Operative treatment of diaphyseal humeral fractures

Humeral shaft fracture: a randomized controlled trial of nonoperative versus operative management (plate fixation)

Purpose

This randomized controlled trial was conducted to investigate the outcomes of humeral shaft–fracture management with the functional Sarmiento brace (nonoperative) versus open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).

Methods

Sixty humeral shaft–fracture patients with a minimum age of 18 years were randomly assigned into two groups: operative treatment with open reduction–internal fixation (ORIF) or functional brace (Sarmiento). A similar postoperative rehabilitation program was applied for all subjects for the next 12 months. The outcomes of each method were measured in terms of nonunion rate, union time, “quick” Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire scores, and rate of complications, such as malunion, infection, and radial nerve injury.

Results

The two groups had similar baseline characteristics, including age, sex, smoking status, and type and mechanism of fracture. The mean union time was about 4.8 weeks shorter in the ORIF group (13.9 weeks in operative group versus 18.7 weeks in nonoperative group), indicating a definite significant superiority (p=0.001) of ORIF management to functional Sarmiento bracing. However, a comparison of quick DASH scores revealed a borderline-significant difference between the groups (p=0.065). Additionally, we found that treatment of humeral shaft fractures using functional bracing was associated with slightly higher risk of nonunion; however this was not significant (p=0.492).

Conclusion

According to the present findings, there is remarkable superiority of ORIF over functional Sarmiento bracing in the management of patients with humeral shaft fracture.

Management of Humeral Shaft Fractures; Non-Operative Versus Operative

Context:

Functional humeral bracing remains the gold standard for treatment of humeral shaft fractures. There is an increasing trend in the literature to perform operative fixation of these fractures.

Evidence Acquisition:

The aim of this systematic review was to compare the level one evidence for the outcome of non-operative with operative management of humeral shaft fractures in adults. A comprehensive electronic literature search of Medline and PubMed was performed with specific inclusion criteria to identify randomized controlled trials.

Results:

In total, seventeen different studies were identified from the search terms and combinations used. Only one study met the inclusion criteria; however, this was a published study protocol of an ongoing trial currently being conducted. One additional published protocol for an ongoing trial was also identified, but this was for a prospective comparative observational study. Although this latter study may not be level one evidence, it would offer great insight into the functional outcome of humeral shaft fractures and economic implications of operative management, which is currently not addressed in the literature. Two retrospective comparative studies were also identified, one of which demonstrated a significantly lower rate of nonunion and malunion in those patients undergoing operative management.

Conclusions:

This systematic review demonstrated a deficiency in the current literature of level one evidence available for the management of humeral shaft fractures. The current ongoing randomized control trail would offer a greater insight into the management of humeral shaft fractures and help confirm or refute the current literature. If this randomized control trial affirms the reduction in the rate of nonunion with operative fixation, a cost economic analysis is essential. As it would seem to offer operative management to all patients may be over treatment and not to offer this at all would undertreat.

Plate osteosynthesis of humeral diaphyseal fractures associated with radial palsy: twenty cases

BACKGROUND

Surgical management of humeral fractures associated with radial nerve palsy remains controversial. Some advocate surgical treatment in emergency while others recommend nonoperative treatment.

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to assess nerve recovery in a series of patients treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plate for humeral fracture associated with radial nerve palsy. We hypothesised that surgical treatment with ORIF in emergency allows good nerve recovery.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on 20 patients out of 225 humeral shaft fractures operated between 1995 and 2012. There were 11 women and nine men, with a mean age of 51 ± 22 years (23-93). The fractures were located in mid third of the shaft in 15 cases (75 %), distal third in four (20 %) and superior third in one (5 %). Mean delay for surgical treatment was three days (zero to 15). The plate was positioned at the medial face in 16 cases (80 %) and posterior face in four (20 %). In six cases, the radial nerve was not seen (30 %). In the 14 cases where it was seen (70 %), it was continuous. Neurolysis was performed in seven cases (35 %).

RESULTS

Fifteen patients (75 %) had a good nerve palsy recovery, with a mean delay of ten months (six to 12). Statistically significant correlation was observed between delay of surgical treatment and delay of radial recovery (p = 0.0166 ; Rho = - 0.53). Early osteosynthesis was correlated with better nerve recovery. One patient required complementary nerve surgery and another tendon transfer. Bone healing was obtained in all cases. Concerning functional outcomes, mean QuickDASH, a shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, was 9 ± 17 (0-59), and 85 % of patients were able to recover their previous physical activities.

CONCLUSION

ORIF by plate of humeral shaft fracture with radial nerve palsy in emergency allows good palsy recovery (75 %) with a short delay (about three days).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective study.