Open reduction and internal fixation of coronal fractures of the capitellum

The Operative Management of Capitellum Fractures

Capitellum fractures represent fewer than 1% of elbow fractures. Most commonly, these fractures occur secondary to either axial loading with the elbow fully extended or direct impact to the lateral aspect of the elbow. Numerous classification systems exist, with many types and subtypes. Since capitellum fractures are uncommon and fracture type varies widely, there is a lack of consensus with regard to treatment recommendations. We present a case series of seven patients with capitellum fractures, who presented between January 2016 and August 2020 to Addenbrooke's Hospital (Cambridge, the United Kingdom). All patients were female, with an average age of 33 years. In each case, the affected elbow joint was immobilised using a backslab before open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) was performed. Joint mobility was recorded both on the day of the injury and at clinic review postoperatively (first at two weeks and then at between four and eight weeks). The Oxford Elbow Score (OES) was measured retrospectively, relating to (1) before the injury and (2) six months after fracture reduction. ORIF was associated with a near-full return of pronation and supination by eight weeks, with flexion-extension also improving significantly. The Oxford Elbow Score at six months reached 82.0% of pre-injury scores. Overall, our results suggest that ORIF is a well-tolerated and effective treatment strategy for capitellum fractures. Future studies with a greater sample size are required to assess the outcomes across a longer period, to determine whether outcomes are maintained and continue to improve.

Lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach vs. olecranon osteotomy approach: an anatomic study of cadavers

BACKGROUND

Exposure of the articular surface is the key to successful open reduction and internal fixation treatment for coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus. The olecranon osteotomy approach has previously been described as one of the most effective exposure approaches. Nevertheless, this approach cannot expose the anterior trochlea, and it is impossible to reduce and fix the capitellum under direct vision. The purpose of this study was to compare the exposure of the articular surface of the distal humerus between the lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach (group L) and the olecranon osteotomy approach (group O).

METHODS

Each approach was performed on 8 freshly frozen upper limbs of adult cadavers. After each approach was completed, a 0.5-mm Kirschner wire is inserted along the edge to mark the visible part of the articular surface. Then, the soft tissue of each elbow is removed, and a surface-scanning system is used to create a digital 3-dimensional model. The visible part of the articular surface obtained by each surgical approach was mapped and quantified using markers created by Kirschner wires.

RESULTS

The lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach and the olecranon osteotomy approach exposed 0.8 ± 0.0 and 0.6 ± 0.0 of the distal humeral articular surface (P < .001), 1.0 ± 0.0 and 0.3 ± 0.1 of the capitellum (P < .001), 0.6 ± 0.0 and 0.7 ± 0.0 of the trochlea (P < .001), 0.7 ± 0.0 and 0.5 ± 0.1 of the anterior trochlea (P < .001), and 0.5 ± 0.0 and 1.0 ± 0.0 of the posterior trochlea, respectively (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the olecranon osteotomy approach, the lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach could more fully expose the total articular surface of the distal humerus, capitellum, and anterior trochlea, but the olecranon osteotomy approach could more fully expose the trochlea and posterior trochlea.

Coronal Shear Fractures of the Distal Humerus

Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus are rare, frequently comminuted, and are without consensus for treatment. The aim of this paper is to review the current concepts on the diagnosis, classification, treatment options, surgical approaches, and complications of capitellar and trochlear fractures. Computed Tomography (CT) scans, along with the Dubberley classification, are extremely helpful in the decision-making process. Most of the fractures necessitate open reduction and internal fixation, although elbow arthroplasty is an option for comminuted fractures in the elderly low-demand patient. Stiffness is the most common complication after fixation, although reoperation is infrequent.

