Tetraplegia Management Update

Hirayama Disease: Surgical Restoration of Hand Function

PURPOSE

Hirayama disease (HD) is a rare, nonfamilial, self-limiting, progressive lower cervical myelopathy, resulting in debilitating distal upper-extremity motor deficits, mimicking high ulnar neuropathy, lower trunk brachial plexopathy, or C8-T1 radiculopathy. Although most literature focuses on pathophysiology and prevention of disease progression, there remains limited discussion regarding treatment to improve upper-extremity function in patients with stable disease. The upper-extremity manifestations of HD are reviewed along with surgical options for restoring hand function.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with HD who underwent reconstruction to improve hand function was undertaken. Demographic data, preoperative electrodiagnostic and electromyographic, and physical examination findings were collected. Outcome data involved postoperative grip, pinch, and functional assessment documented on clinical visits. Qualitative descriptions of the surgical techniques are described.

RESULTS

Among six patients identified, four met the inclusion criteria and underwent tendon transfers and selected joint arthrodeses. All patients were diagnosed as teenagers, were right hand-dominant, and three were male. Unilateral symptoms were present in one patient and were bilateral in the rest. All patients were treated with tendon transfers for thumb opposition, grasp, anticlaw, and thumb interphalangeal joint arthrodesis. All patients had postoperative grip strength improvement. The average follow-up was 3.2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Hirayama disease is a rare disease often managed by spine surgeons and neurologists who may be unaware of options for restoring hand function deficits. Technical strategies and outcomes of improving hand function in HD have not been adequately described. Surgical options to improve hand function are tailored to the deficits and include tendon transfers, select joint arthrodeses, and/or tenodeses. Risk of disease progression and expectations following hand reconstruction must be managed carefully.

TYPE OF STUDY LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic V.

Surgical Technique: Brachioradialis to Extensor Carpi Radialis Longus and Brevis Nerve Transfers for Tetraplegia

Improving upper extremity function in high cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) patients with tetraplegia is a challenging task owing to the limited expendable donor muscles and nerves that are available. Restoring active wrist extension for these patients is critical because it allows for tenodesis grasp. This is classically achieved with brachioradialis (BR) to extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) tendon transfer, but outcomes are suboptimal because BR excursion is insufficient and its origin proximal to the elbow further limits the functionality of the tendon transfer, particularly in the absence of elbow extension. As an alternative approach to restore wrist extension in patients with ICSHT group 1 SCI, we present the first clinical report of the BR to extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL) and BR to ECRB nerve transfers.

Impact of Upper Limb Motor Recovery on Functional Independence After Traumatic Low Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) causes devastating loss of upper limb function and independence. Restoration of upper limb function can have a profound impact on independence and quality of life. In low-cervical SCI (level C5-C8), upper limb function can be restored via reinnervation strategies such as nerve transfer surgery. The translation of recovered upper limb motor function into functional independence in activities of daily living (ADLs), however, remains unknown in low cervical SCI (i.e., tetraplegia). The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of patterns in upper limb motor recovery with functional independence in ADLs. This will then inform prioritization of reinnervation strategies focused to maximize function in patients with tetraplegia. This retrospective study performed a secondary analysis of patients with low cervical (C5-C8) enrolled in the SCI Model Systems (SCIMS) database. Baseline neurological examinations and their association with functional independence in major ADLs-i.e., eating, bladder management, and transfers (bed/wheelchair/chair)-were evaluated. Motor functional recovery was defined as achieving motor strength, in modified research council (MRC) grade, of ≥ 3 /5 at one year from ≤ 2/5 at baseline. The association of motor function recovery with functional independence at one-year follow-up was compared in patients with recovered elbow flexion (C5), wrist extension (C6), elbow extension (C7), and finger flexion (C8). A multi-variable logistic regression analysis, adjusting for known factors influencing recovery after SCI, was performed to evaluate the impact of motor function at one year on a composite outcome of functional independence in major ADLs. Composite outcome was defined as functional independence measure score of 6 or higher (complete independence) in at least two domains among eating, bladder management, and transfers. Between 1992 and 2016, 1090 patients with low cervical SCI and complete neurological/functional measures were included. At baseline, 67% of patients had complete SCI and 33% had incomplete SCI. The majority of patients were dependent in eating, bladder management, and transfers. At one-year follow-up, the largest proportion of patients who recovered motor function in finger flexion (C8) and elbow extension (C7) gained independence in eating, bladder management, and transfers. In multi-variable analysis, patients who had recovered finger flexion (C8) or elbow extension (C7) had higher odds of gaining independence in a composite of major ADLs (odds ratio [OR] = 3.13 and OR = 2.87, respectively, p < 0.001). Age 60 years (OR = 0.44, p = 0.01), and complete SCI (OR = 0.43, p = 0.002) were associated with reduced odds of gaining independence in ADLs. After cervical SCI, finger flexion (C8) and elbow extension (C7) recovery translate into greater independence in eating, bladder management, and transfers. These results can be used to design individualized reinnervation plans to reanimate upper limb function and maximize independence in patients with low cervical SCI.

Assessing an Online Patient Decision Aid about Upper Extremity Reconstructive Surgery for Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Pilot Testing Knowledge, Decisional Conflict, and Acceptability

Background. While nerve and tendon transfer surgery can restore upper extremity function and independence after midcervical spinal cord injury, few individuals (∼14%) undergo surgery. There is limited information regarding these complex and time-sensitive treatment options. Patient decision aids (PtDAs) convey complex health information and help individuals make informed, preference-consistent choices. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a newly created PtDA for people with spinal cord injury who are considering options to optimize upper extremity function. Methods. The PtDA was developed by our multidisciplinary group based on clinical evidence and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. A prospective pilot study enrolled adults with midcervical spinal cord injury to evaluate the PtDA. Participants completed surveys about knowledge and decisional conflict before and after viewing the PtDA. Acceptability measures and suggestions for further improvement were also solicited. Results. Forty-two individuals were enrolled and completed study procedures. Participants had a 20% increase in knowledge after using the PtDA (P < 0.001). The number of participants experiencing decisional conflict decreased after viewing the PtDA (33 v. 18, P = 0.001). Acceptability was high. To improve the PtDA, participants suggested adding details about specific surgeries and outcomes. Limitations. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we used an entirely virtual study methodology and recruited participants from national networks and organizations. Most participants were older than the general population with a new spinal cord injury and may have different injury causes than typical surgical candidates. Conclusions. A de novo PtDA improved knowledge of treatment options and reduced decisional conflict about reconstructive surgery among people with cervical spinal cord injury. Future work should explore PtDA use for improving knowledge and decisional conflict in the nonresearch, clinical setting.

