Evaluation of static progressive stretch for the treatment of wrist stiffness

Treatment of wrist stiffness through posture orthosis and active exercise: A case report

Introduction

Wrist fractures, particularly the distal radius, can result in significant stiffness and hand dysfunction if not mobilized early. The variable immobilization period post-fracture depends on fracture type, location, stability, and surgical intervention. Inadequate early mobilization typically leads to structured stiffness, influenced by patient health, injury mechanism, joint surface involvement, associated tissue injuries, and patient motivation.

Case presentation

A 64-year-old female in good health suffered a distal radius fracture, treated with open reduction and internal fixation. A modified treatment plan, including custom orthosis and active wrist exercises, was initiated after the standard immobilization phase to enhance the range of motion while accommodating the patient's daily activities.

Clinical discussion

The patient underwent 15 evaluations of active range of motion (AROM) using a goniometer, guided by the American Society of Hand Therapists. A Tissue Composition Analysis (TCA) was performed to guide the orthosis-treatment choice. Despite consistent improvement shown in AROM, it was inconclusive whether the modified treatment contributed significantly beyond the standard approach.

Conclusions

While the patient's AROM improved, the treatment's effect on this single case cannot definitively confirm the efficacy of the modified approach. A more extensive study is necessary to evaluate the conservative treatment strategy's validity for such fractures in high-demand patients, considering the biomechanical complexity of the injury and the patient's professional needs.

Effectiveness of the static progressive Joint Active System splint in improving upper extremity joint stiffness

PURPOSE

Injuries to the upper extremity often result in stiffness. The joint capsule may lose its elastic properties, limiting motion. Most modalities for increasing motion are based on capsule stretching, and usually involve physical or occupational therapy. We tested the hypothesis that the Joint Active System static-progressive splint is helpful in increasing range of motion in stiff joints after failure of other treatments.

METHODS

Candidates for the Joint Active System splint were mostly patients with upper extremity trauma that required surgery, if they plateaued after therapy but still had stiffness. A retrospective review was performed of all patients from 2015 to 2019 that met our inclusion criteria. Etiologies of stiffness and patient demographics were documented. Range of motion was recorded before and after treatment and, when available, functional scores were calculated.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were treated with the Joint Active System splint; 5 were excluded, leaving 39 for analysis: 15 elbow, 14 wrist and 10 proximal interphalangeal joints. All patients had received therapy before using the Joint Active System and 11 had tried a dynamic splint in addition to therapy. All joints showed significant improvement in motion after treatment: from 66.5° to 95.7° in the elbow, 63.5° to 81.1° in the wrist and 33.2° to 51.8° in the proximal interphalangeal joint. When functional scores were available before and after treatment, there was significant improvement for both elbow and wrist. Even when the Joint Active System was started many months after injury, it was effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite reaching a plateau with therapy, the Joint Active System static-progressive splint is effective in improving range of motion in elbow, wrist and finger joints with stiffness following injury or surgery.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective case series.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, level IV.

Efficacy of a high-intensity home stretching device and traditional physical therapy in non-operative management of adhesive capsulitis - a prospective, randomized control trial

BACKGROUND

Historically, in-person physical therapy serves as a foundational component of nonoperative treatment of adhesive capsulitis (AC). This study compares the effectiveness of an at-home high-intensity stretch (HIS) device to traditional physical therapy (PT) and to PT in combination with the HIS device. We hypothesize that the HIS device will be as effective as PT alone or as combination therapy in the first-line treatment of AC and use of the HIS device will exhibit improvement at higher rate.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients with idiopathic adhesive capsulitis and a minimum of 12 months follow-up were included in this study. Patients were randomized into one of the three groups: HIS device, PT alone, or HIS device + PT. Passive range of motion (ROM), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores were measured. Additionally, patient satisfaction, compliance and complications were recorded. Paired t-test, ANOVA and Chi-squared tests were used in analysis.

