Radial nerve excursion and strain at the elbow and wrist associated with upper-extremity motion

The effect of plate location on radial nerve palsy recovery time associated with humeral shaft fractures

BACKGROUND

This study aims to investigate the influence of plate placement on nerve regeneration in humerus fractures accompanied by radial nerve injury.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 94 patients with humerus fractures and concomitant radial nerve injury treated between January 2018 and November 2022. After applying exclusion criteria, 31 patients were included in the study. Clinical outcomes were assessed by comparing demographic data, surgical duration, radial nerve recovery time, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH), and the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale.

RESULTS

Two distinct groups were established: lateral plating and anteromedial (AM) plating. These groups demonstrated comparability regarding age, gender, and body mass index (BMI). No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups concerning MEPS and MRC. The AM plating group notably exhibited shorter surgical durations, faster recovery times, and lower DASH scores.

CONCLUSION

According to the findings of this investigation, in cases of humerus fractures accompanied by radial nerve injury, AM plating may be preferable over lateral plating due to its association with reduced surgical durations and expedited nerve recovery.

Causes, symptoms, and treatments of nerve entrapments around the elbow: Current concepts

The elbow is a joint extremely susceptible to stiffness, even after a trivial trauma. As for other joints, several factors can generate stiffness such as immobilisation, joint incongruity, heterotopic ossification, adhesions, or pain. Prolonged joint immobilisation, pursued to assure bony and ligamentous healing, represents the most acknowledged risk factor for joint stiffness. The elbow is a common site of nerve entrapment syndromes. The reasons are multifactorial, but peculiar elbow anatomy and biomechanics play a role. Passing from the arm into the forearm, the ulnar, median, and radial nerves run at the elbow in close rapport with the joint, fibrous arches and through narrow fibro-osseous tunnel. The elbow joint, in fact, has a large range of flexion which exposes nerves lying posterior to the axis of rotation to traction and those anterior to compression.

Muscle responses during radial nerve-biased upper limb neurodynamic test in asymptomatic individuals: a cross-sectional study

This laboratory cross-sectional study aimed at explore the muscle response (MR) of the upper trapezius, infraspinatus, biceps brachii and extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) during the radial nerve-biased upper limb neurodynamic test (RN-ULNT) in healthy participants. Myoelectric activity was stage-by-stage recorded during two sequencing variants of the RN-ULNT: S1, in which elbow extension was the last movement; and S2, in which wrist flexion was the last movement. Final elbow and wrist joint angle and sensory response (SR) in five zones (Z1-Z5) were also registered. MR was qualitatively categorized as 'absent' (No-MR), 'true' (TMR) or 'uneven' (UMR). In both sequences, significant increases in muscle activity occurred mostly during shoulder abduction and elbow extension (p ≤ 0.009). Also, elbow extension but not wrist flexion increased the activity of the ECRB muscle (p ≤ 0.009). S2 showed significantly higher upper trapezius (p = 0.04) and biceps brachii (p = 0.036) muscle activity during wrist flexion, and higher report of SR in Z1 and Z4 (p < 0.001) compared to S1. Only the ECRB muscle showed significant differences in the MR type between S1 and S2 (TMR, p = 0.016; UMR, = 0,012). Our results may be useful in the assessment of upper limb musculoskeletal disorders.

Neurodynamics: is tension contentious?

Tensioning techniqueswere the first neurodynamic techniques used therapeutically in the management of people with neuropathies. This article aims to provide a balanced evidence-informed view on the effects of optimal tensile loading on peripheral nerves and the use of tensioning techniques. Whilst the early use of neurodynamics was centered within a mechanical paradigm, research into the working mechanisms of tensioning techniques revealed neuroimmune, neurophysiological, and neurochemical effects. In-vitro and ex-vivo research confirms that tensile loading is required for mechanical adaptation of healthy and healing neurons and nerves. Moreover, elimination of tensile load can have detrimental effects on the nervous system. Beneficial effects of tensile loading and tensioning techniques, contributing to restored homeostasis at the entrapment site, dorsal root ganglia and spinal cord, include neuronal cell differentiation, neurite outgrowth and orientation, increased endogenous opioid receptors, reduced fibrosis and intraneural scar formation, improved nerve regeneration and remyelination, increased muscle power and locomotion, less mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia and allodynia, and improved conditioned pain modulation. However, animal and cellular models also show that ‘excessive’ tensile forces have negative effects on the nervous system. Although robust and designed to withstand mechanical load, the nervous system is equally a delicate system. Mechanical loads that can be easily handled by a healthy nervous system, may be sufficient to aggravate clinical symptoms in patients. This paper aims to contribute to a more balanced view regarding the use of neurodynamics and more specifically tensioning techniques.

