Virological response and safety outcomes in therapy-nai ve patients treated for chronic hepatitis C with taribavirin or ribavirin in combination with pegylated interferon alfa-2a: a randomized, phase 2 study

Hepatitis C virus associated glomerulopathies

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a systemic disorder which is often associated with a number of extrahepatic manifestations including glomerulopathies. Patients with HCV infection were found to have a higher risk of end-stage renal disease. HCV positivity has also been linked to lower graft and patient survivals after kidney transplantation. Various histological types of renal diseases are reported in association with HCV infection including membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN), membranous nephropathy, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, fibrillary glomerulonephritis, immunotactoid glomerulopathy, IgA nephropathy, renal thrombotic microangiopathy, vasculitic renal involvement and interstitial nephritis. The most common type of HCV associated glomerulopathy is type I MPGN associated with type II mixed cryoglobulinemia. Clinically, typical renal manifestations in HCV-infected patients include proteinuria, microscopic hematuria, hypertension, acute nephritis and nephrotic syndrome. Three approaches may be suggested for the treatment of HCV-associated glomerulopathies and cryoglobulinemic renal disease: (1) antiviral therapy to prevent the further direct damage of HCV on kidneys and synthesis of immune-complexes; (2) B-cell depletion therapy to prevent formation of immune-complexes and cryoglobulins; and (3) nonspecific immunosuppressive therapy targeting inflammatory cells to prevent the synthesis of immune-complexes and to treat cryoglobulin associated vasculitis. In patients with moderate proteinuria and stable renal functions, anti-HCV therapy is advised to be started as pegylated interferon-α plus ribavirin. However in patients with nephrotic-range proteinuria and/or progressive kidney injury and other serious extra-renal manifestations, immunosuppressive therapy with cyclophosphamide, rituximab, steroid pulses and plasmapheresis should be administrated.

Anemia management in patients with chronic viral hepatitis C

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature regarding current strategies for the management of anemia associated with treatment for chronic viral hepatitis C (HCV) in adults.

DATA SOURCES

The MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched (January 1980-October 2012) for articles in English using the search terms anemia, ribavirin, dose reduction, erythropoietin stimulating agents, hepatitis C, HIV, liver transplant, telaprevir, and boceprevir.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All relevant original studies, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, guidelines, and review articles were assessed for inclusion. References from pertinent articles were examined for additional content not found during the initial search.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Standard of care for patients infected with HCV genotype 1 now requires a triple therapy regimen including an HCV NS3 protease inhibitor. These regimens lead to significantly higher rates of anemia compared to prior dual therapy regimens. Development of an optimal management strategy should begin with risk stratification. Ribavirin dose reductions have been recommended in the package inserts for the pegylated interferon products and studies have demonstrated the need for maintenance of 80% of the initial ribavirin dose to achieve optimal sustained virologic response (SVR) with dual therapy. The use of erythropoietin-stimulating agents has been shown to be effective for anemia caused by peginterferon and ribavirin without compromising SVR rates. Limited data have been published regarding the management of anemia with triple therapy; however, efficacy studies for boceprevir and telaprevir have used ribavirin dose reduction and erythropoietin-stimulating agents to successfully manage anemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Anemia is a common adverse event associated with the use of ribavirin, and, more recently, the new HCV protease inhibitors. Ribavirin dose reduction should continue to be used as an initial anemia management strategy, with the use of erythropoietin alfa 40,000 units once weekly reserved for patients whose hemoglobin does not adequately respond to initial management strategies.