Biomechanical stability of complex coronal plane fracture fixation of the capitellum

INTRODUCTION

Coronal plane fractures of the distal humerus are relatively rare and can be challenging to treat due to their complexity and intra-articular nature. There is no gold standard for surgical management of these complex fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability and strength of two different internal fixation techniques for complex coronal plane fractures of the capitellum with posterior comminution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen fresh frozen, age- and gender-matched cadaveric elbows were 3D-navigated osteotomized simulating a Dubberley type IIB fracture. Specimens were randomized into one of two treatment groups and stabilized with an anterior antiglide plate with additional anteroposterior cannulated headless compression screws (group antiGP + HCS) or a posterolateral distal humerus locking plate with lateral extension (group PLP). Cyclic testing was performed with 75 N over 2000 cycles and ultimately until construct failure. Data were analyzed for displacement, construct stiffness, and ultimate load to failure.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in displacement during 2000 cycles (p = 0.291), stiffness (310 vs. 347 N/mm; p = 0.612) or ultimate load to failure (649 ± 351 vs. 887 ± 187 N; p = 0.140) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterolateral distal humerus locking plate achieves equal biomechanical fixation strength as an anterior antiglide plate with additional anteroposterior cannulated headless compression screws for fracture fixation of complex coronal plane fractures of the capitellum. These results support the use of a posterolateral distal humerus locking plate considering the clinical advantages of less invasive surgery and extraarticular metalware.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Biomechanical study.

ISOLATED CAPITELLAR FRACTURE FIXATION WITH HEADLESS SCREWS IN DIFFERENT CONFIGURATIONS

Introduction

We evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of capitellar fractures treated with modified screw insertion (inserting the first fixation screw anteroposteriorly and the second screw posteroanteriorly), a technique that can be applied with a minimally invasive lateral elbow approach.

Materials and Methods

Twenty-one isolated capitellum fractures that were surgically treated were included in the study. Fixation was achieved with two headless cannulated compression screws placed in anteroposterior and posteroanterior order using the modified lateral elbow approach. The Broberg-Morrey rating system was used to assess the post-operative functional status of the patients.

Results

According to the Broberg-Morrey criteria, the mean score was 92.7 (77-100) and 13 cases had excellent, 7 had good, and 1 had fair results. None of the patients developed avascular necrosis or heterotopic ossification. According to the Broberg-Morrey arthrosis score, two cases had Grade 1 and one had Grade 2 arthrosis. One patient had a superficial wound site infection that was treated with antibiotics, and in one case a 60° extension loss was observed in the elbow.

Conclusion

Treatment of isolated capitellar fractures with 2 headless screws placed anteroposteriorly and posteroanteriorly can provide stable fixation and is less traumatic for the elbow joint. Level of Evidence IV; Therapeutic Studies - Investigating the results of treatment.

Biomechanical stability of simple coronal shear fracture fixation of the capitellum

BACKGROUND

Coronal shear fractures of the capitellum are rare, and their surgical management is challenging, without a defined gold standard. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability of 3 different internal fixation techniques for simple coronal shear fractures of the capitellum without posterior comminution.

METHODS

Dubberley type IA fractures of the capitellum were created in 18 cadaveric elbows, which were age and sex matched to the following 3 internal fixation groups: (1) two anteroposterior cannulated headless compression screws (HCSs), (2) two anteroposterior HCSs with an additional anterior antiglide plate (antiGP), and (3) a posterolateral distal humeral locking plate (LP). All fixation techniques were cyclically loaded with 75 N over 2000 cycles and ultimately until construct failure. Data were analyzed for displacement, construct stiffness, and ultimate load to failure.

RESULTS

Fragment displacement under cyclic loading with 2000 cycles did not show a significant difference (P = .886) between the 3 groups. The HCS group showed the highest stiffness compared with the HCS-antiGP and LP groups (602 N/mm vs. 540 N/mm vs. 462 N/mm, P = .417), without reaching a statistically significant difference. Ultimate load to failure was also not significantly different on comparison of all 3 groups (P = .297).

CONCLUSIONS

Simple coronal shear fractures of the capitellum are biomechanically equally stabilized by HCSs compared with HCSs with an additional antiGP or a posterolateral distal humeral LP. In view of the advantages of less (invasive) metalware, the clinical use of 2 isolated anteroposterior HCSs appears reasonable.

Lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach for coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus: Report of three cases and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus are rare injuries and are technically challenging to manage. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) has become the preferred treatment because it provides anatomical reduction, stable internal fixation, and early motion, but the optimal surgical approach remains controversial.

CASE SUMMARY

We report three cases of coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus treated successfully by ORIF via a novel surgical approach, in which lateral epicondyle osteotomy was performed based on the extended lateral approach. We named the novel surgical approach the lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach. All patients underwent surgical treatment and were discharged successfully. All patients had excellent functional results according to the Mayo elbow performance score. The average range of motion was 118° in flexion/extension and 172° in pronation/ supination. Only case 2 had a complication, which was implant prolapse.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that the lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach in ORIF is effective and safe for coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus.

Outcome after the surgical treatment of the Dubberley type B distal humeral capitellar and trochlear fractures with a buttress plate

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the functional outcomes of the surgical treatment performed with a buttress plate for the trochlear and distal capitellum fractures with posterior extension in the humerus.

METHODS

The data belonging to 6 female and 4 male patients with a mean age of 43.8±11.1 (34-72) years were retrospectively evaluated. The mean follow-up period was 59.6±38.79 (22-127) months. The trochlear extension and posterior comminution of the fractures were assessed through the initial X-rays and computerized tomography images. Ten patients were classified as Dubberley type B. All fractures were treated surgically, with open reduction and internal fixation using a lateral buttress plate, headless cannulated screws, and Kirschner (K)-wires. The passive flexion and extension exercises were initiated at the first postoperative day. The patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at the final follow-up. The outcomes were quantified using the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI), visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, and the patient's opinion.

RESULTS

At the final follow-up, the mean elbow flexion was 137.5°±3° (132°-140°), extension was -17.9°±9.2° (10°-35°), pronation was 72.2°±2.6° (68°-75°), and supination was 78.9°±4.09 (72°-85°). The mean MEPI score was calculated as 95.5±5.98 (85-100). According to the MEPI score, 8 patients were evaluated as excellent and 2 as good. The mean VAS pain score was 0.8±1.03 (0-2). The subjective patient evaluation was recorded as excellent in 5 patients, good in 3 patients, and moderate in 2 patients. One patient developed avascular necrosis and 2 patients had elbow joint arthrosis. K-wire migration was observed in one patient. Loss of reduction, nonunion, malunion, reflex sympathetic dystrophy, or heterotopic ossification were not encountered.

CONCLUSION

The management of distal humeral fractures is challenging, and favorable outcomes are closely associated with early joint motion. A solid fixation grants early mobilization. An internal fixation using lateral buttress plate, headless cannulated screws, and interfragmentary K-wires provides a solid and secure construction that allows early postoperative joint motion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Therapeutic study.

Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus: Current concepts and surgical techniques

Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus are a unique subset of distal humeral fractures which entail partial or complete articular fractures of the distal humerus without involvement of the columns. The very distal nature of these fragments, their small size and propensity for comminution render them challenging to treat surgically. The purpose of this article is to describe the classification, outcomes and surgical techniques currently used for the treatment of these fractures using the available literature and authors' clinical experience.

Anti-sliding plate technique for coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to discuss the surgical strategy, technical feasibility, and clinical efficacy of coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus using the anti-sliding plate technique.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients (35 males and 17 females) were treated with the anti-sliding plate technique in our hospital from January 2012 to January 2017. The average age of the patients was 40.4 years. They were classified according to the Dubberley classification system and treated with the anti-sliding plate technique. The long-term functional scores represented by the Mayo Elbow Performance Index and complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

Fractures were classified as follows: 11 type-IA, 5 type-IB, 16 type-IIA, 4 type-IIB, 13 type-IIIA, and 3 type-IIIB according to the Dubberley classification system. All patients were treated with open reduction and internal fixation by the extensile lateral approach and completed a clinical and radiographic follow-up (average, 17.6 months). The average Mayo elbow performance score was 90.6 points, with 36 excellent, 11 good, and 5 fair results. The average range of movement of the elbow joint was 3° (0-15°) for extension and 136° (90-150°) for flexion.