The forgotten radial nerve: A conceptual framework for treatment of lateral elbow pain

BACKGROUND

Lateral elbow pain is a prevalent musculoskeletal overuse disorder that has serious consequences for musculoskeletal health, occupational performance, and overall healthcare burden. Available treatment options (traditional therapy and steroid injections) have been studied rigorously, yet supporting evidence is weak. The majority of treatment options available are targeted at the local pathology of the common extensor tendon as the apparent source of pain, and do not adequately address the cause, the source of overuse, and mechanism of injury.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this paper is to describe a novel approach, a regional interdependence model, to reduce symptoms of upper extremity musculoskeletal overuse in populations at risk by addressing a broader systematic approach versus a localized symptom driven approach for the assessment and treatment of lateral elbow pain.

METHODS

The proposed framework - Think in nerve length and layers (TINLL)- accounts for nerve tension and muscle balance in the entire extremity. In this paper we describe the application of the TINLL model for assessment and treatment of SRSN irritation in individuals with lateral elbow pain and propose a method for treatment and for further studies. The proposed treatment approach combines mobilization with movement, elastic taping, and isometric exercises to address impairment at each level: joint alignment, neural tension, and the superficial sensory nervous system.

RESULTS

Our findings of reduced pain with a relatively small number of therapy sessions in a small retrospective cohort of patients using the TINLL framework for assessment and treatment supports further formal study of this approach in a larger cohort with longer follow-up to determine effectiveness compared to current treatments.

CONCLUSION

Future studies will test and compare the efficacy of the TINLL framework and model of treatment on the short- and long-term outcomes in individuals with chronic lateral elbow pain compared to traditional therapy.

Location of the radial nerve along the humeral shaft between the prone and lateral decubitus positions at different elbow positions

Identification of the radial nerve is important during the posterior approach to a humerus fracture. During this procedure, the patient can be placed in the prone or lateral decubitus position depending on the surgeon’s preference. The distance from the radial nerve to the osseous structures will be different in each position. The purpose of this study was to identify the safety zones in various patient and elbow flexion positions. The distances from the olecranon to the center of the radial groove and intermuscular septum and lateral epicondyle to the lateral intermuscular septum were measured using a digital Vernier caliper. The measurements were performed with cadavers in the lateral decubitus and prone positions at different elbow flexion angles. The distance from where the radial nerve crossed the posterior aspect of the humerus measured from the upper part of the olecranon to the center of the radial nerve in both positions at different elbow flexion angles varied from a mean maximum distance of 130.00 mm with the elbow in full extension in the prone position to a minimum distance of 121.01 mm with the elbow in flexion at 120° in the lateral decubitus position. The mean distance of the radial nerve from the upper olecranon to the lateral intermuscular septum varied from 107.13 to 102.22 mm. The distance from the lateral epicondyle to the lateral edge of the radial nerve varied from 119.92 to 125.38 mm. There was not significant contrast in the position of the radial nerve with osseous landmarks concerning different degrees of flexion, except for 120°, which is not significant, as this flexion angle is rarely used.

