In which cases of pneumonia should we consider treatments for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia?

Gram-negative bacterial infections in surgical intensive care unit patients following abdominal surgery: high mortality associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection

BACKGROUND

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, a multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (GNB), is an emerging nosocomial pathogen. This study assessed the clinical outcomes of GNB infections in surgical intensive care unit (SICU) patients post-abdominal surgery, focusing on the differences between S. maltophilia and other GNBs, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on SICU patients at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital from 2010 to 2020, who developed GNB infections following abdominal surgery.

RESULTS

Of 442 patients, 237 had S. maltophilia and 205 had non-S. maltophilia GNB infections (including 81 with P. aeruginosa). The overall mortality rate was 44.5%, and S. maltophilia infection emerged as a significant contributor to the mortality rate in patients with GNB infections. S. maltophilia patients had longer mechanical ventilation and SICU stays, with a 30-day mortality rate of 35.4%, higher than the non-S. maltophilia GNB (22.9%) and P. aeruginosa (21%) groups. In-hospital mortality was also higher in the S. maltophilia group (53.2%) compared to the non-S. maltophilia GNB (34.6%) and P. aeruginosa groups (29.6%). Risk factors for acquiring S. maltophilia included a higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and prior broad-spectrum antibiotics use. Older age, polymicrobial infections, and elevated bilirubin were associated with increased 30-day mortality in S. maltophilia patients.

CONCLUSION

S. maltophilia infections in post-abdominal surgery patients are linked to higher mortality than non-S. maltophilia GNB and P. aeruginosa infections, emphasizing the need for early diagnosis and treatment to improve outcomes.

Clinical Outcomes of Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole in Critically Ill Patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Bacteremia and Pneumonia Utilizing Renal Replacement Therapies

Background: The clinical outcomes of usual doses of Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMZ) for treating S. maltophilia in critically ill patients on renal replacement therapies (RRT) have not been established. We sought to assess the clinical outcomes of TMP/SMZ in patients with sepsis utilizing RRT. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on all critically ill adult patients with S. maltophilia infections who received RRT between May 2015 and January 2022. The primary endpoint was clinical cure while the secondary endpoints were microbiologic cure, 30-day infection recurrence, and mortality. Results: Forty-five subjects met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 70.0 [interquartile range (IQR): 63.5-77] years, 57.8% were males, and the median body mass index was 25.7 [IQR: 22-30.2] kg/m2. Clinical success and failure were reported in 18 (40%) and 27 (60%) cases, respectively. There was no significant difference between the 30-day reinfection rates of both groups; however, mortality was significantly higher in the clinical failure group, involving 12 patients (44.4%), versus none in the clinical success group (p = 0.001). The median daily dose of TMP/SMZ upon continuous veno-venous hemofiltration was 1064 [IQR: 776-1380] mg in the clinical cure group vs. 768 [IQR:540-1200] mg in the clinical failure group (p = 0.035). Meanwhile, the median dose for those who received intermittent hemodialysis was 500 [IQR: 320-928] mg in the clinical success group compared to 640 [IQR: 360-1005] mg in the clinical failure group (p = 0.372). A total of 55% experienced thrombocytopenia, 42% hyperkalemia, and 2.2% neutropenia. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the total daily dose at therapy initiation was the only independent factor associated with clinical success after adjusting for different variables including the body mass index [Odds ratio 1.004; 95% confidence interval: (1-1.007), p = 0.044]. Conclusions: Although the S. maltophilia isolates were reported as susceptible, TMP/SMZ with conventional doses to treat bacteremia and pneumonia in critically ill patients utilizing RRT was associated with high rates of clinical and microbiologic failure as well as with mortality. Larger outcomes and pharmacokinetics studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Ventilation Management in a Patient with Ventilation-Perfusion Mismatch in the Early Phase of Lung Injury and during the Recovery

