Painful foot neuromas after toe-to-thumb transfer

Reconstruction of the traumatized thumb

BACKGROUND

The goals of thumb reconstruction include the restoration of thumb length, strength, position, stability, mobility, sensibility, and aesthetics. It is a rare event when all of these objectives can be achieved, and prioritization should be based on the goals and functional demands of the patient.

METHODS

In this article, the authors review the most common reconstructive strategies for all types of traumatic thumb defects.

RESULTS

Replantation is approached first as the primary option for most amputations. Nonreplantable injuries are organized using a simple classification adapted from Lister, dividing thumb amputations into four functional categories: soft-tissue deficit with acceptable length, subtotal amputation with borderline length, total amputation with preservation of the carpometacarpal joint, and total amputation with destruction of the carpometacarpal joint. Within each category, relevant microsurgical and nonmicrosurgical reconstructive techniques are discussed, with a focus on appropriate technique selection for a given patient. Evidence and outcomes data are reviewed where available, and case examples from our own experience are provided.

CONCLUSIONS

Given that available options now range from simple gauze dressings to complex microsurgical reconstruction, preservation of reconstructive flexibility is essential and should be facilitated by judicious preservation of intact structures. The divergence of available reconstructive pathways underscores the importance of knowing one's patients, understanding their motivation, and assessing their goals. Only in properly matching the right reconstruction with the right patient will a mutually satisfactory result be achieved.

Salvage of sensation in a hallux-to-thumb transfer by nerve tube reconstruction

We report a patient in whom, at 3 years after successful reconstruction of a right avulsed thumb with a microvascular hallux transfer, the insensate transfer had sensibility restored. The radial sensory and both volar digital nerves of the thumb were reconstructed using 2.3-mm-diameter bioabsorbable neural conduits. At 30 months after reconstruction, static 2-point discrimination of the hallux was 4 mm at 14.7 g/mm(2) in this now 42-year-old right-handed man. The cutaneous pressure threshold for 1-point static touch was 0.7 g/mm(2). There were no painful neuromas at the nerve reconstruction sites.

Reconstruction of the distal radius facet by a free vascularized osteochondral autograft: anatomic study and report of a patient

PURPOSE

Large chondral defects of the distal radius after fractures present a reconstructive challenge. The purpose of this study was to present the anatomic findings from a cadaver of a vascularized osteochondral autograft taken from the third metatarsal appropriate for reconstructing the distal radius articular facet. A patient is presented in whom 70% of the scaphoid fossa was reconstructed with this technique.

METHODS

The base of the third metatarsal was studied in the feet of 20 cadavers. The size and shape of the cartilage were measured. Additionally vessel distribution was recorded and the diameters of vascular foramina were measured with Juch's method.

RESULTS

The base of the third metatarsal is pear shaped and is wider dorsally than plantarly. It averages 19.2 mm long on its main axis. Its cartilaginous surface is minimally concave or flat and it is slanted slightly proximal-dorsal to distal-plantar and proximal-peroneal to distal-tibial. Nutrient foramina were found in every case in the dorsum and on both sides of the proximal shaft. At least 1 nutrient vessel could be tracked back to the dorsalis pedis in every dissected specimen.

CONCLUSIONS

The anatomic features of the base of the third metatarsal make it a potential vascularized autograft to consider for osteochondral defects of the distal radius.