The Course of Posterior Antebrachial Cutaneous Nerve: Anatomical and Sonographic Study with a Clinical Implication

The course of the posterior antebrachial cutaneous nerve (PACN) was studied via ultrasound (US) and dissection. The aim of this study was to reveal the anatomical relationships of PACN with the surrounding structures along its pathway to identify possible critical points of compression. Nineteen cryopreserved cadaver body donor upper extremities were explored via US and further dissected. During US exploration, two reference points, in relation with the compression of the nerve, were marked using dye injection: (1) the point where the RN pierces the lateral intermuscular septum (LIMS) and (2) the point where the PACN pierces the deep fascia. Anatomical measurements referred to the lateral epicondyle (LE) were taken at these two points. Dissection confirmed the correct site of US-guided dye injection at 100% of points where the RN crossed the LIMS (10.5 cm from the LE) and was correctly injected at 74% of points where the PACN pierce the deep fascia (7.4 cm from the LE). There were variations in the course of the PACN, but it always divided from the RN as an only branch. Either ran close and parallel to the LIMS until the RN crossed the LIMS (84%) or clearly separated from the RN, 1 cm before it crossed the LIMS (16%). In 21% of cases, the PACN crossed the LIMS with the RN, while in the rest of the cases it always followed in the posterior compartment. A close relationship between PACN and LIMS, as well as triceps brachii muscle and deep fascia was observed. The US and anatomical study showed that the course of PACN maintains a close relationship with the LIMS and other connective tissues (such as the fascia and subcutaneous tissue) to be present in its pathology and treatment.

Atraumatic proximal radial nerve entrapment. Illustrative cases and systematic review of literature

PURPOSE

The aims of the present study were to describe atraumatic proximal radial nerve entrapment (PRNE) and potential strategies for management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search of 4 electronic databases for studies pertaining to patients with atraumatic PRNE. Studies published between 1930 and 2020 were included. Clinical presentation, nerve conduction studies, electromyography, and treatment methods were reviewed. In order to outline management strategies, 2 illustrative cases of acute PRNE were presented.

RESULTS

We analyzed 12 studies involving 21 patients with 22 PRNE (15 acute and 7 progressive). Sudden or repetitive elbow extension with forceful muscle contraction (n = 16) was the primary mechanism of injury. The two main sites of entrapment were the fibrous arch (n = 7) and hiatus of the lateral intermuscular septum (n = 7). Conservative treatment was performed in 4 patients and allowed for complete clinical recovery in all cases. The remaining 18 patients underwent epineurolysis (n = 16) or resection/repair of hourglass-like constriction (n = 2) between 1.5- and 120-months following diagnosis. Twelve patients experience complete recovery, while partial or no clinical recovery was reported in 1 and 4 cases, respectively; the outcome was unknown in 1 case.

CONCLUSIONS

Atraumatic PRNE is rare and remains challenging with respect to diagnosis and treatment. Current literature suggests that primary sites of entrapment are the fibrous arch and hiatus of the radial nerve at the time of forceful elbow extension.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case series (IV) & systematic review (I).

Conduit-based Nerve Repairs Provide Greater Resistance to Tension Compared with Primary Repairs: A Biomechanical Analysis on Large Animal Samples

Background:

When primary repair of transected peripheral nerves is not possible due to large gaps, nerve grafts or repair using conduits are other options to bridge the gap such that the nerve is repaired without tension. When nerve gaps are repaired primarily, there is a worry about tension, failure, and poor healing. In this biomechanical study comparing nerves repaired primarily versus those repaired with conduits, we hypothesized that conduit repair provided greater mechanical breaking strength.

Methods:

We dissected fresh cadaveric sheep hooves and transacted their peripheral nerves. Subsequently, we divided these transacted nerves into 2 groups: primary repair versus repair using a nerve conduit. After repair using a standardized technique, we tensioned each of these repairs via a load tester and recorded the force required till repair failure occurred.

Results:

Six nerves using primary nerve repair and 6 nerves repaired with a nerve conduit (10 mm length × 2.5 mm diameter) were studied. The average breaking strength of the nerves repaired with the nerve conduit was 0.92 N and that using the primary nerve repair technique was 0.46 N (P = 0.001). All the nerves repaired using nerve conduit repair had an additional 5 mm added to their total length as compared with the nerves in the other group.

Conclusions:

Nerve repair using a nerve conduit ensures a higher breaking strength and potentially a greater tension-free repair as compared with primary nerve repairs in a sheep model. This study supports the use of conduits in the bridging of nerve gaps.

