Condylar blade plate fixation of unstable fractures of the distal ulna associated with fracture of the distal radius

Internal Fixation for Unstable Distal Ulnar Fractures by 2.7 mm Semitubular Hook Plate

Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate the outcomes of the use of a 2.7 mm semitubular hook plate for internal fixation of unstable metaphyseal ulnar fractures. Methods: Between January 2015 and July 2019, 30 consecutive patients with a recent unstable distal ulnar fracture were included in this prospective case series. All patients were subjected to follow-up with the time of union, range of motion, pain using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and radiological and functional outcome using the quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score and Mayo wrist score after 12 months. Results: The mean age of the patients was 45.3 ± 10 years. There were 18 males (60%) and 12 females (40%), and there were 16 patients associated with distal radius fractures (53.33%). According to the AO classification of distal ulnar fractures, 3 fractures were type A2.1 (10%), 9 were type A2.2 (30%), 8 fractures were type A2.3 (26.67%), and 10 fractures were type A3 (33.33%). All fractures have been united with a mean duration of 9 ± 1.4 weeks, the mean supination was 81.4° ± 3.5°, the mean pronation was 81.3° ± 4.5°, the mean flexion was = 71.7° ± 3.6°, and the mean extension was = 81.7° ± 3.4°. The mean VAS was 1.1 ± 1 points, the mean DASH score was 9.3 ± 5.6 points, and the mean Mayo wrist score was 88.5 ± 7.2 points; 17 patients were excellent (56.67%) and 10 patients were good (33.33%) while 3 patients had satisfactory outcome (10%). Conclusion: Using the 2.7 mm semitubular hook plate is a successful choice for internal fixation of unstable distal ulnar fractures isolated or associated with distal radius fractures with a favorable union time, functional outcome, and range of motion with minimal complications.

Treatment of the Distal Forearm Fracture by Volar Dual Window Approach

BACKGROUND

Distal forearm fractures were defined as distal radius fractures with concomitant distal ulna fractures, except ulna styloid fractures. Distal forearm fractures are common among geriatric populations, particularly those with osteoporosis. Conventionally, distal forearm fractures are reduced by a double incision approach; however, malreduction and instability of the distal radioulnar joint were not uncommon. We introduced a modified volar dual window approach to treat the distal forearm fracture and evaluate the functional outcomes and complications.

METHODS

From January 2020 to June 2023, 13 patients with distal forearm fractures underwent open reduction by the modified dual window approach with locking plate fixation. After surgery, splints were applied for two weeks, and the patients underwent postoperative hand therapy for three months. The mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, range of motions, grip strength, postoperative radiographic parameters, and complications data were collected.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 12.1 months, and the mean age was 52.3 years. Average wrist flexion was 67°, extension 69°, pronation 81°, and supination 79°. Grip strength was 28.3 ± 11.5 kg, which was 88% of the uninjured opposite side. The Visual Analog Scale score during activities was recorded as 0.5 ± 0.9. The mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 14 ± 11.5. The postoperative radiographic parameters were as follows: radial height: 10.8 ± 1.7 mm, radial inclination: 22.6 ± 3.7°, volar tilting: 4.0 ± 3.9°, and ulnar variance: -0.4 ± 1.4 mm. All the patients achieved bone union at the final follow-up. Two patients underwent ulnar implant removal due to irritation symptoms. Neither infection, nor neurovascular injury, nor malreduction developed in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified volar dual window approach can achieve good wrist function and distal forearm fracture reduction without increasing neurovascular or wound healing complications. This method is an alternative approach for distal forearm fracture, especially in comminuted distal ulna fracture or distal radioulnar joint incongruity.

Intramedullary Threaded Nail Fixation of Distal Ulnar Fractures: The Surgical Technique and Case Series

BACKGROUND

 To describe the surgical technique of non-compressive intramedullary threaded nail (IMTN) fixation of distal ulnar neck fractures and present the clinical and radiographic outcomes of four patients treated with this novel technique.

METHODS

At a single Level 1 Trauma Center, a retrospective review was conducted for patients with distal ulnar neck fractures treated with retrograde IMTN between 2022 and 2024. Exclusion criteria included inadequate follow-up. A single surgeon performed all procedures using percutaneous retrograde IMTN fixation through the central disc of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC). Patients initiated a range of motion (ROM) protocol two weeks post-operatively. Post-operative radiographic images were used to calculate the ratio of IMTN diameter to the distal ulnar medullary isthmus diameter proximal to the fracture site. Radiographic changes in displacement, angulation, and ulnar variance were calculated between the first and last follow-up radiographs. Functional outcomes including grip strength and ROM were collected.

RESULTS

Four patients with distal ulnar neck fractures were treated with retrograde IMTN between 2022 and 2024. They were followed for a minimum of three months post-operatively. All were female with an average age of 65 years. All distal ulna fractures were associated with operatively treated intraarticular distal radius fractures. All patients were treated with 75 mm length and 4.5 mm diameter IMTNs. IMTN-to-Isthmus ratio was greater than 60% in all cases. Average radiographic displacement and angulation were unchanged at the final follow-up. The average ulnar variance increased by 1.2 mm. At the final follow-up, there were no post-operative complications. No cases demonstrated ulnar-sided wrist pain, nonunion, or required revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Retrograde IMTN fixation is a novel surgical technique for the treatment of distal ulnar neck fractures. We found limited but promising post-operative radiographic and functional outcomes in our patients without reported ulnar-sided wrist pain, nonunion, or need for hardware removal.

Surgical fixation of distal ulna neck and head fractures

OBJECTIVES

Distal ulna plate fixation for ulnar neck and head fractures (excluding ulnar styloid fractures) aims to anatomically reduce the distal ulna fracture (DUF) by open reduction and internal fixation, while obtaining a stable construct allowing functional rehabilitation without need for cast immobilization.

INDICATIONS

Severe displacement, angulation or translation, as well as unstable or intra-articular fractures. Furthermore, multiple trauma or young patients in need of quick functional rehabilitation.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Inability to surgically address concomitant ipsilateral extremity fractures, thus, limiting early active rehabilitation. Stable, nondisplaced fractures. Need for bridging plate or external fixator of distal radiocarpal joint.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

An ulnar approach, with a straight incision between the extensor and flexor carpi ulnaris. Preservation of the dorsal branch of the ulnar nerve. Reduction and plate fixation with avoidance of plate impingement in the articular zone.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Postoperatively, an elastic bandage is applied for the first 24-48 h. In isolated DUF with stable fixation, a postoperative splint is often unnecessary and should be avoided. For the first four weeks, only light weightbearing of everyday activities is allowed to protect the osteosynthesis. Thereafter, heavier weightbearing and activities are allowed and can be increased as tolerated.

RESULTS

The best available evidence likely shows that for younger patients with a DUF, with or without concomitant distal radius fractures, open reduction and internal fixation can be safely achieved with good functional outcome and acceptable union and complication rates as long as proper technique is ensured.

Attritional Extensor Digiti Minimi Tendon Rupture Associated With a Distal Ulna Fracture

Attritional extensor tendon ruptures are common in the setting of arthritis but, to our knowledge, have never previously been reported in the setting of a distal ulna fracture. This case report describes a 56-year-old male patient who sustained a left-hand dog bite resulting in crush injuries to the thumb and ring finger and a minimally displaced distal ulna fracture. The patient initially underwent appropriate surgical intervention for the thumb and finger crush injuries and non-operative management of the distal ulna fracture with splint immobilization. He experienced an extensor digiti minimi tendon (EDM) rupture two and a half weeks post-operatively. Radiographs demonstrated interval distal ulna fracture displacement with a prominent dorsal spike and absence of arthritis. He subsequently underwent distal ulna open reduction internal fixation and an extensor indicis proprius (EIP) to EDM tendon transfer. This case demonstrates a novel complication following non-operative management of a distal ulna fracture in which the prominent dorsal distal ulna resulted in direct irritation to the extensor tendon and subsequent attritional extensor tendon rupture. This potential complication should be considered in determining appropriate treatment for distal ulna fractures.

