Thumb basal joint arthroplasty using abductor pollicis longus tendon: an average 5.5-year follow-up

MAÏA Trapeziometacarpal Joint Arthroplasty: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of 76 Patients With More Than 10 Years of Follow-Up

PURPOSE

Trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint replacement has become a valid option in the therapeutic arsenal of TMC joint osteoarthritis in Europe. Good mid-term results of the MAÏA TMC joint prosthesis suggested that it is a reliable procedure. This study aimed to assess the long-term results of this modular uncemented ball-and-socket hydroxyapatite-coated implant.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study evaluated 92 MAÏA TMC joint prostheses in 76 patients with a minimum of 10 years of follow-up. Indications for the procedure were painful TMC joint osteoarthritis both at rest and during activity, despite nonsurgical treatment for more than six months. Pre- and postoperative clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 134 months (range: 120-158 months). Mean age at the time of surgery was 67 years (range: 53-84 years). The cohort comprised 86.8% of women (n = 66). The mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score improved from 61.3 ± 17.1 to 19.6 ± 16. Range of motion was restored, and postoperative mobility was comparable with that of the contralateral side. Final Kapandji opposition score was almost normal (9.2 ± 0.7). Final key pinch and grip strength improved by 26% and 39%, respectively. Eight implants were surgically revised, six for trapezium cup loosening and two for instability because of polyethylene wear. Three cases of traumatic fracture of the trapezium in older patients were successfully treated with a cast for eight weeks. Five of 26 (20.8%) cases of preoperative-reducible z-deformity were not totally corrected after surgery. The Kaplan-Meier survival over 10 years was 88% (95% confidence interval: 84-93) versus 93% (95% confidence interval: 87-98) over 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

MAÏA TMC joint prosthesis is a reliable long-term surgical procedure for TMC joint osteoarthritis, improving overall function beyond 10 years.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Three-dimensional motion analysis of pre- and postoperative thumb movement in trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis-Comparison of arthrodesis and trapeziectomy with suspensionplasty

Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis (TMC-OA) reduces the range of motion (ROM) of the thumb. However, the kinematic change achieved through surgical treatment remains unclear. Therefore, to quantify the kinematic change following TMC-OA surgery, we performed a three-dimensional motion analysis of the thumb using an optical motion capture system preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively in 23 patients with TMC-OA scheduled for arthrodesis (AD) or trapeziectomy with suspensionplasty (TS). Eighteen hands of nine healthy volunteers were also included as controls. Both procedures improved postoperative pain and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores, and AD increased pinch strength. The ROM of the base of the thumb was preserved in AD, which was thought to be due to the appearance of compensatory movements of adjacent joints even if the ROM of the TMC joint was lost. TS did not improve ROM. Quantifying thumb kinematic changes following TMC-OA surgery can improve our understanding of TMC-OA treatment and help select surgical procedures and postoperative assessment.

Efficacy of Abductor Pollicis Longus Suspension Arthroplasty Combined With Mini TightRope for Osteoarthritis of Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of abductor pollicis longus (APL) suspension arthroplasty with trapeziectomy combined with first and second metacarpal fixation using suture button device.

METHODS

Thirteen patients (14 thumbs) who underwent APL suspension arthroplasty combined with suture button device for osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb (Eaton grade III: 6 and IV: 8 thumbs) at our institution between 2015 and 2019 and were followed up for more than 24 months were included in the study. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion (ROM) of radial and palmar abduction, grip and key pinch strength, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain, and the trapezial space ratio (TSR) on radiographic images before and after surgery were statistically examined.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 59.6 ± 8.1 years, and the mean follow-up period was 45.4 ± 12.2 months. While grip and pinch strength did not significantly change between preoperative and final follow-up measurements, the ROM of radial and palmar abduction and the VAS score at the latest follow-up were significantly better than the preoperative values (P < .05). The mean TSR immediately after surgery and at the latest follow-up was 0.28 ± 0.089 and 0.22 ± 0.084, respectively, indicating a mean reduction rate of 23.3 ± 15.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

This surgical technique showed significant improvement in the ROM of radial and palmar abduction and the VAS score for pain, and the combined fixation of the first and second metacarpals with suture button device suppressed the subsidence of the first metacarpal.

Biomechanical analysis of three techniques of suspensionplasty after trapeziectomy: a cadaveric study

The aim of the present cadaveric study was to assess resistance to first metacarpal subsidence of three techniques of suspensionplasty after trapeziectomy. In total, 18 forearms (mean age 60 years [range 20-89]) were used with six specimens per surgical technique: palmar oblique ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition (LRTI), abductor pollicis longus (APL) suspensionplasty, or suture suspensionplasty. There was no significant difference in mean trapezial space height after trapeziectomy and suspensionplasty compared to the preoperative trapezial height. However, after simulation of physiological lateral pinch, there was a significant (p < 0.05) difference in mean trapezial space height between the APL suspensionplasty and the suture suspensionplasty compared to the LRTI group. After axial loading, there was significantly greater metacarpal subsidence in the LRTI group compared to the APL and suture suspensionplasty groups but no statistically significant difference between the suture suspensionplasty and the APL suspensionplasty groups.Level of evidence: V.

Suspension arthroplasty using the palmaris longus tendon with a suture button for thumb trapeziometacarpal arthritis: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to assess the clinical and radiographic results at a minimum of 2 years after ligament reconstruction suspension arthroplasty (LRSA) that comprised full trapeziectomy and suspensionplasty using the palmaris longus tendon and the Mini TightRope (Arthrex, Naples, FL) for advanced thumb carpometacarpal arthritis.

METHODS

We clinically and radiographically evaluated 26 thumbs in 26 patients who had undergone LRSA at least 2 years previously. The mean follow-up period was 35.9 months. We evaluated the subjective clinical outcomes (visual analogue scale and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores) and objective clinical outcomes (range of motion, pinch strength, grip strength, and trapezial space height ratio).

