Prevalence of and Factors Associated With Major Depression in Patients With Upper Extremity Conditions

Evaluation of Preoperative Factors Affecting Midterm Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Ligament Reconstruction Tendon Interposition: A Prognostic Study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of preoperative patient-reported outcomes as predictors of functional improvement following ligament reconstruction tendon interposition. We hypothesized that high levels of preoperative pain interference (PI) and upper-extremity disability are associated with lower magnitudes of functional improvement ≥1 year after surgery on the shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) (primary outcome) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity (UE) Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) (UE CAT) v1.2 (secondary outcome).

METHODS

Adult patients who underwent ligament reconstruction tendon interposition between February 2014 and April 2018 at an academic tertiary institution were considered for inclusion in this longitudinal cohort study. Patient-reported outcomes were collected at baseline and ≥1 year after surgery. Univariate and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the magnitude of functional improvement on the QuickDASH and UE CAT.

RESULTS

Among 93 included participants, the mean age was 61 ± 7 years, and 75 (81%) were women. At 2.5 ± 1.0 years after surgery, the QuickDASH and UE CAT improved by a mean of 24.5 ± 20.9 and 9.9 ± 10.7 points, respectively. In the primary multivariable model, a greater preoperative QuickDASH (indicative of lower function; coefficient, 0.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6 to 0.9) and lower preoperative Performance of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System PI CAT (eg, less pain interference; coefficient, -0.7; 95% CI, -1.2 to -0.2) were associated with greater QuickDASH improvement independent of potential confounders. In the secondary multivariable model, lower preoperative UE CAT (indicative of worse function; coefficient, -0.9; 95% CI, -1.1 to -0.7) and lower preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System PI CAT (coefficient, -0.3; 95% CI, -0.6 to -0.1) were associated with greater UE CAT improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative patient-reported outcomes may be useful in understanding the degree of improvement that certain patient populations can expect from ligament reconstruction tendon interposition. Those with lower baseline (preoperative) upper-extremity function and PI are expected to derive the greatest functional improvement in the midterm.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic IV.

What Proportion of Patients With Musculoskeletal Sarcomas Demostrate Symptoms of Depression or Anxiety?

BACKGROUND

It is estimated that the 12-month prevalence of depression in the United States is 8.6%, and for anxiety it is 2.9%. Although prior studies have evaluated depression and anxiety in patients with carcinoma, few have specifically evaluated patients with sarcoma, who often have unique treatment considerations such as mobility changes after surgery.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We evaluated patients with sarcoma seen in our orthopaedic oncology clinic to determine (1) the proportion of patients with depression symptoms, symptom severity, how many patients triggered a referral to mental health professionals based upon our prespecified cutoff scores on the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and if their symptoms varied by disease state; (2) the proportion of patients with anxiety symptoms, symptom severity, how many patients triggered a referral to mental health professionals based upon our prespecified cutoff scores on the seven-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7), and if they symptoms varied by disease state; (3) whether other factors were associated with the proportion and severity of symptoms of anxiety or depression, such as tumor location in the body (axial skeleton, upper extremity, or lower extremity), general type of tumor (bone or soft tissue), specific diagnosis, use of chemotherapy, length of follow-up (less than 1 year or greater than 1 year), and gender; and (4) what proportion of patients accepted referrals to mental health professionals, when offered.

METHODS

This study was a cross-sectional survey study performed at a single urban National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center from April 2021 until July 2021. All patients seen in the orthopaedic clinic 18 years of age and older with a diagnosis/presumed diagnosis of sarcoma were provided the PHQ-9 as well as the GAD-7 in our clinic. We did not track those who elected not to complete the surveys. Surveys were scored per survey protocol (each question was scored from 0 to 3 and summed). Specifically, PHQ-9 scores the symptoms of depression as 5 to 9 (mild), 10 to 14 (moderate), 15 to 19 (moderately severe), and 20 to 27 (severe). The GAD-7 scores symptoms of anxiety as 5 to 9 (mild), 10 to 14 (moderate), and 15 to 21 (severe). Patients with PHQ-9 or GAD-7 scores of 10 to 14 were referred to social work and those with scores 15 or higher were referred to psychiatry. Patients with thoughts of self-harm were referred regardless of score. Patients were divided based on disease state: patients during their initial management; patients with active, locally recurrent disease; patients with active metastatic disease; patients with prior recurrence or metastatic lesions who were subsequently treated and now have no evidence of disease (considered to be patients with discontinuous no evidence of disease); patients with no evidence of disease; and patients with an active, noncancerous complication but otherwise no evidence of disease. We additionally looked at the association of gender, chemotherapy administration, and tumor location on survey responses. Data are summarized using descriptive statistics. Differences across categories of disease state were tested for statistical significance using Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous variables and Fisher exact tests for categorical variables as well as pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum tests.