Distal Ulna Fracture Fixation with the Specialized Threaded Pin

Purpose

Distal ulna fractures can often be treated nonsurgically; however, many surgeons consider significant displacement or instability, especially following fixation of an associated distal radius fracture, an indication for surgical fixation because of potential problems associated with malunion of these fractures. Traditionally, these fractures have been addressed with plate fixation but hardware in this location is often prominent and associated with a high rate of symptomatic hardware and subsequent hardware removal. We proposed a method of intramedullary fixation using a specialized threaded pin. As this fixation is intramedullary, it avoids many of the problems associated with traditional surgical treatment methods for this fracture. We present a series of nine patients treated in this manner, all of whom had associated distal radius fractures.

Methods

Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were reviewed, after which patients were contacted via phone. Patient-reported outcome measures, including QuickDASH and visual analog scale scores, were assessed.

Results

The average QuickDASH score was 13.6 (range, 0-100), with a median of 9.1. Three patients reported occasional ulnar-sided wrist pain, with an average visual analog scale score of 1.3 (range, 0-10) and a median of 0.5. All patients returned to all activities except one patient who could not resume playing musical instruments because of stiffness. No patient required removal of the threaded pin, but one patient underwent removal of the radial volar plate. No other patients underwent secondary procedures.

Conclusions

Threaded pin fixation is a viable alternative to existing options for distal ulnar neck fractures and may have an advantage over plate fixation because of a lack of hardware prominence.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic IV.

Management of Very Distal Ulna Fractures: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To synthesize all-cause complications and reoperations data, and secondary clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes after the management of very distal ulna fractures (VDUFs) either nonoperatively or operatively.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for English-language articles from inception to February 17, 2022.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies reporting the nonoperative or operative management of VDUFs were eligible for inclusion. VDUFs were defined as either being Q2-Q5 distal ulna fractures using the OTA/AO Comprehensive Classification of Fractures for distal ulna fractures associated with distal radius fractures or being amenable to characterization by the classification system for ulnar head, neck and metaphyseal fractures by Biyani et al.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently extracted data from included studies. Study validity was assessed using the methodological index for nonrandomized studies.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Seventeen studies (512 VDUFs) were included for analysis. There were 209, 237, and 66 fractures in the nonoperative, open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), and distal ulna resection groups, respectively. Descriptive statistics including weighted mean values, standard deviations, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of VDUFs with nonoperative management, ORIF, or distal ulna resection may all be acceptable treatment options in specific patient populations. Nonoperative management of VDUFs is a promising treatment strategy even for complex fracture patterns in patients 65 years of age or older. Despite higher reoperation rates, ORIF may be considered for the younger, high-demand patient. Distal ulna resection presents with very favorable functional outcomes in patients 65 years of age or older presenting with a complex VDUF with the lowest reoperation rate across all groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparison of surgical treatments for distal ulna fracture when combined with anterior locking plate fixation of distal radius in the over 70 age group

We conducted a retrospective multicentre study to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes, and complications of three surgical treatments of distal ulna fracture (DUF) when combined with anterior locking plate fixation for distal radial fracture (DRF) in patients over 70 years of age. We identified 1521 patients over 70 years of age who were diagnosed as having DRF and who underwent anterior locking plate fixation between 2015 and 2020, among which 122 cases of DUF were analysed. Three surgical treatment options for DUF were identified in this cohort: K-wire fixation (Group K), locking plate fixation (Group L) and Darrach procedure (Group D). The results of the analysis showed the total immobilization period in Group D to be the shortest among the three treatments. Functional outcomes were superior, and the rate of complications were smaller in Group D than in Group L. In addition, rotational range of motion was larger in Group D and Group L compared with Group K. In patients who are 70 years of age or older with combined unstable DRF and highly comminuted or displaced DUF, the Darrach procedure for DUF seems to be the most useful and reasonable treatment option once the fracture of the distal radius has been rigidly fixed.Level of evidence: IV.

Distal ulna fractures in adults-subcapitular, transverse fractures did not benefit from surgical treatment

INTRODUCTION

Fractures of the distal ulna, excluding the styloid, are rare. The cause of injury is often a fall on an outstretched hand with an extended wrist, and in most cases there is a concomitant distal radius fracture. The aims of this retrospective study were to investigate the results of the current treatment of distal ulna fractures in adults, with or without a concomitant distal radius fracture, and if a recently presented fracture classification could predict outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients, 18 years or older, treated for a fracture of the distal third of ulna in our county, were included. Fractures of the styloid tip were excluded. The radiographs of the fractures were independently classified by two specialists in radiology according to the 2018 AO/OTA classification. Follow-up was performed 5-7 years after the injury, through the questionnaire Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and new radiographs of both wrists.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients with 97 fractures were included and filled out the PRWE. 65 patients also had new radiographs taken. 79 patients were women and the mean age at the time of injury was 63 years (SD 14.5). The most common fracture class was the extra-articular transverse fracture, 2U3A2.3 (42%). We found that 40% of the fractures had been treated by internal fixation and only 2 fractures had not healed, one conservatively treated and one operated. The median PRWE was 15 (IQR 33.5). The PRWE score was significantly worse in the operated ulna fractures (p = 0.01) and this was also true for extra-articular transverse fractures 2U3A2.3 (p = 0.001). Initial displacement was more common in operated transverse fractures, but it could not be proven that this was the reason for the inferior result.

CONCLUSIONS

Distal ulna fractures almost always unite and the result is comparable to that of isolated distal radius fractures when measured by PRWE. Based on the opinions of the radiologists and how often a consensus discussion was needed for classification, we found the updated AO classification system difficult to use, if dependent only on standard radiographic views. In the present study, transverse extra-articular ulna fractures did not benefit from internal fixation regardless if associated with a distal radius fracture or isolated.

Ulna hook plate osteosynthesis for ulna head fracture associated with distal radius fracture

Background

Distal ulna head or neck fracture is commonly associated with distal radius fracture. Treatment of these fractures remains controversial. Plate osteosynthesis is commonly performed. The purpose of this study was to observe clinical and radiological outcomes in ulna hook plate osteosynthesis for distal ulna fracture associated with distal radius fracture.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study between 2010 and 2018 included patients presenting combined displaced distal ulna fracture and distal radius fracture who were treated with ulna hook plate osteosynthesis. Patient evaluation included pain measurement with the visual analog scale, wrist range of motion, grip and pinch strengths, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Q-DASH) score, and Mayo wrist score. Preoperative radiographs were reviewed to classify the distal ulna fracture according to Biyani. Bone union was evaluated on postoperative X-rays. At final follow-up, the usual radiographic parameters were measured and distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) osteoarthritis was assessed.

Results

A total of 48 patients were included. Mean age was 63 years old and mean follow-up was 28 months. According to the Biyani classification, there were 12 type I, 4 type II, 8 type III, and 24 type IV distal ulna fractures. Wrist flexion was 60°, extension 57°, pronation 85°, and supination 80°. Grip strength was 21 kg (86% of the uninjured opposite side). Pinch strength was 6.6 kg (92% of the uninjured opposite side). Clinical scores were very good to excellent, with a mean Q-DASH of 12 and a Mayo wrist score of 90. Discomfort or pain due to the implant that required implant removal was reported in 29%, and was higher in younger patients. Nonunion was observed in two cases and secondary implant displacement in one case. These three cases required secondary intervention with ulna head resection, which was higher in Biyani type IV. DRUJ osteoarthritis was observed in 12 patients (31%) and was higher in older patients.

