1
|
Abell BR, Eagleson K, Auld B, Bora S, Justo R, Parsonage W, Sharma P, Kularatna S, McPhail SM. Implementing neurodevelopmental follow-up care for children with congenital heart disease: A scoping review with evidence mapping. Dev Med Child Neurol 2024; 66:161-175. [PMID: 37421232 PMCID: PMC10953404 DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.15698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/10/2023]
Abstract
AIM To identify and map evidence describing components of neurodevelopmental follow-up care for children with congenital heart disease (CHD). METHOD This was a scoping review of studies reporting components of neurodevelopmental follow-up programmes/pathways for children with CHD. Eligible publications were identified through database searches, citation tracking, and expert recommendations. Two independent reviewers screened studies and extracted data. An evidence matrix was developed to visualize common characteristics of care pathways. Qualitative content analysis identified implementation barriers and enablers. RESULTS The review included 33 studies. Twenty-one described individual care pathways across the USA (n = 14), Canada (n = 4), Australia (n = 2), and France (n = 1). The remainder reported surveys of clinical practice across multiple geographical regions. While heterogeneity in care existed across studies, common attributes included enrolment of children at high-risk of neurodevelopmental delay; centralized clinics in children's hospitals; referral before discharge; periodic follow-up at fixed ages; standardized developmental assessment; and involvement of multidisciplinary teams. Implementation barriers included service cost/resourcing, patient burden, and lack of knowledge/awareness. Multi-level stakeholder engagement and integration with other services were key drivers of success. INTERPRETATION Defining components of effective neurodevelopmental follow-up programmes and care pathways, along with enhancing and expanding guideline-based care across regions and into new contexts, should continue to be priorities. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS Twenty-two different neurodevelopmental follow-up care pathways/programmes were published, originating from four countries. Twelve additional publications described broad practices for neurodevelopmental follow-up across regions Common attributes across eligibility, service structure, assessment processes, and care providers were noted. Studies reported programme acceptability, uptake, cost, and effectiveness. Implementation barriers included service cost/resourcing, patient burden, and lack of knowledge/awareness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridget R. Abell
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of HealthQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneQLDAustralia
| | - Karen Eagleson
- Queensland Paediatric Cardiac ServiceQueensland Children's HospitalBrisbaneQLDAustralia
- Faculty of MedicineThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneQLDAustralia
| | - Benjamin Auld
- Queensland Paediatric Cardiac ServiceQueensland Children's HospitalBrisbaneQLDAustralia
| | - Samudragupta Bora
- Faculty of MedicineThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneQLDAustralia
- University Hospitals Rainbow Babies & Children's HospitalCase Western Reserve University School of MedicineClevelandOHUSA
| | - Robert Justo
- Queensland Paediatric Cardiac ServiceQueensland Children's HospitalBrisbaneQLDAustralia
- Faculty of MedicineThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneQLDAustralia
| | - William Parsonage
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of HealthQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneQLDAustralia
- Royal Brisbane and Women's HospitalMetro North HealthBrisbaneQLDAustralia
| | - Pakhi Sharma
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of HealthQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneQLDAustralia
| | - Sanjeewa Kularatna
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of HealthQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneQLDAustralia
| | - Steven M. McPhail
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of HealthQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneQLDAustralia
- Digital Health and Informatics Directorate, Metro South HealthBrisbaneQLDAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brain D, Yan A, Morel D, Ballard E, Hunter J, Hocking J, Chan J. Economic evaluation of applying the Canadian Syncope Risk Score in an Australian emergency department. Emerg Med Australas 2022; 35:427-433. [PMID: 36403945 DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.14139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) in syncope patients presenting to the ED from an economic perspective, using very-low and low-risk patients (CSRS -3 to 0) as a threshold for avoiding hospital admissions. METHODS A decision-analytic model, specifically a decision-tree, was developed to evaluate application of the CSRS. A hypothetical cohort of 1000 patients was modelled based on characteristics and outcome of patients enrolled in a clinical validation study performed alongside this evaluation. Several analytic based approaches were used to handle model outputs and uncertainties. RESULTS For a cohort of 1000 patients, applying the CSRS was associated with 169 less inpatient admissions from the ED, when compared to usual care. There was also a cost-saving of $8255 per admitted patient, when the CSRS was applied, compared to usual care. Adopting the CSRS was the optimal approach in all scenario analyses and was robust to changes in model parameters. More than three-quarters (78.6%) of all model simulations showed that applying the CSRS is a cost-saving approach to managing syncope. There was high confidence in all results, with the approach using the CSRS reducing the costs and number of syncope-related hospital admissions. CONCLUSIONS Compared to usual care, applying the CSRS appeared as a cost-effective strategy. This new evidence will help decision-makers choose cost-effective approaches for the management of patients presenting to the ED with syncope, as they search for efficient ways to maximise health gain from a finite budget.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Brain
- School of Public Health and Social Work Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation, Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - Alan Yan