Highlights

People with cervical spinal cord injury prioritize gaining upper extremity function after injury, but few individuals receive information about treatment options.A newly created patient decision aid (PtDA) provides information about recovery after spinal cord injury and the role of traditional tendon and newer nerve transfer surgery to improve upper extremity upper extremity function.The PtDA improved knowledge and decreased decisional conflict in this pilot study.Future work should focus on studying dissemination and implementation of the ptDA into clinical practice.

A Mixed Methods Approach as a Channel to Interpret Outcomes Research and Lived Experience Enquiry of Upper Extremity Elective Surgery for Tetraplegia

Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) causing tetraplegia is extremely disabling. In such circumstances, restoration of upper extremity (UE) function is considered the highest priority. The advent of early nerve transfer (NT) procedures, in addition to more traditional tendon transfers (TT), warranted in-depth consideration given the time-limited nature of NT procedures. Potential surgery candidates may not yet have come to terms with the permanence of their disability. A mixed methods convergent design was utilized for concurrent analysis of the Aotearoa/New Zealand upper limb registry data from the clinical assessments of all individuals considering UE surgery, regardless of their final decision. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) taxonomy guided data interpretation during the three-phased study series. It was the integration of the findings using the Stewart Model of care drawn from palliative health that enabled the interpretation of higher order messages. It is clear the clinical assessment and selection processes in use require reconsideration given the complexities individuals face following onset of SCI. We draw attention to the higher order cognitive demands placed on individuals, the requirement for SCI peer involvement in decision making and the need for acknowledgment of interdependence as a relational construct when living with tetraplegia.

Derivation and Validation of a Clinical Prediction Rule for Upper Limb Functional Outcomes After Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

IMPORTANCE

Traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) can result in debilitating paralysis. Following cervical SCI, accurate early prediction of upper limb recovery can serve an important role in guiding the appropriateness and timing of reconstructive therapies.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a clinical prediction rule to prognosticate upper limb functional recovery after cervical SCI.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This prognostic study was a retrospective review of a longitudinal cohort study including patients enrolled in the National SCI model systems (SCIMS) database in US. Eligible patients were 15 years or older with tetraplegia (neurological level of injury C1-C8, American Spinal Cord Injury Association [ASIA] impairment scale [AIS] A-D), with early (within 1 month of SCI) and late (1-year follow-up) clinical examinations from 2011 to 2016. The data analysis was conducted from September 2021 to June 2022.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was a composite of dependency in eating, bladder management, transfers, and locomotion domains of functional independence measure at 1-year follow-up. Each domain ranges from 1 to 7 with a lower score indicating greater functional dependence. Composite dependency was defined as a score of 4 or higher in at least 3 chosen domains. Multivariable logistic regression was used to predict the outcome based on early neurological variables. Discrimination was quantified using C statistics, and model performance was internally validated with bootstrapping and 10-fold cross-validation. The performance of the prediction score was compared with AIS grading. Data were split into derivation (2011-2014) and temporal-validation (2015-2016) cohorts.

RESULTS

Among 2373 patients with traumatic cervical SCI, 940 had complete 1-year outcome data (237 patients [25%] aged 60 years or older; 753 men [80%]). The primary outcome was present in 118 patients (13%), which included 92 men (78%), 83 (70%) patients who were younger than 60 years, and 73 (62%) patients experiencing AIS grade A SCI. The variables significantly associated with the outcome were age (age 60 years or older: OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.26-4.19), sex (men: OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.31-1.17), light-touch sensation at C5 (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.44-1.01) and C8 (OR, 036; 95% CI, 0.24-0.53) dermatomes, and motor scores of the elbow flexors (C5) (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60-0.89) and wrist extensors (C6) (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.49-0.75). A multivariable model including these variables had excellent discrimination in distinguishing dependent from independent patients in the temporal-validation cohort (C statistic, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.88-0.93). A clinical prediction score (range, 0 to 45 points) was developed based on these measures, with higher scores increasing the probability of dependency. The discrimination of the prediction score was significantly higher than from AIS grading (change in AUC, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.10-0.18; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this study suggest that this prediction rule may help prognosticate upper limb function following cervical SCI. This tool can be used to set patient expectations, rehabilitation goals, and aid decision-making regarding the appropriateness and timing for upper limb reconstructive surgeries.

MiRNAs as Promising Translational Strategies for Neuronal Repair and Regeneration in Spinal Cord Injury

Spinal cord injury (SCI) represents a devastating injury to the central nervous system (CNS) that is responsible for impaired mobility and sensory function in SCI patients. The hallmarks of SCI include neuroinflammation, axonal degeneration, neuronal loss, and reactive gliosis. Current strategies, including stem cell transplantation, have not led to successful clinical therapy. MiRNAs are crucial for the differentiation of neural cell types during CNS development, as well as for pathological processes after neural injury including SCI. This makes them ideal candidates for therapy in this condition. Indeed, several studies have demonstrated the involvement of miRNAs that are expressed differently in CNS injury. In this context, the purpose of the review is to provide an overview of the pre-clinical evidence evaluating the use of miRNA therapy in SCI. Specifically, we have focused our attention on miRNAs that are widely associated with neuronal and axon regeneration. “MiRNA replacement therapy” aims to transfer miRNAs to diseased cells and improve targeting efficacy in the cells, and this new therapeutic tool could provide a promising technique to promote SCI repair and reduce functional deficits.

Restoration of complex movement in the paralyzed upper limb

OBJECTIVE

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) involves artificial activation of skeletal muscles to reinstate motor function in paralyzed individuals. While FES applied to the upper limb has improved the ability of tetraplegics to perform activities of daily living, there are key shortcomings impeding its widespread use. One major limitation is that the range of motor behaviors that can be generated is restricted to a small set of simple, preprogrammed movements. This limitation stems from the substantial difficulty in determining the patterns of stimulation across many muscles required to produce more complex movements. Therefore, the objective of this study was to use machine learning to flexibly identify patterns of muscle stimulation needed to evoke a wide array of multi-joint arm movements.

