Predicting overt hepatic encephalopathy after TIPS: Value of three minimal hepatic encephalopathy tests

TIPS and hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis

Despite a better understanding in its prognosis and pathogenesis, hepatic encephalopathy (HE) remains one of the major complications of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) with a prevalence ranging from 35 to 50%. Its epidemiology differs according to the indication for TIPS (salvage/rescue TIPS, preemptive (pTIPS) or elective TIPS). In salvage/rescue TIPS, the prognosis is linked to that of bleeding, and HE should not be a contraindication to TIPS, especially as bleeding is a common precipitating factor of HE. In pTIPS, i.e. TIPS performed within the 72 h after stabilization of acute variceal bleeding in high-risk patients, the risk rebleeding and HE is reduced, when compared to endoscopic and drugs treatment. As a consequence, the Baveno VII recommendations state that HE at admission should not be considered as a contraindication to pTIPS placement. In elective situations, such as refractory (intractable ascites (intolerance to diuretics) or resistant ascites (i.e. despite optimal diuretic treatment (spironolactone 400 mg/d and Furosemide 160 mg/d combined with low-salt treatment (< 5.2 g/day) or recurrent ascites (the need for at least 3 paracenteses per year) and secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding, it is recommended to systematically look for risk factors for HE, and chronic or refractory HE remain not recommended to TIPS in most centers. Chronic HE involves persistent neurological symptoms with fluctuating acute episodes. Recurrent HE refers to repeated episodes occurring within 6 months, while refractory HE is resistant to standard treatments, often requiring more aggressive management (Vilstrup et al. 2014). A careful selection of patients is mandatory before elective TIPS decision. Risk factors must be identified and corrected if possible before any TIPS decision is made. Management of HE after TIPS is based on identification of precipitating factors, curative treatment with lactulose as first-line therapy and rifaximin as second-line therapy, and nutritional management. In elective TIPS, prophylactic administration of rifaximin is recommended in order to decrease the risk of further HE development in selected patients (not in everyone, at least according to Baveno VII). Liver transplantation (LT) should be discussed with a multidisciplinary team as an alternative option to TIPS in case of high-risk of post-TIPS HE, and in case of refractory HE after TIPS.

Optimal threshold of portal pressure gradient for patients with ascites after covered TIPS: a multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is recommended for treating recurrent and refractory ascites. However, determining the target portal pressure gradient (PPG) has been inconclusive. This multicentre cohort study explored the post-TIPS PPG potential range associated with improving survival.

METHODS

The study enrolled 276 patients, all of whom underwent covered TIPS for ascites treatment across four medical centers. The cumulative incidences of clinical outcomes were compared among groups categorized by potential PPG thresholds.

RESULTS

During the whole follow-up period with a medium follow-up of 21.6 (7.5, 41.6) months, 122 (44.2%) experienced liver-related death, and 73 (26.4%) patients experienced a recurrence of ascites. Multivariable analysis revealed PPG < 7 mmHg (p = 0.007) and the recurrence of ascites (p = 0.033) are independent risk factors for survival, while the PPG ≥ 11 mmHg was an independent risk factor for the recurrence of ascites (p = 0.012). Patients with ≥ 7 mmHg had a lower rate of liver-related death than patients with post-TIPS PPG < 7 mmHg (51.0% vs 66.6%, p = 0.004), while those with post-TIPS PPG ≥ 11 mmHg exhibited a higher cumulative incidence of ascites compared to those with post-TIPS PPG < 11 mmHg (44.6% vs 33.7%, p = 0.023). The robustness of the results was confirmed.

CONCLUSION

Our study highlighted the existence of an optimal post-TIPS PPG range in patients with recurrent and refractory ascites. Patients may experience improved survival and ascites control with a post-TIPS PPG of 7-11 mmHg.