RESULTS

Final ROM in all planes improved for all groups compared to baseline (p < 0.001), with only HIS device group able to restore > 95% of contralateral ROM in all planes at final follow-up. Patients with PT alone were on average slowest to improve ROM from baseline, at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year in all planes except internal rotation. ASES and SST scores improved for all groups when compared to baseline (p < 0.001). Use of HIS-device resulted in greater improvement in SST and ASES Total scores compared to PT alone (p = 0.045, and p = 0.048, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of an at-home high-intensity stretching device for conservative treatment of idiopathic adhesive capsulitis improves outcomes in ROM and in ASES and SST scores both when used as an adjunct to physical therapy and when used alone.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study protocol was registered at www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov (20/05/2022, NCT05384093).

Examination of the traction effect in an artificial muscle-type dynamic traction orthosis using computed tomography

BACKGROUND

Dart-throwing motion from radial dorsiflexion to palmar flexion has recently attracted attention as a functional movement direction of the wrist joint. We developed a novel artificial muscle-type dynamic traction orthosis (DTSaM) that includes these movements. This prospective crossover controlled study aimed to compare the traction effects in the presence and absence of DTSaM using computed tomography.

METHODS

Healthy participants with no history of finger disease (6 men: 6 fingers, 4 women: 4 fingers; average age [range]: 29.4 [34-24] years) were examined. The distance and area of the joint space between the radiolunate (RL) and capitolunate (CL) joints were evaluated using 2 types of computed tomography: automatic movement and DTSaM.

RESULTS

Participants with DTSaM showed more dilated joint space distance on the dorsal and central sides (p < 0.05) and larger joint space areas on the dorsal side (p < 0.05) of the RL and CL joints than those without orthosis. Significant differences in the magnitude of change in each joint were observed between the RL and CL joints regarding the joint space distance on the dorsal (p = 0.021) and central (p = 0.038) sides and the joint space area on the dorsal side (p = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

The movement of the CL joint is important in the dorsiflexion direction. Our results suggest that the dilated CL joint allows dorsiflexion and that combined traction and dart-throwing motion exercises may be possible for wrist joint contracture.

Objective Methods of Monitoring Usage of Orthotic Devices for the Extremities: A Systematic Review

Orthoses are commonly prescribed to relieve symptoms for musculoskeletal and neurological conditions; however, patients stop wearing orthoses as recommended for many reasons. When considering the effectiveness of orthoses, there needs to be an objective way to monitor whether participants wear the orthosis as instructed, because if this is not followed, the orthoses will not work as intended. This review aimed to identify, summarise, and compare objective methods used to measure compliance with orthoses applied to the extremities. Databases (Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, and MEDLINE) were searched for eligible studies. Twenty-three studies were accepted in the final review, including five studies that employed upper limb orthoses, two that employed hip orthoses, and fifteen that employed lower limb orthoses. To measure compliance objectively, studies utilised temperature sensors, pressure sensors, accelerometers, a step counter, or a combination of sensors. All sensor types have their own advantages and disadvantages and should be chosen based on study-specific parameters. Sensor-derived monitoring provides quantitative, objective data that are beneficial in both clinical and research settings. The ideal solution to monitoring compliance would consist of both objective and user-reported aspects that, in combination, would provide an all-encompassing picture of the orthotic treatment prescribed.

Printing a static progressive orthosis for hand rehabilitation

BACKGROUND

Static progressive orthosis is used for the treatment of severe joint contracture after trauma and/or surgery. However, a custom-fabricated static progressive splint would be expensive and labor intensive. Especially, owing to very limited payment under the current Taiwanese National Health Insurance, the incentives to fabricate a patient-specific splint are insufficient for a therapist. To ease splint construction, we introduced three-dimensional (3D)-printed "shark fin"-shaped device works as a static progressive orthosis for the hand rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to describe and demonstrate the newly designed device.

METHODS

This study included a 46-year male suffered from a left distal radius fracture and underwent open reduction internal fixation and a 23-year male with the right thumb flexor pollicis longus rupture, requiring tendon repair. Both subjects used this "shark fin"-shaped device to stretch for increasing range of motion (ROM) of wrist extension and the thumb.