APPROACH

Arm kinematics and electromyographic activity from 29 muscles were recorded while a 'trainer' monkey made an extensive range of arm movements. Those data were used to train an artificial neural network that predicted patterns of muscle activity associated with a new set of movements. Those patterns were converted into trains of stimulus pulses that were delivered to upper limb muscles in two other temporarily paralyzed monkeys.

RESULTS

Machine-learning based prediction of EMG was good for within-subject predictions but appreciably poorer for across-subject predictions. Evoked responses matched the desired movements with good fidelity only in some cases. Means to mitigate errors associated with FES-evoked movements are discussed.

SIGNIFICANCE

Because the range of movements that can be produced with our approach is virtually unlimited, this system could greatly expand the repertoire of movements available to individuals with high level paralysis.

Selective transfer of nerve to supinator to restore digital extension in central cord syndrome: An anatomical study and a case report

BACKGROUND

Nerve transfers are increasingly used to restore upper extremity function in patients with spinal cord injury. However, the role of nerve transfers for central cord syndrome is still being established. The purpose of this study is to report the anatomical feasibility and clinical use of nerve transfer of supinator motor branches (NS) to restore finger extension in a central cord syndrome patient.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The posterior interosseous nerve (PIN), its superficial division, and branches were dissected in 14 fresh cadavers, with a mean age of 65 (58-79). Measurements included number and length of branches of donor and recipient, diameters, regeneration distance from coaptation site to motor entry point and axonal counts. A NS transfer to extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU), extensor digiti quinti (EDQ) and extensor digitorum communis (EDC) was performed in a 28-year-old patient, with central cord syndrome after a motorcycle accident, who did not recover active finger extension at 10 months post injury.

RESULTS

The PIN consistently divided into a deep and superficial branch between 1.5 cm proximal to, and 2 cm distal to the distal boundary of the supinator. The superficial branch provided a first common branch to the ECU and EDQ. In 12/14 dissections, the EDC was innervated by a 4 cm long branch that entered the muscle on its radial deep surface. In all cases, the superficial branch of the PIN could be separated in a retrograde fashion from the PIN and coapted with NS. The mean myelinated fiber count in nerve to EDC was 401 ± 190 compared to 398 ± 75 in the NS. At 48 months after surgery, with the wrist at neutral, the patient recovered full metacarpophalangeal extension scoring M4. Supination was preserved with the elbow extended or flexed.

CONCLUSIONS

Restoration of finger extension in central cord syndrome is possible with a selective transfer of the NS to EDC, and is anatomically feasible with a short regeneration distance and favorable axonal count ratio.

[Nerve transposition (nerve transfer): development and principles]

This review article presents the history, indications and techniques for the usual nerve transpositions in the upper extremities. By means of nerve transposition paralyzed muscles are reinnervated using dispensable donor motor axons. Many standard operations on the upper extremities are attributable to concepts of German-speaking surgeons and orthopedists. The reliable return of function by the short-range and selective motor reinnervation using nerve transfer results in a renaissance of these techniques. The spectrum of applications has been substantially extended in recent years. In order to achieve an optimal result, a subtle microsurgical technique is necessary. In this way excellent results can be achieved even for complex proximal nerve injuries.

Upper Extremity Surgery in Tetraplegia and the Online Information Void

Background: People with tetraplegia lack awareness of, and subsequently underutilize, reconstructive surgery to improve upper extremity function. This is a topic of international discussion. To bridge the information gap, proposed mandates encourage providers to discuss surgical options with all tetraplegic patients. Outside of the clinical setting, little is known about information available to patients and caregivers-particularly online. The purpose of this study is to evaluate online content for surgical options for improved upper extremity function for people with tetraplegia. Methods: A sample of online content was generated using common search engines and 2 categories of key words and phrases, general and specific. Articles on the first 2 search pages were evaluated for content and audience. Results: A total of 76 different search results appeared on the first 2 pages using 8 unique search phrases. Of articles generated from general phrases, only 5% mentioned tendon or nerve transfers in tetraplegia. When more specific key search phrases were used, the number of lay articles increased to 71%. Conclusions: Based on initial results, general online information on the management of tetraplegia largely excludes discussions of upper limb reconstruction and the well-known benefits. Unless patients, their caregivers, and nonsurgical health care providers have baseline knowledge of tendon and/or nerve transfers, they are unlikely to obtain de novo awareness of surgical options with self-initiated searches. Thus, the challenge and opportunity is to revise the online dialogue to include upper extremity surgery as a fundamental tenet of tetraplegia care.

Functional reconstructions using only ulnar nerve and ulnar nerve-innervated muscles for traumatic musculocutaneous, median and radial nerve palsies

A 20-year-old right-handed fisherman experienced a severe injury in a high-energy traffic accident. These injuries included a shaft fracture of the right humerus, open comminuted fracture of the right forearm and multiple peripheral nerve palsies involving the musculocutaneous, median and radial nerves. Six months after the initial treatment, the patient was referred to our hand surgeons for further treatment. Several operations for functional reconstruction using only the ulnar nerve and ulnar nerve-innervated muscles were performed: the main procedures included a partial ulnar nerve transfer for elbow flexion, flexor carpi ulnaris transfer for reconstruction of wrist and finger extension and opponensplasty using the abductor digiti minimi. Three years after the initial injury, the patient had relatively good function including elbow flexion and stable side pinch and grasp. Functional reconstruction using a combination of the ulnar nerve and ulnar nerve-innervated muscles may be useful in specific cases involving multiple peripheral nerve injuries.

The current state of electrocorticography-based brain-computer interfaces

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) provide a way for the brain to interface directly with a computer. Many different brain signals can be used to control a device, varying in ease of recording, reliability, stability, temporal and spatial resolution, and noise. Electrocorticography (ECoG) electrodes provide a highly reliable signal from the human brain surface, and these signals have been used to decode movements, vision, and speech. ECoG-based BCIs are being developed to provide increased options for treatment and assistive devices for patients who have functional limitations. Decoding ECoG signals in real time provides direct feedback to the patient and can be used to control a cursor on a computer or an exoskeleton. In this review, the authors describe the current state of ECoG-based BCIs that are approaching clinical viability for restoring lost communication and motor function in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or tetraplegia. These studies provide a proof of principle and the possibility that ECoG-based BCI technology may also be useful in the future for assisting in the cortical rehabilitation of patients who have suffered a stroke.