Anatomical Factors Contributing to Radial Nerve Excursion at the Brachium: A Cadaveric Study

PURPOSE

The radial nerve appears to be more vulnerable to injury in the brachium than the median and ulnar nerves. The underlying mechanism for this increased vulnerability is not well explained. We hypothesize that the radial nerve has less excursion than the median and ulnar nerves because it is anatomically tethered by the lateral intermuscular septum (LIS) and that elbow positioning and LIS release will improve its excursion.

METHODS

Eight paired fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremity specimens were used. The radial, median, and ulnar nerves were transected at the level of the spiral groove. Nerve excursion was determined at a constant tension of 100 g from 0° to 90° of elbow flexion and repeated for the radial nerve after releasing the LIS. The cross-sectional areas of nervous and connective tissue were then determined histologically.

RESULTS

Radial and median nerve excursion correlated positively with increased elbow flexion, and ulnar nerve excursion correlated negatively with increased elbow flexion. Release of the LIS significantly improved radial nerve excursion at 0°, 60°, and 90° of elbow flexion. Release of the LIS with 90° of elbow flexion increased radial nerve excursion by approximately 3 times. Histological analysis demonstrated similar mean composition of nonnervous connective tissue among the 3 nerves.

CONCLUSIONS

The radial nerve is anatomically tethered in the brachium by the LIS and has limited excursion compared with the median and ulnar nerves. Radial nerve excursion improves with elbow flexion and LIS release. Flexing the elbow to 90° doubles radial nerve excursion. Releasing the LIS as well triples the excursion of the radial nerve. Histological composition was similar among the three nerves at the brachium.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Releasing the LIS and flexing the elbow improve radial nerve excursion. These steps may be useful during humeral fracture fixation.

Surgical management of acute claw hand in a competitive baseball player

We describe an unusual case of acute ulnar neuropathy with a flexible claw hand deformity in a baseball pitcher. Treatment involved ulnar nerve decompression at the elbow with subsequent recurrence of symptoms upon return to pitching. Definitive treatment included a wide secondary release of tethered locations resulting in return of function. At final follow-up the patient has returned to unrestricted baseball throwing activities.

Assessing the Reliability of Ultrasound Imaging to Examine Radial Nerve Excursion

Ultrasound imaging allows cost effective in vivo analysis for quantifying peripheral nerve excursion. This study used ultrasound imaging to quantify longitudinal radial nerve excursion during various active and passive wrist movements in healthy participants. Frame-by-frame cross-correlation software allowed calculation of nerve excursion from video sequences. The reliability of ultrasound measurement of longitudinal radial nerve excursion was moderate to high (intraclass correlation coefficient range = 0.63-0.86, standard error of measurement 0.19-0.48). Radial nerve excursion ranged from 0.41 to 4.03 mm induced by wrist flexion and 0.28 to 2.91 mm induced by wrist ulnar deviation. No significant difference was seen in radial nerve excursion during either wrist movement (p > 0.05). Wrist movements performed in forearm supination produced larger overall nerve excursion (1.41 ± 0.32 mm) compared with those performed in forearm pronation (1.06 ± 0.31 mm) (p < 0.01). Real-time ultrasound is a reliable, cost-effective, in vivo method for analysis of radial nerve excursion.

Antidromic vs orthodromic sensory median nerve conduction studies

Objective

Median sensory nerve conduction studies are arguably the most often performed electrodiagnostic tests worldwide. Routine tests in clinical practice are done using either antidromic or orthodromic techniques type of stimulation, with no universal agreement on the use of one or the other technique.

Methods

We review the advantages and drawbacks of antidromic and orthodromic as well as their particularities for clinical application and research.

Results

The two techniques differ on how physical and physiological changes affect the action potential. Near-nerve recording is better suited for the orthodromic than for the antidromic technique, while studies of nerve excitability are better suited for the antidromic than for the orthodromic technique.

Conclusion

Both techniques are equally suitable for routine tests but research studies may specifically demand one or the other.

Excursion of the Sciatic Nerve During Nerve Mobilization Exercises: An In Vivo Cross-sectional Study Using Dynamic Ultrasound Imaging

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory cross-sectional study using single-group, within-subject comparisons.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether different types of neurodynamic techniques result in differences in longitudinal sciatic nerve excursion.