Meta-analysis: mortality and serious adverse events of peginterferon plus ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) therapy is the current standard of care for patients with chronic hepatitis C. Determining precisely the risk of serious adverse events (SAEs) and mortality from a single study is rather difficult because of the infrequency of such events. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the rates of SAEs and the mortality of PEG-IFN/RBV therapy in a pooled large sample, and to assess the relationship between SAEs and mortality rates and therapeutic characteristics.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of PEG-IFN/RBV therapy. We calculated the crude mortality and SAE rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Eighty studies with 153 treatment arms that included 27569 patients were enrolled (14401 patients treated with Peg-IFN alpha-2a/RBV and 13168 with Peg-IFN alpha-2b/RBV). All-cause and treatment-related deaths were observed in 50 (0.18%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.24%) and sixteen (0.058%; 95% CI 0.033-0.094%) patients, respectively. The crude SAE rate was 7.08% (95% CI 6.75-7.41%). Subgroup analysis revealed higher SAE rates in patients receiving PEG-IFN alpha-2a than in those with PEG-IFN alpha-2b (7.45 vs. 6.74%), and higher SAE rates with higher doses than with the lower doses in PEG-IFN-2a and 2b (11.94 vs. 6.99%, 7.10 vs. 5.05%, respectively), and with extended duration (> 48 weeks) than with standard duration (48 weeks) (15.5 vs. 6.67%) in PEG-IFN alpha-2a.

CONCLUSION

The mortality rate during PEG-IFN/RBV therapy was acceptably low, but the rate of SAEs was not negligible in a treatment for a benign disease, and the rate was affected by treatment regimens.

Differences in clinical outcomes among hepatitis C genotype 1-infected patients treated with peginterferon alpha-2a or peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin: a meta-analysis

Background

With the development of new direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for hepatitis C, the backbone peginterferon alpha used may be of importance in maximizing treatment outcomes. To this end, the rates of sustained virologic response (SVR), relapse, and treatment discontinuation among hepatitis C genotype 1-infected patients given peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin or peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin were determined using a meta-analysis.

Methods

Randomized trials examining peginterferon alpha-2a or peginterferon alpha-2b co-administered with ribavirin for 48 weeks were included. Data were extracted on SVR, relapse, and treatment discontinuations for treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients. Pooled proportions using fixed and random effects meta-analysis were calculated.

Results

Twenty-six trials provided data on patients treated with peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin, and 19 trials provided data on patients treated with peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin. Five trials were direct head-to-head evaluations. In the subset of trials that included head-to-head evaluations, no significant differences were observed between the two treatments for treatment-naïve (relative risk [RR]: 1.07, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.97–1.18) and treatment-experienced patients (RR: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.58–2.77). Using only active trial arms, a larger proportion of the treatment- naïve patients who were provided peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin achieved a SVR (47%), which is greater than that of treatment-naïve patients who were provided peginterferon alpha- 2b plus ribavirin (40% SVR achievement); however, a larger proportion of treatment- experienced patients who were provided peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin achieved a SVR (16%) when compared with treatment-experienced patients given peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin (12% SVR achievement). A larger proportion of relapses occurred among both treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients given peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin, when compared with treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients taking peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin. The proportion of patients discontinuing treatment was greater among treatment-naïve patients taking peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin, but smaller among treatment-experienced patients.

Conclusion

There are small differences in treatment outcomes for different types of peginterferon- alpha. Patient status and complexity of administration may differentiate clinical outcomes.

The cryoglobulinaemias

Cryoglobulins are immunoglobulins that precipitate in vitro at temperatures less than 37°C and produce organ damage through two main pathways: vascular sludging (hyperviscosity syndrome, mainly in type I cryoglobulinaemia) and immune-mediated mechanisms (principally vasculitis, in mixed cryoglobulinaemia). Cryoglobulinaemia is associated with many illnesses, which can be broadly grouped into infections, autoimmune disorders, and malignancies; the most common cause is infection with hepatitis C virus. Mixed cryoglobulinaemic syndrome is diagnosed when a patient has typical organ involvement (mainly skin, kidney, or peripheral nerve) and circulating cryoglobulins. Cutaneous purpura is the most common manifestation of cryoglobulinaemic vasculitis. The most frequently affected internal organs are the peripheral nerves, kidneys, and joints. The course varies widely and prognosis is influenced by both cryoglobulinaemic damage to vital organs and by comorbidities associated with underlying diseases. More than 90% of cases of cryoglobulinaemia have a known underlying cause; therefore treatment is focused on the cause of the disorder rather than merely symptomatic relief. Studies suggest that both combined or sequential antiviral therapies and targeted biological treatments might be more effective than monotherapy.

