1
|
Ubom AE, Vatish M, Barnea ER. FIGO good practice recommendations for preterm labor and preterm prelabor rupture of membranes: Prep-for-Labor triage to minimize risks and maximize favorable outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2023; 163 Suppl 2:40-50. [PMID: 37807588 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.15113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
Preterm labor occurs in around 10% of pregnancies worldwide. Once diagnosed, significant efforts must be made to reduce the likelihood of morbidity and mortality associated with preterm birth. In high-resource settings, access to hospitals with a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is readily available, whereas access to NICU care is limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and many rural settings. Use of FIGO's Prep-for-Labor triage method rapidly identifies low- and high-risk patients with preterm labor to enable clinicians to decide whether the patient can be managed on site or if transfer to a level II-IV facility is needed. The management steps described in this paper aim to minimize the morbidity and mortality associated with preterm labor and in the setting of preterm labor with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). The methods for accurate diagnosis of PPROM and chorioamnionitis are described. When the risk of preterm birth is high, antenatal corticosteroids should be administered for lung maturation combined with limited tocolysis for 48 hours to permit the corticosteroid course to be completed. Magnesium sulfate is also administered for fetal neuroprotection. Implementation of FIGO's Prep-for-Labor triage method in an LMIC setting will help improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akaninyene Eseme Ubom
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
| | - Manu Vatish
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Eytan R Barnea
- Society for the Investigation of Early Pregnancy (SIEP), New York, New York, USA
- Obstetrics Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Feduniw S, Gaca Z, Malinowska O, Brunets W, Zgliczyńska M, Włodarczyk M, Wójcikiewicz A, Ciebiera M. The Management of Pregnancy Complicated with the Previable Preterm and Preterm Premature Rupture of the Membranes: What about a Limit of Neonatal Viability?-A Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:2025. [PMID: 36010375 PMCID: PMC9407094 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12082025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2022] [Revised: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM) at the limit of viability is associated with low neonatal survival rates and a high rate of neonatal complications in survivors. It carries a major risk of maternal morbidity and mortality. The limit of viability can be defined as the earliest stage of fetal maturity when a fetus has a reasonable chance, although not a high likelihood, for extra-uterine survival. The study reviews available data on preventing preterm delivery caused by the previable PPROM, pregnancy latency, therapeutic options including the use of antibiotics and steroids, neonatal outcomes, and future directions and opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stepan Feduniw
- Department of Reproductive Health, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-004 Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Olga Malinowska
- Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-089 Bialystok, Poland
| | | | - Magdalena Zgliczyńska
- Department of Obstetrics, Perinatology and Neonatology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-809 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Marta Włodarczyk
- Department of Biochemistry and Pharmacogenomics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
- Centre for Preclinical Research, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anna Wójcikiewicz
- Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-809 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Michał Ciebiera
- Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-809 Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kirchhoff E, Schneider V, Pichler G, Reif P, Haas J, Joksch M, Mager C, Schmied C, Schöll W, Pichler-Stachl E, Gold D. Hexoprenaline Compared with Atosiban as Tocolytic Treatment for Preterm Labor. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2022; 82:852-858. [PMID: 35967742 PMCID: PMC9365465 DOI: 10.1055/a-1823-0176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction
Preterm birth is defined as a live birth before 37 weeks of gestation and is associated with increased neonatal morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to
compare the efficacy of hexoprenaline and atosiban for short- and long-term tocolysis and their effects on neonatal and maternal outcomes.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study included women with threatened preterm labor between 24 + 0 and 34 + 0 weeks of gestation without premature rupture of membranes. The
tocolytic efficacy of hexoprenaline and atosiban was compared in women receiving one of the two medications for short- and long-term tocolysis. Continuous variables were compared using
t-test or Mann–Whitney U test, as appropriate. Comparison of categorical variables between the two groups was done with χ
2
test after Pearsonʼs and Fisherʼs exact test.
Results
761 women were enrolled in this study; 387 women received atosiban and 374 women received hexoprenaline as their primary tocolytic agent. Atosiban showed a higher efficacy as
a primary tocolytic agent (p = 0.000) within 48 hours. As regards long-term tocolysis, there were no differences between the treatment groups (p = 0.466). Maternal side effects such as
tachycardia (p = 0.018) or palpitations (p = 0.000) occurred more frequently after the administration of hexoprenaline, while there were no differences between the two drugs administered
with regard to any other maternal or neonatal outcome parameter.