Innovative diagnostic tool aids screening for minimal hepatic encephalopathy in non-alcoholic cirrhosis patients

In this editorial we comment on the article by Jiang et al. We focus on the EncephalApp Stroop test which is an innovative, smartphone-based tool specifically designed for screening minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) in cirrhosis patients. Traditional MHE screening methods, while highly sensitive and specific, are often complex, time-consuming, and require controlled environmental conditions, limiting their widespread clinical use. The EncephalApp Stroop test simplifies the screening process, enhances diagnostic efficiency, and is applicable across diverse cultural contexts. However, the combination of additional biomarkers could further improve diagnostic accuracy. Despite its promising potential, more multicenter clinical studies are required to validate its effectiveness and applicability on a global scale.

Association between overt hepatic encephalopathy and liver pathology after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation in cirrhotic patients

To investigate the association between overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) and liver pathology after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation in cirrhotic patients. From July 2015 to April 2024, 73 patients from 4 hospitals in China who received TIPS creation and liver biopsy were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Based on whether OHE occurred within 3 months after TIPS creation, the patients were categorized into OHE (n = 29) and non-OHE (n = 44) groups. The liver pathology was assessed by hematoxylin-eosin (H&E), Sirius red staining, immunohistochemistry, and immunofluorescence. Liver pathology by H&E staining showed typical features of liver cirrhosis (including disordered structure and pseudolobule formation) in all the patients. No marked difference was observed in extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition between the OHE and non-OHE groups. However, the patients in the OHE group had a higher level of liver and systemic inflammation than in the non-OHE group. And there was a strong correction between intrahepatic macrophage infiltration and serum inflammatory indicators. Additionally, the OHE group had more liver neovascularization, which was consistent with liver inflammation. The emergence of OHE after TIPS creation is closely associated with liver pathology, especially in liver inflammation and angiogenesis, but not in ECM deposition.

Identification of optimal portal pressure decrease to control ascites while minimizing HE after TIPS: A multicenter study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Clinically significant portal hypertension in patients with liver cirrhosis can lead to refractory ascites. A TIPS treats clinically significant portal hypertension but may cause overt hepatic encephalopathy (oHE). Our aim was to determine the optimal reduction of the portal pressure gradient (PPG) through TIPS to control ascites without raising oHE risk.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

This multicenter study screened 1509 patients from 3 European centers (Hannover, Vienna, and Hamburg) undergoing TIPS implantation between 2000 and 2023. Patients with TIPS indications other than refractory ascites/hepatic hydrothorax, vascular liver disease, HCC, or insufficient PPG data were excluded. PPG was measured before and after TIPS insertion. Outcome data were assessed up to 1 year after TIPS insertion. Analyses were conducted utilizing a modern machine learning model, namely a competing-risk random survival forest, partial dependence plots, and competing risk analyses with liver transplantation/death as competitors. The cohort was divided into a 60% derivation and 40% validation cohort. Overall, 729 patients (median MELD: 13 [IQR 10-16], 66% male, 23% oHE before TIPS) were analyzed. The derivation cohort comprised 438 patients, and the validation cohort comprised 291 patients. The optimal PPG reduction, determined by maximally selected Gray statistic and PDP of the random survival forest, was 60%-80%. In this range, patients showed significantly fewer hepatic decompensations due to ascites (HDA) (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR]: 0.7 [0.52-0.96]) with similar oHE incidences (sHR: 0.92 [0.67-1.27]). The PPG range was confirmed in the validation cohort (HDA: sHR: 0.66 [0.46-0.96]; oHE: sHR: 0.89 [0.61-1.32]).

CONCLUSIONS

A targeted PPG reduction of 60%-80% showed significantly reduced HDA without increased oHE risk. Therefore, PPG reduction within this range could be a valid reduction target.

Insertion of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt leads to sustained reversal of systemic inflammation in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Systemic Inflammation (SI) is considered a key mechanism in disease progression and development of complications in decompensated liver cirrhosis. SI is mainly driven by portal hypertension and bacterial translocation. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) insertion represents an effective treatment for portal hypertension. This study aims to investigate the impact of TIPS insertion on SI and bacterial translocation.

