Fractures of the distal radius treated with a nonbridging external fixation technique using multiplanar k-wires

Treatment options in extra-articular distal radius fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This systematic literature review aimed to make a detailed overview on the clinical and functional outcomes and to get insight into the possible superiority of a treatment method for extra-articular distal radius fractures.

METHODS

Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for studies describing treatment results. Five treatment modalities were compared: plaster cast immobilization, K-wire fixation, volar plating, external fixation, and intramedullary fixation.

RESULTS

Out of 7,054 screened studies, 109 were included in the analysis. Overall complication rate ranged from 9% after plaster cast treatment to 18.5% after K-wire fixation. For radiographic outcomes, only volar tilt in the plaster cast group was lower than in the other groups. Apart from better grip strength after volar plating, no clear functional differences were found across treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Current literature does not provide uniform evidence to prove superiority of a particular treatment method when looking at complications, re-interventions, and long-term functional outcomes.

The Effect of a PEEK Material-Based External Fixator in the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures with Non-Transarticular External Fixation

Objective

To explore the effect of a PEEK material‐based external fixator in the treatment of distal radius fractures with non‐transarticular external fixation.

Methods

There were 48 patients in this prospective comparative study. They were divided into two groups according to the materials used: the PEEK group and the titanium group. Wrist dorsiflexion, palmar flexion, pronation, supination, radial deviation, ulnar deviation, grip strength of the palm on the affected side, kneading force, Visual Analogue Scale/Score (VAS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, operation time, frequency of fluoroscopy procedures, and X‐ray results were compared between the two groups. Functional recovery was evaluated at the last follow‐up according to the wrist joint evaluation criteria.

Results

The baseline data were comparable between the two groups, and no significant differences were found in age, sex, fracture types (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the results of DASH, grip strength, and recovery of pinch force and wrist function (dorsiflexion, clavicle, ulnar deviation, deviation, pronation, and supination) (P > 0.05). Normal limb function was achieved in the two groups of patients at an average of 6 weeks after surgery, and there was no significant difference in X‐ray examination radial height (10.60 ± 1.59 vs 11.00 ± 1.53, P = 0.687), radial inclination (1.11 ± 0.24 vs 1.12 ± 0.24, P = 0.798), volar tilt (10.33 ± 2.13 vs 10.00 ± 2.08, P = 0.660), ulnar variance (20.87 ± 3.00 vs 20.38 ± 3.04, P = 0.748), and step‐off persistence (1.73 ± 0.69 vs 1.68 ± 0.72, P = 0.425) between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, the operation time (54.80 ± 12.20 vs 85.23 ± 15.14, P = 0.033) and number of fluoroscopy procedures (36.93 ± 6.89 vs 64.77 ± 9.74, P = 0.000) in the PEEK group were significantly reduced compared with those in the titanium group.

Conclusion

Compared with the traditional titanium external fixator, the PEEK composite external fixator has advantages, such as a shorter operation time and fewer fluoroscopy procedures when used to treat different types of distal radius fracture.

Safe zone of pin insertion for nonbridging external fixators in distal radial fractures: MRI analysis

BACKGROUND

Of the anatomical reduction and fixation methods used to treat distal radius fracture, non-bridging external fixation has the advantage of enabling early wrist motion. The surgical technique relies on successful placement of the pin in individual fracture fragments. The present study aimed to identify the safe zone of pin insertion for a non-bridging external fixator into the distal radius that avoids metal impingement of extensor tendons.

METHODS

The width and length of the septal attachments of the extensor retinaculum were measured on axial MR images of 62 wrists.

RESULTS

The 2-3 septum was the widest and longest, with a width of 2-7 mm and a location 0-36 mm proximal to the wrist joint. The width of the 1-2 septum was 2-6 mm, and was widest at 10 mm proximal to the joint. The 1-2 septum was triangular-shaped, while the 2-3 septum was oval-shaped. The 3-4 and 4-5 septa had narrow attachments and were adequate for pin insertion (with a pin 1-2 mm in width) at a position less than 8 mm proximal to the wrist. The width of the 1 R septum (radial to the 1st septum) was 2-6 mm at the radiovolar aspect of the wrist.

CONCLUSIONS

There were two safe pin insertion sites; the first was safe at the distal aspect only (8-10 mm proximal to the wrist) and included the 1-2, 3-4, and 4-5 septa, while the second was safe from 0 mm to 32-38 mm proximal to the wrist and included the 1 R and the 2-3 septa. The 1 R septum had adequate size for use as a new pin insertion site that aligns in the internervous plane and has minimal risk of superficial radial nerve injury.

