1
|
Kodali NA, Janarthanan R, Sazoglu B, Demir Z, Dirican O, Zor F, Kulahci Y, Gorantla VS. A World Update of Progress in Lower Extremity Transplantation: What's Hot and What's Not. Ann Plast Surg 2024; 93:107-114. [PMID: 38885168 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000004035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT The field of vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) is the new frontier of solid organ transplantation (SOT). VCA spans life-enhancing/life-changing procedures such as upper extremity, craniofacial (including eye), laryngeal, tracheal, abdominal wall, penis, and lower extremity transplants. VCAs such as uterus transplants are life giving unlike any other SOT. Of all VCAs that have shown successful intermediate- to long-term graft survival with functional and immunologic outcomes, lower extremity VCAs have remained largely underexplored. Lower extremity transplantation (LET) can offer patients with improved function compared to the use of conventional prostheses, reducing concerns of phantom limb pain and stump complications, and offer an option for eligible amputees that either fail prosthetic rehabilitation or do not adapt to prosthetics. Nevertheless, these benefits must be carefully weighed against the risks of VCA, which are not trivial, including the adverse effects of lifelong immunosuppression, extremely challenging perioperative care, and delayed nerve regeneration. There have been 5 lower extremity transplants to date, ranging from unilateral or bilateral to quadrimembral, progressively increasing in risk that resulted in fatalities in 3 of the 5 cases, emphasizing the inherent risks. The advantages of LET over prosthetics must be carefully weighed, demanding rigorous candidate selection for optimal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naga Anvesh Kodali
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC
| | - Ramu Janarthanan
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, India
| | - Bedreddin Sazoglu
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC
| | - Zeynep Demir
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC
| | - Omer Dirican
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC
| | - Fatih Zor
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Yalcin Kulahci
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC
| | - Vijay S Gorantla
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huelsboemer L, Boroumand S, Kochen A, Dony A, Moscarelli J, Hauc SC, Stögner VA, Formica RN, Pomahac B, Kauke-Navarro M. Immunosuppressive strategies in face and hand transplantation: a comprehensive systematic review of current therapy regimens and outcomes. FRONTIERS IN TRANSPLANTATION 2024; 3:1366243. [PMID: 38993787 PMCID: PMC11235358 DOI: 10.3389/frtra.2024.1366243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
Background Recipients of Vascularized Composite Allotransplants require effective immunosuppressive therapy to prevent graft rejection. This systematic review summarizes the current body of literature on immunosuppressive regimens used in face and hand transplants while summarizing their outcome in terms of rejection, renal failure, and infections. Methods A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted to identify relevant studies from 1998 until July 1st, 2023. We included all studies that discussed immunosuppressive strategies in face and hand transplant recipients according to PRISMA. Results The standard triple maintenance therapy was mostly adjusted due to nephrotoxicity or high incidence of rejection. The most common alternative treatments utilized were sirolimus (25/91; 27.5%) or everolimus (9/91; 9.9%) following hand- and photophoresis (7/45; 15.6%), sirolimus (5/45; 11.1%) or belatacept (1/45; 2.2%) following face transplantation. Episodes of rejection were reported in 60 (65.9%) of hand- and 33 (73%) of face transplant patients respectively. Graft loss of 12 (13.2%) hand and 4 (8.9%) face transplants was reported. Clinical CMV infection was observed in 6 (6.6%) hand and 7 (15.5%) face transplant recipients. Conclusions Based on the herein presented data, facial grafts exhibited a heightened incidence of rejection episodes and CMV infections. Facial mucosa adds complexity to the immunological graft composition highlighting the need of individualized immunosuppressive regimens and further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lioba Huelsboemer
- Division of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Sam Boroumand
- Division of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Alejandro Kochen
- Division of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
- Regenerative Wound Healing Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Alna Dony
- Division of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
- School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Jake Moscarelli
- Division of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Sacha C Hauc
- Division of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Viola A Stögner
- Division of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Richard N Formica
- Department of Medicine, Section of Nephrology and Transplantation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Bohdan Pomahac
- Division of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Martin Kauke-Navarro
- Division of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maxillary and Mandibular Healing After Facial Allotransplantation. J Craniofac Surg 2022; 33:2427-2432. [PMID: 36409868 DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000008831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Facial transplantation has emerged as a viable option in treating devastating facial injuries.Despite the high healing rate of Le Fort III and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies (BSSO) in nontransplant patients, few studies have reported assessment of maxillary and mandibular healing in face transplant patients compared with nontransplant patients. The aim of this study was to examine differences in bone healing in our patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective chart review was conducted of facial allotransplantation patients at the Cleveland Clinic from December 2008 to inception. Demographics such as age, date of birth, and sex were recorded. Additional variables included procedures, revisions, reoperations, medications, and bone stability and healing. Computed tomography (CT) images assessed the alignment of skeletal components, bony union quality, and stability of fixation. RESULTS Three patients were included: 2 had Le Fort III segment transplantation, and 1 had transplantation of both a Le Fort III segment and mandibular BSSO. The Le Fort III segment in all patients exhibited mobility and fibrous union at the Le Fort III osteotomy on CT. In contrast, the BSSO healed uneventfully after transplantation and revision surgery, with bony union confirmed by both CT and histology of the fixation area between the donor and recipient mandible bilaterally. No patients with midfacial fibrous union required revision of the nonunion as they were clinically asymptomatic. CONCLUSION Le Fort osteotomy demonstrates inferior healing in facial transplantation compared with the nontransplant population. In contrast, the successful healing in the mandible is likely owing to the high density of rich cancellous bone.