RESULTS

At the final follow-up evaluation, the mean visual analogue scale score was 11.1 (standard deviation (SD) 13.4) and the mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire score was 9.39 (SD 10.1). The mean palmar and radial abduction were 62.3° (SD 11.8°) and 63.8° (SD 9.09°), respectively. The mean key pinch and grip strength were 3.92 (SD 1.07) kg and 19.7 (SD 7.77) kg, respectively. The mean trapezial space ratio was 0.21 (SD 0.10). The subjective clinical outcomes, range of motion, and pinch strength were significantly improved compared with preoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

LRSA for advanced-stage thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis relieves pain, improves range of motion and strength, and obtains favourable subjective patient-reported clinical outcomes.

Suture Suspension Arthroplasty for Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis Reconstruction: 12- to 14-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Many surgical procedures have been described for the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint osteoarthritis, with significant variation. To date, none has proven to be superior. The purpose of this study was to report long-term follow-up results of suture suspension arthroplasty (SSA).

METHODS

The SSA technique uses a single incision, trapeziectomy, and an intra-articular suture suspension sling anchored into the insertions of the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) and abductor pollicis longus (APL), which serves to stabilize the base of the thumb metacarpal, correct subluxation deformity, and maintain arthroplasty space. Ninety of 153 SSA reconstructions (59% recall) were evaluated at long-term follow-up (mean, 12.6 years). Data were analyzed for functional outcomes, including preoperative and postoperative grip and pinch strength, radiographs, complications, and postoperative Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores.

RESULTS

The mean age at date of surgery was 61.7 ± 7.6 years (82% women). Significant improvement was noted in grip strength (preoperative mean, 25.0 kg; postoperative mean, 28.0 kg; P < .0001), key pinch (preoperative, 4.2 kg; postoperative, 5.1 kg; P < .0001), and tip pinch (preoperative, 2.9 kg; postoperative, 3.6 kg; P < .0001). Radiographic subsidence averaged 35% (0-90). Postoperative QuickDASH scores (mean, 6.6; range, 0-50) revealed good to excellent pain relief and function. One revision was performed, and postoperative FCR rupture occurred in 3 reconstructions.

CONCLUSIONS

The SSA technique for thumb CMC arthritis reconstruction yields good to excellent long-term clinical outcomes. Potential advantages of the SSA include short operative time, a single incision, minimal cost, and no need for tendon harvesting, pin fixation, or implantable hardware.

Prognostic factors and clinical features in metacarpophalangeal joint hyperextension after ligament reconstruction with trapeziectomy: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Management of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) hyperextension deformity in thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint arthritis is challenging. It remains unclear how the preoperative MCP joint angle affects the outcomes. The present study aimed to clarify the associations between postoperative MCP hyperextension deformity and outcomes, and to determine the preoperative MCP joint angle that can predict poor outcomes.

METHODS

We investigated the functional outcomes of patients who underwent surgery for CMC arthritis at two institutions from 2016 to 2020. All patients received a modified Thompson technique, ligament reconstruction suspension arthroplasty, and had no additional treatment for MCP hyperextension. The patients were divided into three groups according to their postoperative MCP joint angles: Group A, <10°; Group B, 10°-20°; Group C, >20°. Evaluations included preoperative and postoperative VAS, Quick DASH, range of motion (ROM), grip power, pinch strength, first web space angle, and postoperative trapezial space ratio (TSR).

RESULTS

Overall, 66 eligible patients (72 thumbs) were identified and received follow-up for a mean of 25.2 months. The 72 thumbs were assigned to Group A (n = 38), Group B (n = 16), and Group C (n = 18). Group C had significantly lower preoperative MCP joint angle and postoperative grip power, pinch strength, and TSR compared with the Group A (P < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in VAS, Quick DASH, ROM, and first web space angle (P > 0.05). The preoperative risk factor for highly residual MCP hyperextension was preoperative MCP joint angle (OR = 1.078; P = 0.001), with a cut-off value of 21.5° (AUC = 0.79; sensitivity = 0.813; specificity = 0.821).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative MCP hyperextension of >20° after ligament reconstruction with trapeziectomy has adverse effects on functional outcomes. In cases with preoperative MCP joint angle of >21.5°, additional treatment for MCP hyperextension should be considered.

Efficacy of Abductor Pollicis Longus Suspensionplasty Compared to Ligament Reconstruction and Tendon Interposition

Background: Multiple surgical techniques are described for basal joint osteoarthritis. This study compares clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction with trapeziectomy and abductor pollicis longus (APL) suspensionplasty compared to trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) when performed by 2 fellowship-trained hand surgeons. Methods: A retrospective review of 51 consecutive patients undergoing APL suspensionplasty (53 hands) was performed. With this technique, a distally based APL slip is brought through and sewn to the flexor carpi radialis (FCR). The remaining APL is placed in the trapeziectomy void. This technique was compared to 151 patients (166 hands) who underwent LRTI using the FCR tendon. Outcomes assessed included postoperative pain relief, grip and pinch strength, complications, and need for reoperation. Two-tailed, Fisher's exact test was used for data analysis. Results: APL suspensionplasty resulted in postoperative pain relief in 92.5% (n = 49) compared to 94.0% (n = 156) with LRTI (P = .758). Mean postoperative grip and pinch strengths with APL suspensionplasty were 41.2 and 10.4 kg, respectively. With LRTI, average grip strength was 42.0 kg, and pinch was 10.1 kg. Both techniques were well tolerated with minimal complications. In the APL group, 1 patient had a postoperative infection requiring drainage. Among the LRTI cases, 1 wound dehiscence required closure, and 2 minor postoperative wound infections resolved with oral antibiotics. Mean follow-up time among APL suspensionplasty patients was 3.3 months compared to 8.4 months following LRTI. Conclusions: APL suspensionplasty is a safe, effective procedure which provides similar pain relief and functional outcomes compared to LRTI.

