Impact of transition from open bay to single room design NICU on MDRO colonization rates

Effect of single-patient room design on the incidence of nosocomial infection in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Previous studies have yielded varying conclusions regarding the impact of single-patient room design on nosocomial infection in the intensive care unit (ICU). We aimed to examine the impact of ICU single-patient room design on infection control.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, and CBM databases from inception to October 2023, without language restrictions. We included observational cohort and quasi-experimental studies assessing the effect of single- versus multi-patient rooms on infection control in the ICU. Outcomes measured included the nosocomial infection rate, incidence density of nosocomial infection, nosocomial colonization and infection rate, acquisition rate of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), and nosocomial bacteremia rate. The choice of effect model was determined by heterogeneity.

Results

Our final analysis incorporated 12 studies involving 12,719 patients. Compared with multi-patient rooms in the ICU, single-patient rooms demonstrated a significant benefit in reducing the nosocomial infection rate (odds ratio [OR]: 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59, 0.79; p < 0.00001). Analysis based on nosocomial infection incidence density revealed a statistically significant reduction in single-patient rooms (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.44, 0.92; p = 0.02). Single-patient rooms were associated with a marked decrease in nosocomial colonization and infection rate (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.32, 0.62; p < 0.00001). Furthermore, patients in single-patient rooms experienced lower nosocomial bacteremia rate (OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.59, 0.89; p = 0.002) and lower acquisition rate of MDROs (OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.73; p = 0.002) than those in multi-patient rooms.

Conclusion

Implementation of single-patient rooms represents an effective strategy for reducing nosocomial infections in the ICU.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/).

Central-line-associated bloodstream infection burden among Dutch neonatal intensive care units

BACKGROUND

The establishment of an epidemiological overview provides valuable insights needed for the (future) dissemination of infection-prevention initiatives.

AIM

To describe the nationwide epidemiology of central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) among Dutch Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs).

METHODS

Data from 2935 neonates born at <32 weeks' gestation and/or with a birth weight <1500 g admitted to all nine Dutch NICUs over a two-year surveillance period (2019-2020) were analysed. Variations in baseline characteristics, CLABSI incidence per 1000 central-line days, pathogen distribution and CLABSI care bundles were evaluated. Multi-variable logistic mixed-modelling was used to identify significant predictors for CLABSI.

RESULTS

A total of 1699 (58%) neonates received a central line, in which 160 CLABSI episodes were recorded. Coagulase-negative staphylococci were the most common infecting organisms of all CLABSI episodes (N=100, 63%). An almost six-fold difference in the CLABSI incidence between participating units was found (2.91-16.14 per 1000 line-days). Logistic mixed-modelling revealed longer central line dwell-time (adjusted odds ratio (aOR):1.08, P<0.001), umbilical lines (aOR:1.85, P=0.03) and single rooms (aOR:3.63, P=0.02) to be significant predictors of CLABSI. Variations in bundle elements included intravenous tubing care and antibiotic prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

CLABSI remains a common problem in preterm infants in The Netherlands, with substantial variation in incidence between centres. Being the largest collection of data on the burden of neonatal CLABSI in The Netherlands, this epidemiological overview provides a solid foundation for the development of a collaborative platform for continuous surveillance, ideally leading to refinement of national evidence-based guidelines. Future efforts should focus on ensuring availability and extraction of routine patient data in aggregated formats.

Influence of transition from open bay units to single room units in a neonatal intensive care unit on hospital transmission of multi-drug-resistant Enterobacterales

BACKGROUND

It was shown previously that changing the design of a hospital neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) from open bay units (OBUs) to single room units (SRUs) was not associated with a reduction in Gram-negative multi-drug-resistant organism (MDRO) colonization rates. It was therefore hypothesized that colonization mainly occurs vertically, or through parents and healthcare workers, and not through environmental factors, and that transition to SRUs would not decrease the number of clusters of MDROs with an epidemiological link. To investigate this, core-genome multi-locus sequence typing (cgMLST) was applied on MDROs cultured from infants at the study hospital.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all infants carrying MDROs admitted to the NICU of a tertiary care academic hospital 2 years prior to the transition from OBUs to SRUs in May 2017, and 1.5 years after the transition (2018-2020).

RESULTS

In total, 55 infants were diagnosed with MDRO carriership. Isolates were available from 49 infants for cgMLST. In the OBU period, one cluster involving four of 20 (20%) infants was identified, and in the SRU period, four clusters involving nine of 29 (31%) infants were identified. It was possible to make an epidemiological link in all four SRU MDRO clusters, but this was not possible for the OBU cluster. In the latter case, transmission from an environmental source on the ward seemed likely.

