Automated room decontamination: report of a Healthcare Infection Society Working Party

Disinfection and sterilization: New technologies

BACKGROUND

Adherence to professional guidelines and/or manufacturer's instructions for use regarding proper disinfection and sterilization of medical devices is crucial to preventing cross transmission of pathogens between patients. Emerging pathogens (e.g., Candida auris) and complex medical devices provide new challenges.

METHODS

A search for published English articles on new disinfection and sterilization technologies was conducted by Google, Google scholar and PubMed.

RESULTS

Several new disinfection methods or products (e.g., electrostatic spraying, new sporicides, colorized disinfectants, "no touch" room decontamination, continuous room decontamination) and sterilization technologies (e.g., new sterilization technology for endoscopes) were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

These technologies should reduce patient risk.

úNo touch..Ñ methods for health care room disinfection: Focus on clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Hospital patient room surfaces are frequently contaminated with multidrug-resistant organisms. Since studies have demonstrated that inadequate terminal room disinfection commonly occurs, ..úno touch..Ñ methods of terminal room disinfection have been developed such as ultraviolet light (UV) devices and hydrogen peroxide (HP) systems.

METHODS

This paper reviews published clinical trials of ..úno touch..Ñ methods and ..úself-disinfecting..Ñ surfaces.

RESULTS

Multiple papers were identified including clinical trials of UV room disinfection devices (N.ß=.ß20), HP room disinfection systems (N.ß=.ß8), handheld UV devices (N.ß=.ß1), and copper-impregnated or coated surfaces (N.ß=.ß5). Most but not all clinical trials of UV devices and HP systems for terminal disinfection demonstrated a reduction of colonization/infection in patients subsequently housed in the room. Copper-coated surfaces were the only ..úself-disinfecting..Ñ technology evaluated by clinical trials. Results of these clinical trials were mixed.

DISCUSSION

Almost all clinical trials reviewed used a ..úweak..Ñ design (eg, before-after) and failed to assess potential confounders (eg, compliance with hand hygiene and environmental cleaning).

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence is strong enough to recommend the use of a ..úno-touch..Ñ method as an adjunct for outbreak control, mitigation strategy for high-consequence pathogens (eg, Candida auris or Ebola), or when there are an excessive endemic rates of multidrug-resistant organisms.

Superiority of manual disinfection using pre-soaked wipes over automatic UV-C radiation without prior cleaning

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of ultraviolet C (UV-C) radiation against a broad spectrum of micro-organisms has been demonstrated in several studies, but differences in the specific doses and the extent of microbial reduction were found. Furthermore, the conditions of laboratory tests differ greatly from reality, such that efficacy achieved in tests may not necessarily be assumed in reality. Consequently, it is important to investigate the effectiveness of UV-C in representative field trials. The aim was therefore to develop and establish a field test to evaluate automatic UV-C in comparison to manual disinfection.

METHODS

Before and after disinfection, samples were repeatedly collected from naturally highly contaminated surfaces using the swab technique to obtain representative data sets for disinfected and non-disinfected surfaces. Subsequently, the log reduction values (LRV) and the disinfection success were evaluated for UV-C radiation and full compliant manual disinfection using alcohol-based wipes.

RESULTS

Surfaces that are naturally contaminated with bacteria on a regular and nearly uniform basis have been identified as particularly suitable for field testing. Mean contamination was reduced from 23.3 to 1.98 cfu/cm2 (LRV 0.9) and 29.7 to 0.26 cfu/cm2 (LRV 1.2) for UV-C and manual disinfection, respectively. UV-C disinfection achieved 75.5% successful disinfected surfaces, whereas manual disinfection showed 98.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Full compliant manual disinfection showed slightly higher LRVs and disinfection success than automatic UV-C disinfection. Successful, operator-independent UV-C disinfection still has the potential to improve disinfection performance in addition to manual disinfection.

Tolerance of clinical vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates against UV-C light from a mobile source

BACKGROUND

Admission to a room previously occupied by patients carrying environmentally robust pathogens implies an increased risk of acquiring those pathogens. Therefore, 'No-touch' automated room disinfection systems, including devices based on UV-C irradiation, are discussed to improve terminal cleaning. It is still unclear if clinical isolates of relevant pathogens behave differently under UV-C irradiation compared to laboratory strains used in the approval process of disinfection procedures. In this study we analysed the susceptibility of well characterized clonally divergent vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) strains, including a linezolid-resistant isolate, against UV-C radiation.

METHODS

Susceptibility against UV-C of ten clonally divergent clinical isolates of VRE was determined in comparison to the commonly used test organism Enterococcus hirae ATCC 10541. Ceramic tiles contaminated with 105 to 106 colony forming units/25 cm² of the different enterococci were positioned at a distance of 1.0 and 1.5 m and irradiated for 20 s, resulting in a UV-C dose of 50 and 22 mJ/cm², respectively. Reduction factors were calculated after quantitative culture of the bacteria recovered from treated and untreated surfaces.