Total trapeziectomy

Total trapeziectomy has been extensively studied and has been used to treat thumb basal joint arthritis for decades. It remains a simple and reliable technique that every hand surgeon must learn and master, as a primary or revision procedure. Several techniques have been described, but none of them seems better than the others. Without the need for an implant and because of its long-lasting benefits, total trapeziectomy is currently the only surgical technique for thumb basal joint arthritis that can lay claim to being a potential life-long procedure.

Trapeziometacarpal joint ligament reconstruction in early stages of first carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis

Trapeziometacarpal joint ligament reconstruction is a surgical option in the early stages of thumb basal joint arthritis when the joint is painful and unstable without chondropathy. Arthroscopy is invaluable here to ensuring the joint surfaces are intact, which is often underestimated by radiography. The Eaton-Littler procedure using a distally pedicled flexor carpi radialis slip has been studied the most in this context. This reconstruction provides pain relief while slowing the rapid development of osteoarthritis.

Simplified abductor pollicis longus suspension interposition arthroplasty for thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis

Purpose

The primary treatment goals for advanced-stage thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint osteoarthritis are complete pain relief and restoration of thumb strength. The purpose of the present study was to introduce a variation of the abductor pollicis longus (APL) suspension arthroplasty using a single looping of a radial slip from the APL tendon around the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) tendon combined with RegJoint™ interposition and to determine its efficacy in the treatment of thumb CMC joint osteoarthritis.

Methods

Between 2015 and 2017, 21 patients were included. The average age was 60.8 years (range 48–79). The mean follow-up was 27.7 months (range 8–50). Evaluation included pain, radial and palmar abduction, tip pinch and grip strength, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score.

Results

Pain averaged 0.3 (range 0–4) at rest and 1.4 (range 0–4) on exertion. The radial and palmar abduction were 97% and 99% compared to the contralateral side. The tip pinch and grip strength were 4.1 kg (range 3–6.5) and 22 kg (range 13.3–40), respectively. The DASH score accounted for 18.5 (range 0.8–41.7).

Conclusion

The modified APL suspension interposition arthroplasty was an efficient and simplified option for the treatment of thumb CMC joint osteoarthritis, with results comparable or better than other published procedures. The APL suspension technique was easy to perform avoiding difficult bone tunneling and incision of the FCR tendon. The RegJoint™ interposition as spacer prevented impingement of the first metacarpal base on the second metacarpal base or the trapezoid bone.

Arthroscopic ligamentoplasty for osteoarthritis of the thumb carpometacarpal joints: Clinical and radiological outcomes with a minimum 2-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

We reported a new technique for arthroscopic ligamentoplasty for the thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (CMC-OA) along with a minimum of 2 years of results.

METHODS

Twenty-nine thumbs with CMC-OA in stages II and III according to the Eaton and Glickel classification, were treated by arthroscopic ligamentoplasty. The procedure included partial trapeziectomy followed by ligamentoplasty similar to the Thompson technique. We evaluated pain VAS; DASH; grip and pinch strength; thumb abduction range of motion, and radiographic examination preoperatively and every 3 months until 1 year after surgery, and every 6 months thereafter. The mean duration of the follow-up was 3.2 years with a range of 2.0-6.0 years.

RESULTS

Pain, VAS, and DASH were significantly improved at 3 months after surgery than those preoperatively. Further, the strength of grip, tip, and key pinch significantly increased at 9, 9, and 12 months after surgery, respectively. Additionally, these improvements were maintained until the final follow-up. The range of motion tended to decrease in both palmar and radial abduction, although the differences were not significant. Radiographic examination after surgery showed that the ratio of trapezial space was significantly reduced because of surgical excision of the trapezium. However, there were no significant differences in the results between each follow-up time and the final follow-up. Moreover, the ratio of subluxation on the plain X-ray was significantly improved and maintained until the final follow-up. The parameters of clinical and radiographic outcomes, except motion, were significantly improved, even in patients with including those in stage III and with greater than 1/3 subluxation of the 1st metacarpal base on plain radiography.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic ligamentoplasty was effective for pain relief and improvement of grip and pinch strength for the patients with symptomatic CMC-OA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study/Level IV.

Unplanned Early Reoperation Rate Following Thumb Basal Joint Arthroplasty

Purpose

Thumb basal joint arthritis is a common degenerative condition of the hand that is often managed with thumb basal joint arthroplasty (BJA). This procedure generally results in a high level of patient satisfaction; however, the rate and cause of early unplanned reoperation after thumb BJA are not well-understood. Therefore, we performed a review to better understand the rate and cause of early reoperation.

Methods

A retrospective review of all thumb BJA cases performed at a single private academic center between 2014 and 2016 yielded 637 patients and 686 primary thumb BJAs with a minimum 1-year follow-up (mean, 2.4 years). Data collection included patient demographics, surgical technique and type of thumb BJA performed, time to reoperation, reason for early reoperation (within 2 years), and type of reoperation.

Results

Of 686 patients undergoing thumb BJAs, 10 had unplanned early reoperation (1.5%). Mean duration between the index procedure and reoperation was 5.2 months (range, 0.5–14.3 months). Of the 10 unplanned early reoperations, 4 thumbs in 4 patients required revision arthroplasties owing to persistent pain. Time to reoperation for revision arthroplasty was 9.6 months (range, 3.9–14.3 months). Three of 10 reoperations resulted from early infection, 2 from unplanned early removal of symptomatic K-wires, and one from radial sensory neuritis.

Conclusions

In this series of nearly 700 consecutive cases, we identified an unexpected early reoperation rate of 1.5%, with only a 0.6% reoperation rate specifically for painful subsidence requiring a revision arthroplasty. Mean time to revision was 9.6 months. These rates are lower than those published previously and should be considered by patients and surgeons when planning thumb BJA.

Type of study/level of evidence

Prognostic IV.

Tendon versus Pyrocarbon Interpositional Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis

Background

Trapeziometacarpal (TMC) arthritis is treated with surgery when nonsurgical treatment fails. The best surgical option for improving pain relief, functional outcomes, and postoperative complications remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes and complications between trapezium excision with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) and pyrolytic carbon interpositional arthroplasty.