BACKGROUND

Large differences in nerve biomechanics have been demonstrated for different neurodynamic techniques for the upper limb (median nerve), but recent findings for the sciatic nerve have only revealed small differences in nerve excursion that may not be clinically meaningful.

METHODS

High-resolution ultrasound imaging was used to quantify longitudinal sciatic nerve movement in the thigh of 15 asymptomatic participants during 6 different mobilization techniques for the sciatic nerve involving the hip and knee. Healthy volunteers were selected to demonstrate normal nerve biomechanics and to eliminate potentially confounding variables associated with dysfunction. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

The techniques resulted in markedly different amounts of nerve movement (P<.001). The tensioning technique was associated with the smallest excursion (mean ± SD, 3.2 ± 2.1 mm; P < or = .004). The sliding technique resulted in the largest excursion (mean ± SD, 17.0 ± 5.2 mm; P<.001), which was approximately 5 times larger than that resulting from the tensioning technique and, on average, twice as large as that resulting from individual hip or knee movements.

CONCLUSION

Consistent with current theories and findings for the median nerve, different neurodynamic exercises for the lower limb resulted in markedly different sciatic nerve excursions. Considering the continuity of the nervous system, the movement and position of adjacent joints have a large impact on nerve biomechanics.

Tension of the ulnar, median, and radial nerves during ulnar nerve neurodynamic testing: observational cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

The ulnar nerve upper limb neurodynamic test (ULNT3) uses upper limb positioning to investigate symptoms arising from the ulnar nerve. It is proposed to selectively increase tension of the nerve; however, this property of the test is not well established.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the upper limb position that results in: (1) the greatest tension of the ulnar nerve and (2) the greatest difference in tension between the ulnar nerve and the other 2 major nerves of the upper limb: median and radial.

DESIGN

This was an observational cadaver study.

METHODS

Tension (in newtons) of the ulnar, median, and radial nerves was measured simultaneously using 3 buckle force transducers in 5 upper limb positions in 10 embalmed human cadavers (N=20 limbs). Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni post hoc tests determined differences in tension among nerves and among limb positions.

RESULTS

The addition of shoulder horizontal abduction (H.Abd; 12.62 N; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]=10.76, 14.47) and combined shoulder abduction and internal rotation (H.Abd+IR; 11.86 N; 95% CI=9.96, 13.77) to ULNT3 (scapular depression, shoulder abduction and external rotation, elbow flexion, forearm pronation, and wrist and finger extension) produced significantly greater ulnar nerve tension compared with the ULNT3 alone (8.71 N; 95% CI=7.25, 10.17). The ULNT3+H.Abd test demonstrated the greatest difference in tension among nerves (mean difference between ulnar and median nerves=11.87 N; 95% CI=9.80, 13.92; mean difference between ulnar and radial nerves=8.47 N; 95% CI=6.41, 10.53).

LIMITATIONS

These results pertain only to the biomechanical plausibility of the ulnar nerve neurodynamic test and do not account for other factors that may affect the clinical application of this test.

CONCLUSIONS

The ULNT3+H.Abd is a biomechanically plausible test for detecting peripheral neuropathic pain related to the ulnar nerve. In situations where the shoulder complex will not tolerate the combination of shoulder external rotation in abduction, performing upper limb neurodynamic tests with internal rotation instead of external rotation is a biomechanically plausible alternative.

Interventions in the disturbances in the motor and sensory environment

Treatment of peripheral nervous system (PNS) pathology presents intervention challenges to every therapist. Many of the current and future interventions will be directed at restoring the normal anatomy, function, and biomechanical properties of the PNS, restoring normal neural physiology and ultimately patient function and quality of life. Present interventions use mechanical (movement) or electrical procedures to affect various properties of the peripheral nerve. The purpose of this article was to apply basic science to clinical practice. The pathology and accompanying structural and biomechanical changes in the PNS will be presented in three specific areas commonly encountered in the clinic: nerve injury and laceration; compression neuropathies; and neuropathic pain and neural tension dysfunction. The intent is to address possible interventions exploring the clinical reasoning process that combines basic science and evidence-based best practice. The current lack of literature to support any one intervention requires a strong foundation and understanding of the PNSs' structure and function to refine current and develop new intervention strategies. Current evidence will be presented and linked with future considerations for intervention and research. During this interlude of development and refinement, best practice will rely on sound clinical reasoning skills that incorporate basic science to achieve a successful outcome when treating these challenging patients.