Nerve transfer rehabilitation in tetraplegia: Comprehensive assessment and treatment program to improve upper extremity function before and after nerve transfer surgery, a case report

CONTEXT

A 28-year-old male, sustained a traumatic Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) in January 2015, and was classified as AIS A, neurological level of injury (NLI) C4. As an inpatient at the SCI rehabilitation unit, he underwent multidisciplinary assessment involving SCI specialists, peripheral nerve surgeons, psychologists, occupational and physical therapists. Team consensus determined he was a candidate for nerve transfer surgery to improve upper extremity function. The patient undertook a pre-surgical neurorehabilitation program of 3 months duration. Surgery was performed bilaterally at 11 and 13 months after SCI (right and left arm respectively).

FINDINGS

Upon completion of surgical procedures, the patient underwent an intensive post-surgical rehabilitation program based on established goals, with follow-up every 3 months, up to 24 months after the surgery. Notable improvements were wheelchair propulsion, the ability to relieve pressure, grasp, pinch, and release an object. Standardized measures for SCI individuals (SCIM-III, CUE-Q, LiSAT-9 and UEMS) showed significant improvements.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Nerve transfers in tetraplegia are an underused technique. The benefits of surgery along with an intensive neurorehabilitation program, can improve independence and function in daily living activities for a properly selected group of individuals.

Nerve transfers in tetraplegia: a review and practical guide

INTRODUCTION

Spinal cord injury (SCI) may lead to tetraplegia. Several nerve transfers have been successfully used for the restoration of the upper limb in tetraplegia. Reconstruction of an upper limb is individualized based on the functional level. In this study, the authors reviewed nerve transfers based on the injury level for the restoration of upper limb function in tetraplegia.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We performed this study to review nerve transfers in tetraplegia by searching MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to identify relevant articles published through December 2020. We selected studies that reported cases in tetraplegia and extracted information on demographic data, clinical characteristics, operative details, and strength outcomes based on each injury level after surgery.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Total of 29 journal articles reporting on 275 nerve transfers in 172 upper limbs of 121 patients were included in the review. The mean time between SCI and nerve transfer surgery was 21.37 months (range: 4-156 months), and the follow-up time was 21.34 months (range: 3-38 months). The best outcomes were achieved for the restoration of wrist/finger extension and elbow extension.

CONCLUSIONS

Nerve transfer can provide a new function in tetraplegic patients' upper limbs to improve daily living activities. The type of surgical procedure should be performed based on the functional level of SCI and the individual's needs. Functional recovery occurs more in extensor muscles than flexors. Nerve transfer is a promising option in the reconstruction of upper limb function in tetraplegia.

Biomechanical Comparison of Tendon Coaptation Methods With a Meshed Suture Construct

PURPOSE

Tendon-to-tendon attachment constructs for tendon reconstructions or transfers need to be secure in order to allow early mobilization after surgery. The purpose of this study was to biomechanically compare 2 common constructs secured with a novel mesh suture versus a nonabsorbable braided suture.

METHODS

We used 100 cadaveric tendons to create 5 different tendon coaptation constructs (a to e) (10 coaptations per group): (a) Pulvertaft weave with a braided suture (PTe); (b) mesh suture (PTm); (c) single-pass, side-to-side (SP-STS) coaptation with 30-mm overlap using a mesh suture (SP-STS-30m); (d) SP-STS 50-mm overlap with a mesh suture (SP-STS-50m); and (e) SP-STS with 30-mm tendon overlap using a braided suture (SP-STS-30e). The tensile strength, bulk, gliding resistance, and failure type were compared.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the various tendon constructs and the suture type in terms of coaptation bulk. All SP-STS constructs with mesh suture had higher peak gliding resistance than any of the PT constructs regardless of suture type. Compared with the PT constructs, the SP-STS constructs with mesh or braided suture had a higher peak load, peak load normalized to repair length, and stiffness. Within each tendon coaptation construct group, Pulvertaft or SP-STS, the suture type did not affect any of the investigated parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The SP-STS constructs are significantly stronger and stiffer than the PT constructs. The SP-STS with mesh suture exhibited greater gliding resistance than the PT constructs and may result in greater gliding resistance through physiological tissue planes. However, the use of a mesh suture did not affect strength, bulk, gliding resistance, or failure type when compared within a construct group.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The use of SP-STS constructs for tendon coaptations produces a stronger and stiffer construct than the PT weave; however, the use of a mesh suture may not provide any benefit over a braided suture.

Upper Limb Reconstruction in Tetraplegic Patients: A Primer for Spinal Cord Injury Specialists

Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) often causes debilitating loss of function of the upper limb. Upper extremity reconstruction surgery can restore some of the upper limb function in tetraplegic patients with SCI. The procedures are typically muscle-tendon unit transfer surgeries, which redistribute the remaining functional muscles to restore active elbow extension, key grip, and finger grasping. In addition to the tendon transfer surgeries, nerve transfers have emerged recently and are showing promising results. However, despite more than half of the tetraplegic patients can benefit from upper limb surgery, only a few of them receive the procedures. This missed opportunity may be due to the lack of communication between SCI specialists and hand surgeons, or the lack of awareness of such options among the specialists and patients. In this review, we provide a basic overview of upper limb reconstruction in tetraplegic patients with target audience of SCI specialists for their better understanding of the basic concept of surgery and information for patient consultation before referring to hand surgeons.

Upper-Extremity Reconstruction in Tetraplegia: A Critical Analysis Review

Management of tetraplegia should be individualized to a patient's particular deficiencies and functional goals. Surgical decision-making for upper-extremity reconstruction in patients with tetraplegia relies on a thorough physical examination to determine which nerves and muscles remain under volitional control with adequate strength for transfer. Peripheral nerve transfers, either in conjunction with or in place of traditional tendon transfers, enable providers to offer an expanded set of surgical options for patients with tetraplegia who are seeking upper-extremity reconstruction. All upper-extremity reconstructive efforts should be carefully considered with regard to their potential effects on the availability of future reconstructive efforts.