Methods

From March 2009 to August 2014, 37 patients (39 wrists) with Eaton-Littler stage II or III TMC arthritis underwent complete trapezium excision with LRTI (Group L, n=19) or pyrolytic interpositional arthroplasty (Group P, n=20). Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores; grip and pinch strength; Kapandji scores to quantify thumb opposition; and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores were used to compare clinical outcomes between the two groups. Radiographic changes (metacarpal shortening, subluxation, and radiolucency) were evaluated on the radiographs of thumb basal joints.

Results

There were no differences in patient demographics, Eaton-Littler stage, preoperative outcome measures, or the duration of follow-up between the two groups. At the last follow-up, VAS pain scores, pinch and grip strengths, Kapandji scores, and DASH scores were significantly improved in both groups compared with preoperative scores. All follow-up measurements were similar between the two groups except pinch strength, which was 1.8 kg higher in Group P (p<0.001). Proximal metacarpal migration did not differ significantly between the groups. Periprosthetic lucency more than 1 mm was observed in 7 of 20 (35%) thumbs. Complication rates were similar between the two groups.

Conclusions

All subjective and objective outcomes were similar following LRTI and pyrolytic interpositional arthroplasty in patients with TMC arthritis, except pinch strength, which was more improved following pyrolytic interpositional arthroplasty. Longer follow-up is required to test adverse effects of high rates of periprosthetic lucency and prosthetic subluxation on clinical outcomes after PyroDisk interpositional arthroplasty.

Mean 5-Year Follow-up for Suture Button Suspensionplasty in the Treatment of Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

Suture button suspensionplasty (SBS) has been used to treat thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis (CMC joint OA). Although promising short-term outcomes have been reported, no outcomes beyond 4 years have been published. The aim of this article is to report intermediate outcomes of SBS.

METHODS

We reviewed the charts of 14 patients who underwent 16 SBS procedures for symptomatic thumb CMC joint OA. We recorded demographic data, preoperative Eaton stage, length of follow-up, Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire scores, as well as pinch strength, grip strength, range of motion, and metacarpal subsidence. Operative time and postoperative complications were documented.

RESULTS

Average age was 64 years. There were 12 women and 2 men. Preoperative Eaton stages were III and IV in 8 thumbs each. Mean operative time was 93 minutes. Mean follow-up was 64 months with mean Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score improvement of 58.2. Mean palmar and radial abduction were 105% and 97%, respectively, of the nonsurgical thumb. Kapandji scores for all operated thumbs were either 9 or 10. Pinch and grip strength were 107% and 102%, respectively, of the nonsurgical side. Mean trapezial space height was 71%. One patient underwent removal of a symptomatic implant and 2 patients had transient neuropraxia of the dorsal radial sensory nerve.

CONCLUSIONS

Favorable outcomes (improvement in range of motion and pain relief) of SBS remain durable over time. Our results show that improvement in strength may also be expected over time when using SBS after trapeziectomy for the treatment of thumb CMC joint OA.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Pyrolytic Carbon Arthroplasty versus Suspensionplasty for Trapezial-Metacarpal Arthritis

Purpose This study aims to compare outcomes after pyrolytic carbon implant hemiarthroplasty (PH) versus Thompson suspensionplasty (TS) for trapezial-metacarpal (TM) arthritis. Patients and Methods There were 87 arthritic TM joints in 71 patients treated with PH (n = 47 joints, 37 patients) or TS (n = 40 joints, 34 patients). Patients had significantly longer follow-up in the TS group (86.9 months, 25th-75th percentile = 55.6-103.8) versus the PH group (38.4 months, 25th-75th percentile = 23.2-65.8, p < 0.001). Results PH patients maintained higher final grip strength (p = 0.03) and apposition pinch strength (p = 0.01) compared with TS patients. Nelson scores were significantly higher among patients undergoing PH (mean = 50.4, standard deviation [SD] = 24.5) compared with TS (mean = 36.8, SD = 12.5, p < 0.01). There was a significantly higher proportion of complications (p < 0.01), reoperations (p < 0.01), and joint revision surgery (p < 0.01) in patients undergoing PH compared with TS. Controlling for age and sex, there was a 72.8% lower risk of complications (p = 0.02), 87.7% lower risk of reoperations (p = 0.01), and 87.2% lower risk of joint revision surgery (p < 0.01) among patients undergoing TS compared with PH. There was a shorter time to first complication (p < 0.01), reoperation (p < 0.02), and joint revision (p < 0.01) in those undergoing PH compared with TS. Conclusion Both cohorts exhibited functional range of motion and pinch and grip strengths postoperatively, and those undergoing PH began with and maintained higher grip and pinch strength at final follow-up. Those undergoing PH had significantly increased risk of complications, reoperations, and joint revision surgery. Most complications in patients undergoing PH were related to suspected development of scaphotrapezotrapezoidal (STT) arthritis postoperatively. We thus recommend careful evaluation of possible STT arthritis when considering PH arthroplasty. Level of Evidence Level III.