METHODS

We prospectively included 59 cirrhotic patients undergoing TIPS insertion. Blood samples were collected at TIPS insertion and follow-up (FU) 1, 3, 6, and 12 months thereafter. At all time points, we performed a comprehensive analysis of SI including 43 soluble inflammatory markers (SIMs), and surrogates of bacterial translocation (sCD14, sCD163). To investigate long-term kinetics of SI, C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cells (WBC) were retrospectively analyzed in a cohort of 177 patients up to 3 years after TIPS insertion.

RESULTS

At TIPS insertion, 30/43 SIMs, sCD14, and sCD163 measured significantly higher in cirrhotic patients compared to healthy controls. By FU6 25 SIMs and sCD14 measured at significantly lower levels compared to baseline. Interestingly, in patients with TIPS indication of refractory ascites, IL-6 decreased to levels documented in earlier stages of cirrhosis. In long-term follow-up, CRP levels significantly decreased after TIPS insertion, which translated into lower mortality in Cox regression analysis (HR 0.968, p=0.042). Notably, patients with residual ascites post-TIPS showed significantly higher CRP and IL-6 levels across all follow-ups compared to patients with resolved ascites.

CONCLUSION

Decreasing portal hypertension via TIPS insertion leads to a significant attenuation of SI and bacterial translocation over time.

Value of systemic inflammation markers for the detection of minimal and prediction of overt hepatic encephalopathy after TIPS insertion

Development of overt hepatic encephalopathy (oHE) is a particularly feared complication when considering treatment with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). However, the pathophysiology of HE, in particular after TIPS-insertion, is complex and valid predictors remain scarce. We aimed to investigate whether systemic inflammation markers (SIM) are linked to minimal (mHE) and overt HE (oHE) development before and after TIPS. 62 prospectively recruited patients undergoing TIPS-insertion were included and monitored for oHE occurrence two years thereafter. Patients underwent psychometric testing including the portosystemic encephalopathy syndrome test (PSE), yielding the psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES), and Animal Naming Test (ANT) before TIPS (baseline) and during structured follow-up 1, 3, 6 and 12 months afterwards. SIM (IL-6, TNF-α and IL-1β) were measured at corresponding timepoints. Patients were predominantly male (64.5%) with a median age of 58 years and MELD of 11. The majority (75.8%) received a TIPS for treatment of refractory ascites. 67.9% presented with mHE before TIPS. No link between the investigated SIM and PHES or ANT at baseline or during any follow-up was documented. 19 (30.6%) patients developed oHE during follow-up. Neither baseline SIM levels nor test results were significantly associated with risk for oHE. We demonstrated a significant decline of all SIM during follow-up, which did not translate to an ameliorated risk for oHE. In patients undergoing TIPS-insertion, the selected SIM have neither a strong link to post-TIPS-oHE development nor to subclinical changes in psychometric tests for mHE.

Comparison of 6 tests for diagnosing minimal hepatic encephalopathy and predicting clinical outcome: A prospective, observational study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Current guidelines recommend the assessment for minimal HE in patients with liver cirrhosis. Various efforts were made to find tools that simplify the diagnosis. Here, we compare the 6 most frequently used tests for their validity and their predictive value for overt hepatic encephalopathy (oHE), rehospitalization, and death.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

One hundred thirty-two patients with cirrhosis underwent the Portosystemic Encephalopathy-Syndrome-Test yielding the psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES), Animal Naming Test (ANT), Critical Flicker Frequency (CFF), Inhibitory Control Test (ICT), EncephalApp (Stroop), and Continuous Reaction Time Test (CRT). Patients were monitored for 365 days regarding oHE development, rehospitalization, and death. Twenty-three patients showed clinical signs of HE grade 1-2 at baseline. Of the remaining 109 neurologically unimpaired patients, 35.8% had abnormal PHES and 44% abnormal CRT. Percentage of abnormal Stroop (79.8% vs. 52.3%), ANT (19.3% vs. 51.4%), ICT (28.4% vs. 36.7%), and CFF results (18.3% vs. 25.7%) changed significantly when adjusted norms were used for evaluation instead of fixed cutoffs. All test results correlated significantly with each other ( p <0.05), except for CFF. During follow-up, 24 patients developed oHE, 58 were readmitted to the hospital, and 20 died. Abnormal PHES results were linked to oHE development in the multivariable model. No other adjusted test demonstrated predictive value for any of the investigated endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