Regional estimates of cortical thickness in brain areas involved in control of surgically restored limb movement in patients with tetraplegia

Context/Objective: Spinal cord injury (SCI) causes atrophy of brain regions linked to motor function. We aimed to estimate cortical thickness in brain regions that control surgically restored limb movement in individuals with tetraplegia. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Sahlgrenska University hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. Participants: Six individuals with tetraplegia who had undergone surgical restoration of grip function by surgical transfer of one elbow flexor (brachioradialis), to the paralyzed thumb flexor (flexor pollicis longus). All subjects were males, with a SCI at the C6 or C7 level, and a mean age of 40 years (range = 31-48). The average number of years elapsed since the SCI was 13 (range = 6-26). Outcome measures: We used structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to estimate the thickness of selected motor cortices and compared these measurements to those of six matched control subjects. The pinch grip control area was defined in a previous functional MRI study. Results: Compared to controls, the cortical thickness in the functionally defined pinch grip control area was not significantly reduced (P = 0.591), and thickness showed a non-significant but positive correlation with years since surgery in the individuals with tetraplegia. In contrast, the anatomically defined primary motor cortex as a whole exhibited substantial atrophy (P = 0.013), with a weak negative correlation with years since surgery. Conclusion: Individuals with tetraplegia do not seem to have reduced cortical thickness in brain regions involved in control of surgically restored limb movement. However, the studied sample is very small and further studies with larger samples are required to establish these findings.

French recommendations for the management of patients with spinal cord injury or at risk of spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVES

To update the French guidelines on the management of trauma patients with spinal cord injury or suspected spinal cord injury.

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 27 experts was formed. A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the outset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industrial funding (i.e. pharmaceutical, medical devices). The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasised.

METHODS

The committee studied twelve questions: (1) What are the indications and arrangements for spinal immobilisation? (2) What are the arrangements for pre-hospital orotracheal intubation? (3) What are the objectives of haemodynamic resuscitation during the lesion assessment, and during the first few days in hospital? (4) What is the best way to manage these patients to improve their long-term prognosis? (5) What is the place of corticosteroid therapy in the initial phase? (6) What are the indications for magnetic resonance imaging in the lesion assessment phase? (7) What is the optimal time for surgical management? (8) What are the best arrangements for orotracheal intubation in the hospital environment? (9) What are the specific conditions for weaning these patients from mechanical ventilation for? (10) What are the procedures for analgesic treatment of these patients? (11) What are the specific arrangements for installing and mobilising these patients? (12) What is the place of early intermittent bladder sampling in these patients? Each question was formulated in a PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format and the evidence profiles were produced. The literature review and recommendations were made according to the GRADE® Methodology.

RESULTS

The experts' work synthesis and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 19 recommendations. Among the recommendations formalised, 2 have a high level of evidence (GRADE 1+/-) and 12 have a low level of evidence (GRADE 2+/-). For 5 recommendations, the GRADE method could not be applied, resulting in expert advice. After two rounds of scoring and one amendment, strong agreement was reached on all the recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

There was significant agreement among experts on strong recommendations to improve practices for the management of patients with spinal cord injury.

Nerve transfers in the upper extremity following cervical spinal cord injury. Part 1: Systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Patients with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI)/tetraplegia consistently rank restoring arm and hand function as their top functional priority to improve quality of life. Motor nerve transfers traditionally used to treat peripheral nerve injuries are increasingly being used to treat patients with cervical SCIs. In this study, the authors performed a systematic review summarizing the published literature on nerve transfers to restore upper-extremity function in tetraplegia.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE 1946-, Embase 1947-, Scopus 1960-, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and clinicaltrials.gov to identify relevant literature published through January 2019. The authors included studies that provided original patient-level data and extracted information on clinical characteristics, operative details, and strength outcomes after nerve transfer procedures. Critical review and synthesis of the articles were performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-two unique studies, reporting on 158 nerve transfers in 118 upper limbs of 92 patients (87 males, 94.6%) were included in the systematic review. The mean duration from SCI to nerve transfer surgery was 18.7 months (range 4 months-13 years) and mean postoperative follow-up duration was 19.5 months (range 1 month-4 years). The main goals of reinnervation were the restoration of thumb and finger flexion, elbow extension, and wrist and finger extension. Significant heterogeneity in transfer strategy and postoperative outcomes were noted among the reports. All but one case report demonstrated recovery of at least Medical Research Council grade 3/5 strength in recipient muscle groups; however, there was greater variation in the results of larger case series. The best, most consistent outcomes were demonstrated for restoration of wrist/finger extension and elbow extension.

CONCLUSIONS

Motor nerve transfers are a promising treatment option to restore upper-extremity function after SCI. Flexor reinnervation strategies show variable treatment effect sizes; however, extensor reinnervation may provide more consistent, meaningful recovery. Despite numerous published case reports describing good patient outcomes with nerve transfers, there remains a paucity in the literature regarding optimal timing and long-term clinical outcomes with these procedures.

Nerve transfers in the upper extremity following cervical spinal cord injury. Part 2: Preliminary results of a prospective clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

Patients with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI)/tetraplegia consistently rank restoring arm and hand function as their top functional priority to improve quality of life. Motor nerve transfers traditionally used to treat peripheral nerve injuries are increasingly used to treat patients with cervical SCIs. In this article, the authors present early results of a prospective clinical trial using nerve transfers to restore upper-extremity function in tetraplegia.

METHODS

Participants with American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade A-C cervical SCI/tetraplegia were prospectively enrolled at a single institution, and nerve transfer(s) was performed to improve upper-extremity function. Functional recovery and strength outcomes were independently assessed and prospectively tracked.

RESULTS

Seventeen participants (94.1% males) with a median age of 28.4 years (range 18.2-76.3 years) who underwent nerve transfers at a median of 18.2 months (range 5.2-130.8 months) after injury were included in the analysis. Preoperative SCI levels ranged from C2 to C7, most commonly at C4 (35.3%). The median postoperative follow-up duration was 24.9 months (range 12.0-29.1 months). Patients who underwent transfers to median nerve motor branches and completed 18- and 24-month follow-ups achieved finger flexion strength Medical Research Council (MRC) grade ≥ 3/5 in 4 of 15 (26.7%) and 3 of 12 (25.0%) treated upper limbs, respectively. Similarly, patients achieved MRC grade ≥ 3/5 wrist flexion strength in 5 of 15 (33.3%) and 3 of 12 (25.0%) upper limbs. Among patients who underwent transfers to the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) for wrist/finger extension, MRC grade ≥ 3/5 strength was demonstrated in 5 of 9 (55.6%) and 4 of 7 (57.1%) upper limbs 18 and 24 months postoperatively, respectively. Similarly, grade ≥ 3/5 strength was demonstrated in 5 of 9 (55.6%) and 4 of 7 (57.1%) cases for thumb extension. No meaningful donor site deficits were observed. Patients reported significant postoperative improvements from baseline on upper-extremity-specific self-reported outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Motor nerve transfers are a promising treatment option to restore upper-extremity function after SCI. In the authors' experience, nerve transfers for the reinnervation of hand and finger flexors showed variable functional recovery; however, transfers for the reinnervation of arm, hand, and finger extensors showed a more consistent and meaningful return of strength and function.