CONCLUSIONS

The anti-sliding plate technique follows basic AO principles and neutralizes the shearing force combined with lag screws and/or Kirschner wires after the anatomic reduction of the fracture. It allows for the stable internal fixation of the fracture, which is critical for early mobilization and a good functional outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Case Series, Treatment Study.

Capitellum Fracture Open Reduction and Internal Fixation With Headless Screws

Partial articular fractures involving the capitellum represent an injury to the lateral column of the distal humerus. Capitellum open reduction and internal fixation restores this portion of the distal humerus articular surface and biomechanical integrity to the lateral column. This video demonstrates open reduction and internal fixation of a type I capitellar fracture with headless compression screws through an extensile lateral approach.

Mid-term and Long-term Functional and Radiographic Results of 13 Surgically Treated Adolescent Capitellum Fractures

BACKGROUND

Capitellum fractures are rare in adolescents, and information in literature is still limited. The purpose of this study was to report the mid-term and long-term functional and radiographic results of 13 surgically treated adolescent capitellum fractures in a level I trauma center.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients aged 10 to 16 years, who underwent surgery for a capitellum fracture and were followed up for at least 12 months. Fractures were classified according to the McKee modification of the Bryan and Morrey classification, and elbow arthritis was classified using the Broberg and Morrey system. Functional outcomes were assessed with the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and the Turkish-language version of the shortened version of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scale.

RESULTS

The mean time to surgical intervention was 4.5 days (range, 1 to 18 d). The mean flexion-extension range of motion arc was measured as 115 (range, 45 to 150) degrees. The mean restriction for extension and flexion compared with the uninjured side was measured as 10.7 (range, 0 to 45) and 11.5 (range, 0 to 45) degrees, respectively. The mean MEPI was 87.7 points (range, 50 to 100 points) with 9 patients as excellent, 1 good, 1 fair, and 2 poor results. The mean QuickDASH score was 11 (range, 0 to 57). The mean MEPI score was 95.6 and 75 and the mean QuickDASH score was 2.62 and 25.0 for early surgery group (≤3 d) and late surgery group (>3 d), respectively (P=0.073, 0.024). Elbow joint contracture developed in 4 patients. Implant removal and open release of joint contracture was applied to 2 patients. Elbow arthritis of grade 3 was observed in 2 patients and grade 2 in 1 patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Capitellum fractures may be easily missed on conventional radiographs, if not suspected. Delayed diagnosis may lead to a worsening of the functional outcomes. Computerized tomography is helpful in the determination of these fractures. Early diagnosis and a well-performed surgery is essential for successful outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-case series.

Anatomic cadaveric study of the extensile extensor digitorum communis splitting approach for exposing the ulnar coronoid process

BACKGROUND

The extensile extensor digitorum communis (EDC) splitting approach can access the ulnar coronoid process (UCP), which can be used to treat terrible triad injuries. The present study anatomically examined the extensile EDC splitting approach for exposing the UCP.

METHODS

Twenty fresh frozen cadaveric upper limbs were dissected. The splitting length of the EDC and detachment length of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB)-extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL)-brachioradialis (BR) origin were measured to expose the UCP. The distance between the most distal site of the EDC splitting and the point at which the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) crosses the anterior aspect of the radial shaft, and the distance between the most proximal site of the ECRB-ECRL-BR origin detachment and the point at which the radial nerve crosses the anterior aspect of the humeral shaft were measured.

