their one hour plasma glucose value >130 gm/dl. Of the 440 women who responded to and underwent the subsequent 75gram OGTT, 158 (61.2%) had one abnormal value, 73(28.2%) had two abnormal values and 27 (10.5%) had three abnormal values. 64(24.8%) of them had fasting plasma glucose ≥ 92/dl. 36(13.9%) women were found to have GDM in the first trimester (12 weeks), 43 (16.7%) in the 13-18 weeks, 114 (44.1%) in the 19-28 weeks and 65 (25.2%) in the third trimester(28 weeks). The overall prevalence of GDM was 23.3%. There was increased association of GDM with increasing age, parity, family predisposition and infertility.

CONCLUSION

It is evident that there is increased prevalence of GDM in Indian population. Universal screening for GDM is better to routine risk factor based screening and it should be done at the first prenatal visit for early diagnosis of glucose intolerance in pregnancy especially in countries like India. There is increased association of GDM with infertility, advanced age, obesity, family predisposition and parity.