Conclusions

Ulna hook plate fixation gives good clinical results and a high rate of fracture union, but complications are common. Implant irritation is a frequent complication, especially in young patients, and often requires implant removal.

Level of evidence: IV

Outcomes of distal ulna locking plate in management of unstable distal ulna fractures: a prospective case series

INTRODUCTION

Given the absence of a satisfying plate system to deal with multifragmentary or subcapital distal ulnar fractures, the Distal Ulna Locking Plate (DUL, I.T.S. GmbH, Graz, Austria) could become a useful treatment option. This study aimed to evaluate the results of this anatomically pre-contoured plate regarding patients with unstable or displaced distal ulnar fractures.

METHODS

In a prospective clinical trial, 20 patients (18 female, two male; mean age 70 years (24-91 years)) with unstable or displaced distal ulna fractures between December 2010 and August 2015 were analyzed. All patients were treated with open reduction and internal fixation using the DUL. They were evaluated at three follow-up appointments at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively regarding their bone healing, ulnar variance (UV), range of motion (ROM) and grip strength. Patient related outcomes were measured using the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaires, and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The results after one year were compared to the outcome of the healthy contralateral side.

RESULTS

All fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation using the Distal Ulna Locking Plate healed within 6 months and showed stable ulnar variances after surgery. ROM (rotational plane 81.1 ± 9.0°, sagittal plane 55.1 ± 14.6°, frontal plane 33.0 ± 9.4°) and grip strength (18.7 ± 7.1 N) at the follow-up after 12 month had similar values compared with the uninjured side. The mean DASH score (36.4 ± 29.0), the PRWE-score (14.5 ± 27.0), and the VAS (at rest 0.5 ± 1.1, during activity 1.2 ± 2.4) after one year had no significant difference to the uninjured side. The surgeon's overall satisfaction rate regarding plate handling reached 81.8%.

CONCLUSION

Stabilization of unstable distal ulna fractures using the DUL restores nearly normal anatomy and function. Its pre-countered design, volar placement, and enhanced stability present a satisfying plate system.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

 The trial was retrospectively Registered at www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov on 16 December 2021 (Trial Registration Number: NCT05329012).

Treatment Modality of Distal Ulnar Head and Neck Fractures Associated With Operatively Treated Distal Radius Fractures Does Not Affect Outcomes

Background: This study compares the functional outcomes and complications between operatively and nonoperatively treated distal ulnar head and neck fractures associated with internal fixation of concomitant distal radius fractures. Methods: A 7-year retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients with operatively treated distal radius fractures associated with distal ulnar head and neck fractures. Ulnar styloid fractures were excluded. Fifty-eight patients who had a minimum of 6 months of follow-up were identified. Patients were divided into 3 treatment groups: nonoperative, open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), and distal ulna resection. Reviewed data included demographics, injury and treatment details, complications, and patient-reported outcome measures. Outcomes measures included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) surveys. Due to inadequate power, 5 patients treated with distal ulna resection were excluded from statistical analysis. Results: The average patient age was 56 years, with an average follow-up of 27 months. All patients underwent ORIF of the distal radius fracture. Distal ulna fractures were treated nonoperatively in 25 patients, with ORIF in 28 patients, and with distal ulna resection in 5 patients. There were no statistically significant differences in wrist or forearm range of motion, complication rates, secondary procedure rates, PRWE scores, or PROMIS scores between ORIF and nonoperative treatment. Conclusion: No differences in wrist or forearm range of motion, complication rates, secondary procedure rates, PRWE scores, or PROMIS scores were observed between ORIF and nonoperative treatment of distal ulnar head and neck fractures associated with operatively treated distal radius fractures.

Using autograft in the surgical treatment of isolated distal ulna fractures with open reduction internal fixation improves short-term clinical outcomes: 11 years of experience

BACKGROUND

Most of the studies on ulna fractures assess the treatment of fractures accompanied by other tissue injuries; thus, the number of studies focused directly on isolated distal ulna fractures are very few. In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the short-term results of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and autograft+ORIF approaches in the treatment of isolated distal ulna fractures.

HYPOTHESIS

Using autograft in the surgical treatment of isolated distal ulna fractures with open reduction internal fixation improves short-term clinical outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The records of isolated distal ulna fractures (distal one-third) operated at the Maltepe University Hospital Orthopedics and Traumatology Clinic between January 2009 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The cases were divided into two groups according to surgical approach, ORIF (n=40) or autograft+ORIF (n=34).

RESULTS

The mean age was 41.55±12.42 years. 52.7% of the cases were female, 67.6% of the fractures were right-sided, and 37.8% of the traumas causing the fracture were high-energy trauma. There was no significant difference between the ORIF and autograft+ORIF groups in terms of age, gender, side and severity of trauma (p>0.05). It was found that pseudoarthrosis development was significantly more prevalent in the ORIF group (25%) compared to the autograft+ORIF group (5.9%) (p=0.026). The median (1st quartile-3rd quartile) time to union was 16 (14-17) weeks in the ORIF group, and 9.5 (8.5-12) weeks in the autograft+ORIF group. Compared to ORIF, the time to union was significantly shorter with the autograft+ORIF procedure (p<0.001). At both the 3rd and 12th month follow-up examinations, the autograft+ORIF group was found to have significantly higher MAYO score and grip strength, and lower DASH score, compared to the ORIF group.

DISCUSSION

When an autograft is used in addition to ORIF in the surgical treatment of isolated distal ulna fractures, the bone heals faster, pseudoarthrosis develops less frequently, and short-term (3rd and 12th months) functional results are better.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; therapeutic study.

Does Simultaneous Fixation of Both Distal Radius and Distal Ulnar Fractures Improve Outcomes? A Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction: Distal metaphyseal ulnar fractures are often found in conjunction with distal radius fractures. However, there is no consensus on optimal management. The purpose of this study was to determine whether simultaneous fixation of both distal radius and distal ulnar fractures would improve outcomes. Materials and Methods: Patients treated for distal radial fractures over a 4-year period at our trauma center were identified, and their medical records were analyzed. Twenty-three patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. All radius fractures were fixed using a volar locking plate. Fourteen ulnar fractures were treated with surgical fixation, and nine were treated conservatively. Data were collected on patient demographics, mechanism of injury, whether it was a closed or open fracture, Gustilo classification, AO/OTA classification, immobilization period, follow-up period, and type of treatment. Physical findings comprising the active range of motion and grip strength and radiological findings, including the ulnar variance compared to the healthy side and bone union, were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores. Results: There was no significant difference between the groups in the quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, but the arc of dorsi-palmar flexion was more restricted in the operative group than in the conservative group. Other results were not significantly different between the two groups. Discussion: Fixation of distal metaphyseal ulnar fractures can be challenging, and several studies have shown the validity of conservative treatments. This supports the view that if the distal radius fracture is anatomically and rigidly fixed, distal metaphyseal ulnar fractures can be successfully managed conservatively. Conclusion: Our results did not show any merit in the simultaneous fixation of both distal radius and distal ulnar fractures. Thus, needless surgery should be avoided.

Management of Acute Distal Radioulnar Joint Instability Following a Distal Radius Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

We sought to review the clinical outcomes of conservative and operative treatment options for acute distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability associated with distal radius fractures in adult patients.

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE for articles published between 1990 and 2020 involving DRUJ instability associated with distal radius fractures was performed. The primary outcomes analyzed included clinical grip strength; range of motion; the disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score; and the modified Mayo wrist score (MMWS).