Collapse
|
4
|
Wells MW, Rampazzo A, Papay F, Gharb BB. Two Decades of Hand Transplantation: A Systematic Review of Outcomes. Ann Plast Surg 2022; 88:335-344. [PMID: 35113506 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000003056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Hand transplantation for upper extremity amputation provides a unique treatment that restores form and function, which may not be achieved by traditional reconstruction and prosthetics. However, despite enhancing quality of life, hand transplantation remains controversial, because of immunological complications, transplant rejection, and medication effects. This systematic literature review sought to collect information on current experiences and outcomes of hand transplants to determine the efficacy and utility of hand transplants. The databases PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were analyzed with combinations of "hand" or "upper extremity" or "arm" and "transplant" or "allograft," with information collected on recipient characteristics, details of transplant, immunological outcomes, functional outcomes, and complications. Functional outcomes, as measured by Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, were compared between patient groups using Wilcoxon signed-rank test or 1-way analysis of variance test and post hoc Tukey test. Within the 108 articles that fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria, there were 96 patients with 148 hand transplants. There were 57 patients who experienced acute rejection and 5 patients with chronic rejection. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores significantly decreased after hand transplantation and were significantly lower for distal transplants compared with proximal transplants. There were 3 patients with concurrent face transplantation and 2 patients with simultaneous leg transplants. Sixteen patients experienced amputation of the hand transplant, and there were 5 deaths. This study found that hand transplantation provides significant restoration of function and form, especially for proximal transplants. Reduction in complications, such as rejection and amputation, can be achieved by decreasing medication cost and patient education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael W Wells
- From the Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine
| | | | - Francis Papay
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Heineman J, Bueno EM, Kiwanuka H, Carty MJ, Sampson CE, Pribaz JJ, Pomahac B, Talbot SG. All hands on deck: Hand replantation versus transplantation. SAGE Open Med 2020; 8:2050312120926351. [PMID: 32537157 PMCID: PMC7268554 DOI: 10.1177/2050312120926351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Our hands play a remarkable role in our activities of daily living and the
make-up of our identities. In the United States, an estimated 41,000
individuals live with upper limb loss. Our expanding experience in limb
transplantation—including operative techniques, rehabilitation, and expected
outcomes—has often been based on our past experience with replantation.
Here, we undertake a systematic review of replantation with transplantation
in an attempt to better understand the determinants of outcome for each and
to provide a summary of the data to this point. Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
guidelines, we conducted PubMed searches from 1964 to 2013 for articles in
English. In total, 53 primary and secondary source articles were found to
involve surgical repair (either replantation or transplantation) for
complete amputations at the wrist and forearm levels. All were read and
analyzed. Results: Hand replantations and transplantations were compared with respect to
pre-operative considerations, surgical techniques, post-operative
considerations and outcomes, including motor, sensation, cosmesis, patient
satisfaction/quality of life, adverse events/side effects, financial costs,
and overall function. While comparison of data is limited by heterogeneity,
these data support our belief that good outcomes depend on patient
expectations and commitment. Conclusion: When possible, hand replantation remains the primary option after acute
amputation. However, when replantation fails or is not possible, hand
transplantation appears to provide at least equal outcomes. Patient
commitment, realistic expectations, and physician competence must coincide
to achieve the best possible outcomes for both hand replantation and
transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Heineman
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ericka M Bueno
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Harriet Kiwanuka
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew J Carty
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christian E Sampson
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Julian J Pribaz
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bohdan Pomahac
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Simon G Talbot
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Is Lower Extremity Transplantation a Superior Alternative to Prostheses? No—At Least Not Yet. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-018-0217-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
7
|
World experience after more than a decade of clinical hand transplantation: update on the Polish program. Hand Clin 2011; 27:433-42, viii. [PMID: 22051385 DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2011.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
It has been demonstrated over the past decade that the generally achieved functional outcomes of patients after hand transplantation (HTx) are better than those of equivalent replantations. However, HTx should be performed in specialized centers with Institutional Review Board-approved transplantation programs. In Poland such requirements are fulfilled by The Subdepartment of Replantation of Limbs of St. Jadwiga Hospital in Trzebnica. A main emphasis of this subdepartment is to make the very involved process of donor recruitment, recipient screening, surgery, and postoperative treatment fully transparent. This article summarizes the experience of this center with HTx over the past 5 years.