New treatments for chronic hepatitis C virus infection

The treatment of hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) by a combination of pegylated interferon and ribavirin, according to early viral kinetics, leads to a sustained virological response (SVR) in more than 50% of patients with chronic infection. This SVR is a complete recovery of the infection but more than 50% of genotype 1-infected patients do not achieve SVR. A better understanding of the viral cycle, and the characterization of viral enzymes which are potential targets, resulted in the development of new molecules, direct acting antivirals (DAA) targeted against HCV, either specific of genotype 1 (protease inhibitors NS3/NS4A and polymerase inhibitors NS5B) or with a wider spectrum (NS5A or entry inhibitors), and non-specific antivirals (new interferons, cyclophilin inhibitors). We describe the results of phase II and III trials which clearly demonstrated a 20 to 30% increase in the SVR rate of genotype 1-infected patients, either naïve or treatment experienced. These new drugs should be approved by the end of 2011, after a temporary approval for compassionate use in cirrhotic patients with previous relapse or partial response to the combination therapy. In the future, the main limitations of triple therapy will be safety (cutaneous rash or anemia which may be controlled), cost, compliance, viral resistance, and drug interactions that must be avoided by educating patients and physicians.

Current therapies for chronic hepatitis C

Hepatitis C virus affects more than 180 million people worldwide and as many as 4 million people in the United States. Given that most patients are asymptomatic until late in the disease progression, diagnostic screening and evaluation should be performed in patients who display high-risk behaviors associated with acquisition of hepatitis C. Chronic hepatitis C is associated with cirrhosis, hepatic failure, and death; therefore, treatment is aimed at reducing these complications, as well as improving quality of life and minimizing adverse effects. The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Practice Guidelines on the Diagnosis, Management, and Treatment of Hepatitis C represent the gold standard for guidance on the management of hepatitis C. Standard treatment for hepatitis C is peginterferon alpha in combination with ribavirin. Currently, two pegylated interferon products are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of hepatitis C. The duration of therapy with peginterferon and ribavirin is dictated by viral genotype and virologic response. Additional therapies are under investigation for treatment of chronic hepatitis C and show early promise of comparative efficacy and fewer adverse effects. Special considerations in certain populations, including patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus, those with end-stage renal disease, injection drug users, pregnant women, and pediatric patients, should guide treatment decisions.

Taribavirin: potential future in the treatment of hepatitis C

Taribavirin is a prodrug of ribavirin, studied as a treatment modality in combination with PEGylated interferon for chronic hepatitis C. Taribavirin is catalyzed to ribavirin by adenosine deaminase, which is ubiquitous within the body. Taribavirin has resulted in significantly lower rates of anemia, the main complication of ribavirin and cause of dose reductions or discontinuation. Previous clinical studies failed to demonstrate noninferiority to ribavirin. However, better results were observed when taribavirin was given as a weight-based medicine, as shown in a recently published Phase IIb study.

Peginterferon and ribavirin treatment for hepatitis C virus infection

Pegylated interferon α (IFNα) in combination with ribavirin is currently recommended as a standard-of-care treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. This combination therapy has drastically improved the rate of sustained virological response, specifically in difficult-to-treat patients. Recently, individualized treatment, such as response-guided therapy, is being developed based on host-, HCV- and treatment-related factors. Furthermore, modified regimens with currently available medications, novel modified IFNα and ribavirin or combinations with specifically targeted antiviral therapy for HCV agents, are currently being investigated. The purpose of this review is to address some issues and epoch-making topics in the treatment of chronic HCV infection, and to discuss more optimal and highly individualized therapeutic strategies for HCV-infected patients.

An assessment of the use of chimpanzees in hepatitis C research past, present and future: 1. Validity of the chimpanzee model

The USA is the only significant user of chimpanzees in biomedical research in the world, since many countries have banned or limited the practice due to substantial ethical, economic and scientific concerns. Advocates of chimpanzee use cite hepatitis C research as a major reason for its necessity and continuation, in spite of supporting evidence that is scant and often anecdotal. This paper examines the scientific and ethical issues surrounding chimpanzee hepatitis C research, and concludes that claims of the necessity of chimpanzees in historical and future hepatitis C research are exaggerated and unjustifiable, respectively. The chimpanzee model has several major scientific, ethical, economic and practical caveats. It has made a relatively negligible contribution to knowledge of, and tangible progress against, the hepatitis C virus compared to non-chimpanzee research, and must be considered scientifically redundant, given the array of alternative methods of inquiry now available. The continuation of chimpanzee use in hepatitis C research adversely affects scientific progress, as well as chimpanzees and humans in need of treatment. Unfounded claims of its necessity should not discourage changes in public policy regarding the use of chimpanzees in US laboratories.