Maintenance of pronation function after pronator teres to flexor pollicis longus tendon transfer: a cadaver study

STUDY DESIGN

Mechanistic cadaver study.

OBJECTIVES

Patients in groups 4 and 5 of the International Classification for Surgery of the Hand in Tetraplegia have a few options for tendon transfer donors, but in general the needs for reestablishing motor power exceed the donor options, such that any increase in the number of potential transfers can enhance function. Although transfer of brachioradialis (BR) in these patients is well-established, pronator teres (PT) may also be a suitable donor due to its strength and excursion. It has not been extensively studied in this role, possibly because of concerns about its expendability as the major agonist of forearm pronation. The purpose of this study is to quantify forearm pronation capability pre- and post-tendon transfer of PT to flexor pollicis longus (FPL) in a cadaver model.

SETTING

Surgery center in Indianapolis, USA.

METHODS

Five cadaver arms were evaluated for pronation capability against gravity before and after PT to FPL tendon transfer. In both stages, the arms were also assessed for the pronation forces produced at the wrist when pulling PT with 25, 50, and 75 N of force. With each force, the arms were tested in full supination and neutral position.

RESULTS

All five arms were capable of pronating against gravity before and after the PT to FPL tendon transfer. Following the transfer, pronation force at the wrist decreased by 1-5 N, but the change was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

PT to FPL tendon transfer produces thumb flexion while retaining the forearm's ability to pronate and would likely retain good clinical function, freeing up BR to recreate active finger flexion or extension.

Considerations in the Management of Upper Extremity Spasticity

Spasticity is a movement disorder characterized by a velocity-dependent increase in muscle tone and a hyperexcitable stretch reflex. Common causes of spasticity include cerebral palsy, spinal cord injury, and stroke. Surgical treatment plans for spasticity must be highly individualized and based on the characteristics of patients and the spasticity in order to maximize functional gains. Candidates for surgery must be carefully selected. In this article, the authors review the pathophysiology of spasticity and discuss general considerations for surgical management with an emphasis on patient factors and spasticity characteristics. Specific considerations for the common causes of spasticity are presented.

Management of Spinal Cord Injury-Induced Upper Extremity Spasticity

Spasticity affects more than 80% of patients with spinal cord injury. Neural mechanisms and musculotendinous alterations lead to typical upper extremity features including shoulder adduction/internal rotation, forearm pronation, and elbow, wrist, and finger flexion. Long-standing spasticity may lead to soft tissue and joint contractures and further impairment of upper extremity function. Surgical management involves tendon lengthening, release, and transfer, as well as selective neurotomy, in an effort to reduce spastic muscle hypertonicity, restore balance, prevent further contracture, and improve posture and function. This article summarizes surgical strategies to improve function of the upper extremity in patients with tetraplegia.

Surgical Management of Spasticity of the Elbow

A spastic limb refers to one with increased tone. This commonly results from an upper motor neuron injury, which, in turn, leads to disinhibition of reflex arcs. At the level of the elbow, affected individuals typically exhibit a flexion posture secondary to spastic contracture of the biceps, brachialis, and brachioradialis muscles. Surgical treatment aims to improve access for hygiene, function, and cosmetic appearance of the affected limb. The specific surgical intervention performed depends on the degree of elbow flexion contracture and whether there is an associated joint contracture or soft tissue deficit.

Advanced Assessment of the Upper Limb in Tetraplegia: A Three-Tiered Approach to Characterizing Paralysis

Background: More than half of all individuals who sustain a spinal cord injury (SCI) experience some degree of impairment in the upper limb. Functional use of the arm and hand is of paramount importance to these individuals. Fortunately, the number of clinical trials and advanced interventions targeting upper limb function are increasing, generating optimism for improved recovery and restoration after SCI. New interventions for restoring function and improving recovery require more detailed examination of the motor capacities of the upper limb. Objectives: The purpose of this article is to introduce a three-tiered approach to evaluating motor function, with specific attention to the characteristics of weak and fully paralyzed muscles during acute rehabilitation. The three tiers include (1) evaluation of voluntary strength via manual muscle testing, (2) evaluation of lower motor neuron integrity in upper motor neuron-paralyzed muscles using surface electrical stimulation, and (3) evaluation of latent motor responses in paralyzed muscles that exhibit a strong response to electrical stimulation, using surface electromyographic recording electrodes. These characteristics contribute important information that can be utilized to mitigate potential secondary conditions such as contractures and identify effective interventions such as activity-based interventions or reconstructive procedures. Our goal is to encourage frontline clinicians - occupational and physical therapists who are experts in muscle assessment - to consider a more in-depth analysis of paralysis after SCI. Conclusion: Given the rapid advancements in SCI research and clinical interventions, it is critical that methods of evaluation and classification evolve. The success or failure of these interventions may depend on the specific characteristics identified in our three-tiered assessment. Without this assessment, the physiological starting point for each individual is unknown, adding significant variability in the outcomes of these interventions.

Double Motor Nerve Transfer for All Finger Flexion in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: An Anatomical Study and a Clinical Report

PURPOSE

To explore the feasibility of restoring all finger flexion after a cervical spinal cord injury.

METHODS

Double nerve transfer was conducted in 22 cadaver upper extremities. Donor nerves were the brachialis branch of the musculocutaneous nerve and the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) branches of the radial nerve. Recipient nerves were the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) and the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) branch of ulnar nerve (ulnar-FDP). Nerve transfers were evaluated on 3 parameters: surgical feasibility, donor-to-recipient axon count ratio, and distance from the coaptation site to the muscle entry of recipient nerve. A complete C6 spinal cord injury reconstruction was accomplished in a patient using a double nerve transfer of ECRB to ulnar-FDP and brachialis to AIN.