Strain as a Function of Time in Extrinsic Wrist Ligaments Tensioned Through External Fixation

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to determine the time-dependent dissipation of extrinsic wrist ligament tension following the application external fixation with axial distraction of the wrist in a cadaveric model.

METHODS

Six paired fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens underwent mechanical testing simulating external fixation with 1 arm of each pair osteotomized to simulate a distal radius fracture. The change in tension was then recorded over 24 hours.

RESULTS

The rate of stress relaxation decreased with time. The average loss in tension in the control arms and osteotomized arms was 55% and 59%, respectively, over a 24-hour period. There was no statistically significant difference in the stress relaxation behavior between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

This study further supports the recommendation that comminuted distal radius fractures treated with an external fixator should have Kirschner wire augmentation or other additional means of fixation to help maintain fracture length and alignment. The results of this study call in to question the efficacy of ligamentotaxis alone through external fixation as the sole means of maintaining reduction of displaced, unstable distal radius fractures.

Non-bridging external fixation employing multiplanar K-wires versus volar locked plating for dorsally displaced fractures of the distal radius

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare non-bridging external fixation to palmar angular stable plating with respect to radiological outcome, wrist function, and quality of life.

METHODS

One hundred and two consecutive patients (mean age: 63 years) were enrolled in the study. Fifty-two patients were randomized for plate osteosynthesis (2.4 mm, Synthes), 50 patients received non-bridging external fixation (AO small fixator). Objective (range of motion, grip strength), patient rated outcomes (quality of life, pain), and radiological outcome were assessed 8 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

Loss of radial length of more than 3 mm was not detected in any group. Volar tilt was better restored by external fixation (7.2°) than by volar plating (0.1°). Wrist function was good in both groups. The external fixator was tolerated very well, and the quality of life assessment revealed comparable results in both groups. Osteoporosis was found in 54 % of patients and had no influence on radiological and functional outcome.

CONCLUSION

Non-bridging external fixation employing multiplanar K-wires is a suitable treatment option in intra- and extra-articular fractures of the distal radius even in osteoporotic bone.

Management of distal radius fractures from the North American perspective

In North America, the rate of nonoperative management of displaced distal radius fractures has declined as the rate of internal fixation has increased. Volar locking plate fixation has increased in popularity despite a lack of supportive level 1 evidence. Issues of cost-effectiveness are relevant because there is no best-practice treatment at this stage. Clinicians should be aware of the goals of treatment and challenges, particularly in managing elderly patients with distal radius fractures. Large, randomized controlled trials or meta-analyses may provide answers about when operative intervention is favored over nonoperative management and which operative intervention provides the best outcomes.

Evaluation of the safe zone for percutaneous Kirschner-wire placement in the distal radius: Cadaveric study

Distal radius fractures are a common injury that is often reduced with percutaneous K-wires. The sensory nerves in this area are at risk of injuring from pin placement. Cadaveric studies of the nerve distribution patterns have elucidated certain safe zones for pin placement that limits the risk of sensory nerve injury. These studies have advocated a limited open technique that involves a shallow incision followed by blunt dissection to the bone before a k-wire is drilled into the radius. A previously identified safe zone in the anatomical snuffbox was evaluated in 40 cadaver wrists for k-wire placement via a percutaneous technique that involves putting the pin directly through the skin without an incision or blunt dissection. After k-wire placement each wrist was dissected and sensory nerve distribution relative to the pin placement was evaluated. The variability of the distribution of the sensory nerves, namely the lateral antebracheal cutaneous nerve and the superficial branch of the radial nerve, is such that no truly safe zone exists for pin placement with the percutaneous technique in this area.

Nonbridging external fixation of distal radius fractures

Surgical management of distal radius fractures continues to evolve because of their high incidence in an increasingly active elderly population. Traditional radiocarpal external fixation relies on ligamentotaxis for fracture reduction but has several drawbacks. Nonbridging external fixation has evolved to provide early wrist mobility in the setting of anatomic fracture reduction. Several studies of the nonbridging technique have demonstrated satisfactory results in isolated nonbridging external fixation series and in comparison with traditional spanning external fixation. Nonbridging external fixation for surgical treatment of distal radius fractures can be technically demanding and requires at least 1 cm of intact volar cortex in the distal fracture fragment for successful implementation.