Results

Of the 531 articles identified in the literature search, 8 met our defined criteria and were included in the final analysis. The cumulative sample size was 258 patients at a mean follow-up of 11.1 months (range, 3–16.9 months). Treatment groups included cast immobilization in supination, K-wire stabilization, and triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) repair. Statistical analysis revealed no difference across groups in active flexion-extension or DASH scores. A significant decrease in grip strength was found in patients who underwent TFCC repair compared with that in those who underwent both cast immobilization (P = .04) and K-wire stabilization (P = .02). Furthermore, we found a significant decrease in active pronation-supination between patients who underwent TFCC repair and those who underwent cast immobilization (P = .03). Patients who underwent TFCC repair were also found to exhibit decreased MMWS as compared with those who underwent K-wire stabilization (P = .05). Overall, persistent DRUJ instability was only found in 4 patients (1.5%), without a significant difference between treatment groups.

Conclusions

This study suggests functional advantages of certain treatment modalities over others, with the range of motion being highest in patients who underwent cast immobilization and grip strength being highest in patients who underwent K-wire stabilization. However, the mean DASH scores showed no difference across all groups, calling into question the clinical need to pursue operative treatment via K-wire stabilization or TFCC repair over conservative treatment via cast immobilization. This study will hopefully serve as a foundation for future prospective studies to help improve and standardize treatment algorithms in patients with DRUJ instability and distal radius fractures.

Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic II.

Finite element analysis of different locking plate fixation methods for the treatment of ulnar head fracture

Background

Ulnar head fractures are increasingly higher with the growing proportion of the elderly people. Failure to achieve a stable anatomic reduction of ulna head fracture may lead to a distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) dysfunction and nonunion of the distal radius. Due to the lack of the postoperative reporting outcomes and the biomechanical studies, it has not been well established about the optimal management of the comminuted distal ulna head fracture. Hence, the purpose of this study is to use finite element analysis to explain the advantages and disadvantages of ulnar-side locking plate fixation compared with dorsal-side locking plate fixation and its screw arrangement in the treatment of ulnar head fractures.

Methods

FE models of the ulnar head fracture and the models of ulnar-side locking plate and dorsal-side plate with two or three distal screws was constructed. In order to simulate forces acting on the ulnar and the osteosynthesis material during daily-life activity in subjects who underwent reconstructive surgery, we applied three loading conditions to each model, viz. 20 N axial compression, 50 N axial compression, 1 N∙m torsion moment, 1 N∙m lateral bending moments, and 1 N∙m extension bending moments. Under these conditions, values of the von Mises stress (VMS) distribution of the implant, peak VMS, the relative displacement of the head and shaft fragments between the fracture ends and the displacement and its direction of the models were investigated.

Results

The stress values of ulnar-side plates were lower than those of dorsal-side plates. And the ulnar-plate fixation system also has smaller maximum displacement and relative displacement. When adding a screw in the middle hole of the ulnar head, the values of model displacement and the peak stress in fixation system are lower, but it may evidently concentrate the stress on the middle screw.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our study indicated that ulnar-side locking plates resulted in a lower stress distribution in the plate and better stability than dorsal-side locking plates for ulnar head fracture fixation. Adding an additional screw to the ulnar head could increase the stability of the fixation system and provide an anti-torsion function. This study requires clinical confirmation of its practicality in the treatment of ulnar head fractures. This study requires clinical confirmation as to its practicality in the treatment of ulnar head fracture.

Acute Distal Radioulnar Joint Instability: Evaluation and Treatment

This article reviews the anatomy and mechanics of pronation and supination (axial rotation) of the forearm through the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ), and the proximal radioulnar joint (PRUJ). Injuries to the bones and/or ligaments of the forearm, wrist, or elbow can result in instability, pain, and limited rotation. Acute dislocations of the DRUJ commonly occur along with a fracture to the distal radius, radial metadiaphysis, or radial head. These injuries are all caused by high-energy trauma. Outcomes are predicated on anatomic reduction and restoration of stability to the DRUJ and PRUJ with or without ligamentous repair or reconstruction.

Ulnocarpal-Spanning Plate Fixation as a Novel Technique for Complex Distal Ulna Fracture: A Case Report

CASE

The patient was a 60-year-old woman with a comminuted, open distal radius and distal ulna metadiaphyseal fracture. After fixation of the distal radius, the distal ulna was unstable and crepitant with rotation and anteroposterior translation. Because of limited bone stock and poor soft tissue, we spanned the distal ulna using a wrist spanning plate. This was removed at 6 weeks postoperatively. She healed and was satisfied with her outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This case describes the original use of a wrist spanning plate for a complex distal ulna fracture. Ulnocarpal-spanning plate fixation provides an alternative to traditional methods of fixation.

Outcomes of Distal Ulna Fractures Associated With Operatively Treated Distal Radius Fractures

Background: The purpose of this study was to report outcomes in patients with nonstyloid distal ulna fractures treated in conjunction with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radius fractures. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who had undergone ORIF of a distal radius fracture over a 5-year period at a single institution was performed. Radiographic review was performed to identify patients with a concomitant fracture of the distal ulna. Radiographs were examined to determine whether and how the distal ulna fracture was stabilized and to assess healing of the distal ulna. Range of motion (ROM) was determined by review of the patients' charts. All skeletally mature patients with distal ulna fractures (not including isolated styloid fractures) undergoing surgical fixation of the distal radius fracture were included. Patients were excluded if follow-up was inadequate. There were 172 fractures of the distal ulna meeting the inclusion criteria. Seven patients were excluded. There were 91 patients treated without ulna fixation (ulna-no) and 74 patients treated with ulna fixation (ulna-yes). Results: Seventy-two (97%) of the ulna-yes patients healed. All patients in the ulna-no group healed. The only significant difference in ROM was in pronation, although the magnitude of this difference was relatively small. Conclusions: Fractures of the distal ulna have high rates of healing and result in equivalent motion regardless of whether the distal ulna is treated operatively. Routine surgical fixation of concomitant distal ulna fractures during distal radius ORIF does not appear to be necessary.

Intramedullary Stabilization Technique Using Headless Compression Screws for Distal Ulnar Fractures

Distal ulnar fractures are commonly accompanied by distal radial fractures, and several treatment options such as plate osteosynthesis and pinning with Kirschner's wires are used. In this study, we present a technique using headless compression screws to achieve bony union of distal ulnar fractures. From November 2016 to November 2018, we treated 11 patients with distal ulnar fractures combined with distal radial fractures with headless compression screws (DePuy Synthes). Patients were instructed to maintain a short-arm splint for less than two weeks after the treatment. The mean time to bony union was 6.5 weeks, mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 14.6 points, and mean visual analog scale score was 1.09 points. Full range of motion was possible in all directions after surgery and no specific complications were observed. The suggested technique allows minimal incision and minimally invasive intramedullary fixation and can promote bony union in a simple way without specific complications.

Incidence of distal ulna fractures in a Swedish county: 74/100,000 person-years, most of them treated non-operatively

Background and purpose - Fractures of the distal ulna can occur in isolation or in conjunction with a distal radius fracture. They may result in incongruence and instability of the distal radioulnar joint. We investigated the incidence of distal ulna fractures, whether any fracture types were more common, and the methods of treatment used.Patients and methods - Data were collected from patients 18 years or older, treated for a fracture of the distal ulna in Östergötland, Sweden, during 2010-2012. Patients were identified in the patient registry. The fractures were classified according to the AO comprehensive classification of fractures.Results - The incidence of distal ulna fractures was 74/100,000 person-years. The most common fracture type was that of the ulnar styloid Q1 (79%), followed by the ulnar neck Q2 (11%). Rarest was ulna head fracture, type Q4 (1%). Incidental findings were a mean age of 63 years (SD 18), a concomitant distal radius fracture in 92% of the patients and that 79% were caused by falling from standing height. Internal fixation was performed in 30% of the Q2-Q6 fractures. This indicates that most were considered stable without internal fixation or stable after fixation of a concomitant radius fracture.Interpretation - Our results show that fractures of the distal ulna are not very common, and some fracture types are even rare. There seem to be no consensus on treatment.