RESULTS

In the cadaver study, nerve transfers from ECRB to AIN, brachialis to AIN, and ECRB to ulnar-FDP were all feasible. The transfer from the brachialis to ulnar-FDP was not possible. Mean myelinated axon counts of AIN, brachialis, ulnar-FDP, and ECRB were 2,903 ± 1049, 1,497 ± 606, 753 ± 364, and 567 ± 175, respectively. The donor-to-recipient axon count ratios of ECRB to AIN, brachialis to AIN, and ECRB to ulnar-FDP were 0.24 ± 0.15, 0.55 ± 0.38, and 0.98 ± 0.60, respectively. The distance from coaptation of the ECRB to the ulnar-FDP muscle entry was shorter than for the other nerve transfers (54 ± 14.29 mm). At 18 months, there was restoration of flexion in all fingers and functional improvement from double nerve transfer of the brachialis to the AIN and the ECRB to the ulnar-FDP.

CONCLUSIONS

Restoration of all finger flexion may be feasible by the ECRB to ulnar-FDP and brachialis to AIN double nerve transfer.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Double nerve transfer can be used in C6-C7 spinal cord injury and patients with lower arm-type brachial plexus injury who have no finger flexion but have good brachialis and ECRB.

[Hand function reconstruction by tendon transfers in patients with cervical spinal cord injury]

Objective

To explore the effectiveness of functional reconstruction of hand grasp and pinch by tendon transfers in patients with cervical spinal cord injury.

Methods

Between July 2013 and January 2016, tendon transfer surgery were performed in 21 patients (41 hands) with cervical spinal injury that motion level was located at C ₆ to reconstruct hand grasp and pinch function. There were 18 males and 3 females with a mean age of 42.3 years (range, 17-65 years). Nineteen patients were with complete spinal cord injury [American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grading A], 1 patient was with central cord syndrome whose bilateral hands were completely paralyzed and lower limbs were normal (ASIA grading D), and 1 patient was with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (AISA grading D). The time from injury to hospitalization was 12-22 months (mean, 16.8 months). According to the International classification of surgery of the hand in tetraplegia (ICSHT), there were 6 cases of grade O3, 10 of grade O4, 3 of grade OCu5, and 2 of grade O5. The surgery was divided into two stages with an interval of 6-11 months. At the first stage, grip function was reconstructed in all patients by transfering the extensor carpi radialis longus from radialis side to palmar side through subcutaneous tunnel, and braided and sutured with the flexor pollicis longus and flexor digitorum profundus. At the second stage, the lateral pinch function of the thumb and index finger was reconstructed by braiding and suturing the radial half of the extensor carpi ulnaris (the patients graded as ICSHT O3) or pronator tere (the patients graded above ICSHT O3) with extensor pollicis longus and abductor pollicis longus. The grasp force, the thumb and index finger lateral pinch force, and the maximum fingertips distance between the thumb and index finger were measured at preoperation and at different time points after operation. The modified Lamb and Chan questionnaire, based upon the activities of daily living, was used to evaluate the hand function of all patients at 6 months after sencond stage surgery.

Results

There was 1 patient with elbow skin lesion, 1 patient with wrist stiffness; both of them recovered after corresponding treatment. All the 21 patients were followed up 15-32 months (mean, 19.6 months) without wound infection, tendon adhesion, tendon rupture, and other complications. The grasp forces of all patients were significantly improved at 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the first stage surgery when compared with preoperative value ( P<0.05); and no significant difference was found between different time points after operation ( P>0.05). The thumb and index finger lateral pinch force and the maximum fingertips distance between the thumb and index finger of all patients were also significantly improved at 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the second stage surgery when compared with preoperative values ( P<0.05); and no significant difference was found between different time points after operation ( P>0.05). And there was no significant difference of above indexes between the patients graded as ICSHT O3 and above ICSHT O3 ( P>0.05). The functional outcome was good in 19 cases, fair in 1 case, and poor in 1 case according to modified Lamb and Chan questionnaire at 6 months after second stage surgery.

Conclusion

Tendon transfer can significantly improve the hand function and the quality of life of the patients with complete cervical spinal cord injury.

Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon Transfer for Re-establishing Extrinsic Finger Function: Feasibility Study in Cadavers

PURPOSE

To determine the anatomic feasibility of transferring the biceps brachii tendon into either the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) or flexor digitorum profundus (FDP), determine the excursion imparted to EDC and FDP tendons after transfer, and compare the work capacity of the cadaver biceps to previously published data on the biceps as well as the recipient muscles by calculating the physiologic cross-sectional area (PCSA).

METHODS

Four fresh-frozen cadaver shoulder-elbow-wrist specimens were used to measure tendon excursion that can be obtained with transfer of the distal biceps tendon into either the EDC or FDP. Two cadavers had distal biceps-to-EDC transfer performed, and the other 2 had distal biceps-to-FDP performed. Passive ranging of each elbow from flexion to extension and active loading at 90° of elbow flexion were then performed on each specimen to determine tendon excursion. An analysis of the PCSA of the biceps muscle was performed on each specimen.

RESULTS

Distal biceps-to-EDC transfer resulted in an average of 24 mm of tendon excursion with passive loading, and 24 mm of tendon excursion with active loading. Distal biceps-to-FDP transfer resulted in an average of 24 mm of tendon excursion with passive loading, and 24 mm of tendon excursion with active loading. The average PCSA was 3.6 cm².

CONCLUSIONS

Transfer of the distal biceps tendon into the EDC or FDP is anatomically feasible and provides roughly 24 mm of tendon excursion to the tendon units. The PCSA in the specimens used is slightly lower than other published data; it closely approximates the PCSA of the EDC, but is only half of the PCSA of the FDP in previously published data.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The findings suggest potentially novel transfer options for restoring finger flexion and extension in patients lacking FDP or EDC function.

Adaptive motor cortex plasticity following grip reconstruction in individuals with tetraplegia

Background:

Tendon transfer is a surgical technique for restoring upper limb motor control in patients with cervical spinal cord injuries (SCI), and offers a rare window into cortical neuroplasticity following regained arm and hand function.