Hepatitis C treatment: current and future perspectives

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a member of Flaviviridae family and one of the major causes of liver disease. There are about 175 million HCV infected patients worldwide that constitute 3% of world's population. The main route of HCV transmission is parental however 90% intravenous drug users are at highest risk. Standard interferon and ribavirin remained a gold standard of chronic HCV treatment having 38-43% sustained virological response rates. Currently the standard therapy for HCV is pegylated interferon (PEG-INF) with ribavirin. This therapy achieves 50% sustained virological response (SVR) for genotype 1 and 80% for genotype 2 & 3. As pegylated interferon is expensive, standard interferon is still the main therapy for HCV treatment in under developed countries. On the other hand, studies showed that pegylated IFN and RBV therapy has severe side effects like hematological complications. Herbal medicines (laccase, proanthocyandin, Rhodiola kirilowii) are also being in use as a natural and alternative way for treatment of HCV but there is not a single significant report documented yet. Best SVR indicators are genotype 3 and 2, < 0.2 million IU/mL pretreatment viral load, rapid virological response (RVR) rate and age <40 years. New therapeutic approaches are under study like interferon related systems, modified forms of ribavirin, internal ribosome entry site (HCV IRES) inhibitors, NS3 and NS5a inhibitors, novel immunomodulators and specifically targeted anti-viral therapy for hepatitis C compounds. More remedial therapies include caspase inhibitors, anti-fibrotic agents, antibody treatment and vaccines.

Management of hepatitis C virus-related mixed cryoglobulinemia

Mixed cryoglobulinemia is a chronic immune complex-mediated disease strongly associated with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Mixed cryoglobulinemia is a vasculitis of small and medium-sized arteries and veins, due to the deposition of complexes of antigen, cryoglobulin and complement in the vessel walls. The main clinical features of mixed cryoglobulinemia vasculitis include the triad of palpable purpura, arthralgias, and weakness, and other pathological conditions such as glomerulonephritis, peripheral neuropathy, skin ulcers, and widespread vasculitis. The treatment of HCV-related mixed cryoglobulinemia is difficult due to the multifactorial origin and clinical polymorphism of the syndrome. It can be directed to eradicate the HCV infection, suppress the B-cell clonal expansion and cryoglobulin production, or ameliorate symptoms. The choice of the most appropriate treatment is strictly related to the assessment of disease activity, and to the extent and severity of organ involvement.

Safety and efficacy of viramidine versus ribavirin in ViSER2: randomized, double-blind study in therapy-naive hepatitis C patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) plus ribavirin (standard of care for chronic hepatitis C virus [HCV]), can cause dose-limiting anemia in up to 22% of patients. Viramidine is associated with a lower incidence of anemia because of its liver-targeting properties.

METHODS

The efficacy and safety of viramidine versus ribavirin plus peg-IFN alfa-2a was assessed in patients with HCV. Randomized patients received peg-IFN alfa-2a 180 mcg with viramidine 600 mg twice daily or weight-based doses of ribavirin 1000 or 1200 mg/day. Treatment duration was based on HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) genotype: genotype 2/3 and non-2/3 patients were treated for 24 and 48 weeks, respectively. The primary efficacy end point was the non-inferiority of viramidine versus ribavirin (proportion of patients achieving sustained virologic response at week 24). The primary safety end point was the proportion of patients experiencing a hemoglobin event.

RESULTS

In total, 962 patients received peg-IFN alfa-2a with viramidine (n=644) or ribavirin (n=318). Sustained virologic response was achieved in 40% of viramidine-treated patients and 55% of ribavirin-treated patients (difference of proportions 0.150 [95% CI, 0.09, 0.21]). Improved efficacy was seen with higher viramidine exposure on a mg/kg basis. Viramidine was significantly superior to ribavirin in hemoglobin event rates (54% vs. 80%; p<0.001). Adverse event rates were similar between groups except for diarrhea (viramidine 29.5%; ribavirin 15.7%; p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Viramidine 600 mg BID did not meet the primary efficacy non-inferiority end point but met the safety end point. Determination of a viramidine dosage that would yield superior efficacy over ribavirin is needed.