WITHDRAWN: Surgery for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Surgery is used to treat persistent pain and dysfunction at the base of the thumb when conservative management, such as splinting, or medical management, such as oral analgesics, is no longer adequate in reducing disability and pain. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2005.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of different surgical techniques for trapeziometacarpal (thumb) osteoarthritis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following sources up to 08 August 2013: CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 8), MEDLINE (1950 to August 2013), EMBASE (1974 to August 2013), CINAHL (1982 to August 2013), Clinicaltrials.gov (to August 2013) and World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Trials Portal (to August 2013).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs where the intervention was surgery for people with thumb osteoarthritis. Outcomes were pain, physical function, quality of life, patient global assessment, adverse events, treatment failure or trapeziometacarpal joint imaging.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by the Cochrane Collaboration. Two review authors independently screened and included studies according to the inclusion criteria, assessed the risk of bias and extracted data, including adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 11 studies with 670 participants. Seven surgical procedures were identified (trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI), trapeziectomy, trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction, trapeziectomy with interpositional arthroplasty (IA), Artelon joint resurfacing, arthrodesis and Swanson joint replacement). We did not find any studies that compared surgery with sham surgery or surgery with non-surgical interventions.Most included studies had an unclear risk of most biases which raises doubt about the results. No procedure demonstrated any superiority over another in terms of pain, physical function, quality of life, patient global assessment, adverse events, treatment failure (re-operation) or trapeziometacarpal joint imaging. One study demonstrated a difference in adverse events (mild-moderate swelling) between Artelon joint replacement and trapeziectomy with tendon interposition. However, the quality of evidence was very low due to a high risk of bias and imprecision of results.Low quality evidence suggests trapeziectomy with LRTI may not provide additional benefits or result in more adverse events over trapeziectomy alone. Mean pain (three studies, 162 participants) was 26 mm on a 0 to 100 mm VAS (0 is no pain) for trapeziectomy alone, trapeziectomy with LRTI reduced pain by a mean of 2.8 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) -9.8 to 4.2) or an absolute reduction of 3% (-10% to 4%). Mean physical function (three studies, 211 participants) was 31.1 points on a 0 to 100 point scale (0 is best physical function, or no disability) with trapeziectomy alone, trapeziectomy with LRTI resulted in sightly lower function scores (standardised mean difference 0.1, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.32), an equivalent to a worsening of 0.2 points (95% CI -5.8 to 6.1) on a 0 to 100 point scale (absolute decrease in function 0.03% (-0.83% to 0.88%)). Low quality evidence from four studies (328 participants) indicates that the mean number of adverse events was 10 per 100 participants for trapeziectomy alone, and 19 events per 100 participants for trapeziectomy with LRTI (RR 1.89, 95% CI 0.96 to 3.73) or an absolute risk increase of 9% (95% CI 0% to 28%). Low quality evidence from one study (42 participants) indicates that the mean scapho-metacarpal distance was 2.3 mm for the trapeziectomy alone group, trapeziectomy with LRTI resulted in a mean of 0.1 mm less distance (95% CI -0.81 to 0.61). None of the included trials reported global assessment, quality of life, and revision or re-operation rates.Low-quality evidence from two small studies (51 participants) indicated that trapeziectomy with LRTI may not improve function or slow joint degeneration, or produce additional adverse events over trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction.We are uncertain of the benefits or harms of other surgical techniques due to the mostly low quality evidence from single studies and the low reporting rates of key outcomes. There was insufficient evidence to assess if trapeziectomy with LRTI had additional benefit over arthrodesis or trapeziectomy with IA. There was also insufficient evidence to assess if trapeziectomy with IA had any additional benefit over the Artelon joint implant, the Swanson joint replacement or trapeziectomy alone.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We did not identify any studies that compared surgery to sham surgery or to non-operative treatments. We were unable to demonstrate that any technique confers a benefit over another technique in terms of pain and physical function. Furthermore, the included studies were not of high enough quality to provide conclusive evidence that the compared techniques provided equivalent outcomes.

Meniscal allograft arthroplasty for the treatment of trapeziometacarpal arthritis of the thumb

BACKGROUND

Arthritis at the trapeziometacarpal joint of the thumb is common. Several surgical options exist showing favorable results. We report the outcomes after interposition of allograft knee meniscus for thumb trapeziometacarpal arthritis.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients (25 thumbs) had surgery for thumb trapeziometacarpal arthritis using knee meniscal allograft tissue. Eleven thumbs had a minimum follow-up of 24 months, 2 thumbs had a minimum of 12 months, and 12 thumbs had less than 6 months. Disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaire scores, pain levels, grip strength, pinch strength, range of motion, and radiographic measurements were performed.

RESULTS

Between the preoperative and 24-month follow-up measurements, patient pain levels were reduced. There was a significant improvement in DASH scores. Comparisons between preoperative and postoperative strength measurements showed increase in grip strength and key pinch strength. Trapeziometacarpal subsidence was 5.5 %, and subluxation index measurements decreased 3.9 %. There was no clinical or radiographic evidence of foreign body reaction and no other complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of meniscal allograft arthroplasty are comparable to other surgical techniques for trapeziometacarpal arthritis with respect to pain, outcomes, strength, oppositional motion, complications, surgical time, cost, and return to work. The results suggest that meniscal allograft arthroplasty is a viable option in the surgical management of stages II and III arthritis of the TM joint. Further follow-up and clinical studies are warranted.

Slip abductor pollicis longus suspension tendinoplasty for management of trapezio-metacarpal joint osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

Trapezio-metacarpal (TM) joint arthritis is a common cause of pain and functional disability of the hand. The ideal surgical procedure for TM joint osteoarthritis is still controversial. The aim of the current study is to assess the outcome of complete trapezial excision and abductor pollicis longus tendon interposition arthroplasty in the treatment of TM osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Twenty patients (16 women and 4 men) were prospectively enrolled in the current study with average age of 51.5 years (36-64). All patients had complete trapezial excision and abductor pollicis longus tendon interposition arthroplasty with minimum follow-up of 24 months.

RESULTS

At final follow-up there was significant improvement as regard pain, range of motion, and functional assessment scores. Pre-operative visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain improved from 6.2 (±1.54) to 1.1 (±0.97), and the average Quick DASH Score improved from 47.6 (±8.81) points pre-operatively to 13.6 (±5.46) points post-operatively. The mean pre-operative Buck-Gramcko score system improved from 21 (±6.2) points to 41.5 (±7). The average post-operative satisfaction score was 9.1(±2.1), with all the patients somewhat satisfied and recommending operation to other patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The total trapeziectomy tendinoplasty with suspension and interposition using the abductor pollicis longus is a reliable procedure for the treatment of TMJ osteoarthritis, providing satisfactory functional results.