RESULTS

The patient receiving ulnar shortening surgery used this device to stretch for increasing ROM of wrist extension. The active ROM of wrist extension improved from 30° to 50°. The other patient with the right thumb flexor pollicis longus rupture suffered from thumb contracture; the ROMs of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint and interphalangeal (IP) joint were 40°-55° and 20°-25°, respectively. After tenolysis surgery, his ROMs of the MCP and IP joints were improved to 10°-35° and 40°-65°, respectively. Following physical therapy by applying the device, his ROMs of the MCP and IP joints were further increased to 0°-40° and 25°-70°, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Incorporating the "shark fin"-shaped orthosis into hand rehabilitation increased the ROM of wrist extension for a patient with distal radius fracture and improved the ROM of the MCP and IP joints in another patient after tenolysis surgery.

Methods for assessment of patient adherence to removable orthoses used after surgery or trauma to the appendicular skeleton: a systematic review

Background

Patient adherence to treatment is a key determinant of outcome for healthcare interventions. Whilst non-adherence has been well evidenced in settings such as drug therapy, information regarding patient adherence to orthoses, particularly in the acute setting, is lacking. The aim of this systematic review was to identify, summarise, and critically appraise reported methods for assessing adherence to removable orthoses in adults following acute injury or surgery.

Methods

Comprehensive searches of the Ovid versions of MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, CINAHL, Central, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and SPORTDiscus identified complete papers published in English between 1990 and September 2018 reporting measurement of adherence to orthoses in adults following surgery or trauma to the appendicular skeleton. Only primary studies with reference to adherence in the title/abstract were included to maintain the focus of the review. Data extraction included study design, sample size, study population, orthosis studied, and instructions for use. Details of methods for assessing adherence were extracted, including instrument/method used, frequency of completion, number of items (if applicable), and score (if any) used to evaluate adherence overall. Validity and reliability of identified methods were assessed together with any conclusions drawn between adherence and outcomes in the study.

Results

Seventeen papers (5 randomised trials, 10 cohort studies, and 2 case series) were included covering upper (n = 13) and lower (n = 4) limb conditions. A variety of methods for assessing adherence were identified, including questionnaires (n = 10) with single (n = 3) or multiple items (n = 7), home diaries (n = 4), and discussions with the patient (n = 3). There was no consistency in the target behaviour assessed or in the timing or frequency of assessment or the scoring systems used. None of the measures was validated for use in the target population.

Conclusions

Measurement and reporting of adherence to orthosis use is currently inconsistent. Further research is required to develop a measurement tool that provides a rigorous and reproducible assessment of adherence in this acute population.

Trial registration

PROSPERO: CRD42016048462. Registered on 17/10/2016.

Static progressive stretch orthosis-consensus modality to treat knee stiffness-rationale and literature review

The current literature supports static progressive stretch (SPS) orthoses as the consensus modality to treat joint stiffness as an adjunct to manual therapy. Over 50 published studies prove the efficacy and safety of this modality as an adjunct to therapy to improve range of motion (ROM) as well as decrease stiffness and pain. Data from a large prospective study on SPS effectiveness identified a 90% improvement in ROM, 84% reduction in stiffness and swelling, 70% reduction in pain, and no reports of complications or injury. Another 13 studies evaluating patients with knee stiffness have shown excellent results with SPS, and a reduced need for manipulation under anesthesia or additional surgeries. The bidirectional SPS device allows for ROM therapy in both flexion and extension, uses short, 5-minute incremental stretches for up to a 30-minute session applied 1 to 3 times per day for 8 weeks, though treatment might be needed for longer durations (8 to 12 weeks) in cases with chronic stiffness/contracture, to improve motion and significantly reduces need for manipulation or surgery for treatment of knee fibrosis. Earlier application of SPS therapy, even immediately postoperative following corrective surgery for motion loss, can greatly improve the results for patients who have limitations in knee motion.