The utility of therapeutic drug monitoring for ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C--a critical review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C.

DATA SOURCES

Literature searches were conducted through PubMed (1949-June 2009), EMBASE (1980-June 2009), BIOSIS Previews (1969-June 2009), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-June 2009), Google, and www.clinicaltrials.gov using the terms ribavirin, therapeutic monitoring, hepatitis C, and drug levels. In addition, pertinent reference citations from identified publications were reviewed. Studies were limited to English language, adult age, and human subjects.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All articles identified from the data sources were evaluated. Studies that measured ribavirin concentrations or dose and treatment response were included in the review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

While monitoring of ribavirin plasma concentrations to improve treatment response in patients with chronic hepatitis C has been described in the literature, the utility of TDM for ribavirin in this group of patients has not been systematically studied. Thus, a previously published 9-step decision-making algorithm was employed to help determine whether TDM is warranted, based on currently available evidence. Thirty articles involving patients with chronic hepatitis C mono-infection, 12 for hepatitis C-HIV coinfection, 5 for renal dysfunction, and 5 for post-liver transplant patients were reviewed. In all subpopulations, studies exist that either support or refute the usefulness of ribavirin TDM. Additionally, the majority of the included studies had methodologic limitations, such as small sample size, retrospective analyses, and lack of p value adjustment for multiple analyses. Large randomized controlled trials would help to definitively answer this question.

CONCLUSIONS

There is conflicting evidence about the existence of a correlation between ribavirin concentrations and virologic response or development of toxicity. This inconsistent evidence, coupled with the currently employed effective strategies that maximize sustained virologic response and minimize development of anemia, precludes the utility of TDM for ribavirin.

Prognosis of hepatitis C virus-infected Canadian post-transfusion compensation claimant cohort

Accurate prognostic estimates were required to ensure the sufficiency of the $1.1 billion compensation fund established in 1998 to compensate Canadians who acquired hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection through blood transfusion between 1986 and 1990. This article reports the application of Markov modelling and epidemiological methods to estimate the prognosis of individuals who have claimed compensation. Clinical characteristics of the claimant cohort (n = 5004) were used to define the starting distribution. Annual stage-specific transition probabilities (F0-->F1, . . ., F3-->F4) were derived from the claimants, using the Markov maximum likelihood estimation method. HCV treatment efficacy was derived from the literature and practice patterns were estimated from a national survey. The estimated stage-specific transition probabilities of the cohort between F0-->F1, F1-->F2, F2-->F3 and F3-->F4 were 0.032, 0.137, 0.150 and 0.097 respectively. At 20 years after the index transfusion, approximately 10% of all living claimants (n = 3773) had cirrhosis and 0.5% developed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). For nonhaemophilic patients, the predicted 20-year (2030) risk of HCV-related cirrhosis was 23%, and the risk of HCC and liver-related death was 7% and 11% respectively. Haemophilic patients who are younger and are frequently co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus would have higher 20-year risks of cirrhosis (37%), HCC (12%) and liver-related death (19%). Our results indicate that rates of progression to advanced liver disease in post-transfusion cohorts may be lower than previously reported. The Canadian post-transfusion cohort offers new and relevant prognostic information for post-transfusion HCV patients in Canada and is an invaluable resource to study the natural history and resource utilization of HCV-infected individuals in future studies.

