Functional and oncological outcome following marginal excision of well-differentiated forearm liposarcoma with nerve involvement

Resection Status Does Not Impact Recurrence in Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma of the Extremity

BACKGROUND

Well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) is a low-grade soft tissue sarcoma with a propensity for local recurrence. The necessity of obtaining microscopically free surgical margins (R0) to minimize local recurrence is not clear. This study evaluates recurrence-free survival (RFS) of extremity WDLPS in relation to resection margin status.

METHODS

A retrospective review of adult patients with primary extremity WDLPS at seven US institutions from 2000 to 2016 was performed. Patients with recurrent tumors or incomplete resection (R2) were excluded. Clinicopathologic factors were analyzed to assess impact on local RFS.

RESULTS

97 patients with primary extremity WDLPS were identified. The majority of patients had deep, lower extremity tumors. Mean tumor size was 18.2±8.9cm. Patients were treated with either radical (76.3%) or excisional (23.7%) resections; 64% had R0 and 36% had microscopically positive (R1) resection margins. Ten patients received radiation therapy with no difference in receipt of radiation between R0 vs R1 groups. Thirteen patients (13%) developed a local recurrence with no difference in RFS between R0 vs R1 resection. Five-year RFS was 59.5% for R0 vs 85.2% for R1. Only one patient died of disease after developing dedifferentiation and distant metastasis despite originally having an R0 resection.

DISCUSSION

In this large multi-institutional study of surgical resection of extremity WDLPS, microscopically positive margins were not associated with an increased risk of recurrence. Positive microscopic margin resection for extremity WDLPS may yield similar rates of local control while avoiding a radical approach to obtain microscopically negative margins.

The need for improved patient reported outcome measures in patients with extremity sarcoma: A narrative review

BACKGROUND

Extremity sarcoma causes impairments to functionality and quality of life. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) assess patient perspectives relating to domains of health and quality of life.

METHODS

To describe PROMs utilised in extremity sarcoma, the available literature was screened for studies that utilised PROMs to evaluate outcomes in extremity sarcoma following surgery.

RESULTS

Seventy articles met eligibility criteria; six PROMs were identified. The Toronto Extremity Salvage Score, The Short-Form 36, The EORTC QLQ-C30, The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, the Reintegration to Normal Living index and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. Most sarcoma patients score well in these tools, with bone sarcoma, and extent of resection being predictors of poor outcomes.

CONCLUSION

TESS is the only sarcoma-specific PROM, and though a valid assessment of functionality, it has difficulty differentiating patients with minor functional impairments. The absence of a disease-specific measure of health is concerning, as generic tools do not account for the unique experiences sarcoma patients face and may impair their accuracy in analysing intervention effectiveness.

Atypical Lipomatous Tumors: Does Our Inconsistent Terminology Have Patient Repercussions? Results of a Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Misnaming low-grade lipomatous tumors poses a clinical and medicolegal challenge, potentially subjecting patients to expensive and unnecessary surgeries. The terms atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT) and "well-differentiated" liposarcoma (WDL) have been used interchangeably in pathology reports, scholarly works and consensus recommendations, creating vagaries between low-virulence extremity tumors and retroperitoneal disease with metastatic potential.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed on all studies that reported on the local recurrence rate and metastasis of ALTs and WDLs in living human subjects. Local recurrence and metastases were compared using Fisher's Exact Test.

RESULTS

In total, 20 studies evaluated ALTs (n=936), whereas 13 studied WDLs (n=626). Mean follow-up was 6.6±2.0 years (median, 7.0 y). No metastatic disease was observed among ALTs, whereas 15 patients with WDLs (2.7%, P<0.0001) had metastases. The local recurrence rate of ALTs was significantly lower than WDLs after both marginal (15.1%, 141/936 vs. 46.0%, 288/626, P<0.0001) and wide excisions (3.3%, 2/59 in ALT vs. 17.4%, 19/109, P=0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

ALT should be reserved for extremity lesions meeting appropriate histopathologic criteria that represent nonmetastatic disease, reducing over-diagnosis, over-treatment, and patient risk.

Surgical management of truncal and extremities atypical lipomatous tumors/well-differentiated liposarcoma: A systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Atypical lipomatous tumors or well-differentiated liposarcomas (ALT/WDLS) are low-grade soft tissue tumors that are commonly located on the trunk and extremities. There is no consensus on the best surgical approach for ALT/WDLS.