Screw Fixation and Autogenous Bone Graft for an Irreducible Distal Ulna Fracture Associated with Distal Radius Fracture

Distal ulna fractures often occur with distal radius fractures, and their treatment method is still controversial. We considered reduction of the distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ) surface the most important factor when treating distal ulna fractures accompanied by residual dislocation. We herein presented a patient with a distal ulna fracture accompanied by dislocation of the DRUJ surface in whom an autogenous bone fragment collected from the radius was grafted onto the ulnar bone defect after open reduction and Herbert screw fixation. In this technique, the bone fragment was supported through the medullary cavity by inserting a Herbert screw, which was less likely to cause irritation between the screw and surrounding tissue, because the screw was almost entirely present in the bone. In addition, an autogenous bone graft from the same surgical field may be less invasive than that from another region.

Comparative Study of Internal Fixation of the Ulna and Distal Ulna Resection in Patients Older Than 70 Years With Distal Radius and Distal Metaphyseal Ulna Fractures

Background: Acute management of fractures of the distal ulna that are associated with fractures of the distal radius remains difficult, particularly in the elderly. Methods: In this study, we investigated whether internal fixation of the distal ulna is associated with a higher rate of complications than resection of the distal ulna in patients older than 70 years. Twenty-four consecutive patients were included in this study, 12 of whom had undergone open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the distal ulna, and 12 who had undergone distal ulna resection. Patients were retrospectively assessed for range of motion, grip strength, pain, and radiographic appearance. The functional outcome was evaluated by the Mayo Wrist Score. Complications were classified according to the Classification of Surgical Complications. Results: There were no differences in patient demographics between the 2 groups, except patient age. Clinical evaluation showed no difference at follow-up; however, there were significantly more complications associated with ORIF compared with resection. Conclusions: The results from our study show that women older than 70 years with fracture of the distal radius and distal ulna have a higher rate of complications if ORIF of the distal ulna is performed. Patients should be warned, by surgeons, of this in cases where ORIF of the distal ulna is suggested.

Conservative treatment of distal ulna metaphyseal fractures associated with distal radius fractures in elderly people

INTRODUCTION

Although volar locking plates (VLPs) have been exclusively used for unstable distal radius fractures (DRFs), the optimal management of distal ulna fractures (DUFs) remains controversial. Internal fixation using a plate for DUFs might be challenging because of the presence of osteoporotic bone and fragile bone fragments in elderly patients.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that a strategy including VLP fixation for DRFs and non-intervention for DUFs with early wrist mobilization would provide encouraging results in elderly patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighteen patients (17 women and one man, mean age 74.7 years) were included in the study. According to the Biyani classification, there were seven patients with type-1, three with type-2, five with type-3, and three with type-4 DUFs. Radiological results were analyzed in 18 patients and the clinical results could be evaluated in 10 patients who attended the necessary follow-up meetings. Ulnar angular deformity (UAD) and ulnar shortening amount (USA) were measured using anteroposterior radiographs. USA was defined as the difference in ulnar variance between just after surgery and at the final visit. Clinical results were assessed using the modified Gartland and Werley score, disability arm shoulder hand (DASH) score, range of motion, grip strength, pain, and distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability.

RESULTS

All ulna metaphyseal fractures united. The mean UAD just after surgery was 5.9° (range, 0-22). At the final visit, the mean UAD was 6.4° (range, 0-17). The mean USA was 0.35mm, and only one patient showed ulnar shortening of >2mm. The results were "excellent" in nine patients and "good" in one, according to the modified Gartland and Werley score. The mean DASH score was 4.2. Mean flexion and extension angles were 58° and 71°. One patient complained of ulnar-sided pain during exertion and no patients complained of DRUJ instability.

DISCUSSION

All DUFs achieved good radiological results, including comminuted fractures. Functional outcomes were promising, including wide wrist ROM and no DRUJ instability. An approach including VLP fixation for DRFs and non-intervention for DUFs is a good option for elderly patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV retrospective study.

Technique for Intramedullary Stabilization of Ulnar Neck Fractures

BACKGROUND

Distal ulna fractures at the ulnar neck can be seen in association with distal radius fractures, and multiple techniques have been described to address the ulnar neck component of these injuries. We have found that treatment of ulnar neck fractures can be challenging in terms of anatomy and fracture fixation. We present a new percutaneous fixation technique for ulnar neck fractures commonly seen with distal radius fractures.

TECHNIQUE

Fixation of the ulnar neck fracture is performed after fixation of the distal radius fracture. Our technique uses anterograde intramedullary fixation to stabilize the fracture with a 1.6-mm (0.062 inch) Kirschner wire or a commercially available metacarpal fixation intramedullary nail. The fixation is introduced into the intramedullary space of the ulnar shaft 4 to 6 cm proximal to the fracture at a separate surgical site along the subcutaneous border of the ulna. The fixation is also supported with a sugar-tong splint for the first few weeks after surgery and requires removal of the ulnar implant approximately 10 weeks after implantation.

CONCLUSION

Our technique utilizes a percutaneous approach with minimal fracture exposure. It provides a relatively simple and reproducible method to address ulnar neck fractures commonly seen in association with distal radial fractures.

Ulnar Neck Fractures Associated with Distal Radius Fractures

Background  There is little published data to guide management of ulnar neck fractures associated with fractures of the distal radius. Purpose  As unplanned surgery usually reflects adverse events and this injury combination is relatively uncommon, we used a large database to study the incidence of unplanned surgeries after surgical and nonsurgical treatment of distal metaphyseal ulna fractures associated with a distal radius fracture and identify factors associated with these unplanned surgeries. Patients and Methods  We identified 277 patients with an ulnar neck fracture associated with a distal radius fracture. Fifty-six (20%) ulnar neck fractures were initially treated operatively and six of them (11%) had a second, unplanned surgery. Of the 221 initially nonoperatively treated fractures, only one (0.45%) had a subsequent unplanned surgery that seemed unrelated to the fracture (ulnar nerve neurolysis). Results  Bivariate analysis showed that younger age, open fracture, multifragmentary fractures, and initial operative treatment of the ulnar neck fracture were significantly associated with unplanned surgery. A multivariable analysis was not feasible due to the small number of unplanned surgeries. Conclusion  Eighty percent of ulnar neck fractures associated with a fracture of the distal radius was treated nonoperatively in our region, and subsequent surgery for problems was very uncommon. Operative treatment and fracture complexity were associated with unplanned surgery, which reflected some measure of injury severity, technical inadequacy, and inherent problems associated with surgery. Level of Evidence  Level II, prognostic study.

[Incidence of distal ulna fractures associated with distal radius fractures: Treatment options]

Fractures of the neck and/or head of the ulna or distal ulna fracture (DUF) other than ulnar styloid fractures can occur in combination with distal radius fractures (DRF). This combination can have a significant influence on the treatment and prognosis since it causes the entire distal forearm to be unstable. In a series of 1279 consecutive unilateral DRFs, we found an associated ulnar neck fracture in 5.9% of cases, ulnar head and neck fracture in 1.6%, and isolated ulnar head fracture in 1.4%. Overall, 9% of cases in this study had a DUF with a DRF. The frequency of extra-articular "A" (11%) and intra-articular "C" (9%) DRFs according to the AO classification was about the same. There were no cases of DUF combined with partial "B" DRF. There was a correlation between combined DUF with DRF and the patient's group in the PAF classification. DUF are more frequently associated with DRF in elderly patients. Specific distal ulnar locking plates were recently introduced and they may be a useful adjunct to distal radius locking plates when treating patients with combined DUF and DRF.