- Emergency Department Redcliffe Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - Doug Morel
- Emergency Department Redcliffe Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - Emma Ballard
- Statistical Support Group QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - Jonathan Hunter
- Department of Medicine Redcliffe Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - Julia Hocking
- Office for Research Griffith University Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - Jason Chan
- Emergency Department Redcliffe Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kularatna S, Jadambaa A, Senanayake S, Brain D, Hawker N, Kasparian NA, Abell B, Auld B, Eagleson K, Justo R, McPhail SM. The Cost of Neurodevelopmental Disability: Scoping Review of Economic Evaluation Methods. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res 2022; 14:665-682. [PMID: 36304697 PMCID: PMC9596191 DOI: 10.2147/ceor.s370311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The provision of effective care models for children with neurodevelopmental delay or disability can be challenging in resource constrained healthcare systems. Economic evaluations have an important role in informing resource allocation decisions. This review systematically examined the scope and methods of economic models evaluating interventions for supporting neurodevelopment among children with common neurodevelopmental disorders and identified methods of economic models and presented policy implications. This scoping review employed the Arksey and O'Malley framework and aligned with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Four electronic databases were systematically searched to identify eligible model-based economic evaluations of neurodevelopmental care models published since 2000. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist was used to assess quality of reporting. Data were systematically extracted, tabulated, and qualitatively synthesised across diagnostic categories. Searches identified 1431 unique articles. Twelve studies used a decision analytic model to evaluate care for neurodevelopmental disorders and were included in the review. Included studies focused on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD, n=6), autism spectrum disorder (ASD, n=3), cerebral palsy (n=2), and dyslexia (n=1). The most used decision analytic modelling approach was a Markov model (n=6), followed by a decision tree (n=3), and a combination of decision tree and Markov model (n=3). Most studies (n=7) adopted a societal perspective for reporting costs. None of the reviewed studies modelled impact on families and caregivers. Four studies reported cost-savings, three identified greater quality of life, and three identified cost increases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjeewa Kularatna
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia,Correspondence: Sanjeewa Kularatna, Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4059, Australia, Tel +61 7 3138 0050, Email
| | - Amarzaya Jadambaa
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Sameera Senanayake
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - David Brain
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Nadia Hawker
- Metro South Health, Queensland Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Nadine A Kasparian
- Cincinnati Children’s Center for Heart Disease and Mental Health, Heart Institute and the Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Bridget Abell
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Benjamin Auld
- Queensland Paediatric Cardiac Service, Queensland Children’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Karen Eagleson
- Queensland Paediatric Cardiac Service, Queensland Children’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Robert Justo
- Queensland Paediatric Cardiac Service, Queensland Children’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Steven M McPhail
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia,Digital Health and Informatics Directorate, Metro South Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Estimating excess length of stay due to healthcare-associated infections by applying and comparing three time-varying approaches: multistate model, survival regression and matched case control methods. J Hosp Infect 2022; 126:44-51. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
5
|
Fenny AP, Otieku E, Labi KAK, Asante FA, Enemark U. Cost-effectiveness analysis of alcohol handrub for the prevention of neonatal bloodstream infections: Evidence from HAI-Ghana study. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0264905. [PMID: 35245332 PMCID: PMC8896731 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Published evidence of the cost-effectiveness of alcohol-based handrub (ABH) for the prevention of neonatal bloodstream infections (BSI) is limited in sub-Saharan Africa. Therefore, this study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of a multimodal hand hygiene involving alcohol-based hand rub (ABH) for the prevention of neonatal BSI in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) setting in Ghana using data from HAI-Ghana study. Design was a before and after intervention study using economic evaluation model to assess the cost-effectiveness of a multimodal hand hygiene strategy involving alcohol-based hand rub plus soap and water compared to existing practice of using only soap and water. We measured effect and cost by subtracting outcomes without the intervention from outcomes with the intervention. The primary outcome measure is the number of neonatal BSI episode averted with the intervention and the consequent cost savings from patient and provider perspectives. The before and after intervention studies lasted four months each, spanning October 2017 to January 2018 and December 2018 to March 2019, respectively. The analysis shows that the ABH program was effective in reducing patient cost of neonatal BSI by 41.7% and BSI-attributable hospital cost by 48.5%. Further, neonatal BSI-attributable deaths and extra length of hospital stay (LOS) decreased by 73% and 50% respectively. Also, the post-intervention assessment revealed the ABH program contributed to 16% decline in the incidence of neonatal BSI at the NICU. The intervention is a simple and adaptable strategy with cost-saving potential when carefully scaled up across the country. Though the cost of the intervention may be more relative to using just soap and water for hand hygiene, the outcome is a good reason for investment into the intervention to reduce the incidence of neonatal BSI and the associated costs from patient and providers’ perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ama Pokuaa Fenny