Ribavirin monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. A high proportion of patients never experience symptoms. Peginterferon plus ribavirin is the recommended treatment for chronic hepatitis C. However, ribavirin monotherapy may be considered for some patients.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of ribavirin monotherapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified trials through electronic databases, manual searches of bibliographies and journals, authors of trials, and pharmaceutical companies until March 2009.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised trials irrespective of blinding, language, or publication status comparing ribavirin versus no intervention, placebo, or interferon for chronic hepatitis C.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measures were serum sustained virological response (loss of hepatitis C virus RNA at least six months after treatment), liver-related morbidity plus all-cause mortality, and adverse events. Secondary outcome measures were end of treatment virological response, biochemical response (transaminase activity), and histological response. Randomisation methods, blinding, data handling, and funding were extracted as measures of bias control. Random-effects and fixed-effect meta-analyses were performed for all outcomes. We only present the results of the fixed-effect model if both models provide the same result regarding statistical significance. We present data as risk difference (RD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 14 randomised trials with 657 patients. The majority of trials had unclear control of bias. Compared with placebo or no intervention, ribavirin had no significant effect on the sustained virological response (RD 0%, 95% CI -2% to 3%, five trials) or end of treatment virological response (RD 0% 95% CI -3% to 3%, ten trials). Ribavirin had no significant effect on liver-related morbidity plus mortality (RD 0%, 95% CI -2% to 3%, 11 trials). Ribavirin significantly increased the risk of adverse reactions, including anaemia. Ribavirin significantly improved end of treatment biochemical and histological response but not the sustained biochemical response. Ribavirin was significantly inferior to interferon regarding virological and biochemical responses (five trials).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Ribavirin seems without beneficial effects on serum virological response and liver-related morbidity or mortality, and significantly increased the risk of adverse reactions. Ribavirin monotherapy seems significantly inferior to interferon monotherapy. The total number of included patients is small, and more trials are perhaps needed. The use of ribavirin monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C cannot be recommended outside randomised trials.

A phase III study of the safety and efficacy of viramidine versus ribavirin in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C: ViSER1 results

Pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) are effective in eradicating the hepatitis C virus in more than half of patients. However, anemia arising from RBV-induced hemolysis can prompt dose reductions and lower sustained virologic response (SVR) rates. In early clinical trials, Viramidine (VRD, renamed taribavirin), an RBV prodrug, was associated with less anemia and VRD given at 600 mg twice daily (BID) appeared to provide the best safety with comparable efficacy to RBV. The phase III Viramidine's Safety and Efficacy versus Ribavirin 1 (ViSER1) study randomized 972 treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C to fixed-dose VRD (600 mg BID) or weight-based RBV (1000 or 1200 mg/day), each given with peg-IFN alfa-2b at 1.5 microg/kg/week. The primary efficacy endpoint was SVR rate, and the primary safety endpoint was hemoglobin (Hb) event rate (percent of patients with Hb < 10 g/dL or at least a 2.5-g/dL decrease from baseline). SVR rates were 37.7% with VRD (244/647) and 52.3% with RBV (170/325). Thus, the ViSER1 study failed to demonstrate the primary noninferiority efficacy endpoint. Significantly fewer patients had Hb events with VRD (353/647; 54.6%) compared to those with RBV (272/325; 83.7%) (P < 0.001), and significantly fewer developed anemia (Hb < 10 g/dL) with VRD (34/647; 5.3%) compared to those with RBV (76/325; 23.5%) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Fixed doses of VRD failed to demonstrate noninferiority to RBV in producing SVR rates. The incidence of anemia was approximately four-fold significantly lower with VRD than with RBV. These results suggest fixed-dose VRD given 600 mg BID is insufficient to treat patients with chronic hepatitis C; a weight-based dosing trial of viramidine is currently under way.

Hepatitis C virus infection and immunomodulatory therapies

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains a large-scale and significant health concern. The combination of subcutaneously administered pegylated interferon and oral ribavirin is the FDA-approved regimen for the treatment of chronic HCV infection. Combination therapy may result in a sustained virologic response leading to HCV eradication, with a reduction in risk for cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the combination of PEG-IFN and ribavirin does not universally result in cure in all patients who undergo treatment. In this article, the authors discuss immunomodulatory therapies and clinical trials in the treatment of HCV infection.

Ribavirin analogs

Ribavirin is ineffective against hepatitis C virus as mono-therapy but is critical in attaining both early virologic response and sustained virologic response when combined with pegylated interferon. Ribavirin has significant dose-limiting toxicities, the most important of which is hemolytic anemia. Taribavirin is a ribavirin pro-drug, which targets the liver and has less incidence of anemia, and it may be a promising alternative to ribavirin in the future.