Conclusion
Our retrospective study shows a significantly higher efficacy of atosiban in the first 48 hours, especially when administered at an early gestational age. There were no
significant differences in terms of neonatal outcome but significantly more maternal adverse effects during the administration of hexoprenaline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ebba Kirchhoff
- Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe der Med. Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Verena Schneider
- Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe der Med. Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Gerhard Pichler
- 2 Klinische Abteilung für Neonatologie der Med. Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Philipp Reif
- Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe der Med. Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Josef Haas
- Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe der Med. Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Maike Joksch
- Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe der Med. Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Corinna Mager
- Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe der Med. Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Christian Schmied
- Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe der Med. Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Schöll
- Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe der Med. Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Elisabeth Pichler-Stachl
- Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe der Med. Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Daniela Gold
- Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe der Med. Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Young Park J, Hong S, Hye Jo J, Hye Shin I, Young Kim G, Sun Ko H, Yang Park I. The effect of tocolytics in women with preterm labor after 34 weeks of gestation: A propensity score-matched study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2022; 277:1-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.07.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
5
|
Relić G, Mujović V, Šulović N, Minić S. Mehanizam kontrakcije i relaksacije miometrijuma, interakcija okcitocina i prostaglandina. PRAXIS MEDICA 2020. [DOI: 10.5937/pramed2002041r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Regulation of uterine activity during pregnancy is due to the nature of the loss of humoral sympathetic, holinergical and peptidergic inervation. So far, nothing found that would indicated that the mechanism of premature birth and its pathogenesis different from the normal mechanism of delivery, except for different maturity of the fetus. Since a large number of substances that participate in the contraction and relaxation of miometrium (estrogen, progesterone, cortisol, etc.). Today's modern research has focused on prostaglandins and oxytocin, or their interaction. Accepting oxytocin as substance initiation deliveries it is difficult for two reasons: the level of oxytocin in the blood can not lift before the delivery and release of oxytocin remains constant during pregnancy. Oxytocin probably plays a role in support delivery for decidual cells stimulates the synthesis of uterine PGF2a.
Collapse
|
6
|
Ulrich D, Schneider V, Pichler G, Haas J, Culea V, Joksch M, Mager C, Schmied C, Lakovschek IC, Lang U, Reif P. Neonatal Outcome After Hexoprenaline Compared with Atosiban After Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes. JOURNAL OF FETAL MEDICINE 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s40556-019-00225-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AbstractPreterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) occurs in up to 3% of all pregnancies. Only few comparative studies have investigated potential risks and benefits between different tocolytic substances in women with PPROM. The aim of this study was to compare the neonatal short term outcome after tocolysis with Atosiban or Hexoprenaline in women with PPROM. This is a retrospective observational cohort study of women with PPROM between 24 and 32 weeks of gestation comparing neonatal and maternal outcome after tocolysis with atosiban or hexoprenaline. Outcome parameters were short term neonatal outcome, maternal tocolytic efficacy, effectiveness and tolerability and neonatal neurodevelopmental long-term outcome. Continuous variables were compared using t-Test or Mann–Whitney U test, as appropriate. For categorical variables Chi-square after Pearson and Fisher exact-test were used to compare the two groups. 93 women were included into this study with 42 women receiving hexoprenaline and 51 women receiving atosiban as primary tocolytic treatment. Mean gestational age was 29 weeks in both groups at the time PPROM. No differences were found for any short term neonatal outcome parameters, tocolytic efficacy, effectiveness and tolerability and neonatal neurodevelopmental long-term outcome. Both hexoprenaline and atosiban do not affect the short and long term neonatal outcome in women with PPROM for the time of lung maturation.