RESULTS

Susceptibility to UV-C varied considerably among the strains studied, with the mean value of the most robust strain being up to a power of ten lower compared to the most sensitive strain at both UV-C doses. The two most tolerant strains belonged to MLST sequence types ST80 and ST1283. The susceptibility of the laboratory strain E. hirae ATCC 10541 ranged between the most sensitive and most tolerant isolates for both irradiation doses. However, for UV-C dose of 22 mJ/cm², the reduction of the most tolerant isolate of ST1283 was statistically significantly lower compared to E. hirae ATCC 10541. The most susceptible strains belonged to the MLST sequence types ST117 and ST203.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that UV-C doses reported in the literature are sufficient for the reduction of commonly used reference strains of enterococci but could be insufficient for the reduction of tolerant patient VRE-isolates in a hospital setting. Therefore, for future studies, the most tolerant clinical isolates should be used to validate automated UV-C devices or longer exposure times should be expected to ensure efficacy in the real world.

Phenotypic Variation in Clinical S. aureus Isolates Did Not Affect Disinfection Efficacy Using Short-Term UV-C Radiation

Pigmentation, catalase activity and biofilm formation are virulence factors that cause resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to environmental stress factors including disinfectants. In recent years, automatic UV-C room disinfection gained greater importance in enhanced disinfection procedures to improve disinfection success in hospitals. In this study, we evaluated the effect of naturally occurring variations in the expression of virulence factors in clinical S. aureus isolates on tolerance against UV-C radiation. Quantification of staphyloxanthin expression, catalase activity and biofilm formation for nine genetically different clinical S. aureus isolates as well as reference strain S. aureus ATCC 6538 were performed using methanol extraction, a visual approach assay and a biofilm assay, respectively. Log₁₀ reduction values (LRV) were determined after irradiation of artificially contaminated ceramic tiles with 50 and 22 mJ/cm² UV-C using a commercial UV-C disinfection robot. A wide variety of virulence factor expression was observed, indicating differential regulation of global regulatory networks. However, no direct correlation with the strength of expression with UV-C tolerance was observed for either staphyloxanthin expression, catalase activity or biofilm formation. All isolates were effectively reduced with LRVs of 4.75 to 5.94. UV-C disinfection seems therefore effective against a wide spectrum of S. aureus strains independent of occurring variations in the expression of the investigated virulence factors. Due to only minor differences, the results of frequently used reference strains seem to be representative also for clinical isolates in S. aureus.

Enhanced disinfection with hybrid hydrogen peroxide fogging in a critical care setting

Background

Environmental contamination contributes to hospital associated infections, particularly those caused by multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO). This study investigated bioburden presence on surfaces in a critical care center’s patient rooms following typical environmental services (EVS) practices and following intervention with hybrid hydrogen peroxide™ (HHP™) fogging.

Methods

Upon patient discharge, following standard cleaning or cleaning with ultraviolet (UV) light use, patient rooms were sampled by swabbing for adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and aerobic colony counts (ACC) from five preset locations. Rooms were then fogged via HHP technology using chemical indicators and Geobacillus stearothermophilus biological indicators for sporicidal validation monitoring. Following fogging, rooms were sampled again, and results were compared.

Results

A 98% reduction in ACC was observed after fogging as compared to post EVS practices both with and without UV light use. No statistical difference was seen when comparing cleaning to cleaning with UV light use. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were identified following EVS practices and not detected following HHP fogging. ATP samples were reduced 88% by fogging application. Chemical and biological indicators confirmed correct application of HHP fogging, as seen through its achievement of a 6-log reduction of bacterial spores.

Conclusion

HHP fogging is a thorough and efficacious technology which, when applied to critical care patient rooms, significantly reduces bioburden on surfaces, indicating potential benefits for implementation as part of infection prevention measures.

Potassium Linoleate (Isomerized) Satisfies the United States Environmental Protection Agency MB-05-16 for Hospital Disinfectant on Hard, Non-porous Surfaces

Potassium conjugated linoleic acid or potassium linoleate (isomerized), 86 mM, satisfies the United States Environmental Protection Agency protocol hospital disinfectant for non-porous surfaces MB-05-16 with one-minute treatment. This stringent protocol requires separate preparations of Staphylococcus aureus (American Type Culture Collection 6538) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (American Type Culture Collection 15442) unstirred for 48 hours, submerging 10 mm polished cylinders in the culture, and placing for 45 minutes in a 37°C humidified chamber before treating. Since potassium linoleate (isomerized) also satisfies the United States Environmental Protection Agency protocol MB-35-00 for Candida auris, this study establishes potassium linoleate (isomerized) as an effective cross-kingdom antimicrobial plant salt, soap, or cleanser. We affirm the need for formal post-treatment plating on agar to establish efficacy and not rely on OD₆₀₀ when testing for antimicrobial capacity. Aqueous dilution of the soap causes variable opalescence making optical density an unreliable marker for antimicrobial efficacy.