CONCLUSION

After transition to SRUs, there was no decrease in the number of clusters of MDROs with an epidemiological link, suggesting that nursing infants in an NICU with an SRU design is not, in itself, protective against the acquisition of MDROs.

New Antimicrobials for the Treatment of Neonatal Sepsis Caused by Multi-Drug-Resistant Bacteria: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Infections by multi-drug-resistant (MDR) organisms are sharply increasing in newborns worldwide. In low and middle-income countries, a disproportionate amount of neonatal sepsis caused by MDR Gram negatives was recently reported. Newborns with infections by MDR organisms with limited treatment options may benefit from novel antimicrobials.

METHODS

We performed a literature search investigating the use in newborns, infants and children of novel antimicrobials for the treatment of MDR Gram negatives, namely ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, cefiderocol, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/relebactam, and Gram positives with resistance of concern, namely ceftaroline and dalbavancin. PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched.

RESULTS

A total of 50 records fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most articles were case reports or case series, and ceftazidime/avibactam was the most studied agent. All studies showed favorable efficacy and safety profile in newborns and across different age cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

novel antibiotics may be considered in newborns for the treatment of MDR Gram negatives with limited treatment options and for Gram positives with resistance concerns. Further studies are needed to address their effectiveness and safety in newborns.

Clinical, humanistic and economic outcomes, including experiencing of patient safety events, associated with admitting patients to single rooms compared with shared accommodation for acute hospital admissions: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

OBJECTIVES

Assess the impact of single rooms versus multioccupancy accommodation on inpatient healthcare outcomes and processes.

DESIGN

Systematic review and narrative synthesis.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, Google Scholar and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence website up to 17 February 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Eligible papers assessed the effect on inpatients staying in hospital of being assigned to a either a single room or shared accommodation, except where that assignment was for a direct clinical reason like preventing infection spread.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data were extracted and synthesised narratively, according to the methods of Campbell et al. RESULTS: Of 4861 citations initially identified, 145 were judged to be relevant to this review. Five main method types were reported. All studies had methodological issues that potentially biased the results by not adjusting for confounding factors that are likely to have contributed to the outcomes. Ninety-two papers compared clinical outcomes for patients in single rooms versus shared accommodation. No clearly consistent conclusions could be drawn about overall benefits of single rooms. Single rooms were most likely to be associated with a small overall clinical benefit for the most severely ill patients, especially neonates in intensive care. Patients who preferred single rooms tended to do so for privacy and for reduced disturbances. By contrast, some groups were more likely to prefer shared accommodation to avoid loneliness. Greater costs associated with building single rooms were small and likely to be recouped over time by other efficiencies.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of difference between inpatient accommodation types in a large number of studies suggests that there would be little effect on clinical outcomes, particularly in routine care. Patients in intensive care areas are most likely to benefit from single rooms. Most patients preferred single rooms for privacy and some preferred shared accommodation for avoiding loneliness.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022311689.

Comparison of neonatal morbidity and mortality between single-room and open-bay care: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

In response to the increasing focus on family-centred care, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) environments have gradually shifted towards the single-room design. However, the assumed benefits of this emerging design remain a subject of debate. Our goal was to evaluate the impact of single-room versus open-bay care on the risk of neonatal morbidity and mortality in preterm neonates.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Level III NICU.

PATIENTS

Neonates born <32 weeks' gestation between 15 May 2015 and 15 May 2019.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mortality and morbidities of a cohort of neonates admitted to a new, single-room unit (SRU) were compared with a historical cohort of neonates admitted to an open-bay unit (OBU). Group differences were evaluated and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Three-hundred and fifty-six and 343 neonates were admitted to the SRU and OBU, respectively. No difference in neonatal morbidities and mortality were observed between cohorts (bronchopulmonary dysplasia: OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.58, p=0.44; retinopathy of the prematurity stage ≥2: OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.84 to 2.22, p=0.10; intraventricular haemorrhage: OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.34, p=0.86; mortality: OR 1.55, 95% CI 0.75 to 3.20, p=0.28). In adjusted regression models, single-room care was independently associated with a decreased risk of symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus (adjusted OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.95). No independent association between single-room care and any of the other investigated outcomes was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of single-rooms in our NICU did not lead to a significant reduction in neonatal morbidity and mortality outcomes.