Proposed Guidelines for Treatment of Concomitant Distal Radius and Distal Ulna Fractures

BACKGROUND

Concomitant distal radius and distal ulna metaphysis or head fractures (DRUF) are uncommon and acceptable results have been reported from cast immobilisation and internal fixation.

METHODS

We reviewed the charts of 1094 patients treated for distal radius fracture at our institution in a two year period from 2009 to 2010. 24 patients with concomitant DRUF with were treated by cast immobilisation (group 1, n = 11), internal fixation of both bones (group 2, n = 7), internal fixation of radius alone (group 3, n = 2), and internal fixation of radius with distal ulna resection (group 4, n = 4). Patients treated by surgery underwent intraoperative assessment of distal ulna stability to determine the indication for ulna fixation. Post surgical range of motion, clinical parameters, and functional outcome scores (Gartland-Werley and modified Mayo) were measured.

RESULTS

Wrist motion was comparable in each group. Radiographic parameters were better in surgical groups. 23 of 24 patients achieved excellent/good outcomes based on Gartland-Werley scores, while 12 of 24 achieved good modified Mayo wrist score. There was a case of distal ulna non-union in group 1, and another case of delayed distal radius union in group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

By evaluating patients' functional requirement, and dynamic fluoroscopy examination, satisfactory outcomes can be achieved for various presentations of DRUF.

Distal Ulna Fractures: A Biomechanical Comparison of Locking Versus Nonlocking Plating Constructs

OBJECTIVE

To determine the biomechanical properties of plating options for distal ulna fractures.

METHODS

Fourth-generation ulna artificial bones were osteotomized and fixed with 4 different constructs: 2 locking compression plates (a straight 2.7-mm plate and a 2.4-mm T-plate) with both nonlocking and locking screws. The artificial bones underwent nondestructive tests to determine construct stiffness in flexion/extension and lateral bending. The final testing consisted of cyclical loading in axial torsion until implant failure.

RESULTS

The straight plate fixation construct was significantly stiffer than the T-plate construct for both flexion/extension bending (P < 0.001) and radial/ulnar bending (P < 0.05). Nonlocking screws provided significantly stiffer fixation in flexion bending than locking screws (P < 0.05); however, no difference was found in extension bending. Conversely, locking screws were significantly stiffer in radial/ulnar bending than the nonlocking screws (P < 0.05). Failure under torsional cyclical loading was significantly different among constructs. The straight plate with nonlocking construct withstood the most half-cycles. The mechanisms of failure were unique to each type of fixation.

CONCLUSIONS

These results do not show any clear biomechanical advantage of locked plating for fractures of the distal ulna. The increased stiffness associated with locked plating likely contributes to earlier and more pronounced failure mechanisms under repetitive axial torsion.

Primary excision of the ulnar head for fractures of the distal ulna associated with fractures of the distal radius in severe osteoporotic patients

We performed primary excision of the ulnar head on 23 patients over 70 years of age with severe comminuted fractures of both the distal radius and ulna. The distal radius fracture was fixed rigidly with a volar locking plate, and the ulnar head was resected at the fracture site. All the distal radial fractures united without major complications. The mean wrist flexion/extension arc was 122°, the mean pronation/supination arc was 164°, and grip strength was 69% of that on the contralateral side. All patients returned to their daily activities within a short time without any additional surgical treatment. For elderly patients, primary excision of the ulnar head is an effective treatment for comminuted distal radius and ulna fractures.

LCP distal ulna plate fixation of irreducible or unstable distal ulna fractures associated with distal radius fracture

PURPOSE

The advent of locking compression plate (LCP) has provided convenient and secure fixation of distal ulna fractures. This study was performed to evaluate the functional and clinical outcomes following LCP distal ulna plate fixation of irreducible or unstable distal ulna fractures with concomitant distal radius fractures.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 17 patients who had been treated with LCP distal ulna plates for distal ulna fractures was performed. The average age of the patients was 58.9 years (range 21-87 years), and the mean follow-up period was 15 months (range 12-20 months). This study consisted of eleven fractures involving metaphysis and six ulna styloid base fractures. Fracture union, radiologic parameters, stability of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ), and functional outcomes, including ROM, grip strength, and functional scores were evaluated.

RESULTS

All patients showed bony union, the average radial height was 10.5 mm, and the ulnar variance was 0.8 mm on final radiographs. None of the patients had instability of the DRUJ compared with the opposite wrist, and the subluxation ratio was within normal range on the follow-up CT scan. There were 6 excellent and 11 good cases according to Sarmiento's modified wrist score at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Locking compression plate distal ulna plate fixation of irreducible or unstable distal ulna fractures after stabilization of concomitant distal radius fractures showed favorable results in union, alignment, and functional outcomes and therefore could be one of the recommendable implant options for distal ulna fractures.

Fixation of distal ulna fractures associated with distal radius fractures using intrafocal pin plate

Background Unstable distal ulna fractures in the setting of distal radius fractures can present a challenging problem, especially in the elderly population. Operative fixation of the subcapital distal ulna fracture may help to provide a stable ulnar buttress for attempting to reduce the distal radius fracture. Traditional fixation techniques of the distal ulna may prove unsatisfactory in the setting of osteoporosis and comminution. Description The intrafocal pin plate is placed through a small incision distally and uses the curve of the plate to obtain multiple points of fixation within the intramedullary canal. The overhang of the distal aspect of the plate helps to reduce the fracture. The plate is secured using unicortical locking screws in the ulnar head. Patients and Methods The most ideal fracture pattern for this fixation technique is a subcapital distal ulna fracture that is unstable and associated with a distal radius fracture. This technique is contraindicated in ulnar head fractures, segmental fractures with proximal extension, and open fractures with gross contamination as well as in the setting of active infection. Results This technique has provided a stable ulnar buttress and aided in the reduction of grossly unstable distal radius fractures. All of these patients have gone on to union, and we have not experienced a need for plate removal due to pain or soft tissue irritation. Conclusions We have found the intrafocal pin plate to provide both a stable ulnar buttress as well as intramedullary fixation to aid in the fixation of distal radius fractures associated with unstable distal ulna subcapital fractures.

Distal ulna fractures

In isolation, distal ulna fractures are rare. They are often found in conjunction with distal radius fractures, and the complexity of the interaction of the distal ulna with the radioulnar joint and triangular fibrocartilage complex makes understanding and treatment of distal ulna fractures challenging. Fixation of distal ulna fractures can be problematic owing to comminution making reduction challenging. A thin soft tissue can lead to hardware prominence and necessitate implant removal. In this Current Concepts article, we review the anatomy, pathology, and treatment of distal ulna fractures as well as potential complications and salvage procedures.

Management distal radius and distal ulnar fractures with fragment specific plate

This article describes the use of a new generation low profile dorsal rim plate for management of distal radius fractures from the dorsal approach. This plate was designed to maximize stability while minimizing complications from the extensor tendons. A volar ulnar plate designed to specifically stabilize fractures of the ulnar head and neck is also described.

Treatment of unstable distal ulna fractures associated with distal radius fractures in patients 65 years and older

PURPOSE

To prospectively compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of 2 treatment methods for unstable distal ulna fractures associated with distal radius fractures in patients 65 years of age and older.