Intramedullary fixation of distal radius fractures

Intramedullary fixation is the latest in a variety of techniques that have been developed to manage distal radius fractures. Intramedullary nailing of these fractures combines the soft-tissue advantages of a less invasive surgical approach with the biomechanical advantages of locking screw technology. These features may enable an accelerated postoperative rehabilitation and quicker return to function. Disadvantages associated with the intramedullary technique include the necessity of a closed or percutaneous reduction and the inability of the implant to adequately stabilize intraarticular or highly comminuted fractures. Consequently, intramedullary implants are primarily indicated for fixation of extra-articular or simple intraarticular split patterns and should not be employed for management of volar or dorsal shear fractures. Preliminary clinical data is emerging in the form of short-term follow-up studies with limited numbers of study participants.

Treatment of unstable distal radius fractures with Ilizarov circular, nonbridging external fixator

Unstable distal radius fractures remain a challenge for the treating orthopaedic surgeon. We present a retrospective follow-up study (mean follow-up 12.5 months) of 20 patients with 21 unstable distal radius fractures that were reduced in a closed manner and stabilized with a nonbridging Ilizarov external fixator. Subsequent insertion of olive wires for interfragmentary compression was performed in cases with intra-articular fractures. According to the overall evaluation proposed by Gartland and Werley scoring system 12 wrists were classified as excellent, 6 as good, 2 as fair and 1 as poor. Grade II pin-tract infection in distal fracture fragment was detected in 3 wires from a total of 78 (3.8%) and in 4 half pins out of a total of 9 (44.4%). Pronation was the most frequently impaired movement. This was restricted in 4 patients (19%) in whom a radioulnar transfixing wire was applied. Symptoms of irritation of superficial sensory branch of the radial nerve occurred in 3 patients with an olive wire applied in a closed manner in the distal fragment. Ilizarov method yields functional results comparable to that of other methods whilst it avoids wrist immobilization, open reduction and reoperation for implant removal. The method is associated with a low rate of major complication and satisfactory functional outcome.

A novel non-bridging external fixator construct versus volar angular stable plating for the fixation of intra-articular fractures of the distal radius--a biomechanical study

Non-bridging external fixation has recently been introduced as an alternative to volar angular stable plating for the fixation of unstable intra-articular distal radial fractures. The purpose of this study was to biomechanically compare a new non-bridging external fixator construct to volar angular stable plate fixation in a dorsally comminuted intra-articular fracture model of the distal radius.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five pairs of fresh frozen human cadaveric radii were randomly supplied with either a non-bridging external fixator or a stainless steel volar locking plate. A three-fragmental AO 23-C2.1 fracture was created by removing a 15 degrees dorsal wedge with remaining volar cortical contact and by an intra-articular osteotomy lateral to the lister-tubercle. Physiological load transfer via the wrist was simulated by means of a custom-made seesaw. For biomechanical testing, the bones were loaded in cyclic axial compression. Starting at 100N, the load was monotonically increased at 0.025 degrees N per cycle until failure of the construct. Motion of the lunate and scaphoid fragments with respect to the radial diaphysis was acquired by optical three-dimensional (3D) motion tracking. Plastic wedge deformation was determined after 2000, 4000 and 6000 cycles.

RESULTS

The amplitude of wedge motion at the beginning of the test as a measure for construct stiffness was significantly lower for the fixator group (P=0.003, power=0.99). Plastic wedge deformation after 2000, 4000 and 6000 cycles was found significantly lower for the external fixator (repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), P=0.009, power=0.86). Displacement of the intra-articular gap was found below 0.6mm (mean) for both groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The study revealed superior biomechanical properties of the proposed non-bridging external fixation compared to volar locked plating in an unstable intra-articular fracture model with volar cortical support. However, both fixation techniques seem to apply sufficient stabilisation to restore and retain anatomy after fracture of the most distal part of the radius and should be individually chosen according to distinct criteria.

Plating for distal radius fractures

No area of fracture management has had such a recent explosion of new treatment modalities as distal radius plating. This explosion has largely been implant- and industry-driven, with little evidence-based research guiding the way. A perceived difficulty with commonly used modalities by the orthopedic community has been enough to drive an entire new set of options for distal radius fixation. A drift from dorsal to volar plating has occurred that has been unexamined by randomized research. Segment specific fixation has been a new mindset that has resulted in a novel plate line and has caused other manufacturers to redesign their product lines. Other novel approaches for proposed problems include locking plates, nail-plate combinations, and others. This article outlines some of these options with a literature opinion and a clarification from the authors. A treatment plan for common fractures of the distal radius is also outlined.