- Economics Division, Institute of Statistical, Social and Economic Research (ISSER), University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana
- * E-mail: ,
| | - Evans Otieku
- Economics Division, Institute of Statistical, Social and Economic Research (ISSER), University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kwaku Appiah-Korang Labi
- Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
| | - Felix Ankomah Asante
- Economics Division, Institute of Statistical, Social and Economic Research (ISSER), University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana
| | - Ulrika Enemark
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Brain D, Jadambaa A. Economic Evaluation of Long-Term Survivorship Care for Cancer Patients in OECD Countries: A Systematic Review for Decision-Makers. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph182111558. [PMID: 34770070 PMCID: PMC8582644 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182111558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Long-term cancer survivorship care is a crucial component of an efficient healthcare system. For numerous reasons, there has been an increase in the number of cancer survivors; therefore, healthcare decision-makers are tasked with balancing a finite budget with a strong demand for services. Decision-makers require clear and pragmatic interpretation of results to inform resource allocation decisions. For these reasons, the impact and importance of economic evidence are increasing. The aim of the current study was to conduct a systematic review of economic evaluations of long-term cancer survivorship care in Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) member countries and to assess the usefulness of economic evidence for decision-makers. A systematic review of electronic databases, including MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO and others, was conducted. The reporting quality of the included studies was appraised using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. Each included study’s usefulness for decision-makers was assessed using an adapted version of a previously published approach. Overall, 3597 studies were screened, and of the 235 studies assessed for eligibility, 34 satisfied the pre-determined inclusion criteria. We found that the majority of the included studies had limited value for informing healthcare decision-making and conclude that this represents an ongoing issue in the field. We recommend that authors explicitly include a policy statement as part of their presentation of results.
Collapse
|
7
|
Manoukian S, Stewart S, Graves N, Mason H, Robertson C, Kennedy S, Pan J, Kavanagh K, Haahr L, Adil M, Dancer SJ, Cook B, Reilly J. Bed-days and costs associated with the inpatient burden of healthcare-associated infection in the UK. J Hosp Infect 2021; 114:43-50. [PMID: 34301395 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.12.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Revised: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare-associated infection (HAI) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality resulting in excess costs. AIM To investigate the impact of all types of HAI on the inpatient cost of HAI using different approaches. METHODS The incidence, types of HAI, and excess length of stay were estimated using data collected as part of the Evaluation of Cost of Nosocomial Infection (ECONI) study. Scottish NHS reference costs were used to estimate unit costs for bed-days. Variable (cash) costs associated with infection prevention and control (IPC) measures and treatment were calculated for each HAI type and overall. The inpatient cost of HAI is presented in terms of bed-days lost, bed-day costs, and cash costs. FINDINGS In Scotland 58,010 (95% confidence interval: 41,730-74,840) bed-days were estimated to be lost to HAI during 2018/19, costing £46.4 million (19m-129m). The total annual cost in the UK is estimated to be £774 million (328m-2,192m). Bloodstream infection and pneumonia were the most costly HAI types per case. Cash costs are a small proportion of the total cost of HAI, contributing 2.4% of total costs. CONCLUSION Reliable estimates of the cost burden of HAI management are important for assessing the cost-effectiveness of IPC programmes. This unique study presents robust economic data, demonstrating that HAI remains a burden to the UK NHS and bed-days capture the majority of inpatient costs. These findings can be used to inform the economic evaluation and decision analytic modelling of competing IPC programmes at local and national level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Manoukian
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - S Stewart
- Safeguarding Health through Infection Prevention Research Group, Research Centre for Health (ReaCH), Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
| | - N Graves
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - H Mason
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - C Robertson
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - S Kennedy
- HPS Stats Support, Public Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK
| | - J Pan
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - K Kavanagh
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - L Haahr
- Safeguarding Health through Infection Prevention Research Group, Research Centre for Health (ReaCH), Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - M Adil
- Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
| | - S J Dancer
- Department of Microbiology, Hairmyres Hospital, NHS Lanarkshire, UK; School of Applied Science, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - B Cook
- Departments of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - J Reilly