METHODS

From February 2008 to March 2010, the first 29 ulnas were treated surgically (group 1) and the next 32 ulnas were treated nonoperatively (group 2). The mean final follow-up period was 34 months (range, 24-56 mo). All radiuses were fixed internally, in both groups. Clinical outcomes were compared between groups using a visual analog scale for postoperative pain; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores; active range of motion; grip strength; and the modified system of Gartland and Werley. Radiological outcomes, including ulnar variance, were evaluated. Arthrosis was evaluated at the radiocarpal joint or distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) according to the system of Knirk and Jupiter.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the groups in any of the clinical outcomes. No significant differences were observed for radiological outcomes including ulnar variance, distal radius, and union rate. There were no patients in either group with symptomatic arthritic changes in the radiocarpal joint or DRUJ at the final follow-up. In group 2, 1 patient had malunion (angulated, 14°) on the anteroposterior view without evidence of arthrosis in the DRUJ, and functional outcomes were good.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population distal ulna fractures can be successfully managed nonoperatively when they occur in combination with distal radius fractures.

Distal ulna hook plate fixation for unstable distal ulna fracture associated with distal radius fracture

The significance of distal ulna fractures is often undermined, which can result in inadequate treatment compared with fractures of the radius, the ulna's larger counterpart. However, little guidance exists in the current literature on how to manage distal ulna head or neck fractures and intra-articular ulna head fractures. Therefore, the purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the outcomes of distal ulna hook plate fixation for the treatment of an unstable distal ulna fracture associated with a distal radius fracture. Twenty-five patients with unstable distal ulna fractures who underwent stable fixation for an associated distal radius fracture were included in the study. All patients achieved satisfactory reduction and bony union. Average final motion was as follows: wrist flexion, 72° (range, 60°-85°); extension, 69° (range, 65°-80°); pronation, 77° (range, 55°-95°); supination, 82° (range, 65°-90°); ulnar deviation, 35° (range, 15°-50°); and radial deviation, 24° (range, 10°-40°). Average postoperative grip strength was 28 kg (range, 22-30 kg) and was 91% (range, 71%-100%) in the cases in which the dominant hand was injured and 80% (range, 65%-100%) in the cases in which the nondominant hand was injured. Average postoperative modified Mayo wrist score and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 87 points (range, 65-100 points) and 14 points (range, 0-54 points), respectively. Chronic instability of the distal radioulnar joint was not encountered in any patient. Thus, the study demonstrated that distal ulna hook plate fixation for the treatment of unstable distal ulna fractures can achieve healing with good alignment, satisfactory function, and minimal transient morbidity.

Intrafocal pin plate fixation of distal ulna fractures associated with distal radius fractures

Subcapital ulnar fractures in association with distal radius fractures in elderly patients increase instability and pose a treatment challenge. Fixation of the ulnar fracture with traditional implants is difficult due to the subcutaneous location, comminution, and osteoporosis. We describe an intrafocal pin plate that provides fixation by a locking plate on the distal ulna and intramedullary fixation within the shaft. The low profile and percutaneous technique make this device a useful alternative for treatment of subcapital ulna fractures in the elderly.

Remodeling of distal ulna after excision arthroplasty for acute comminuted distal ulnar fracture: a case report

Bone adaptation after excision arthroplasty of distal radioulnar joint in an acute traumatic distal ulna fracture has never been reported. A case of irreparable and comminuted distal ulnar head fracture was managed by excising the ulna head and repairing the fovea (deep ligament) attachments of distal radioulnar ligaments, and then an unexpected remodeling of the distal ulna with the shape of pole and seat was noted. The anatomy of deep fibers of distal radioulnar ligament is important not only in biomechanics about the stability of distal radioulnar joint but it is also possible in the morphology about the shape of the distal radioulnar joint.

Initial shortening and internal fixation in combination with a Sauvé-Kapandji procedure for severely comminuted fractures of the distal radius in elderly patients

We identified 11 women with a mean age of 74 years (65 to 81) who sustained comminuted distal radial and ulnar fractures and were treated by volar plating and slight shortening of the radius combined with a primary Sauvé-Kapandji procedure. At a mean of 46 months (16 to 58), union of distal radial fractures and arthrodesis of the distal radioulnar joint was seen in all patients. The mean shortening of the radius was 12 mm (5 to 18) compared to the contralateral side. Flexion and extension of the wrist was a mean of 54° and 50°, respectively, and the mean pronation and supination of the forearm was 82° and 86°, respectively. The final mean disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score was 26 points. According to the Green and O'Brien rating system, eight patients had an excellent, two a good and one a fair result. The good clinical and radiological results, and the minor complications without the need for further operations related to late ulnar-sided wrist pain, justify this procedure in the elderly patient.

[Fracture of the distal radius associated with an articular comminutive fracture of the distal ulna: treatment in emergency by osteosynthesis of the radius by volar locking plate for the radius and a resection of the distal end of the ulna: report of one case]

The authors present a case of a distal radius fracture associated with a comminutive fracture of the ulna head, treated by volar locking plate for the radius fracture and ulnar head resection. We obtain an early good objective and subjective functional result, whereas this type of fracture is classically associated with bad results in the series published with other treatments. This result needs to be confirmed by a more exhaustive series.

Acute dislocations of the distal radioulnar joint and distal ulna fractures

This article reviews acute dislocations of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) and distal ulna fractures. Acute dislocations can occur in isolation or in association with a fracture to the distal radius, radial metadiaphysis (Galeazzi fracture), or radial head (Essex-Lopresti injury). Distal ulna fractures may occur in isolation or in combination with a distal radius fracture. Both injury patterns are associated with high energy. Outcomes are predicated on anatomic reduction and restoration of the stability of the DRUJ.

The role of locking technology in the hand

Locked fixed-angle plating in the hand and wrist helps to optimize outcomes following surgical fixation of select acute fractures and complex reconstructions. Select indications include unstable distal ulna head/neck fractures, periarticular metacarpal and phalangeal fractures, comminuted/multifragmentary diaphyseal fractures with bone loss (ie, combined injuries of the hand), osteopenic/pathologic fractures, nonunions and corrective osteotomy fixation, and small joint arthrodesis. Locked plating techniques in the hand should not be seen as a panacea for wrist and digital acute trauma and delayed reconstructions. An understanding of the biomechanics of fixed-angle plating and proper technical application of locking constructs will optimize outcomes and minimize complications. As clinical experience with locking technology in hand trauma broadens, new indications and applications will emerge. Currently, several systems are available. The specific implants share common features in their protocols for insertion, but unique differences in their design (ie, individual locking mechanisms, uniaxial vs polyaxial locking capability, metallurgy, and plate profiles) must be appreciated and considered preoperatively.

Outcome following acute primary distal ulna resection for comminuted distal ulna fractures at the time of operative fixation of unstable fractures of the distal radius

Optimal acute management of the highly comminuted distal ulna head/neck fracture sustained in conjunction with an unstable distal radius fracture requiring operative fixation is not well established. The purpose of the present study was to determine the clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes following acute primary distal ulna resection for comminuted distal ulna fractures performed in conjunction with the operative fixation of unstable distal radius fractures. Between 2000 and 2007, 11 consecutive patients, mean age 62 years (range, 30-75) were treated for concomitant closed, comminuted, unstable fractures of the distal radius and ulna metaphysis. All 11 patients underwent distal ulna resection through a separate dorsal ulnar incision with ECU tenodesis following surgical fixation of the distal radius fracture. According to the Q modifier of the Comprehensive Classification of Fractures, there were six comminuted fractures of the ulnar neck (Q3) and five fractures of the head/neck (Q5). Operative fixation of the distal radius fracture included volar plate fixation in four patients and spanning external fixation with supplemental percutaneous Kirschner wires in seven patients. At a mean of 42 months (range, 18-61 months) postoperatively, clinical, radiographic, and wrist-specific functional outcome with the modified Gartland and Werley wrist score were evaluated. At latest follow-up, mean wrist range of motion measured 53 degrees flexion (range, 35-60 degrees), 52 degrees extension (range, 30-60 degrees), 81 degrees pronation (range, 75-85 degrees), and 77 degrees supination (range, 70-85 degrees). Mean grip strength measured 90% of the contralateral, uninjured extremity (range, 50-133%). No patient had distal ulna instability. Final radiographic assessment demonstrated restoration of distal radius articular alignment. According to the system of Gartland and Werley as modified by Sarmiento, there were seven excellent and four good results. No patient has required a secondary surgical procedure. Acute primary distal ulna resection yields satisfactory clinical, radiographic, and functional results in appropriately selected patients and represents a reliable alternative to open reduction and internal fixation when anatomic restoration of the distal ulna/sigmoid notch cannot be achieved. Primary distal ulna resection with distal radius fracture fixation may help avoid secondary procedures related to distal ulna fixation or symptomatic post-traumatic distal radioulnar joint arthrosis.