Objective:

Here, we aimed to examine neuroplasticity mechanisms related to re-established voluntary motor control of thumb flexion following tendon transfer.

Methods:

We used functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) to test the hypothesis that restored limb control following tendon transfer is mediated by activation of that limb’s area of the primary motor cortex. We examined six individuals with tetraplegia who underwent right-sided surgical grip reconstruction at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden. All were right-handed males, with a SCI at the C6 or C7 level, and a mean age of 40 years (range = 31–48). The average number of years elapsed since the SCI was 13 (range = 6–26). Six right-handed gender- and age-matched control subjects were included (mean age 39 years, range = 29–46). Restoration of active thumb flexion in patients was achieved by surgical transfer of one of the functioning elbow flexors (brachioradialis), to the paralyzed thumb flexor (flexor pollicis longus). We studied fMRI responses to isometric right-sided elbow flexion and key pinch, and examined the cortical representations within the left hemisphere somatomotor cortex a minimum of one year after surgery.

Results:

Cortical activations elicited by elbow flexion did not differ in topography between patients and control participants. However, in contrast to control participants, patients’ cortical thumb flexion activations were not topographically distinct from their elbow flexion activations.

Conclusion:

This result speaks against a topographic reorganization in which the thumb region regains thumb control following surgical tendon transfer. Instead, our findings suggest a neuroplastic mechanism in which motor cortex resources previously dedicated to elbow flexion adapt to control the thumb.

Establishing reconstructive neurosurgery as a subspecialty

Neurosurgery is experiencing the emergence of a new subspecialty focused on function restoration. New, evolving, and reappraised surgical procedures have provided an opportunity to restore function to many patients with previously undertreated disorders. Candidates for reconstruction were previously limited to those with peripheral nerve and brachial plexus injuries, but this has been expanded to include stroke, spinal cord injury, and a host of other paralyzing disorders affecting both upper and lower motor neurons. Similar to the recent evolution of the well-established subdisciplines of spinal and vascular neurosurgery, reconstructive neurosurgery requires the adaptation of techniques and skills that were not traditionally a part of neurosurgical training. Neurosurgeons—as the specialists who already manage this patient population and possess the requisite surgical skills to master the required techniques—have a unique opportunity to lead the development of this field. The full development of this subspecialty will lay the foundation for the subsequent addition of emerging treatments, such as neuroprosthetics and stem cell–based interventions. As such, reconstructive neurosurgery represents an important aspect of neurosurgical training that can ameliorate many of the deficits encountered in the traditional practice of neurosurgery.

Rehabilitation After Surgical Reconstruction to Restore Function to the Upper Limb in Tetraplegia: A Changing Landscape

Upper limb reconstructive surgical procedures for individuals with tetraplegia are performed in many centers internationally. Most recipients of surgery return to local communities and nonsurgical centers for postoperative rehabilitation and long-term follow-up. This supplement focuses on the clinical significance of upper extremity reconstruction, addressing issues related to the availability and choice for surgery, preoperative assessments, postoperative training paradigms, and appropriate outcome measures. Comprehensive intervention protocols are described in terms of dose, timing, specific activities, modalities, and related outcomes. Shared knowledge of current rehabilitation practice, as it relates to reconstructive surgery, can expand treatment options communicated to patients, increase the availability of postoperative muscle reeducation programs, and motivate long-term follow-up assessments.

Essential gains and health after upper-limb tetraplegia surgery identified by the International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF)

STUDY DESIGN

A questionnaire-based survey.

OBJECTIVES

To describe functional gains and health following upper-limb tetraplegia surgery using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a reference and to explore interconnections across different dimensions of functioning and health.

SETTING

A specialized center for advanced reconstruction of extremities at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

METHODS

Fifty-seven individuals who participated in a satisfaction survey were included in the present study. Besides questions concerned with the respondents' satisfaction with different aspects of surgery, the measures included perceived overall health status (EQ-VAS) and achieved grip strength. Univariate analyses were used to explore interconnections between measures.

RESULTS

The gains could be subcategorized and linked to the ICF domains 'mobility', 'self-care', 'communication', 'domestic life', and 'community, social and civic life', with 'handling objects' and 'maneuvering a wheelchair' as the most frequently reported gains. The mean EQ-VAS score was 67±22. No significant correlation was shown between grip strength and activity gains, nor between grip strength and perceived overall health. The degree of satisfaction was, however, associated with self-reported overall health among participants.

CONCLUSION

The functional gains achieved after tetraplegia surgery could be applied to the ICF constructs' body functions/structures and activity with possible implications on participation. The overall health perception was relatively high and could be linked to the degree of satisfaction among participants. Muscle strength is not necessarily transferable to activity performance. This emphasizes the importance of addressing factors other than strength in the post-surgical rehabilitation and assessments.

Satisfaction with upper limb reconstructive surgery in individuals with tetraplegia: the development and reliability of a Swedish self-reported satisfaction questionnaire

Study design:

A questionnaire-based survey.

Objectives:

To assess satisfaction after upper limb reconstructive surgery in individuals with tetraplegia and to determine the reliability of a Swedish satisfaction questionnaire.

Setting:

A center for advanced reconstruction of extremities, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Methods:

Seventy-eight individuals with tetraplegia were invited to participate in the survey assessing satisfaction with the result of surgery across various domains. Measures of reliability included stability and internal consistency of domains consisting questions regarding global satisfaction, activities and occupation/schooling.

Results:

Fifty-eight individuals (76%) participated, among whom 47 (82%) completed the questionnaire twice for repeatability assessment. The responses in the domains relating to global satisfaction, activities and occupation/schooling were positive in 83%, 72% and 31% of participants, respectively. Ninety-five percent felt they had benefited from the surgery, and 86% felt that the surgery had made a positive impact on their life. The psychometric testing indicated that the questionnaire yields scores that are reliable by both test–retest and internal consistency, with the exception of the domain occupation/schooling that had a high prevalence of missing and neutral responses and seemingly represents separate and distinct entities.

Conclusion:

Surgical rehabilitation of the upper limb in tetraplegia is highly beneficial and rewarding from a patient perspective, leading to satisfactory gains in activities of daily living as well as enhanced quality of life. The questionnaire is a reliable instrument for measuring satisfaction after surgery. However, occupationally and educationally related aspects of the surgical outcome should constitute separate domains, and further modifications of the questionnaire are thus recommended.