To close the stable door before the horse has bolted

INASL-ISN Joint Position Statements on Management of Patients with Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Disease

Renal dysfunction is very common among patients with chronic liver disease, and concomitant liver disease can occur among patients with chronic kidney disease. The spectrum of clinical presentation and underlying etiology is wide when concomitant kidney and liver disease occur in the same patient. Management of these patients with dual onslaught is challenging and requires a team approach of hepatologists and nephrologists. No recent guidelines exist on algorithmic approach toward diagnosis and management of these challenging patients. The Indian National Association for Study of Liver (INASL) in association with Indian Society of Nephrology (ISN) endeavored to develop joint guidelines on diagnosis and management of patients who have simultaneous liver and kidney disease. For generating these guidelines, an INASL-ISN Taskforce was constituted, which had members from both the societies. The taskforce first identified contentious issues on various aspects of simultaneous liver and kidney diseases, which were allotted to individual members of the taskforce who reviewed them in detail. A round-table meeting of the Taskforce was held on 20-21 October 2018 at New Delhi to discuss, debate, and finalize the consensus statements. The evidence and recommendations in these guidelines have been graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system with minor modifications. The strength of recommendations (strong and weak) thus reflects the quality (grade) of underlying evidence (I, II, III). We present here the INASL-ISN Joint Position Statements on Management of Patients with Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Disease.

IMPACT OF ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY STAGING ON PROGNOSIS OF PATIENTS WITH CIRRHOSIS

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and severe complication of cirrhosis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of AKI staging on 30-day mortality of patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was diagnosed according to the International Club of Ascites recommendations and staged according to the European Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines. Comparisons between groups were made by one-way analysis of variance and Tukey test. Chi-square was calculated for dichotomous variables. Comparisons of renal impairment status among patients were performed using Kaplan-Meier statistics and differences between groups were analyzed using the log-rank test. A P-value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty-two patients were included in the study. The diagnosis of AKI was performed in 98 (42.2%) of them. The overall 30-day mortality was 19.8% (46/232). Mortality increased as the degree of AKI progressed. Among patients who did not have AKI, mortality was 5.2% (7/134). When compared to patients without AKI, patients diagnosed with AKI stage 1a had mortality of 12.1% (4/33, P=0.152); patients with AKI stage 1b had mortality of 45% (18/40, P<0.001); and patients with AKI stages 2 or 3 had mortality of 68% (17/25, P<0.001). Moreover, it is noteworthy that full response to treatment was associated to a decreased mortality when compared to patients who did not show complete recovery of renal function (14.3% vs 57.9%, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

AKI stages 1b or greater, but not AKI stage 1a, are associated to higher 30-day mortality of patients with cirrhosis.

AKI persistence at 48 h predicts mortality in patients with acute on chronic liver failure

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Management of acute kidney injury (AKI) in cirrhotics has undergone a paradigm change. We evaluated the impact of AKI persistence at 48 h on outcome in patients with acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with ACLF (n = 373) were prospectively followed. AKI was defined as increase in serum creatinine of 0.3 mg/dl or 1.5- to 2-fold from baseline. Persistent AKI was defined as nonresponsive AKI at 48 h with respect to admission serum creatinine.

RESULTS

AKI at admission was present in 177 (47.5 %) patients. At 48 h, 73 % patients had persistent AKI and 27 % had responsive AKI. High Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) (≥26) [p, odds ratio (OR), 95 % confidence interval (CI)] [<0.001, 3.65 (2.1-3.67)], systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) [0.03, 1.6 (1.02-21.6)], and age (≥42 years) [0.03, 1.84 (1.19-2.85)] were significant predictors of AKI persistence. Persistent AKI was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality [p < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) 1.7, 95 % CI 1.32-2.27]. We further found a lower cutoff for serum creatinine of 1.14 mg/dl at 48 h with better sensitivity of 61 %, specificity of 61 %, and likelihood ratio (LR+) of 1.6, correctly classifying 61 %, as against the conventional cutoff of 1.5 mg/dl with sensitivity of 37 %, specificity of 57 %, and LR+ of 3.3, correctly classifying 56 %. This new cutoff also predicted mortality with higher odds (OR 2.4, 95 % CI 1.3-4.8) as compared with the conventional cutoff (OR 2.1, 95 % CI 1.1-4.1).

CONCLUSION

AKI persistence at 48 h predicts mortality better than serum creatinine of 1.5 mg/dl in patients with ACLF. Serum creatinine value of 1.14 mg/dl and smaller increases in its value should be considered for risk stratification of patients with ACLF for interventional strategies.