Where applicable, the diagnosis of minimal HE should be made based on adjusted norm values for the tests, exclusively. The minimal HE tests cannot be equated with one another and have an overall limited value in predicting clinical outcomes.

Myosteatosis is an independent risk factor for overt hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting

OBJECTIVE

The relationship between skeletal muscle and adipose tissue compositions and risk of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) following transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) treatment needs to be investigated.

METHODS

A total of 282 patients were collected from two medical centres. The median time of follow-up was 48.23 + 1.36 months and the first-year results of all patients after TIPS therapy were collected. The muscle and adipose tissue indices were quantified at the third lumbar vertebra level. Sarcopenia and myosteatosis were defined according to previous researches. Receiver operating characteristic curves, chi-square test, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to investigate the potential association between muscle and adipose indices, sarcopenia, myosteatosis and the risk of developing post-TIPS OHE.

RESULTS

All skeletal muscle indices, adipose tissue indices and sarcopenia had limited associations with post-TIPS OHE. Myosteatosis (148 cases, 52.5%, 55 with OHE, 37.2%) was identified as an independent risk factor for post-TIPS OHE. with P  < 0.001 in Chi-square test, P  < 0.001, odds ratio (OR): 2.854, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.632-4.993 in univariate logistic regression analyses, and P  = 0.007, OR: 2.372, 95% CI: 1.268-4.438 in multivariate logistic regression analyses, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that myosteatosis was proven as an independent risk factor for the development of post-TIPS OHE.

Recent developments in the management of ascites in cirrhosis

In recent years, advances have been made for treating ascites in patients with cirrhosis. Recent studies have indicated that several treatments that have been used for a long time in the management of portal hypertension may have beneficial effects that were not previously identified. Long-term albumin infusion may improve survival in patients with cirrhosis and ascites while beta-blockers may reduce ascites occurrence. Transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt (TIPS) placement may also improve survival in selected patients in addition to the control with ascites. Low-flow ascites pump insertion can be another option for some patients with intractable ascites. In this review, we summarize the latest data related to the management of ascites occurring in cirrhosis. There are still unanswered questions, such as the optimal use of albumin as a long-term therapy, the place of beta-blockers, and the best timing for TIPS placement to improve the natural history of ascites, as well as the optimal stent diameter to reduce the risk of shunt-related side-effects. These issued should be addressed in future studies.

Post-Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) Hepatic Encephalopathy-A Review of the Past Decade's Literature Focusing on Incidence, Risk Factors, and Prophylaxis

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an established treatment for portal hypertension and its' complications in liver cirrhosis, yet the development of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) remains a significant concern. This review covers the reported incidence, risk factors, and management strategies for post-TIPS HE over the past decade. Incidence varies widely (7-61%), with factors like age, liver function, hyponatremia, and spontaneous portosystemic shunts influencing risk. Procedural aspects, including TIPS timing, indication, and stent characteristics, also contribute. Pharmacological prophylaxis with lactulose and rifaximin shows promise, but current evidence is inconclusive. Procedural preventive measures, such as shunt embolization and monitoring portal pressure gradients, are explored. Treatment involves pharmacological options like lactulose and rifaximin, and procedural interventions like stent diameter reduction. Ongoing studies on novel predictive markers and emerging treatments, such as faecal microbiota transplant, reflect the evolving landscape in post-TIPS HE management. This concise review provides clinicians with insights into the multifaceted nature of post-TIPS HE, aiding in improved risk assessment, prophylaxis, and management for patients undergoing TIPS procedures.