Manipulation under anaesthesia versus low stretch device in poor range of motion after TKA

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two frequently used non-operative treatment techniques for a stiff knee after total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients with a stiff knee after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were randomized into a manipulation under anaesthesia group, or a low load stretch (stretch) group. The patients were followed up for 6 weeks and were evaluated for maximum flexion and extension, range of motion (ROM), pain, stiffness and function.

RESULTS

Both groups showed a significant increase in knee flexion in this study. Only the stretch group showed a significant increase in extension ROM. In both groups, a significant increase in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities was observed. No significant difference was observed between both groups for the flexion or extension ROM, or for any of the pain, function or stiffness scores during this study.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study showed that the stretch technique had equal or superior results concerning ROM and function compared to manipulation under anaesthesia. The stretch technique achieved this without requiring the patient to undergo in-hospital treatment or anaesthesia, limiting the costs and the risks for complications. The results of this study showed that stretching is a valuable tool for treating joint contractures of the knee. Therefore, the use of this stretching technique may be an excellent first choice of treatment modality in patients with slow progress of knee flexion or persistent knee stiffness following TKA, prior to manipulation under anaesthesia or lysis of adhesions.

Efficacy of a static progressive stretch device as an adjunct to physical therapy in treating adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a prospective, randomised study

BACKGROUND

Stress relaxation and static progressive stretch are techniques used for non-surgical restoration of shoulder range of motion for patients with adhesive capsulitis.

OBJECTIVES

To compare a static progressive stretch device plus traditional therapy with traditional therapy alone for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomised controlled trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty patients with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder were assigned at random to an experimental group or a control group.

INTERVENTIONS

Both groups received three traditional therapy sessions per week for 4 weeks. In addition, the experimental group used a static progressive stretch device for 4 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was shoulder range of motion (active and passive shoulder abduction, and passive shoulder external rotation). The secondary outcome measures were function [measured by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire] and pain [measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS)].

RESULTS

At baseline, there were no differences between the two groups. However, after the intervention, there were significant (P<0.05) differences between the groups for all outcome parameters: 0.3 for mean VAS scores [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.6 to 1.1], -10.1 for DASH scores (95% CI -21.0 to 0.9), 21.2° for shoulder passive external rotation (95% CI 16.8 to 25.7), 26.4° for shoulder passive abduction (95% CI 17.4 to 35.3), and 27.7° for shoulder active abduction (95% CI 20.3 to 35.0). At 12-month follow-up, the differences between the groups were maintained and even increased for mean shoulder range of motion, VAS scores and DASH scores, with significant differences (P<0.001) between the groups: -2.0 for VAS scores (95% CI -2.9 to -1.2), -53.8 for DASH scores (95% CI -64.7 to -42.9), 47.9° for shoulder passive external rotation (95% CI 43.5 to 52.3), 44.9° for shoulder passive abduction (95% CI 36.0 to 53.8), and 94.3° for shoulder active abduction (95% CI 87.0 to 101.7).

CONCLUSION

Use of a static progressive stretch device in combination with traditional therapy appears to have beneficial long-term effects on shoulder range of motion, pain and functional outcomes in patients with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. At 12-month follow-up, the experimental group had continued to improve, while the control group had relapsed.

Effectiveness of bracing in the treatment of nonosseous restriction of elbow mobility: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 studies

BACKGROUND

Restriction of elbow mobility is a very frequent complaint after trauma or surgery. The objective of this study was to assess and compare the effectiveness of dynamic, static, or static-progressive bracing in patients with elbow stiffness of traumatic or postoperative origin and without evidence of ossification. For the purpose of this study, effectiveness was measured as the increase in total range of motion, as well as extension and flexion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a systematic search of the keywords "elbow AND (stiffness OR stiff) AND (brace OR splint OR conservative)" in the online databases PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and the Cochrane Library. We included all clinical studies using dynamic or static bracing in patients with elbow stiffness. Eligible outcomes were changes in total range of motion, flexion, and extension; sustainability of results; and complications.