Hepatitis C virus virology and new treatment targets

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the leading cause of chronic liver disease. An estimated 130 million people worldwide are persistently infected with HCV. Almost half of patients who have chronic HCV infection cannot be cured with the standard treatment consisting of pegylated IFN-alpha and ribavirin. For those patients who do not respond to this standard antiviral therapy, there is currently no approved treatment option available. Recent progress in structure determination of HCV proteins and development of a subgenomic replicon system enables the development of a specifically targeted antiviral therapy for hepatitis C. Many HCV-specific compounds are now under investigation in preclinical and clinical trials.

[Hepatitis C: the recovery]

After the discovery of the hepatitis B virus in 1968 and of the hepatitis A virus in 1973, many years were needed to identify the hepatitis C virus (HCV) in 1989. The discovery of HCV was a revolution for hepatology because of the magnitude of the global burden related to HCV infection, a major cause of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Therapy of hepatitis C has rapidly evolved with currently nearly 60% of sustained virological response with the combination of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin. In patients with sustained virological response, viral eradication, corresponding to the cure of infection, and regression of histological liver lesions have been demonstrated. Recently, the availability of in vitro culture systems allowed to characterize viral enzymes, potential therapeutic targets. A novel therapeutic era is open with the protease and polymerase inhibitors, used as a first step in association with pegylated interferon and ribavirin, both to increase efficacy and decrease the risk of resistance. Thanks to these new molecules with a potent antiviral activity, one can reasonably predict a rapid improvement of treatments becoming more efficient and also better tolerated with the progressive replacement of interferon and ribavirin by combinations of these virus specific enzyme inhibitors.

New developments in the antiviral treatment of hepatitis C

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major cause of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. HCV is endemic in most parts of the world, with an estimated 170 million people infected worldwide and 3-4 million new cases each year. HCV-related end-stage liver disease is now the main indication for liver transplantation in the USA and Western Europe. Unfortunately, no vaccine or immunoglobulin is available to prevent HCV infection. Currently, HCV treatment consists of the combined administration of pegylated interferon and ribavirin for a period of 24-48 weeks, resulting in complete viral eradication in 40-80% of patients, depending on genotype, viral load and patient characteristics. This therapy is often accompanied with side-effects that affect compliance and reduce treatment outcomes. Recently, reliable in vitro culture systems have been developed which accelerated antiviral therapy research. Many new specifically targeted antiviral therapies for hepatitis C (STAT-C) and treatment strategies are evaluated in clinical trials. These new antiviral agents are expected to improve treatment significantly with potentially shorter treatment duration. The most promising antiviral agents will be reviewed.

Development of novel treatments for hepatitis C

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major and growing global health problem, affecting about 170 million people worldwide, and is a leading cause of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Currently, treatment is restricted to interferon alfa and ribavirin, which leads to a successful outcome in only about 50% of individuals. New effective treatments with tolerable side-effect profiles are needed urgently, but development has been hindered by an inability to culture HCV and a scarcity of animal models. Herein, we review progress in HCV biology, including cell culture and new animal models, and the contribution of this work to our understanding of the virus' life-cycle and pathogenesis and development of specifically targeted antiviral treatment. We also discuss changes in our understanding of HCV epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnostics.

Taribavirin: a potential alternative to ribavirin

Pegylated interferon and ribavirin are currently the standard of care therapy for chronic hepatitis C. In the near future, protease inhibitors are likely to be part of a three-drug regimen with interferon and ribavirin. It is not yet clear if therapy duration will be shorter, but it appears that anemia will be more severe. Ribavirin has to date been proven indispensible as a member of the treatment regimen, despite the potentially dangerous side effect of anemia. Taribavirin (viramidine), a purine nucleoside analog, is a prodrug of ribavirin. In a Phase III registration trial, it failed to show adequate efficacy but did have significantly less anemia when compared with weight-adjusted ribavirin. The dosing of taribaivirin may have been the flaw of that study, and indeed interim results of a Phase IIb study currently underway appear to have better antiviral effects with weight-based dosing. Sustained viral response rates comparable to ribavirin in a larger prospective study will be needed to supplant the current regimen. However, even if taribavirin efficacy is slightly lower than ribavirin, but anemia rates are considerably lower, there may still be a role for taribaivirin in a triple regimen where a protease molecule will be the predominant antiviral agent.