Collapse
|
7
|
Madar H. [Management of preterm premature rupture of membranes (except for antibiotherapy): CNGOF preterm premature rupture of membranes guidelines]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 46:1029-1042. [PMID: 30389540 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the different parts of therapeutic management of viable preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), except the antibiotherapy and birth modalities. METHODS The Medline, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases over a period from 1980 to September 2018 have been consulted. RESULTS When the diagnostic of viable PPROM is reached, the woman should be hospitalized and signs of intrauterine infection (IUI) should be sought (Professional consensus). If cervical assessment appears necessary, speculum, digital examination or cervical ultrasound may be performed (Professional consensus). It is recommended to limit cervical evaluation regardless of the method used (Professional consensus). Initial ultrasound is recommended to determine the fetal presentation, locate the placenta, estimate the fetal weight and the residual amniotic fluid volume (Professional consensus). Performing vaginal and urinary bacteriological sampling at admission is recommended before any antibiotic (Professional consensus). In the case of positive vaginal culture, an antibiogram is necessary since it can guide antibiotherapy in the case of IUI and early onset neonatal bacterial sepsis (Professional consensus). In absence of demonstrated neonatal benefit, there is insufficient evidence to recommend or to not recommend initial tocolysis in PPROM (Grade C). If tocolysis was administered, it is recommended not to prolong it for more than 48hours (Grade C). Antenatal corticosteroid administration is recommended before 34 weeks of gestation (WG) (Grade A) and magnesium sulfate administration is recommended for women at high risk of imminent preterm birth before 32 WG (Grade A). Vitamin supplementation (vitamins C and E) is not recommended (Professional consensus), and it is recommended not to impose strict bed rest in case of PPROM (Professional consensus). In case of clinical signs of IUI with cerclage, it is recommended to remove the cerclage immediately (Professional consensus). The home care management of clinically stable PPROM after 48hours of hospital observation can be considered (Professional consensus). During the monitoring of a PPROM, it is recommended to identify elements relating to the diagnosis of IUI (Professional consensus). CONCLUSION The level of evidence and scientific data in the literature concerning the management (except antibiotics) of PPROM are low. Initial management of viable PPROM requires hospitalization. The main objectives of the management are the detection and medical care of maternal and fetal complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Madar
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Pellegrin, CHU de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pinto Cardoso G, Houivet E, Marchand-Martin L, Kayem G, Sentilhes L, Ancel PY, Lorthe E, Marret S. Association of Intraventricular Hemorrhage and Death With Tocolytic Exposure in Preterm Infants. JAMA Netw Open 2018; 1:e182355. [PMID: 30646165 PMCID: PMC6324618 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE No trials to date have demonstrated the benefits of tocolysis on death and/or neonatal morbidity in preterm infants; tocolytics may affect the fetal blood-brain barrier. OBJECTIVES To assess the risks associated with tocolysis in women delivering prematurely as measured by death and/or intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) in preterm infants and to compare the association of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) nifedipine and nicardipine hydrochloride vs atosiban used for tocolysis with death and/or IVH. DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS The French 2011 EPIPAGE-2 (Enquête Épidémiologique sur les Petits Âges Gestationnels) cohort was limited to mothers admitted for preterm labor without fever, who delivered from 24 to 31 weeks of gestation from April 1 through December 31, 2011. Groups of preterm infants with vs without tocolytic exposure and groups with atosiban vs CCB exposure were compared. Data analysis was performed from June 7, 2014, through September 3, 2017. EXPOSURES Tocolytics. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was a composite of death and/or IVH in preterm infants. Secondary outcomes included death, IVH, and a composite of death and/or grades III to IV IVH. RESULTS A total of 1127 mothers (mean [SD] age, 25.5 [6.0] years) experienced preterm labor and gave birth to 1343 preterm infants with a male to female ratio of 1.23 and mean (SD) gestational age of 27 (2.5) weeks. Of these, 789 mothers (70.0%) received tocolytics; 314 (39.8%) received only atosiban, and 118 (15.0%) received only a CCB. In the first analysis, the primary outcome (death and/or IVH) was not significantly different in preterm infants with vs without tocolytic exposure (183 of 363 [50.4%] vs 207 of 363 [57.0%]; relative risk [RR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.77-1.01; P = .07). The secondary outcome (death and/or grades III-IV IVH) was significantly lower in preterm infants with vs without tocolytic exposure (92 of 363 [25.3%] vs 118 of 363 [32.5%]; RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.98; P = .03). Other outcomes did not differ significantly. In the secondary analysis, death and/or IVH was not significantly different in preterm infants with atosiban vs CCB exposure (96 of 214 [44.9%] vs 62 of 121 [51.2%]; RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.70-1.10; P = .26), nor was IVH (77 of 197 [39.1%] vs 48 of 106 [45.3%]; RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.66-1.13; P = .29). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this population-based study, findings suggest that tocolytics were associated with a reduction of death and severe IVH. Other studies are necessary to compare perinatal outcomes after use of atosiban vs CCBs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaëlle Pinto Cardoso
- Department of Neonatal Pediatrics and Intensive Care, Neuropediatrics and Rehabilitation Center, Reference Centre for Learning Disabilities of the Child, Rehabilitation Centre, Rouen University Hospital–Charles Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, France