RESULTS

We included 13 eligible studies, providing data on 14 treated groups in 247 patients. The mean age of these patients was 34.5 ± 10.4 years, and female patients comprised 46% ± 12%. The mean duration from the incident to the start of brace treatment was 6.9 ± 5.1 months. The mean improvement in range of motion during the course of treatment was 38.4° ± 8.9° (95% confidence interval, 39.5°-41.8°).

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence strongly supports the use of static-progressive stretching 3 times 30 minutes per day in each direction as a first line of treatment in patients with post-traumatic and postsurgical elbow stiffness. If this treatment fails or if reasons for stiffness other than soft-tissue incompliance are identified, further surgical interventions should be considered.

Static progressive orthosis for patients with limited radial and/or ulnar deviation: an innovative orthotic design

After injury to the wrist and forearm, therapists and patients frequently work to regain the motions of wrist flexion/extension and forearm pronation/supination. Although these motions play a vital role in everyday functioning, for some, limitations in wrist radial/ulnar deviation can also present functional challenges. These authors describe the creation and utilization of a static progressive orthosis to assist a patient in regaining wrist radioulnar deviation

Dynamic splints do not reduce contracture following distal radial fracture: a randomised controlled trial

QUESTION

Do dynamic splints reduce contracture following distal radial fracture?

DESIGN

Assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty outpatients with contracture following distal radial fracture.

INTERVENTION

The control group received routine care consisting of exercises and advice for 8 weeks. In addition to routine care, during the day the experimental group received a dynamic splint, which stretched the wrist into extension but allowed intermittent movement.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes were passive wrist extension and the Patient Rated Hand Wrist Evaluation (PRHWE). The secondary outcomes were active wrist extension, flexion, radial deviation, and ulnar deviation, and the performance and satisfaction items of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). All outcomes were measured at commencement, at the end of 8 weeks of treatment, and at 12 weeks (ie, 1 month follow-up).

RESULTS

The mean between-group difference for passive wrist extension and PRHWE at 8 weeks were 4 deg (95% CI -4 to 12) and -2 points (95% CI -8 to 4), respectively. The corresponding values at 12 week follow-up were 6 deg (95% CI 1 to 12) and 2 points (95% CI -5 to 9). There were no sufficiently important between-group differences for any of the secondary outcome measures at 8 or 12 weeks.

CONCLUSION

It is unclear whether dynamic splints following distal radial fracture have therapeutic effects on passive wrist extension or PRHWE, but they clearly do not have any therapeutic effects on active wrist extension, flexion, radial or ulnar deviation, or on the performance or satisfaction items of the COPM. The ongoing use of dynamic splints following distal radial fracture is difficult to justify.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTRN12608000309381.

Orthotic considerations for dense connective tissue and articular cartilage--the need for optimal movement and stress

Orthotic intervention is an essential component of hand rehabilitation, addressing biological factors that affect activity and participation. Functional, pain-free joint mobility requires skeletal stability, healthy articular cartilage, and appropriate extensibility of periarticular dense connective tissues (DCTs). This article addresses basic science underlying clinical reasoning when considering orthoses to maintain or restore structural integrity, mobility and function of DCT structures, and articular cartilage. However, these tissues often have different and sometimes conflicting requirements for the maintenance and restoration of integrity and health. The duration of immobilization, especially at end range, should be carefully considered, as it impairs nutrition of tissues and adversely compresses articular cartilage, causing injury that may not be reversible. Immobilization also reduces extensibility of DCT. Thus, an intermittent orthotic wearing schedule is suggested, allowing movement wherever possible to promote tissue health. To optimize benefits and minimize harmful effects of orthotic intervention, further research on physiological responses of human tissues to immobilization and tension is needed.

Use of a static progressive stretch orthosis to treat post-traumatic ankle stiffness

Background

Chronic ankle stiffness can develop for numerous reasons after traumatic injury, and may adversely affect patient gait, mobility, and function. Although standard physical therapeutic techniques typically resolve this stiffness, some cases may be recalcitrant to these measures, making it difficult to restore range-of-motion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a static progressive stretch orthosis for the treatment of chronic ankle stiffness.