Comparison of longitudinal sciatic nerve movement with different mobilization exercises: an in vivo study utilizing ultrasound imaging

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study using a single-group, within-subjects comparison.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether different types of neural mobilization exercises are associated with differing amounts of longitudinal sciatic nerve excursion measured in vivo at the posterior midthigh region.

BACKGROUND

Recent research focusing on the upper limb of healthy subjects has shown that nerve excursion differs significantly between different types of neural mobilization exercises. This has not been examined in the lower limb. It is important to initially examine the influence of neural mobilization on peripheral nerve excursion in healthy people to identify peripheral nerve excursion impairments under conditions in which nerve excursion may be compromised.

METHODS

High-resolution ultrasound imaging was used to assess sciatic nerve excursion at the posterior midthigh region. Four different neural mobilization exercises were performed in 31 healthy participants. These neural mobilization exercises used combinations of knee extension and cervical spine flexion and extension. Frame-by-frame cross-correlation analysis of the ultrasound images was used to calculate nerve excursion. A repeated-measures analysis of variance and isolated means comparisons were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Different neural mobilization exercises induced significantly different amounts of sciatic nerve excursion at the posterior midthigh region (P<.001). The slider exercise, consisting of the participant performing simultaneous cervical spine and knee extension, resulted in the largest amount of sciatic nerve excursion (mean ± SD, 3.2 ± 2.0 mm). The amount of excursion during the slider exercise was slightly greater (mean ± SD, 2.6 ± 1.5 mm; P = .002) than it was during the tensioner exercise (simultaneous cervical spine flexion and knee extension). The single-joint neck flexion exercise resulted in the least amount of sciatic nerve excursion at the posterior midthigh (mean ± SD, -0.1 ± 0.1 mm), which was significantly smaller than the other 3 exercises (P<.001).

CONCLUSION

These findings are consistent with the results of previous research that has examined median nerve excursion associated with different neural mobilization exercises. Such nerve excursion supports theories of nerve motion associated with cervical spine and extremity movement, as generalizable to the lower limb.

The validity of upper-limb neurodynamic tests for detecting peripheral neuropathic pain

The validity of upper-limb neurodynamic tests (ULNTs) for detecting peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP) was assessed by reviewing the evidence on plausibility, the definition of a positive test, reliability, and concurrent validity. Evidence was identified by a structured search for peer-reviewed articles published in English before May 2011. The quality of concurrent validity studies was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool, where appropriate. Biomechanical and experimental pain data support the plausibility of ULNTs. Evidence suggests that a positive ULNT should at least partially reproduce the patient's symptoms and that structural differentiation should change these symptoms. Data indicate that this definition of a positive ULNT is reliable when used clinically. Limited evidence suggests that the median nerve test, but not the radial nerve test, helps determine whether a patient has cervical radiculopathy. The median nerve test does not help diagnose carpal tunnel syndrome. These findings should be interpreted cautiously, because diagnostic accuracy might have been distorted by the investigators' definitions of a positive ULNT. Furthermore, patients with PNP who presented with increased nerve mechanosensitivity rather than conduction loss might have been incorrectly classified by electrophysiological reference standards as not having PNP. The only evidence for concurrent validity of the ulnar nerve test was a case study on cubital tunnel syndrome. We recommend that researchers develop more comprehensive reference standards for PNP to accurately assess the concurrent validity of ULNTs and continue investigating the predictive validity of ULNTs for prognosis or treatment response.