Renal dysfunction in cirrhosis: acute kidney injury and the hepatorenal syndrome

Renal dysfunction is a common complication of liver cirrhosis and of utmost clinical and prognostic relevance. Patients with cirrhosis are more prone to developing acute kidney injury (AKI) than the non-cirrhotic population. Pre-renal AKI, the hepatorenal syndrome type of AKI (HRS-AKI, formerly known as 'type 1') and acute tubular necrosis represent the most common causes of AKI in cirrhosis. Correct differentiation is imperative, as treatment differs substantially. While pre-renal AKI usually responds well to plasma volume expansion, HRS-AKI and ATN require different specific approaches and are associated with substantial mortality. Several paradigms, such as the threshold of 2.5 mg/dL for diagnosis of HRS-AKI, have recently been abolished and novel urinary biomarkers are being investigated in order to facilitate early and correct diagnosis and treatment of HRS-AKI and other forms of AKI in patients with cirrhosis. This review summarizes the current diagnostic criteria, as well as pathophysiologic and therapeutic concepts for AKI and HRS-AKI in cirrhosis.

The evolving concept of acute kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis

Renal dysfunction is prevalent in patients with advanced cirrhosis and decompensation. The presence of type 1 hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) has traditionally been defined by a set of stringent criteria based on serum creatinine levels. These diagnostic criteria have been found to be too stringent to be widely applicable to patients with cirrhosis, leading to underdiagnosis of renal failure in this population. Acute kidney injury (AKI) has now been proposed to characterize renal dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis and is defined as an increase in serum creatinine by 0.3 mg/dl in <48 h or an increase in serum creatinine by 50% from a stable baseline reading within 3 months. Type 1 HRS is renamed HRS-AKI. Stage 1 AKI is defined by 0.3 mg/dl serum creatinine or a 50% increase, stages 2 and 3 AKI are defined by a two-fold and three-fold increase in serum creatinine levels, respectively. Data collected so far suggests that even stage 1 AKI is associated with worse prognosis in patients with cirrhosis. The progression of AKI usually indicates substantially worse outcomes. A panel of biomarkers, including inflammatory markers, are envisaged to complement and enhance our current diagnostic criteria in the future and provide aetiology of the AKI.

Impact of acute kidney injury on prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in patients with liver cirrhosis, and its impact on the clinical course is increasingly recognized. Diagnostic classification systems for AKI in cirrhosis have been suggested. The prognostic significance of the respective AKI stages remains to be evaluated in decompensated cirrhosis with ascites.

METHODS

Data of consecutive patients with cirrhosis and ascites undergoing paracentesis at a tertiary care center were analyzed. AKI was defined as an increase in serum creatinine of ≥ 0.3 mg/dL or by ≥ 50% within 7 days after paracentesis, and classified according to (i) revised Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria and (ii) modified AKI criteria for cirrhosis (C-AKI). In contrast to AKIN, C-AKI stage A discriminates prognosis based on an absolute creatinine cut-off at < 1.5 mg/dL versus C-AKI stage B at ≥ 1.5 mg/dL.

RESULTS

The final study cohort included 239 patients. Median transplant-free survival was 768 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 331-1205 days) without AKI, 198 (0-446) in AKI-1, 91 (0-225) in AKI-2, 19 (0-40) and in AKI-3, whereas it was 89 (20-158) days in C-AKI-A, 384 (0-1063) in C-AKI-B, and 22 (7-776) in C-AKI-C. Mild AKI was already associated with significantly increased 30-day mortality (AKI-1:26.4%, C-AKI-A:33.3%) as compared with patients without AKI (14.3%), even when serum creatinine remained within normal range (< 1.2 mg/dL) we observed a significant 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

AKIN criteria-considering small increases in serum creatinine rather than absolute thresholds-seem to be more accurate for estimating prognosis of AKI after paracentesis than C-AKI criteria. Even patients developing AKI-1 with "normal" serum creatinine are at increased risk for mortality.

Definition and Diagnosis of Acute Kidney Injury in Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of advanced cirrhosis. Type 1 hepatorenal syndrome is the best-known and most severe form of AKI, and it has a precise definition and a set of specific diagnostic criteria. More recently, it has become recognized that milder degrees of renal dysfunction also have a negative impact on patient outcome in various patient populations. Key Messages: Several definitions and criteria for staging the severity of AKI have been proposed, including the RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of Function and End-Stage Renal Disease) group, the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN), and the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) group. All of them incorporate some changes of serum creatinine and urine output in the definition and staging of AKI. The hepatology community has mostly embraced the AKIN diagnostic and staging criteria and has applied them in the prognostication of patients with advanced cirrhosis. However, the AKIN criteria have not been strictly applied in all studies on cirrhosis. This is partly related to the fact that changes in urine output are difficult to assess in advanced cirrhosis, and partly related to the difficulty in defining the baseline serum creatinine from which the change in serum creatinine is calculated. This has led to some confusion in the interpretation of results of the various studies on AKI in cirrhosis. More recently, some investigators have suggested incorporating the AKIN criteria with setting a lower limit of serum creatinine of 1.5 mg/dl in determining the diagnosis and prognosis of AKI in cirrhosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This is an ongoing debate as to how best to define AKI in cirrhosis. In the near future there should be prospective clinical trials that will clarify which diagnostic and staging criteria of AKI will best serve the cirrhotic population.