New therapies for hepatitis C virus infection

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains a global health threat with approximately 175 million carriers worldwide. Currently, treatment consists of pegylated interferon alpha plus ribavirin for 12-72 weeks, depending on HCV genotype, baseline viral load, and initial virological response to therapy. Serious adverse effects and limited sustained virological responses with this therapy warrant the need for novel HCV therapies. Specifically targeted antiviral therapies designed to inhibit the HCV serine protease and the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase have recently entered clinical development. Herein, the main characteristics of these new antiviral agents and the most important challenges arising with their use--namely, toxicities and rapid selection of resistance--are discussed.

Novel therapies in hepatitis B and C

Chronic hepatitis B and C affect approximately 500 million people in the world, with substantial disease burden including liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. For chronic hepatitis B, two treatment strategies are currently available, both with suboptimal response and significant side effects. Promising new drugs are approaching the stage of approval; however, these agents still need further development to control this disease. Based on the understanding of the hepatitis C virus life cycle, new treatment developments for chronic hepatitis C tend to succeed rapidly; therefore, it is only a matter of time before new therapies emerge. This review summarizes the most important new agents available for treatment of chronic hepatitis B and C.

Novel hepatitis C drugs in current trials

Almost half of the patients who have chronic hepatitis C cannot be cured with the current standard treatment. Recent progress in structure determination of HCV proteins and development of a subgenomic replicon system and a cell culture infectious HCV clone enabled the development of a specifically targeted antiviral therapy for hepatitis C (STAT-C). Many HCV-specific compounds are under investigation in preclinical and clinical trials. The development of agents in different classes may allow construction of antiviral combinations that enhance the effectiveness of antiviral treatment, reduce the duration of treatment, and, eventually, may even avoid the use of interferon-alfa.

Emerging drugs for hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains a global health threat with approximately 200 million carriers worldwide. Current treatment consists of the use of peginterferon (pegIFN)/ribavirin (RBV) for 24 or 48 weeks depending on HCV genotype. Serious side effects and the fact that less than half of patients infected with HCV genotypes 1 and 4 (which are the most common) accomplish sustained virological response with this medication warrant the need for novel anti-HCV therapies.

OBJECTIVE

Description of specifically targeted antiviral therapies for hepatitis C (STAT-C) designed to inhibit the serine protease and the RNA-dependent HCV-RNA polymerase.

METHODS

Review of available data reported in peer-reviewed journals and medical conferences.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

Early preclinical studies using these compounds produced encouraging results, but the initial enthusiasm has been hampered by toxicity issues and rapid selection of resistance. Therefore, combination therapy with a backbone of pegIFN/RBV, or perhaps in the future using several of these small molecules, preferably having distinct modes of action and resistance profiles, will be required.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus infection

Acute and chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains a serious health problem worldwide, however, there has been advancement in the treatment of HCV infection due to standard treatment using pegylated interferon and ribavirin. The literature indicates that therapy for HCV is becoming more individualized. In addition to considering genotype and viral RNA levels before treatment, achievement of an early virologic response (EVR) and a rapid virologic response (RVR) is now possible during therapy. Moreover, problem patients, such as non-responders, relapsers, HIV or HBV co-infected patients, patients with liver cirrhosis, and pre- or post-liver transplantation patients are an increasing fraction of the patients requiring treatment. This article reviews the literature regarding standard treatments and problem patients with acute and chronic HCV infection. It also includes discussion on contraindications and side effects of treatment with interferon and ribavirin, as well as new drug development.

New treatment strategies against hepatitis C viral infection

Treatment of hepatitis C virus infection is currently based on a combination of pegylated interferon and ribavirin. Because efficacy of this therapy remains suboptimal and side effects sometimes problematic, major efforts have been put forward by scientists and the pharmaceutical industry to develop alternative treatments for this chronic infection. Over the past few years, clinical studies performed with some of these new agents have been presented at major international meetings. The present paper aims to review the rationale underlying the development of these new forms of treatment as well as the current available data concerning their clinical efficacy.