Treatment of distal radius fractures with a nonbridging cross-pin fixator (the CPX system)

Many treatment methods exist for patients presenting with a fracture of the distal radius. With the evolution of innovative procedures and devices, treatment of these particular fractures is shifting to more contemporary approaches. The minimally invasive technique with the cross-pin fixator (CPX) system offers a new biomechanical concept for relatively rigid fixation of distal radius fractures (DRF). The CPX system uses percutaneous cross Kirschner wire fixation in combination with a nonbridging external fixator. The stability of the model is derived from the external unilateral frame and the positioning of multiple 1.6 mm Kirschner wires at various angles and planes to each other. This allows for maintenance of DRF reduction, early wrist mobilization, and a prompt return to the usual activities. Between September 2004 and September 2008, there were 54 patients with 56 DRF who were treated with the CPX system. Excluded from the report are 2 patients who had a bone graft and 1 patient who was not willing to adhere to the postoperative protocol. Of the 51 patients with 53 DRF, no major complications were reported. This article describes the CPX surgical technique, the indications, the complications, and the postoperative management.

Fractures of the distal radius treated with cross-pin fixation and a nonbridging external fixator, the CPX system: a preliminary report

PURPOSE

To present the preliminary findings of distal radius fractures (DRF) treated with percutaneous cross-pin fixation and a nonbridging external fixator, the Cross-Pin Fixation (CPX) system.

METHODS

Thirty-five consecutive patients with 37 DRFs were selected from a series of 51 DRFs for closed reduction, percutaneous pinning, and external fixation with the CPX system. Outcome was determined by studying (1) radiological measurements of radial height, palmar tilt, radial inclination and ulnar variance (UV); (2) grip and pinch strength; (3) wrist active range of motion; and (4) patient outcome instruments-the Patient-Rated Wrist Hand Evaluation and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand.

RESULTS

We are reporting on 21 patients, 13 females and 8 males, mean age 54 years (range, 27 to 87 y) with AO type fractures A2, B2, B3, C1, C2, and C3. Follow-up was a minimum of 1 year (range, 12 to 36 months). Wrist rehabilitation began at a mean of 10 days (range, 4 to 16 d) after surgery. There was no loss of reduction. Final mean grip and lateral pinch strength recovered 86% and 94%, respectively, and active range of motion increased to a minimum of 89% of the noninjured side. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand showed change in functional status (minimal detectable change at 95% confidence level) at 4 and 12 weeks. The Patient-Rated Wrist Hand Evaluation results reported resumption of usual activities in the early postoperative period. One patient developed type I complex regional pain syndrome, which resolved, and one patient had residual transient mild superficial radial nerve sensitivity. There were no pin track infections, nonunions, or tendon injuries. All patients returned to their prior employment and activities.

CONCLUSIONS

The CPX system is a minimally invasive technique of closed reduction and internal fixation for displaced, reducible extra-articular and nondisplaced and displaced reducible intra-articular fractures of the distal radius, allowing rehabilitation of the wrist and resumption of usual activities while maintaining fracture reduction.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Distal radius fractures: current concepts

Despite the frequency of distal radius fractures, studies in the existing literature have not been able to determine the optimal surgical strategies for various fracture patterns. Numerous clinical articles have been written, but most are level IV case series or expert opinion reviews. Good biomechanics studies have been published that suggest advantages of certain fixation methods over others. Transference of these expectations to clinical reality, however, requires well-controlled patient trials. In large part, this has not happened. This article reviews the theoretical pros and cons of different surgical strategies used for adult distal radius fractures, and then looks at randomized controlled trials that have been published in the last 5 years.

Volar plate fixation of AO type C2 and C3 distal radius fractures, a single-center study of 55 patients

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that volar locked plate fixation of AO type C2 or C3 fractures could effectively maintain radiographic reduction as shown by comparison of immediate postoperative alignment and that seen after more than 12 months' follow-up.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Level II trauma center located in a suburban area.

PATIENTS

Fifty-five adult patients with intra-articular fractures of the distal radius.

INTERVENTION

Open reduction and internal fixation with a locked volar plate and screws.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Volar tilt, radial inclination, radial length, and articular incongruity were radiologically assessed immediately postoperatively and at the time of final follow-up (mean follow-up: 29 +/- 7 months).