Methods

Twenty-six patients (26 ankles) who had chronic post-traumatic ankle stiffness were studied. The patients began treatment at a mean of 47 weeks (range, 6 to 272 weeks) following their initial injury using a static progressive stretch orthosis. A patient-directed protocol was used for 30 minutes per day, 1 to 3 times per day, until the range-of-motion was considered to have plateaued. Mean treatment time was 10 weeks (range, 3 to 19 weeks). Treatment duration, range-of-motion, and complications with the device were assessed.

Results

The overall mean improvement in motion (combined dorsiflexion and plantar flexion) was 17 degrees (range, 2 to 44 degrees). There was a mean improvement in dorsiflexion of 9 degrees (range, -2 to 20 degrees), and a mean improvement of 8 degrees of plantar flexion (range, -10 to 35 degrees). There were no reports of numbness or skin problems.

Conclusions

The outcomes of this study suggest that a patient-directed treatment protocol using a static progressive stretch orthosis was an effective ancillary method for the treatment of chronic post-traumatic ankle stiffness that was refractory to standard physical therapy techniques.

Static progressive orthoses for the upper extremity: a comprehensive literature review

BACKGROUND

Static progressive orthoses are commonly used in the treatment of stiff joints or joint contractures of the upper extremity, but there are few high-quality studies to support this intervention. In addition, there has not been a recently published review of the current literature describing this treatment technique and the outcomes achieved. The specific purpose of this comprehensive literature review is to investigate the current levels of evidence supporting the use of static progressive orthoses in the treatment of joint stiffness or contracture in clients with orthopedic conditions of the upper extremity. This review will also discuss common diagnoses of patients and outcomes achieved, as well as provide recommendations for future hand therapy practice.

METHODS

A computerized database search of publications incorporating the use of static progressive orthoses for the upper extremity was conducted, dating from January 1979 through January of 2011. The search was limited to studies in English of adults with orthopedic conditions.

RESULTS

A total of 65 publications were located. However, only 16 of these studies met this review's inclusion criteria of level 4 evidence or above. Each of the articles was critically appraised using the Structured Effectiveness for Quality Evaluation of Study (SEQES) and the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Level of Evidence. Total SEQES scores ranged from 17 to 39. The majority of the studies are level 4 evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the overall level of evidence is low, the inclusion of static progressive orthoses as an intervention appears to result in positive outcomes, including increased active range of motion, increased grip strength, improved DASH scores, and improved patient satisfaction as well as reduced pain medications during orthotic intervention. The current evidence supports static progressive orthoses as an intervention for patients with upper extremity joint stiffness or contractures due to orthopedic conditions.

Improving the ROM of wrist movements in stroke patients by means of a haptic wrist robot

A 3 DoFs haptic wrist robot is used to measure and/or assist the movement of the wrist on three axes: flexion/extension (F/E), abduction/adduction (A/A), pronation/ supination (P/S). An assistance scheme based on the widely used progressive splinting therapy is proposed and its efficacy is tested within a group of nine chronic stroke patients, during a pilot study consisting of 2 sessions. Preliminary outcomes show that the technique is effective with the very distal part of wrist involving F/E and A/A but results in a reduced motor improvement for the P/S where proximal part of the arm is involved.

Static-progressive splinting in under 25 minutes and 25 dollars

Wrist stiffness can occur after injury to the wrist and surrounding structures. Frequently hand therapists treat this stiffness with static-progressive splinting techniques in an attempt to lengthen shortened tissues through tissue growth and collagen reorganization. The hand therapist's goal is to fabricate a splint that effectively increases range of motion in a timely and cost-effective manner. Through creative images, these authors illustrate their fabrication of a static-progressive wrist extension and/or flexion splint that is cost effective and can be fabricated in 22 minutes.

Improving the ROM of wrist movements in stroke patients by means of a haptic wrist robot

A 3 DoFs haptic wrist robot is used to measure and/or assist the movement of the wrist on three axes: flexion/extension (F/E), abduction/adduction (A/A), pronation/ supination (P/S). An assistance scheme based on the widely used progressive splinting therapy is proposed and its efficacy is tested within a group of nine chronic stroke patients, during a pilot study consisting of 2 sessions. Preliminary outcomes show that the technique is effective with the very distal part of wrist involving F/E and A/A but results in a reduced motor improvement for the P/S where proximal part of the arm is involved.