RESULTS

The splitting length of the EDC was 45.4 ± 4.8 mm, the detachment length of the ECRB-ECRL-BR origin was 30.2 ± 4.7 mm, the distance between the distal site of the EDC splitting and PIN was 10.6 ± 6.1 mm (minimum distance, 1.1 mm), and the distance between the proximal site of the ECRB-ECRL-BR origin detachment and the radial nerve was 49.5 ± 9.7 mm (minimum distance, 31.7 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

The extensile EDC splitting approach can sufficiently expose the UCP. However, splitting must be performed carefully because the most distal site of the EDC splitting is close to the point at which the PIN crosses the anterior aspect of the radial shaft (average distance, 10 mm; minimum distance, 1 mm).

Clinical outcome and osteoarthritic changes after surgical treatment of isolated capitulum humeri fractures with a minimum follow-up of five years

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome of patients treated for a fracture of the capitulum humeri and to analyze the grade of osteoarthritic changes.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgical reconstruction of isolated capitulum humeri fractures were included in a retrospective comparative analysis. Fractures were classified according to the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) and Dubberley and were functionally evaluated by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES) and the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI). Levels of arthritic changes were measured with the Broberg and Morrey Score. Frequency of complications was evaluated whereby all results were compared to the ipsilateral, unaffected side.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients, ten females (76.9 %) and three males (23.1 %), with a mean age of 48.7 ± 13.3 years were included in the study. Long-term follow-up range of motion (ROM) in the sagittal plane was significantly influenced by time of surgery (p < 0.001), and long-term follow-up with respect to pronation and supination by ROM of the healthy control (p < 0.05). The average ASES score was 37.8, and the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) was 92.7. The mean level of degenerative arthritic changes was 1.9 ± 0.6 on the fractured side and significantly less (0.8 ± 0.8) on the healthy side (p_F-test < 0.001). At a mean follow-up of 118.5 ± 52.4 months neither nonunion nor avascular necrosis were observed in any case. However, six cases of heterotopic ossification were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Satisfying functional outcomes and a low rate of osteoarthritic changes can be expected after the presented open reduction and internal fixation of capitulum humeri fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV - Case series; therapeutic study.

Coronal shear fractures of distal humerus: Diagnostic and treatment protocols

Coronal shear fractures of distal humerus involving the capitellum and the trochlea are rare injuries with articular complexity, and are technically challenging for management. With better understanding of the anatomy and imaging advancements, the complex nature of these fractures is well appreciated now. These fractures involve metaphysealcomminution of lateral column and associated intraarticular injuries are common. Previously, closed reduction and excision were the accepted treatment but now preference is for open reduction and internal fixation with an aim to provide stable and congruent joint with early range of motion of joint. Various approaches including extensile lateral, anterolateral and posterior approaches have been described depending on the fracture pattern and complexity. Good to excellent outcome have been reported with internal fixations and poor results are noted in articular comminution with associated articular injuries. Various implants including headleass compression screws, minifragment screws, bioabsorbable implants and column plating are advocated for reconstruction of these complex fractures. Inspite of articular fragments being free of soft tissue attachments the rate of osteonecrosis and osteoarthritis is reported very less after internal fixation. This article summarizes the diagnostic and treatment strategies for these rare fractures and recommendations for management.

Capitellum Fracture Fragment Excision: a Case Series

BACKGROUND

Fractures of the capitellum are rare injuries, and few studies have reported the results of fragment excision.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purpose of this study was to determine range of motion and short-term clinical outcomes for patients treated with capitellum excision.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed to identify all patients with an isolated capitellum fracture who underwent excision as definitive treatment at our institutions. Mechanism of injury, associated elbow injuries, type of capitellum fracture, complications, and postoperative outcomes including final elbow range of motion (ROM), elbow instability, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score were recorded.

RESULTS

Four patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study. All patients were female with an average age of 69 years (range 42-85). Based on the Bryan and Morrey classification system, three (75%) fractures were classified as type I and one (25%) fracture as type III. The average clinical follow-up was 11 months. Final examination demonstrated a mean elbow range of motion from 14° (range 0-30) of extension to 143° (range 130-160) of flexion. All patients had full forearm rotation, and there was no clinical evidence of elbow instability. The average DASH score was 18.3 (12.5-24.2) at final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Excision of the capitellum, much like excision of the radial head, results in acceptable short-term outcome scores and elbow range of motion in patients with fractures that are not amenable to open reduction and internal fixation.