METHODS

A systematic literature review of PubMed, Medline, Embase, Scopus, and google scholar was performed. All published studies on trunk or extremities ALT/WDLS with reported outcome data were considered and independently screened for inclusion by at least two of the authors.

RESULTS

A total of eighteen studies comprising 793 patients with ALT/WDLS were included. 580 patients underwent marginal excision, with local recurrence observed in 69 (11.9%). 213 patients underwent wide excision with local recurrence in 7(3.3%). Recurrent tumors were successfully re-resected with marginal or wide excision. Dedifferentiation was confirmed in 9 patients (1.1%), and a distant pulmonary metastasis in 1 patient (0.1%).

DISCUSSION

Marginal excision of truncal or extremities ALT/WDLS results in a slightly higher local recurrence rate. However, recurrences are almost always amenable to re-resection. The findings support the use of marginal excision for truncal or extremities ALT/WDLS.

A systematic review of functional outcomes after nerve reconstruction in extremity soft tissue sarcomas: A need for general implementation in the armamentarium

Resection of nerves in extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STS) can lead to large functional deficits. Nerve reconstructions are rarely performed and little is known on their outcomes and indications for their use, even though they are essential in restoring sensation in limb salvage procedures. This study investigated current knowledge on functional outcomes and considerations to be taken before performing such reconstructions after sarcoma resection. A systematic search was performed in July 2018 in PubMed and Embase databases according to PRISMA guidelines. Search terms related to "soft tissue sarcoma" and "nerve reconstruction" were used. Studies evaluating functional outcomes after nerve grafting or nerve transfers in extremity STS were included. Qualitative synthesis was performed on all studies. Nineteen studies were included after full-text screening, describing 26 patients. The majority of patients had a nerve reconstruction in the upper extremity (65%). Perioperative radiotherapy was administered in 67% and perioperative chemotherapy in 29% of patients. Nerve grafting was most commonly performed (n = 23) and nerve transfers were performed in six patients. A wide variety of outcome measures were used. Most patients recovered at least some motor function and sensation, but success rates were higher after upper than lower extremity defects. Multimodal treatment did not preclude successful reconstructions. Nerve reconstructions in extremity STS allow the restoration of sensation in limb salvation, even motor nerve function can be restored with satisfactory function. The use of multimodal therapy does not seem to interfere with success. Nerve reconstructions should therefore be considered in STS patients.

Risk Factors for Diagnostic Failure of Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy of Soft-Tissue Tumors Based on World Health Organization Classification Category and Biologic Potential

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic outcome of ultrasound (US)-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) of soft-tissue tumors and to assess the factors associated with significant diagnostic failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We performed a retrospective analysis of biopsy specimens obtained from patients with soft-tissue tumors of the extremities and superficial trunk who underwent both US-guided CNB and surgical resection. In accordance with the World Health Organization classification, biopsy results and findings from final histologic analysis of the surgically resected specimen (hereafter known as final histologic findings) were categorized in terms of biologic potential as benign, intermediate (locally aggressive), intermediate (rarely metastasizing), or malignant. Biopsy results were considered to show a significant diagnostic failure if they resulted in incorrect classification of biologic potential compared with final histologic findings, if results were indeterminate, or if nondiagnostic specimens were obtained. World Health Organization classification categories and the biologic potential of the tumors according to final histologic findings were assessed to identify any relationship with diagnostic failure of CNB, as were other tumor- and patient-related factors. RESULTS. Significant diagnostic failure was seen for 40 of 303 biopsies (13.20%). Multivariate analysis showed a significant association between diagnostic failure and adipocytic tumors (odds ratio [OR], 9.686; p = 0.037) or vascular tumors (OR, 40.115; p = 0.005); intermediate (rarely metastasizing) biologic potential (OR, 12.279; p = 0.001), or malignant biologic potential (OR, 5.668; p < 0.001); and discordance between radiologic and final histologic findings or indeterminacy of biologic potential (OR, 2.500; p = 0.034). CONCLUSION. The World Health Organization classification categories (adipocytic or vascular), biologic potential (intermediate [rarely metastasizing] or malignant), and discordance between radiologic and final histologic findings or indeterminacy of biologic potential were found to be independent risk factors for significant diagnostic failure of CNB of soft-tissue tumors.