- Safeguarding Health through Infection Prevention Research Group, Research Centre for Health (ReaCH), Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK; National Services Scotland (NSS), UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Graves N, Mitchell BG, Otter JA, Kiernan M. The cost-effectiveness of temporary single-patient rooms to reduce risks of healthcare-associated infection. J Hosp Infect 2021; 116:21-28. [PMID: 34246721 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of single rooms for patient isolation often forms part of a wider bundle to prevent certain healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in hospitals. Demand for single rooms often exceeds what is available and the use of temporary isolation rooms may help resolve this. Changes to infection prevention practice should be supported by evidence showing that cost-effectiveness is plausible and likely. AIM To perform a cost-effectiveness evaluation of adopting temporary single rooms into UK National Health Service (NHS) hospitals. METHODS The cost-effectiveness of a decision to adopt a temporary, single-patient, isolation room to the current infection prevention efforts of an NHS hospital was modelled. Primary outcomes are the expected change to total costs and life-years from an NHS perspective. FINDINGS The mean expected incremental cost per life-year gained (LYG) is £5,829. The probability that adoption is cost-effective against a £20,000 threshold per additional LYG is 93%, and for a £13,000 threshold the probability is 87%. The conclusions are robust to scenarios for key model parameters. If a temporary single-patient isolation room reduces risks of HAI by 16.5% then an adoption decision is more likely to be cost-effective than not. Our estimate of the effectiveness reflects guidelines and reasonable assumptions and the theoretical rationale is strong. CONCLUSION Despite uncertainties about the effectiveness of temporary isolation rooms for reducing risks of HAI, there is some evidence that an adoption decision is likely to be cost-effective for the NHS setting. Prospective studies will be useful to reduce this source of uncertainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Graves
- Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
| | - B G Mitchell
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, NSW, Australia
| | - J A Otter
- National Institute for Healthcare Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in HCAI and AMR, Imperial College London & Public Health England, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - M Kiernan
- Gama Healthcare Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nagel SJ, Frizon L, Maiti T, Machado AG, Gillies GT, Helland L, Woodroffe RW, Howard MA, Wilson S. Contemporary Approaches to Preventing and Treating Infections of Novel Intrathecal Neurostimulation Devices. World Neurosurg 2019; 128:e397-e408. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Revised: 04/18/2019] [Accepted: 04/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
|
10
|
Mitchell BG, Fasugba O, Cheng AC, Gregory V, Koerner J, Collignon P, Gardner A, Graves N. Chlorhexidine versus saline in reducing the risk of catheter associated urinary tract infection: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 2019; 97:1-6. [PMID: 31129443 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Revised: 04/04/2019] [Accepted: 04/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Catheter associated urinary tract infections are one of the most common infections acquired in hospital. A recent randomised control study demonstrated the benefit of using chlorhexidine (0.1%) for meatal cleaning prior to urinary catheter insertion, by reducing both catheter associated asymptomatic bacteriuria and infection. These findings raise the important question of whether a decision to switch from saline to chlorhexidine was likely to be cost-effective. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adopting routine use of chlorhexidine for meatal cleaning prior to urinary catheter insertion METHODS: The outcomes of this cost-effectiveness study are changes to health service costs in $AUD and changes to quality adjusted life years from a decision to adopt 0.1% chlorhexidine for meatal cleaning prior to urinary catheter insertion as compared to saline. Effectiveness outcomes for this study were taken from a 32 week stepped wedge randomised controlled study conducted in three Australian hospitals. RESULTS The changes in health costs from switching from saline to 0.1% chlorhexidine per 100,000 catheterisations would save hospitals AUD$387,909 per 100,000 catherisations, prevent 70 cases of catheter associated urinary tract infections, release 282 bed days and provide a small improvement in health benefits of 1.43 quality adjusted life years. Using a maximum willingness to pay for a marginal quality adjusted life year threshold of AUD$28,000 per 100,000 catherisations, suggests that adopting chlorhexidine would be cost effective and potentially cost-saving. CONCLUSION The findings from our work provide evidence to health system administrators and those responsible for drafting catheter associated urinary tract infections prevention guidelines that investing in switching from saline to chlorhexidine is not only clinically effective but also a sensible decision in the context of allocating finite healthcare resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brett G Mitchell
- Faculty of Arts, Nursing and Theology, Avondale College of Higher Education, 185 Fox Valley Road, Wahroonga, New South Wales 2076, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Oyebola Fasugba
- Nursing Research Institute, Australian Catholic University & St Vincent's Health Australia Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Lifestyle Research Centre, Avondale College of Higher Education, Cooranbong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Allen C Cheng
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Infectious Prevention and Healthcare Epidemiology Unit, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Victoria Gregory
- Faculty of Arts, Nursing and Theology, Avondale College of Higher Education, 185 Fox Valley Road, Wahroonga, New South Wales 2076, Australia
| | - Jane Koerner
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine Australian Catholic University, Watson Australia
| | - Peter Collignon
- Australian Capital Territory Pathology, Canberra Hospital and Health Services, Yamba Drive, Garran, Australian Capital Territory 2605, Australia; Medical School, Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia
| | - Anne Gardner
- School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Nicholas Graves
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|