[Comparative clinical study of 2 surgical techniques for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis]

OBJECTIVE

In trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis (or rhizarthrosis), there is great controversy over the surgical technique to choose: simple trapeziectomy, resection-interposition arthroplasty, interposition arthroplasty suspension-or arthroplasty with implant or prosthesis. These latter 2 are the most used without consensus in the literature on the technique to choose and without sufficient comparative studies. The objective is to compare the 2 techniques most used today: suspension-interposition arthroplasty and arthroplasty with prosthesis.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A prospective study was conducted on 15 patients diagnosed with grade 2-3 rhizarthrosis treated with interposition arthroplasty-suspension (group 1) and 15 with prosthesis (group 2) showing clinical outcomes, advantages and disadvantages of each. The study variables were the visual analogue scale (VAS), the DASH questionnaire, the grip strength, the strength of end to end and end-lateral clamp, the joint balance adduction-abduction and preemption-retropositioning, and the opposition. The 2 groups are from 2 different hospitals operated on by a hand surgeon from the Hand Unit. The follow-up time for all patients included in the study was 12 months.

RESULTS

The VAS, DASH and grip strength at 12 months did not show significant differences. As regards the strength of end to end and end-lateral clamp, group 2 showed the highest values in all follow-up periods with statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient selection and surgical experience is essential, given the satisfactory results of both techniques. Arthroplasty prosthesis is reserved for grades 2 and 3, middle-aged patients, good trapezium architecture, and experienced surgeons.

Basal joint osteoarthritis of the thumb: comparison of suture button versus abductor pollicis longus suspensionplasty

BACKGROUND

Our purpose was to compare the outcomes of patients with severe basilar thumb osteoarthritis treated with trapeziectomy and suspensionplasty using abductor pollicis longus (APL) tendon versus a suture button device.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed for patients undergoing trapeziectomy and suspensionplasty with APL tendon or suture button fixation. Outcome measures included disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH); visual analog score (VAS); grip strength; key pinch; tip pinch; and thumb opposition. Radiographic measurements, surgical times, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients in the APL tendon group and 27 patients in the suture button group had a minimum 6-month follow-up. VAS, DASH, and functional measurements improved after surgery for both groups. Mean operative time was 68 min for the APL tendon group and 48 min for the suture button group. Complications were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of suture button fixation when compared to APL tendon suspensionplasty offers similar clinical outcomes.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic III.

Surgery for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Surgery is used to treat persistent pain and dysfunction at the base of the thumb when conservative management, such as splinting, or medical management, such as oral analgesics, is no longer adequate in reducing disability and pain. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2005.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of different surgical techniques for trapeziometacarpal (thumb) osteoarthritis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following sources up to 08 August 2013: CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 8), MEDLINE (1950 to August 2013), EMBASE (1974 to August 2013), CINAHL (1982 to August 2013), Clinicaltrials.gov (to August 2013) and World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Trials Portal (to August 2013).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs where the intervention was surgery for people with thumb osteoarthritis. Outcomes were pain, physical function, quality of life, patient global assessment, adverse events, treatment failure or trapeziometacarpal joint imaging. We excluded trials that compared non-surgical interventions with surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by the Cochrane Collaboration. Two review authors independently screened and included studies according to the inclusion criteria, assessed the risk of bias and extracted data, including adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 11 studies with 670 participants. Seven surgical procedures were identified (trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI), trapeziectomy, trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction, trapeziectomy with interpositional arthroplasty (IA), Artelon joint resurfacing, arthrodesis and Swanson joint replacement).Most included studies had an unclear risk of most biases which raises doubt about the results. No procedure demonstrated any superiority over another in terms of pain, physical function, quality of life, patient global assessment, adverse events, treatment failure (re-operation) or trapeziometacarpal joint imaging. One study demonstrated a difference in adverse events (mild-moderate swelling) between Artelon joint replacement and trapeziectomy with tendon interposition. However, the quality of evidence was very low due to a high risk of bias and imprecision of results.Low quality evidence suggests trapeziectomy with LRTI may not provide additional benefits or result in more adverse events over trapeziectomy alone. Mean pain (three studies, 162 participants) was 26 mm on a 0 to 100 mm VAS (0 is no pain) for trapeziectomy alone, trapeziectomy with LRTI reduced pain by a mean of 2.8 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) -9.8 to 4.2) or an absolute reduction of 3% (-10% to 4%). Mean physical function (three studies, 211 participants) was 31.1 points on a 0 to 100 point scale (0 is best physical function, or no disability) with trapeziectomy alone, trapeziectomy with LRTI resulted in sightly lower function scores (standardised mean difference 0.1, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.32), an equivalent to a worsening of 0.2 points (95% CI -5.8 to 6.1) on a 0 to 100 point scale (absolute decrease in function 0.03% (-0.83% to 0.88%)). Low quality evidence from four studies (328 participants) indicates that the mean number of adverse events was 10 per 100 participants for trapeziectomy alone, and 19 events per 100 participants for trapeziectomy with LRTI (RR 1.89, 95% CI 0.96 to 3.73) or an absolute risk increase of 9% (95% CI 0% to 28%). Low quality evidence from one study (42 participants) indicates that the mean scapho-metacarpal distance was 2.3 mm for the trapeziectomy alone group, trapeziectomy with LRTI resulted in a mean of 0.1 mm less distance (95% CI -0.81 to 0.61). None of the included trials reported global assessment, quality of life, and revision or re-operation rates.Low-quality evidence from two small studies (51 participants) indicated that trapeziectomy with LRTI may not improve function or slow joint degeneration, or produce additional adverse events over trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction.We are uncertain of the benefits or harms of other surgical techniques due to the mostly low quality evidence from single studies and the low reporting rates of key outcomes. There was insufficient evidence to assess if trapeziectomy with LRTI had additional benefit over arthrodesis or trapeziectomy with IA. There was also insufficient evidence to assess if trapeziectomy with IA had any additional benefit over the Artelon joint implant, the Swanson joint replacement or trapeziectomy alone.We did not find any studies that compared any other combination of the other techniques mentioned above or any other techniques including a sham procedure.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We did not identify any studies that compared surgery to sham surgery and we excluded studies that compared surgery to non-operative treatments. We were unable to demonstrate that any technique confers a benefit over another technique in terms of pain and physical function. Furthermore, the included studies were not of high enough quality to provide conclusive evidence that the compared techniques provided equivalent outcomes.