A clinical review of 11 cases of large-sized well-differentiated liposarcomas

Well-differentiated liposarcomas of the extremities are one of the most frequent types of malignant soft tissue tumors in adults. These tumors are typically locally aggressive and show a tendency to recurrence after surgical excision even though they do not metastasize and very rarely dedifferentiate. Its clinical presentation is generally a progressively growing mass causing aesthetic, functional, or compressive symptoms depending on the tumor's size and localization. Several authors recommend a wide excision with free margins in order to minimize the risk of recurrence, while others report good results and a low rate of recurrence with more conservative or even marginal excision thereby avoiding complications due to surgical site morbidity. We present a retrospective study of 11 patients with a large-sized well-differentiated liposarcoma of the lower limb with a mean follow-up of 3.2 years. The mean size was 22 × 19 × 17 cm, and a marginal resection was made, respecting the affected neurovascular structures, in all cases. Only one recurrence was found and the functional results were 81.6% according to the MSTS functional scale 1 year after surgery. We believe that the marginal excision is a good alternative when the tumor is located near vascular or nerve structures, and as to our experience, it is not associated with elevated recurrences.

Extensive limb-sparing surgery with reconstruction for sarcoma of the hand and wrist

BACKGROUND

Sarcoma rarely involves the hand or wrist. Extensive surgical excision is the current standard of care. At the extremities, such as the hand and wrist, limb-sparing surgery with reconstruction to provide optimal function is increasingly performed. A descriptive case-series study of 16 patients with sarcoma of the hand and wrist managed using limb-sparing surgery is reported here.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Of 19 patients with sarcoma of the hand or wrist treated between 1999 and 2012, 16 were managed using limb-sparing surgery. These were consecutive patients managed at a single-centre and studied retrospectively. The tumour involved the hand in 7 patients and the wrist in 9 patients. The procedure was primary in 6 patients, whereas 10 patients underwent secondary revision surgery. In 12 patients, reconstruction was performed for one or more of the following structures: nerves (n=2), tendons (n=3), bone (n=3), and/or skin (n=8). After surgical excision, the margins were R0 in 15 patients and R1 in 1 patient. At last follow-up, survival, pain, and function as reflected by the DASH and MSTS scores were assessed.

RESULTS

After the median follow-up of 4.5years [1-13], 15 patients were alive with no local recurrence and 1 patient had lung metastases. Mean values were 18 [0-49] for the DASH score and 88.8% [53-100] for the MSTS score.

DISCUSSION

Limb-sparing surgery reconciles the need to achieve complete tumour excision with the need to restore function. No limits should be placed on tumour excision, given the availability of effective reconstructive methods. The functional outcome depends on the tolerance of adjuvant treatments, most notably radiotherapy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective study.

Clinical outcome of deep-seated atypical lipomatous tumor of the extremities with median-term follow-up study

AIMS

There is no consensus on the best surgical treatment for deep-seated atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT) of the extremities; furthermore, the appropriate duration for follow-up observation remains unclear. We investigated clinical and functional median-term outcomes in the primary operations for ALT of the extremities in order to find its best treatment methods and observation periods.

METHODS

From 1996 to 2009, we diagnosed 41 patients with deep-seated ALT of the extremities. Wide resection was performed on 11 patients and marginal resection was performed on 30 patients. The minimum follow-up was 5 years (median, 8.5; range, 5-17.4). Patients were evaluated for their local recurrence, dedifferentiation, and post-operative function using the ISOLS/MSTS scoring system.

RESULTS

Recurrence and dedifferentiation rates were both 0% for the wide resection group, while the rates were 23% (7/30) and 3% (1/30) for the marginal resection group, respectively. Median duration before recurrence was 7.2 years (range, 4.0-14.2). Local recurrence-free survival rate was significantly higher in the wide resection group (P = 0.013). In the marginal resection group, 10% (3/30) of the cases showed residual tumor. The localization of these tumors was all intermuscular. The ISOLS/MSTS scores were 98% (range, 90-100) for wide resection and 99% (range, 93-100) for marginal resection, with no statistical difference (P = 0.694). No ALT-related deaths occurred during the observation period.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to long-term (at least 8 years) of continuous observation, a wide resection is necessary in order to prevent recurrence, dedifferentiation, and residual tumor.

Reconstructive treatment of soft tissue sarcoma of the upper extremity

Limb-sparing surgery is currently the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with soft-tissue sarcoma of the upper extremity. To achieve the best outcome, the reconstructive surgeon must be part of a multidisciplinary team and is required to have a thorough understanding of the whole treatment concept. This article provides an update for the current surgical management of patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the upper extremity. Relevant nonsurgical aspects are also highlighted.