Intra-articular distal ulnar fractures associated with distal radial fractures in older adults: early experience in fixation of the radius and leaving the ulna unfixed

There is no clear consensus about the best management of intra-articular distal ulnar fractures associated with distal radial fractures in older adults. We describe a treatment wherein the distal radial fractures were securely fixed with a palmar plate, leaving the associated ulnar fractures unfixed. The wrists of 14 patients with a mean age of 74 years were reviewed at an average of 18 months after surgery. The results were excellent in 11 cases and good in three, according to the modified Gartland and Werley score. All fracture sites displayed union, and there was no instability of the distal radioulnar joint. A widening of the distal radioulnar joint space was present in one wrist. Angular deformity of the distal ulnar metaphysis was seen in five wrists. This treatment could be an alternative to open reduction with internal fixation for intra-articular distal ulnar fractures in older adults.

The management of distal ulnar fractures in adults: a review of the literature and recommendations for treatment

The distal ulna represents the fixed point around which the radius and the hand acts in daily living. The significance of distal ulnar fractures is often not appreciated and often results in inadequate treatment in comparison to its larger counterpart; the radius. There is little guidance in the current literature as how to manage these fractures and their associated injuries. This paper aims to critically review the current literature and combine it with treatment suggestions based on the experience of the authors to help guide investigation and management of these often complex injuries.

Plate fixation of osteoporotic fractures of the distal radius

Fractures of the distal radius in patients with osteoporosis constitute a unique challenge for the surgeon. They are by nature most commonly seen in the elderly population. Our understanding of the age, physiology, and functionality of the elderly has evolved considerably over the last two decades. Often these fractures simply affect a patient's already-compromised functional status. However, in active elderly adults they can also substantially reduce the functionality, and this can have a significant impact on their ability to care for themselves, pursue avocational activities, or both. In carefully selected patients, even in the face of osteoporosis, plate fixation of these fractures has satisfying outcomes for both the patient and the surgeon and must be considered part of a surgeon's armamentarium in the contemporary treatment of osteoporotic fractures of the distal radius.

Distal forearm fracture in the adult: is ORIF of the radius and closed reduction of the ulna a treatment option in distal forearm fracture?

INTRODUCTION

Distal forearm fractures in younger adults are rare injuries resulting from high energy trauma. Treatment options vary from cast fixation, external fixator, percutaneus pinning and open reduction and internal fixation.

METHOD

We retrospectively reviewed 13 patients aged 18-59 from 1996 to 2005 with a distal unstable forearm fracture. All were treated with open reduction and internal fixation of the radius. The ulna was stabilized either by an open reduction and internal fixation or by a closed reduction with or without pin fixation and cast fixation in all cases. At follow-up, we evaluated the radiologic results in terms of forearm fracture retention and functional outcome according to the wrist score by Krimmer.

RESULT

Radial inclination amounted to 24 degrees at the injured side when compared to 27 degrees at the non-injured side, palmar tilt was 3 degrees versus 7 degrees and ulna variance was -2 versus -1 mm. According to the modified wrist score by Krimmer, seven excellent, two good and four fair results were achieved. The range of motion of the injured wrist joint was 149 degrees of rotation, in the sagittal plane 106 degrees , frontal plane 61 degrees and on the non-injured side rotation was 171 degrees , and movement in the sagittal plane was 146 degrees and 79 degrees in the frontal plane. Decreased forearm rotation (107 degrees vs. 162 degrees ) and decreased range of motion in the sagittal plane (77 degrees vs. 114 degrees ) were measured in patient following open reduction and internal fixation of radius and ulna compared to the outcome in patients with open reduction and internal fixation of the radius and closed reduction of the ulna. Grip strength of the injured side averaged 350 N versus 440 N which is 76% of that of the opposite side. All patients stated no pain at rest and some experienced slight pain at work. Three patients had an excellent performance at daily activities, nine patients presented problems with certain activities, and one patient showed severe limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

Open reduction and internal fixation of the radius is the keystone in treating distal forearm fracture. In case of stable retention of the ulnar head after closed reduction, cast fixation with or without percutaneus pin fixation is a sufficient method to treat unstable distal forearm fractures. In patients with remaining instability of the distal ulna fracture, ORIF is indicated.

Resection of comminuted ulna head fragments with soft tissue reconstruction when associated with distal radius fractures

Acute management of fractures involving the head and neck of the distal ulna associated with comminuted unstable fractures of the distal radius remains difficult and controversial. Fifteen consecutive such cases treated with combined external and internal fixation together with primary resection of comminuted distal ulna fracture fragments and reconstruction of the periosteal sleeve and triangular fibrocartilaginous complex are reviewed. At an average follow-up of 5.8 years, all patients were assessed for range of motion, strength, pain and function, and radiographic appearance. All had a range of motion postoperatively of at least 85% of the opposite wrist in all planes. Average grip strength was 88.6% of the contralateral wrist. Radiographic evaluation demonstrated no evidence of instability in any plane. There were no cases of subluxation of the distal ulna nor collapse of the ulnar side of the carpus. Those 7 patients studied arthrographically demonstrated an intact "water-tight" ulna-sided soft tissue sling, and all distal radius fractures healed primarily.

Open reduction and internal locked fixation of unstable distal ulna fractures with concomitant distal radius fracture

PURPOSE

To evaluate the results following locking plate fixation of unstable distal ulna fractures with concomitant distal radius fracture.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted to identify patients who had been treated with a locking plate for unstable displaced fractures of the distal ulna in which a concomitant ipsilateral distal radius fracture was also treated operatively. Medical records and radiographs were reviewed, and 5 patients were identified with an average age of 52 years (range, 47-61 years) and with follow-up averaging 11.6 months (range, 6-17 months). There were 2 open and 3 closed fractures. Included was 1 simple neck, 1 comminuted neck, 1 head, and 2 head and neck fractures of the distal ulna. All distal radius fracture implants were locked volar plates.

RESULTS

All distal ulna and distal radius fractures united, and the average motion was: flexion 59 degrees ; extension 59 degrees ; pronation 67 degrees ; and supination 72 degrees . Average grip strength was 97% of the opposite extremity. Final ulnar variance averaged -0.4 mm (ulnar negative), radial inclination was 20 degrees , and volar tilt was 8 degrees . All distal radioulnar joints were stable. Two patients had mild, transient paresthesias of the dorsal sensory branch of the ulnar nerve, and both patients recovered completely within 3 months. There were no subsequent surgeries or hardware failures. There were no infections and no wound problems. Based upon the Sarmiento modification of the Gartland and Werley rating score, there were 4 excellent results and 1 good result.

CONCLUSIONS

Locked plating of unstable distal ulna fractures, in the setting of an associated distal radius fracture, resulted in union, good to excellent alignment and motion, nearly symmetric grip strength, and minimal transient morbidity.