Chest trauma is one of the most serious and difficult injuries, with various complications that can lead to ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) mismatch and systemic hypoxia. We are presenting a case of a 53-year-old male with no chronic therapy who was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit due to severe respiratory failure after chest trauma. He developed a right-sided pneumothorax, and then a thoracic drain was placed. On admission, the patient was hemodynamically unstable and tachypneic. He was intubated and mechanically ventilated, febrile (38.9 °C) and unconscious. A lung CT showed massive non-ventilated areas, predominantly in the right lung, guiding repeated therapeutic and diagnostic bronchoalveolar lavages. He was ventilated with PEEP of 10 cmH2O with a FiO2 of 0.6-0.8. Empirical broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy was immediately initiated. Both high FiO2 and moderate PEEP were maintained and adjusted according to the current blood gas values and oxygen saturation. He was weaned from mechanical ventilation, and non-invasive oxygenation was continued. After Stenotrophomonas maltophilia was identified and treated with sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, a regression of lung infiltrates was observed. In conclusion, both ventilatory and antibiotic therapy were needed to improve the oxygenation and outcome of the patient with S. maltophilia pneumonia and V/Q mismatch.

Predictive scoring system for distinguishing Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia from Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia in patients with hematological malignancies

Difficulties in immediately distinguishing Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (SM) bacteremia from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) bacteremia in the clinical setting can lead to treatment delay. We aimed to develop a scoring system to immediately distinguish SM bacteremia from PA bacteremia using clinical indicators. We enrolled cases of SM and PA bacteremia in adult patients with hematological malignancies between January 2011 and June 2018. The patients were randomized into derivation and validation cohorts (2:1), and a clinical prediction tool for SM bacteremia was developed and verified. In total, 88 SM and 85 PA bacteremia cases were identified. In the derivation cohort, the following independent predictors of SM bacteremia were identified: no evidence of PA colonization, antipseudomonal β-lactam breakthrough bacteremia, and central venous catheter insertion. We scored each of the three predictors according to their regression coefficient (2, 2, and 1, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis confirmed the score's predictive performance, with an area under the curve of 0.805. The combined sensitivity and specificity (0.655 and 0.821) was highest with a cut-off value of 4 points. Positive and negative predictive values were 79.2% (19/24) and 69.7% (23/33), respectively. This novel predictive scoring system is potentially useful for distinguishing SM bacteremia from PA bacteremia, which would facilitate immediate administration of appropriate antimicrobial therapy.

Risk factors of lower respiratory tract infection caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To systematically evaluate the risk factors of lower respiratory tract infection caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia for better clinical treatment.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China Journal full-text Database (CNKI), Wanfang Database (WanFang Data), VIP (VIP), and China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) were selected and published by June 2022 about the risk factors of lower respiratory tract infection of S. maltophilia. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and quality evaluation according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. RevMan 5.4 software was used for meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 18 articles were included, including 10 in English and 8 in Chinese. Meta analysis showed that the risk factors of lower respiratory tract infection caused by S. maltophilia included disease severity, hospitalization days, use of glucocorticoids, invasive procedures, use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and use of more than 3 Antibiotics. The OR values of patients with hospitalization, mechanical ventilation, use of more than 3 Antibiotics, endotracheal intubation and tracheotomy were the highest. Specific hospitalization days (OR = 14.56, 95% CI: 6.12~23.01), mechanical ventilation (OR = 14.16, 95% CI: 5.85~34.3), use of more than 3 Antibiotics (OR = 6.21, 95% CI: 1.24~31.14), tracheal intubation (OR = 6.07, 95% CI: 1.97~3.64), tracheotomy (OR = 3.77, 95% CI: 1.09~13.04).

Conclusion

There are many risk factors for lower respiratory tract infection of S. maltophilia, which can occur in patients with severe illness, high APACHE-II score, invasive procedures, and the need for broad-spectrum antibiotics. In terms of the host, these patients are characterized by impaired immune function, severe illness and long-term hospitalization, which objectively leads to the infection of S. maltophilia. Therefore, strengthening the monitoring, prevention and control of patients with risk factors of S. maltophilia infection is conducive to reducing the risk of infection and death.