Selection of tendon grafts for distal radioulnar ligament reconstruction and report of a modified technique

PURPOSE

To investigate the graft length necessary to complete a distal radioulnar ligament reconstruction and assess the suitability of several tendon graft sources.

METHODS

We measured the graft length needed to complete the distal radioulnar ligament reconstruction in 7 fresh-frozen cadaver specimens. The pure tendon lengths of 7 tendon graft sources were measured: palmaris longus, extensor indicis proprius, slips of extensor digiti minimi and abductor pollicis longus, and portions of flexor carpi ulnaris, flexor carpi radialis, and extensor carpi ulnaris. A modified technique that allows for a shorter length of graft is also described, and the suitability of each graft source for this technique was assessed.

RESULTS

The mean graft lengths needed to complete the original and modified reconstructions were 138 mm and 89 mm, respectively. The average length of the tendon graft when measured as pure tendon was: palmaris longus (127 mm), slip of extensor digiti minimi (112 mm), extensor indicis proprius (100 mm), partial flexor carpi radialis (87 mm), slip of abductor pollicis longus (69 mm), partial flexor carpi ulnaris (67 mm), and partial extensor carpi ulnaris (67 mm). The palmaris longus was too short for the original technique in the majority of specimens but was sufficient to complete the modified technique in every specimen that had a palmaris longus. Six specimens also had an extensor indicis proprius of suitable length for the modified technique.

CONCLUSIONS

The length of donor graft required for the modified reconstruction was significantly less than that needed for the original reconstruction. Three specimens had no donor tendons sufficiently long to complete the original technique if a pure tendon graft were used, whereas the modified technique could be completed in all specimens.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Many tendon graft sources in the upper extremity are of insufficient length to complete the distal radioulnar ligament reconstruction as described. A modified technique using suture anchors may be a useful alternative in such cases.

Partial trapeziectomy and pyrocarbon interpositional arthroplasty for trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis: results after minimum 2 years of follow-up

A prospective study was undertaken to assess the outcomes of a series of patients treated using pyrocarbon implant arthroplasty after partial trapeziectomy for trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. We analysed the results of this procedure in 27 trapeziometacarpal joints of 25 patients. The mean follow-up interval was 34 months (range 26-52). The study showed that pyrocarbon interpositional arthroplasty provided excellent pain relief and high patient satisfaction. Overall function, according to disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score, improved from 48 points preoperatively to 14 points at the last follow-up assessment. Key pinch strength recorded in the operated hands was comparable with the results obtained in the contralateral hand and in healthy individuals from the same population. No further operations were performed in the study group. Partial trapeziectomy with pyrocarbon arthroplasty may prove to be a successful option for the treatment of trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. Further long-term comparative studies are warranted.

Five to eight years follow-up for trapeziectomy and Weilby ligament reconstruction for the treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis

Trapeziectomy and Weilby ligament reconstruction is a recognized treatment for osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. Studies published using this procedure have limited follow-up post-surgery. In this series of 24 cases assessed objectively and 36 subjectively with a minimum follow-up of five years, patients continue to have pain relief and function comparable to the opposite non-operated hand. Patient satisfaction is high at 92% and the rate of complications is low. Despite these encouraging results the need for interposition arthroplasty and/or ligament reconstruction in addition to trapeziectomy alone is discussed.

A systematic review of postoperative hand therapy management of basal joint arthritis

BACKGROUND

There are a variety of postoperative immobilization and therapy options for patients with basal joint arthritis. Although prior systematic reviews have compared surgical procedures used to treat basal joint arthritis, none to our knowledge compares therapy protocols for this condition, which are considered an important part of the treatment.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) We sought to determine whether differences in the length and type of postoperative immobilization affect clinical results after basal joint arthritis surgery. (2) We also compared specific therapy protocols that were prescribed. (3) Finally, we evaluated published protocols to determine when patients were released to full activity to see whether these appeared to affect clinical results.

METHODS

A systematic review of English-language studies in the PubMed and Cochrane databases was performed. Studies were then reviewed to determine what postoperative immobilization and therapy protocols the authors used and when patients were released to full activities. A total of 19 studies were identified using the search criteria.

RESULTS

All but one of the studies included a postoperative period of immobilization in either a cast or splint. Immobilization time varied depending on whether Kirschner wires were used for the surgery and whether an implant was placed. Postoperative therapy protocols also varied but followed three general patterns. Some therapy protocols involved teaching patients a home exercise program only, whereas some authors described routine referral to a therapist. The third group consisted of studies in which patients were only referred for therapy if the physicians determined it was necessary during followup. Many studies did not give a specific time for full return to activity and instead described a gradual transition to full activity after immobilization was discontinued. Because of the variability and small numbers, no conclusive recommendations could be made on any of the three study questions.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparative, multicenter studies comparing different immobilization and therapy protocols after the surgical treatment of basal joint arthritis would be helpful for both surgeons and therapists looking to refine their treatment protocols.

Preserving the posttrapeziectomy space with a human acellular dermal matrix spacer: a pilot case series of patients with thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background:

Advanced thumb carpometacarpal arthritis is widely treated with trapeziectomy and tendon interposition despite donor-site morbidities. Trapeziectomy alone leaves a postresection space, leading to proximal metacarpal migration and scaphoid/trapezoid impingement. Prosthetic implants have been unsuccessful due to particulate debris, silicone synovitis, osteolysis, and migration. Recent studies have shown successful use of allograft for interposition material in the posttrapeziectomy space both in animal and human models. To obviate the need for autologous tissue, maintain thumb length, and reduce the risk of scaphoid impingement, the senior author developed an interposition arthroplasty technique using a spacer constructed from human acellular dermal matrix (HADM).