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM) U1245, NEOVASC Team, Research and Biomedical Innovation Institute, Rouen Medical School, Normandy University, Rouen, France
| | - Estelle Houivet
- Department of Biostatistics, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Laetitia Marchand-Martin
- INSERM U1153, Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Center, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Maternité Port-Royal, Paris Descartes University France, Département Hospitalo-Universitaire Risk in Pregnancy, Paris, France
- Unité de Recherche Clinique, Centre d’Investigation Clinique P1419, Cochin Hotel-Dieu Hospital, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Gilles Kayem
- INSERM U1153, Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Center, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Maternité Port-Royal, Paris Descartes University France, Département Hospitalo-Universitaire Risk in Pregnancy, Paris, France
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Armand Trousseau Hospital, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre and Marie Curie Paris 06, Paris, France
| | - Loïc Sentilhes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Ancel
- INSERM U1153, Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Center, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Maternité Port-Royal, Paris Descartes University France, Département Hospitalo-Universitaire Risk in Pregnancy, Paris, France
- Unité de Recherche Clinique, Centre d’Investigation Clinique P1419, Cochin Hotel-Dieu Hospital, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Elsa Lorthe
- INSERM U1153, Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Center, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Maternité Port-Royal, Paris Descartes University France, Département Hospitalo-Universitaire Risk in Pregnancy, Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Marret
- Department of Neonatal Pediatrics and Intensive Care, Neuropediatrics and Rehabilitation Center, Reference Centre for Learning Disabilities of the Child, Rehabilitation Centre, Rouen University Hospital–Charles Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, France
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM) U1245, NEOVASC Team, Research and Biomedical Innovation Institute, Rouen Medical School, Normandy University, Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: Guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 210:217-224. [PMID: 28068594 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.12.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2016] [Accepted: 12/29/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
In France, 60,000 neonates are born preterm every year (7.4%), half of them after the spontaneous onset of labor. Among preventable risk factors of spontaneous prematurity, only cessation of smoking is associated with decreased prematurity (level of evidence [LE]1). It is therefore recommended (Grade A). Routine screening and treatment of vaginal bacteriosis is not recommended in the general population (Grade A). The only population for which vaginal progesterone is recommended is that comprising asymptomatic women with singleton pregnancies, no history of preterm delivery, and a short cervix at 16-24 weeks of gestation (Grade B). A history-indicated cerclage is not recommended for women with only a history of conization (Grade C), uterine malformation (professional consensus), isolated history of preterm delivery (Grade B), or twin pregnancies for primary (Grade B) or secondary (Grade C) prevention of preterm birth. A history-indicated cerclage is recommended for a singleton pregnancy with a history of at least 3 late miscarriages or preterm deliveries (Grade A). Ultrasound cervical length screening is recommended between 16 and 22 weeks for women with a singleton previously delivered before 34 weeks gestation, so that cerclage can be offered if cervical length <25mm before 24 weeks (Grade C). A cervical pessary is not recommended for the prevention of preterm birth in a general population of asymptomatic women with twin pregnancies (Grade A) or in populations of asymptomatic women with a short cervix (professional consensus). Although the implementation of universal screening by transvaginal ultrasound for cervical length at 18-24 weeks of gestation in women with a singleton gestation and no history of preterm birth can be considered by individual practitioners, this screening cannot be universally recommended. In cases of preterm labor, (i) it is not possible to recommend any one of the several methods (ultrasound of the cervical length, vaginal examination, or fetal fibronectin assay) over any other to predict preterm birth (Grade B); (ii) routine antibiotic therapy is not recommended (Grade A); (iii) prolonged hospitalization (Grade B) and bed rest (Grade C) are not recommended. Compared with placebo, tocolytics are not associated with a reduction in neonatal mortality or morbidity (LE2) and maternal severe adverse effects may occur with all tocolytics (LE4). Atosiban and nifedipine (Grade B), unlike beta-agonists (Grade C), can be used for tocolysis in spontaneous preterm labor without preterm premature rupture of membranes. Maintenance tocolysis is not recommended (Grade B). Antenatal corticosteroid administration is recommended for all women at risk of preterm delivery before 34 weeks of gestation (Grade A). After 34 weeks, the evidence is insufficiently consistent to justify recommending systematic antenatal corticosteroid treatment (Grade B), but a course of this treatment might be indicated in clinical situations associated with high risk of severe respiratory distress syndrome, mainly in case of planned cesarean delivery (Grade C). Repeated courses of antenatal corticosteroids are not recommended (Grade A). Rescue courses are not recommended (Professional consensus). Magnesium sulfate administration is recommended for women at high risk of imminent preterm birth before 32 weeks (Grade A). Cesareans are not recommended for fetuses in vertex presentation (professional consensus). Both planned vaginal and elective cesarean delivery are possible for breech presentations (professional consensus). Delayed cord clamping may be considered if the neonatal or maternal state allows (professional consensus).
Collapse
|