Collapse
|
8
|
Hautz T, Engelhardt TO, Weissenbacher A, Kumnig M, Zelger B, Rieger M, Rumpold G, Pierer G, Ninkovic M, Gabl M, Piza-Katzer H, Pratschke J, Margreiter R, Brandacher G, Schneeberger S. World experience after more than a decade of clinical hand transplantation: update on the Innsbruck program. Hand Clin 2011; 27:423-31, viii. [PMID: 22051384 DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2011.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Patients who have lost a hand or upper extremity face many challenges in everyday life. For some patients, reconstructive hand transplantation represents a reasonable option for anatomic reconstruction, restoring prehensile function with sensation and allowing them to regain daily living independence. The first clinical case of bilateral hand transplantation at University Hospital Innsbruck was realized on March 17th, 2000. A decade later, a total of 7 hands and forearms were transplanted in 4 patients. This article review the clinical courses of 3 bilateral hand transplant recipients and highlights psychological aspects on reconstructive hand transplantation with special regard to unilateral/bilateral transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Hautz
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Knobloch K, Rennekampff HO, Meyer-Marcotty M, Gohritz A, Vogt PM. [Organ transplantation, composite tissue allotransplantation, and plastic surgery]. Chirurg 2009; 80:519-26. [PMID: 19214462 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-008-1668-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Transplantations play an increasing role for plastic reconstructive surgeons. The increasing number of solid organ transplantations and the improved long-term survival rates lead to increased numbers of these patients also undergoing plastic and reconstructive procedures. Free flap transfer in solid organ transplant patients is feasible with no higher risk to both transplant function and postoperative complications than for nontransplant patients, even during immune suppression. Composite tissue allotransplantation (CTA) is an evolving field in plastic reconstructive surgery with hands, arms, partial faces, abdominal walls, and knee joints being transferred in clinical settings. However only an interdisciplinary approach using all available resources in highly selected patients after exhausting all other plastic reconstructive procedures is able to achieve reasonable results. The potential complications of long-term immune suppression and patient compliance have to be balanced with the expected and achieved functional result of CTA, whose procedures must be discussed as a potential tissue or organ transplantation, given the legal and logistic implications. The interdisciplinary cooperation of transplant surgeons, microsurgeons, psychologists, and ergo- and physiotherapists is mandatory to achieve successful CTA results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Knobloch
- Plastische, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625 Hannover, Deutschland.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Diefenbeck M, Wagner F, Kirschner MH, Nerlich A, Mückley T, Hofmann GO. Outcome of allogeneic vascularized knee transplants. Transpl Int 2007; 20:410-8. [PMID: 17274795 DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2007.00453.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Transplantation of vascularized knee joints is a novel approach in Composite Tissue Allotransplantation (CTA). In 1996 our group started a clinical knee transplantation project and six transplantations have been performed since. Key problems identified early were the monitoring of acute rejection and choice of an immunosuppressive regime. One graft was lost due to postoperative infection and one due to of noncompliance where the patient discontinued the immunosuppressant regime. In three cases late rejection lead to necrosis and graft dysfunction after 15, 16 and 24 months, respectively. Exit-strategies were arthrodesis in one patient and Above Knee Amputation in two cases. With retrospective analysis after initial five cases the treatment protocol was improved. The immunosuppressive drug regime was altered, femoral diaphysis and knee joint grafting was combined and a vascularized block of donor skin and subcutaneous tissue was harvested with the graft (sentinel skin graft). The sentinel skin graft enabled us to monitor acute rejection by clinical and histological examination and avoid late rejection by rapid treatment with high dose steroids. In summary, over a four-year period, one of six allogeneic vascularized knee transplants has survived, one was lost from a surgical site infection, one by noncompliance and three by late rejection. Analysis of our data leads us to suggest that knee transplantation should be limited to a combined injury consisting of extensive loss of cartilage and bone, deficient extensor mechanism and soft tissue and skin defects without any signs of infection. Transplantation should only be taken into consideration as last option before Above Knee Amputation in an otherwise healthy patient under 35 years of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Diefenbeck
- Berufsgenossenschaftliche Kliniken Bergmannstrost, Klinik für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Halle/Saale, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|