Intra-individual variations in the bifurcation of the radial nerve and the length of the posterior interosseous nerve

Anatomical literature on the radial nerve predominantly features inter-individual variations, with comparatively few studies investigating intra-individual variations. The radial nerve has a complex and variable course, particularly in relation to the location at which the nerve bifurcates to form the superficial branch of the radial nerve and the posterior interosseous nerve. Variations of the radial nerve may change the way the nerve and its branches, their blood supply and nerve transmission respond to forces. This study investigated the presence of intra-individual differences in the bifurcation point of the radial nerve and the length of the posterior interosseous nerve from the bifurcation to the radial tunnel. Eighteen embalmed human cadavers were dissected to reveal the radial nerve. Measurements were taken from the level of the lateral humeral epicondyle to the bifurcation of the radial nerve, and from the bifurcation to the radial tunnel. All cadavers presented with intra-individual variations between the left and right limbs. Significant differences were found between the left and right limbs for the measurement from the lateral humeral epicondyle to the bifurcation (median difference = 18.0 mm; p = 0.016) but not for the measurement from the bifurcation to the radial tunnel (median difference = 7.0 mm; p = 0.396). In conclusion, the location of the radial nerve bifurcation is subject to both intra- and inter-individual variations. Its specific relationship to the lateral humeral epicondyle also varies, occurring both distal and proximal to the level of the epicondyle. Clinical implications of these findings warrant further investigation.

Different nerve-gliding exercises induce different magnitudes of median nerve longitudinal excursion: an in vivo study using dynamic ultrasound imaging

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study using single-group, within-subject comparisons.

OBJECTIVES

To determine in an in vivo study whether different types of nerve-gliding exercises are associated with different amounts of longitudinal nerve excursion.

BACKGROUND

Different types of nerve-gliding exercises have been proposed. It is assumed that different exercises produce different amounts of excursion and strain in the peripheral nervous system. Although this has been confirmed in cadaveric experiments, in vivo studies are lacking.

METHODS

High-resolution ultrasound was used to measure longitudinal excursion of the median nerve in the upper arm during 6 different nerve-gliding exercises. Nerve mobilization techniques that involved the elbow and neck were evaluated in 15 asymptomatic volunteers (mean +/- SD age, 30 +/- 8 years). Nerve longitudinal excursion was calculated using a frame-by-frame cross-correlation analysis. A repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Different exercises induced different amounts of longitudinal nerve excursion (P<.0001). The "sliding technique" was associated with the largest excursion (mean +/- SD, 10.2 +/- 2.8 mm; P = .0001). The amount of nerve movement associated with the "tensioning technique" (mean +/- SD, 1.8 +/- 4.0 mm) was smaller than the nerve excursion induced with individual movements of the neck or elbow (mean +/- SD range, -3.4 +/- 0.9 to 5.6 +/- 2.1 mm; P = .0001).

CONCLUSION

These findings confirm that different types of neurodynamic techniques have different mechanical effects on the nervous system. Recognition of these differences may assist in the selection of treatment techniques. Having demonstrated differences in mechanical effects, future research will have to evaluate whether these different techniques are also associated with different physiological and therapeutic effects.

Customized dynamic splinting: orthoses that promote optimal function and recovery after radial nerve injury: a case report

Radial nerve injury is a relatively common occurrence and recovery depends on the level of injury and extent of connective tissue damage. Orthoses (splints) are often provided to compensate for lost motor power. This article chronicles the recovery, over 27 months, of a 76-year-old woman who sustained a high radial nerve injury of her dominant arm during surgery for total shoulder replacement (Delta Reverse). Customized, low-profile dynamic splints, unlike any previously published design, were developed to address her goals for functional independence and the biological needs of the tissues. Dynamic power was provided to the wrist, fingers, and thumb by elastic cords and thin, flexible thermoplastic, without the need of an outrigger, thus avoiding the need for wire bending and cutting. At the outset, the splint was forearm-based and when wrist extension power was recovered, a hand-based splint was designed. Eventually, a circumferential hand-based thumb-stabilizing splint fulfilled most of the remaining orthotic requirements.

Management of radial tunnel syndrome: a therapist's clinical perspective

Current best evidence for the conservative management of radial tunnel syndrome (RTS) consists primarily of expert opinion and inferences taken from studies on other nerve compressions and related syndromes. There are limited data reported in the literature of this particular disorder. This article reviews literature on modalities, therapeutic exercise, ergonomic interventions, and cortical reorganization, and how they may be considered for intervention with RTS. The author's preferred method of treatment, as based on theoretical constructs, for RTS is presented. Definitive evidence in the literature to support the conservative interventions suggested is lacking. Suggestions for clinical management and study are included in this therapist's clinical perspective.