Validation of the SURFASA score to define steroid responsiveness in patients with acute autoimmune hepatitis

Acute presentation of autoimmune hepatitis -from acute hepatitis to ALF and ACLF

Acute presentation of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) occurs in 22-43% of all AIH cases, and is not a rare condition. Rather than constituting a single disease entity, it represents a clinical spectrum characterized by considerable variability in severity and the presence of preexisting chronic AIH. This spectrum ranges from acute AIH and acute severe AIH to AIH presenting as acute liver failure (ALF) or as acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), contingent upon factors such as coagulopathy, hepatic encephalopathy, and underlying liver disease. Diagnosing acute presentation of AIH can be particularly challenging due to the frequent absence of classical serologic signatures such as autoantibodies and elevated IgG levels. Histopathological examination remains essential for diagnosis, typically necessitating percutaneous or transjugular liver biopsy. Corticosteroids (CS) are recommended for the management of acute AIH and acute severe AIH with coagulopathy. However, the therapeutic response to CS should be meticulously monitored. If a poor response is anticipated, liver transplantation (LT) should be promptly considered. For AIH presenting as ALF with encephalopathy or ACLF with advanced underlying liver disease, LT is generally advised. Nonetheless, there is potential for a trial of CS therapy in cases of ALF with low MELD scores or ACLF without encephalopathy. This review provides an overview of the latest findings concerning the definition, diagnosis, and management of acute presentation of AIH.

Outcomes and management in paediatric autoimmune hepatitis presenting as acute liver failure: Individual patient data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) in children presenting in acute liver failure (ALF) can be fatal and often requires liver transplantation (LTx). This individual patient data meta-analysis (IPD) aims to examine management and outcomes of this population, given the lack of large cohort studies on paediatric AIH first presenting as ALF (AIH-ALF).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of IPD statement using PubMed and Excerpta Medica dataBASE, and included English studies published between 2000 and 2020. The study included patients under 21 years of age, diagnosed with type 1 or 2 AIH and presenting with ALF. Data extracted included clinical and biochemical characteristics, interventions, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Three hundred and thirty eligible patients from 61 studies were identified, with an additional five patients from our institution. The majority were female (66.8%), with a median age of 10. Overall, 59.7% achieved native liver survival (NLS), 35% underwent LTx, and 5% died before LTx. The use of corticosteroids with non-steroid immunomodulators increased the likelihood of NLS by 2.5-fold compared to corticosteroids alone. AIH-1 was associated with 3.3-fold odds for NLS, compared to AIH-2. However, on multivariate analysis, only AIH-1 was identified as an independent predictor for NLS (OR 3.8 [95% CI 1.03-14.2], p = .04).

CONCLUSION

While corticosteroids and non-steroid immunomodulators treatment may offer enhanced probability of achieving NLS, treatment regimens for AIH-ALF may need to consider patient-specific factors, especially AIH type. This highlights the potential for NLS in AIH-ALF and suggest a need to identify biomarkers which predict the need for combination immunosuppression to avoid LTx.

Liver Transplantation for Acute Liver Failure- Indication, Prioritization, Timing, and Referral

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a major success story in gastroenterology, with improvements in critical care and liver transplant resulting in significant improvements in patient outcomes in the current era compared to the dismal survival rates in the pretransplant era. However, the ever-increasing list of transplant candidates and limited organ pool makes judicious patient selection and organ use mandatory to achieve good patient outcomes and prevent organ wastage. Several scoring systems exist to facilitate the identification of patients who need a liver transplant and would therefore need an early referral to a specialized liver unit. The timing of the liver transplant is also crucial as transplanting a patient too early would lead to those who would recover spontaneously receiving an organ (wastage), and a late decision might result in the patient becoming unfit for transplant (delisted) or have an advanced disease which would result in poor post-transplant outcomes. The current article reviews the indications and contraindications of liver transplant in ALF patients, the various prognostic scoring systems, etiology-specific outcomes, prioritization and timing of referral.

Severe acute autoimmune hepatitis: How to early predict who will not respond to corticosteroids and needs urgent liver transplantation?

BACKROUND

In acute severe autoimmune hepatitis (AS-AIH), the early identification of predictors of non-response to corticosteroids and the optimal timing for liver transplantation (LT) remains controversial.

AIMS

To determine early predictors of non-response to corticosteroids and to assess the usefulness of severity scores, namely the recently developed SURFASA.

METHODS

Retrospective multicentre cohort study including consecutive patients admitted for AS-AIH between 2016 and 2020. Definitions- response to corticosteroids: LT-free survival at 90 days (D90); SURFASA score: -6.8 + 1.92x(D0-INR)+1.94xINR[(D3-D0)/D0]+1.64xbilirubin[(D3-D0)/D0].

RESULTS

We included 26 patients [median age 56 (45-69) years; 22 (84.6%) women]. All patients underwent corticosteroid therapy. Overall survival reached 73%. amongst the non-responders, 2 (7.8%) underwent LT and 5 (19.2%) died. The interval between admission and initiation of corticosteroids was not different between responders and non- responders [13 (7-23) vs. 8 (3-10), P:0.06], respectively. SURFASA and MELD-Na⁺ (D3) scores showed an AUROC of 0.96 (0.87-1) and 0.92 (0.82-0.99), respectively, for prediction of non-response. SURFASA >-2.5 had a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 100% and MELD-Na⁺ (D3) >26 had sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 78% for the prediction of non-response.

CONCLUSIONS

SURFASA and MELD-Na⁺ at D3 scores are useful in early identification of non-responders to corticosteroids.