Management of distal humeral coronal shear fractures

Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus are rare, complex fractures that can be technically challenging to manage. They usually result from a low-energy fall and direct compression of the distal humerus by the radial head in a hyper-extended or semi-flexed elbow or from spontaneous reduction of a posterolateral subluxation or dislocation. Due to the small number of soft tissue attachments at this site, almost all of these fractures are displaced. The incidence of distal humeral coronal shear fractures is higher among women because of the higher rate of osteoporosis in women and the difference in carrying angle between men and women. Distal humeral coronal shear fractures may occur in isolation, may be part of a complex elbow injury, or may be associated with injuries proximal or distal to the elbow. An associated lateral collateral ligament injury is seen in up to 40% and an associated radial head fracture is seen in up to 30% of these fractures. Given the complex nature of distal humeral coronal shear fractures, there is preference for operative management. Operative fixation leads to stable anatomic reduction, restores articular congruity, and allows initiation of early range-of-motion movements in the majority of cases. Several surgical exposure and fixation techniques are available to reconstruct the articular surface following distal humeral coronal shear fractures. The lateral extensile approach and fixation with countersunk headless compression screws placed in an anterior-to-posterior fashion are commonly used. We have found a two-incision approach (direct anterior and lateral) that results in less soft tissue dissection and better outcomes than the lateral extensile approach in our experience. Stiffness, pain, articular incongruity, arthritis, and ulnohumeral instability may result if reduction is non-anatomic or if fixation fails.

Articular fractures of the distal humerus

Distal humeral fractures represent 2% of all adult elbow fractures. Injury mechanisms include high-energy trauma with skin involvement, and low energy trauma in osteoporotic bone. Treatment goals are anatomical restoration in young, high-demand patients and quick recovery of activities of daily living in the elderly. Complete fractures are relatively easy to diagnose, but partial intra-articular fractures are not. The clinical diagnosis must take into account potential complications such as open injuries and ulnar nerve trauma. Standard X-rays with additional distraction series in the operating room are sufficient in complete articular fracture cases. Partial intra-articular fractures will need CT scan and 3D reconstruction to fully evaluate the involved fragments. SOFCOT, AO/OTA and Dubberley classifications are the most useful for describing fractures and selecting treatment. Surgery is the optimal treatment and planning is based on fracture type. Complete fractures are treated using a posterior approach. Triceps management is a function of fracture lines and type of fixation planned. Constructs using two plates at 90° or 180° are the most stable, with additional frontal screw for intercondylar fractures. Elbow arthroplasty may be indicated in selected patients, having severely communited distal humerus fractures and osteoporotic bone. Open fractures make fixation and wound management more challenging and unfortunately have poorer outcomes. Other complications are elbow stiffness, non-union, malunion and heterotopic ossification.

Posterior fixation of type IV humeral capitellum fractures with fully threaded screws in adolescents

PURPOSE

Humeral capitellum fractures comprise approximately 1% of all elbow fractures. In this study, we examined the clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes following operative stabilization of Bryan and Morrey type IV fractures of the capitellum in adolescents. We applied headless cannulated screws in a posteroanterior direction without damaging the articular cartilage surface of the fractures.

METHODS

Eight adolescent patients (six male, two female) with a mean age of 15 ± 2.1 years (range 13-18 years) were treated for type IV (McKee) humerus capitellum fractures. In the preoperative radiological evaluation, anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and computed tomography (CT) images were performed. A lateral surgical approach was used, and cannulated fully threaded headless screws were applied in a posteroanterior direction as fixation materials in the fracture reduction. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score was used in the evaluation of elbow joint functions.