Effect of passive stretching on simple camptodactyly in children younger than three years of age

PURPOSE

To present the effectiveness of passive stretching as a treatment for camptodactyly, without any other form of physiotherapy or splinting.

METHODS

From May 2003 to August 2008, 61 digits of 22 patients were treated conservatively using passive stretching exercises. All children were less than 3 years old and had no other anomalies. Flexion contractures before and after treatment in mild, moderate, and severe groups were measured and changes were analyzed statistically. The correlations between various clinical factors and treatment outcome were also analyzed statistically. The average follow-up period was 26 months (range, 12-47 mo).

RESULTS

Mean flexion contracture improved from 20° to 1° in the mild group (p < .001), from 39° to 12° in the moderate group (p < .001), and from 75° to 28° in the severe group (p < .001). Of the clinical factors examined, only initial flexion contracture was found to be significantly correlated with treatment outcome (r = -0.287, p = .0025).

CONCLUSIONS

Passive stretching can effectively improve flexion deformity in camptodactyly in infants and young children.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Static progressive stretch improves range of motion in arthrofibrosis following total knee arthroplasty

Arthrofibrosis is a relatively common complication after total knee arthroplasty that negatively affects function and quality of life. Static progressive stretching is a technique that has shown promising results in the treatment of contractures of the elbow, ankle, wrist and knee. This study evaluated a static progressive stretching device as a treatment method for patients who had refractory knee stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. Twenty-five patients who had knee stiffness and no improvement with conventional physical therapy modalities were treated with the device. After a median of 7 weeks (range, 3-16 weeks), the median increase in range of motion was 25 degrees (range, 8-82 degrees). The median gain in knee active flexion was 19 degrees (range, 5-80 degrees). Ninety-two percent of patients were satisfied with the results. The authors believe static progressive stretching devices may be an effective method for increasing the ranges of motion and satisfaction levels of patients who develop arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty.

Performance adaptive training control strategy for recovering wrist movements in stroke patients: a preliminary, feasibility study

Background

In the last two decades robot training in neuromotor rehabilitation was mainly focused on shoulder-elbow movements. Few devices were designed and clinically tested for training coordinated movements of the wrist, which are crucial for achieving even the basic level of motor competence that is necessary for carrying out ADLs (activities of daily life). Moreover, most systems of robot therapy use point-to-point reaching movements which tend to emphasize the pathological tendency of stroke patients to break down goal-directed movements into a number of jerky sub-movements. For this reason we designed a wrist robot with a range of motion comparable to that of normal subjects and implemented a self-adapting training protocol for tracking smoothly moving targets in order to facilitate the emergence of smoothness in the motor control patterns and maximize the recovery of the normal RoM (range of motion) of the different DoFs (degrees of Freedom).

Methods

The IIT-wrist robot is a 3 DoFs light exoskeleton device, with direct-drive of each DoF and a human-like range of motion for Flexion/Extension (FE), Abduction/Adduction (AA) and Pronation/Supination (PS). Subjects were asked to track a variable-frequency oscillating target using only one wrist DoF at time, in such a way to carry out a progressive splinting therapy. The RoM of each DoF was angularly scanned in a staircase-like fashion, from the "easier" to the "more difficult" angular position. An Adaptive Controller evaluated online performance parameters and modulated both the assistance and the difficulty of the task in order to facilitate smoother and more precise motor command patterns.

Results

Three stroke subjects volunteered to participate in a preliminary test session aimed at verify the acceptability of the device and the feasibility of the designed protocol. All of them were able to perform the required task. The wrist active RoM of motion was evaluated for each patient at the beginning and at the end of the test therapy session and the results suggest a positive trend.

Conclusion

The positive outcomes of the preliminary tests motivate the planning of a clinical trial and provide experimental evidence for defining appropriate inclusion/exclusion criteria.