RESULTS

At final radiographic examination, the average loss of volar tilt was 1.9 +/- 3.3 degrees (P < 0.001) and the average loss of radial inclination was 1.4 +/- 2.8 degrees (P < 0.001). Four patients had more than 5 degrees loss of radial inclination (7.8%), and 22 patients (43.1%) had more than 5 degrees loss of volar tilt. Radial shortening was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of intra-articular fractures of the distal radius with a volar locked plating system is associated with a small but statistically significant loss of volar tilt and radial inclination upon comparison of immediate postoperative alignment with that seen after more than 12 months' follow-up.

Retrospective comparison of percutaneous fixation and volar internal fixation of distal radius fractures

A change in the practice of a single surgeon provided an opportunity for retrospective comparison of comparable cohorts treated with percutaneous fixation (17 patients) or a volar plate and screws (23 patients) an average of 30 months after surgery. The final evaluation was performed according to the Gartland and Werley and Mayo rating systems and the DASH questionnaire. There were no significant differences on the average scores for the percutaneous and volar plating groups, respectively: Gartland and Werley, 4 vs 5; Mayo, 82 vs 83; and DASH score 13 for both cohorts. Motion, grip, and radiographical parameters were likewise comparable. Volar internal plate and screw fixation can achieve results comparable to percutaneous fixation techniques in the treatment of fractures of the distal radius.

Evaluation of a novel, nonspanning external fixator for treatment of unstable extra-articular fractures of the distal radius: biomechanical comparison with a volar locking plate

PURPOSE

To compare the stability of a novel, nonspanning external fixator with a standard volar locked plate for treatment of unstable distal radius fractures.

METHODS

A simulated, unstable, extra- articular distal radius fracture was created in six matched pairs of fresh frozen human distal radii. One of each pair was treated with a nonspanning external fixator [Mirza Cross Pin Fixator (CPX), A.M. Surgical Inc. Smithtown, NY] and the other was treated with a volar locked plate [Distal Volar Radial Plate (DVR), Hand Innovations, Miami, FL]. Each specimen was axially loaded in central, dorsal, and volar locations, loaded in cantilever bending in volar to dorsal, dorsal to volar, and radial to ulnar directions and loaded in torsion. Load-displacement curves were generated to determine the construct stiffness for each loading schema, with comparisons made between the two treatment groups. Specimens were then cyclically loaded with 50 N axial loads applied for 1,000 and 10,000 cycles. Measurement of construct stiffness was repeated and comparisons made both between the two treatments and within treatments to their precycling stiffness.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the mechanical stiffness of the nonspanning external fixator and the volar locking plate after axial loading in any of the loading modalities. Cyclic loads of 1,000 and 10,000 cycles resulted in no significant difference in construct stiffness between the nonspanning external fixator and volar locked plate. However, the nonspanning external fixator demonstrated decreasing stiffness after cyclic loading with 10,000 cycles (p < 0.02).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated no significant difference in the mechanical stiffness of the CPX nonspanning external fixator and volar locked plate in a cadaveric fracture model. Both constructs appear to be biomechanically equivalent in this experimental model; however, this is only one factor in the choice of fixation device for the management of unstable distal radius fractures.

External fixation of distal radius fractures

External fixation has been used for the treatment of distal radius fractures for more than 50 years. Although the fixator configurations have undergone considerable modification over time, the type of fixator itself is not as important as the underlying principles that provide the foundation for external fixation. Although volar plate fixation is currently in vogue, the indications for external fixation remain largely unchanged. Newer fixator designs have also expanded the traditional usage to include nonbridging applications that allow early wrist motion. The following discussion focuses on the myriad uses for external fixation as well as the shortcomings and potential pitfalls.

Plating for distal radius fractures

No area of fracture management has had such a recent explosion of new treatment modalities as distal radius plating. This explosion has largely been implant- and industry-driven, with little evidence-based research guiding the way. A perceived difficulty with commonly used modalities by the orthopedic community has been enough to drive an entire new set of options for distal radius fixation. A drift from dorsal to volar plating has occurred that has been unexamined by randomized research. Segment specific fixation has been a new mindset that has resulted in a novel plate line and has caused other manufacturers to redesign their product lines. Other novel approaches for proposed problems include locking plates, nail-plate combinations, and others. This article outlines some of these options with a literature opinion and a clarification from the authors. A treatment plan for common fractures of the distal radius is also outlined.