RESULTS

Patients were followed up for a mean of 24.6 months. Fracture union was achieved at a mean of 5 ± 0.92 weeks (range 4-6 weeks). The mean elbow extension flexion arc was 135° ± 13.47° (range 110°-150º) and the mean pronation supination arc was 156° ± 4.43° (150°-160°). In one patient, there was nonconformity in the humerus trochlea and in another patient, there was keloid formation on the surgical scar. All patients attained excellent results according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score.

CONCLUSIONS

In the treatment of type IV capitellum fractures in adolescents, open reduction with a lateral surgical approach and fixation using posteroanterior directed, cannulated, fully threaded, headless screws is a reliable method to achieve a pain-free functional elbow joint.

Distal humeral coronal plane fractures: management, complications and outcome

BACKGROUND

Coronal plane fractures of the distal humerus have special characteristics in classification, imaging, surgical approaches, materials used, treatment modalities, and complications. The purpose of this study is to comment on these topics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was done for patients with distal humeral coronal plane fractures. They were classified according to Dubberley and functionally evaluated by Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI). The long-term complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 15 patients, with type 1 fractures in 2, type 2 in 6, and type 3 in 7. All patients were treated by open reduction and internal fixation either by lateral or posterior approach. The average MEPI score was 83.3 (range, 60-100) points with 7 excellent, 2 good, and 6 fair results. The MEPI scores of type 3 fractures were significantly lower than those of types 1 and 2 fractures (P = .037 and P = .002, respectively). The complications were avascular necrosis in 4 (27%) patients, degenerative arthritis in 6 (40%), joint step-off in 6 (40%), heterotopic ossification in 7 (47%), nonunion in 1 (7%), and implant failure in 1 (7%). The presence of avascular necrosis and joint step-off were significantly associated with degenerative arthritis (P = .004 and P = .005, respectively). Heterotopic ossification was significantly associated with presence of lateral epicondyle fracture (P = .004).

CONCLUSION

Type 1A and 2A coronal plane fractures typically had an excellent outcome. However, type 3 and subtype B fractures are prone to developing complications which are primarily avascular necrosis, degenerative arthritis and heterotopic ossification.

Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus

Management of coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus has evolved considerably over the past 3 decades, with an increased appreciation of the complexity of these fractures, improvements in internal fixation techniques, and the use of more extensile exposures. Nearly all of these fractures are displaced, given the paucity of soft tissue attachments and correspondingly, nonsurgical management is fraught with complications including chronic pain, mechanical symptoms, and instability and is not recommended. Good to excellent outcomes can be achieved in the majority of patients with open reduction internal fixation, particularly when the fracture is limited to the radiocapitellar joint. Outcomes are worst for those with considerable medial extension or comminution. Computed tomography is highly recommended to guide surgical planning. The presence of posterior comminution or extension to the medial column might require more extensile exposures and supplemental fixation for adequate stability. Arthroscopic reduction and fixation techniques have been described for the simple fracture. Those not amenable to fixation might do better with total elbow arthroplasty in a select population. Long-term data demonstrate the durability of these elbows following open reduction internal fixation. Complications other than stiffness are rare. Radiographic avascular necrosis does not appear to affect outcome. Radiographic mild to moderate arthritis was observed in half of patients at 17-year follow-up.

Elbow fractures: distal humerus

A distal humerus fracture can be a debilitating and difficult injury to treat. The anatomy of the distal humerus is highly complex, as it articulates with both the radius and ulna and allows for motion in multiple planes. Furthermore, comminution and osteopenia may render the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction weak, making adequate stabilization difficult. Various methods of surgical fixation have been described, with bicolumnar plating being the most popular. Controversy over fixation techniques and the introduction of recently developed implants, including precontoured plates and locking plates, have led to renewed focus on biomechanical testing of various fixation constructs. Failure of adequate reconstruction or fixation can be addressed with adjunctive measures such as incorporation of structural bone grafts, external fixation, or, in certain instances, salvage with total elbow arthroplasty. The articular surface can also be injured from a shear force, resulting in fractures of the capitellum and trochlea in the coronal plane. This article presents a review of current literature concerning the diagnosis, classification, treatment, and outcome of distal humerus fractures.