Methods:

Sixteen patients with Eaton stage III–IV thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis received the above procedure from the 2 senior authors. HADM was imbricated to fill the posttrapeziectomy space and secured to the volar capsule and metacarpal base. Pre- and postoperative trapezial space on radiograph, pain scores, and grip strength were recorded.

Results:

Six months postoperatively, radiographs showed an average joint space loss of 11%. Heights postoperatively were not significantly different from immediate postoperative heights (P ≥ 0.01). At 6 months, patients had improved pain and grip strength (P ≤ 0.01). No infections, foreign body reactions, or other complications occurred.

Conclusions:

HADM has been used extensively in other forms of reconstruction and has been shown to incorporate into surrounding tissues through neovascularization. Our early results illustrate that HADM can safely fill the dead space left by trapeziectomy.

Midterm results after modified Epping procedure for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Various surgical procedures have been proposed for the treatment of trapeziometacarpal joint (TMJ) osteoarthritis. Despite an overall satisfactory outcome in most cases, some patients complain about inadequate performance at work, due to instability of the TMJ. We present a cross-sectional study of patients with TMJ arthritis who underwent a modified Epping procedure for increased TMJ stability.

METHODS

71 patients underwent a modified Epping procedure with a flexor carpi radialis tendon sling stabilizer. 59 patients were followed up after a mean time of 38 months. Residual pain was evaluated by visual analog scale. Functional outcome was quantified by pinch and grip strength, static two-point discrimination test, as well as DASH outcome scoring. Quality of life measures included patients' perceived satisfaction, activities of daily living (ADL), grip/pinch force and manual performance at work.

RESULTS

85 % of the patients regained full or partial manual performance during labor. Strength and ADL improved or remained the same in 81 %. In cases of a unilateral treatment, no difference in grip between the operated and nonoperated hand was observed. Mean tip pinch strength was 2.8 kg for the operated and 3.6 kg for the nonoperated hand. Mean pain level during rest was 0.98, 0.95 during mild activity, and 3.70 during strenuous activity. Mean DASH score was 26.6.

CONCLUSION

The great majority of patients who underwent this novel procedure benefited from an unaffected or improved work performance, due to good TMJ stability combined with adequate motion for ADL. Less favorable results were seen in patients with accompanying hand pathologies.

Using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement to assess reporting of observational trials in hand surgery

PURPOSE

To use the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement checklist to critically evaluate the change in quality of observational trial reporting in the Journal of Hand Surgery American between 2005 and 2011.

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis of observational studies published in the Journal of Hand Surgery American was designed to sample 2 6-month periods of publication (March 2005 to August 2005 and June 2011 to November 2011). Fifty-one items were extracted from the STROBE statement for evaluation. Overall STROBE compliance rates for articles and specific checklist items were determined. Final compliance percentages from each period were compared by Student t-testing. Changes in item compliance over time were quantified.

RESULTS

Overall compliance with the STROBE statement was 38% (range, 10%-54%) in 2005 and 58% (range, 39%-85%) for 2011 manuscripts representing a significant improvement. Seventy-five percent or greater of articles (2005/2011) provided the explicit reporting of background (100%/97%), follow-up time (85%/94%), overall interpretation of data (100%/94%), and results of similar studies (95%/89%). Twenty-five percent or less of articles provided the study design in the abstract (10%/20%), a clear description of the study's setting (10%/23%), the handling of missing data (0%/6%), the potential directions of bias (5%/11%), and the use of a power analysis (0%/17%). Eighty-six percent (44/51) of items were more frequently satisfied in 2011 articles than in 2005 publications. Absolute increases in compliance rates of 40% or greater were noted in 10 items (20%) with no worsening in compliance for an individual item over 6%.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall quality of the reporting of observational trials in the Journal of Hand Surgery American improved from 2005 to 2011. Current observational trials in hand surgery could still benefit from increased reporting of methodological details including the use of power analyses, the handling of missing data, and consideration of potential bias.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic III.

Long-term follow-up of trapeziectomy with abductor pollicis longus tendon interposition arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the thumb carpometacarpal joint

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of trapeziectomy with abductor pollicis longus tendon interposition arthroplasty for moderate to severe osteoarthritis of the thumb carpometacarpal joint (Eaton stages III-IV).

METHODS

We evaluated 13 patients (15 thumbs) who underwent trapeziectomy and abductor pollicis longus tendon interposition arthroplasty for end-stage osteoarthritis of the thumb carpometacarpal joint, at an average follow-up of 15 years. Subjective clinical outcomes evaluated included visual analogue scale scores and disability of arm shoulder and hand score questionnaires. Objective clinical evaluation included lateral pinch and grip tests, and a range of active and passive thumb movements. All patients underwent a radiological assessment by two independent senior radiologists. Wherever possible, results obtained from the operated thumbs were compared to the non-operated side.

RESULTS

At a mean of 15 years post operation (range 15-17 years), there was no statistical difference between the operated and non-operated hands with regards to grip and pinch strength. In all cases CMC and MCPJ range of motion in the operative hand was either equal to or greater than non-operative counterparts. Mean visual analogue scale score was 2.13 and mean DASH score was 16.85. Mean carpal height was 0.52 and mean trapezial space ratio was 0.163. There were no early or late complications recorded and no revision surgery was required.

CONCLUSION

It is the opinion of these authors that abductor pollicis longus tendon interposition arthroplasty is able to provide high-quality long-term results for patients who suffer from moderate to severe osteoarthritis of the thumb carpometacarpal joint.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV.

Trapezium resection with mersilene suspension sling

The reason there are numerous techniques for thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty is that none of them are perfect. Sometimes the simplest procedures work best. This article presents a simple alternative, using a readily available suture to stabilize the thumb after resection of the trapezium, with long-term success.

Ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition for thumb basal arthritis

Arthritis at the base of the thumb is common and debilitating. Arthroplasty has evolved over 3 decades to become a highly refined surgical procedure, with excellent results. This article summarizes the history, method, and expected results of basal joint arthroplasty, and the authors describe their method of ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition for thumb basal arthritis.