RESULTS

Overall, symptoms of depression were seen in 35% (67 of 190) of patients, at varying levels of severity: 19% (37 of 190) had mild symptoms, 9% (17 of 190) had moderate symptoms, 6% (12 of 190) had moderately severe symptoms, and 1% (1 of 190) had severe symptoms. Depresssion symptoms severe enough to trigger a referral were seen in 17% (32 of 190) of patients overall. Patients scored higher on the PHQ-9 during their initial treatment or when they had recurrent or metastatic disease, and they were more likely to trigger a referral during those timepoints as well. The mean PHQ-9 was 5.7 ± 5.8 during initial treatment, 6.1 ± 4.9 with metastatic disease, and 7.4 ± 5.2 with recurrent disease as compared with 3.2 ± 4.2 if there was no evidence of disease (p = 0.001). Anxiety symptoms were seen in 33% (61 of 185) of patients: 17% (32 of 185) had mild symptoms, 8% (14 of 185) had moderate symptoms, and 8% (15 of 185) had severe symptoms. Anxiety symptoms severe enough to trigger a referral were seen in 16% (29 of 185) of patients overall. Patients scored higher on the GAD-7 during initial treatment and when they had recurrent disease or an active noncancerous complication. The mean GAD-7 was 6.3 ± 3.2 in patients with active noncancerous complications, 6.8 ± 5.8 in patients during initial treatment, and 8.4 ± 8.3 in patients with recurrent disease as compared with 3.1 ± 4.2 in patients with no evidence of disease (p = 0.002). Patients were more likely to trigger a referral during initial treatment (32% [9 of 28]) and with recurrent disease (43% [6 of 14]) compared with those with no evidence of disease (9% [9 of 97]) and those with discontinuous no evidence of disease (6% [1 of 16]; p = 0.004). There was an increase in both PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores among patients who had chemotherapy. Other factors that were associated with higher PHQ-9 scores were location of tumor (upper extremity versus lower extremity or axial skeleton) and gender. Another factor that was associated with higher GAD-7 scores included general category of diagnosis (bone versus soft tissue sarcoma). Specific diagnosis and length of follow-up had no association with symptoms of depression or anxiety. Overall, 22% (41 of 190) of patients were offered referrals to mental health professionals; 73% (30 of 41) accepted the referral.

CONCLUSION

When treating patients with sarcoma, consideration should be given to potential concomitant psychiatric symptoms. Screening, especially at the highest-risk timepoints such as at the initial diagnosis and the time of recurrence, should be considered. Further work should be done to determine the effect of early psychiatric referral on patient-related outcomes and healthcare costs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Priorities for Advancing Mental and Social Health Among People Presenting for Care of Musculoskeletal Symptoms : International Consortium for Mental and Social Health in Musculoskeletal Care

An international group of clinicians and researchers formed a consortium to advance mental and social health among people seeking musculoskeletal specialty care: The International Consortium for Mental and Social Health in Musculoskeletal Care (I-MESH). As a first step to organize the work of the consortium, we sought to identify important, appropriate, and feasible interventions to address mental and social health. Members of I-MESH responded to a list of 10 queries intended to elicit mental and social health priorities. Open text answers were analyzed by 2 researchers to elicit individual themes. A modified RAND/UCLA Delphi Appropriateness process was conducted of 32 candidate social and mental health priorities using a 15-person panel of I-MESH members, using 2 rounds of independent voting with intervening discussion via surveys and video teleconferences. Panelists rated each potential priority for importance, feasibility, and appropriateness on a 9-point Likert scale. Top level priorities scored both mean and median greater than 7 in all 3 categories. Second level priorities scored a median 7 or greater on the final scoring in all 3 categories. Candidate priorities were organized into 9 themes: viable business model, coordination of specialty and non-specialty care, actionable measurement, public health/cultural interventions, research, adequate and timely access, incorporating assessment in care, strategies to develop the patient-clinician relationship, communication strategies that can directly enhance health, and support for mental and social health. Twelve top level (met mean and median criteria) and 17 s level priorities (met median criterion) were identified. Implementing evidence-based strategies to efficiently diagnose, prioritize, and begin addressing mental and social health opportunities has the potential for notable impact on both musculoskeletal and overall health. It is our hope that the results of this Delphi panel will generate enthusiasm and collaboration for implementing the mounting evidence that social and mental health are integral to musculoskeletal health.

What are the prevalence of and factors independently associated with depression and anxiety among patients with posttraumatic elbow stiffness? A cross-sectional, multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Joint stiffness is a common complication after articular-related trauma in the elbow, resulting in significant limb disability, psychological stress, and a negative impact on daily life. No previous study has reported the impact of post-traumatic elbow stiffness (PTES) on psychological health. This study aims to (1) investigate the depression and anxiety levels and (2) identify factors independently associated with depression and anxiety symptoms in patients with PTES.

METHODS

A total of 108 patients with PTES presenting to 4 collaborative municipal hospitals were consecutively enrolled from September to December 2020. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were collected through questionnaires and medical records. The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 was used to assess depression and anxiety status. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors independently associated with depression and anxiety symptoms.

RESULTS

The detection rates of mild-to-moderate depression and anxiety are 40.7% and 27.8%, and severe-to-extremely severe levels are 23.1% and 25.9%, respectively. Regression results show that factors independently associated with depression include elbow flexion (odds ratio [OR]_{per 1° loss} = 1.021, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.001-1.041, P = .035), elbow pain on movement (OR_{per 1 point increase} = 1.236, 95% CI: 1.029-1.484, P = .023), family relationship (OR_{less close/very close} = 10.059, 95% CI: 2.170-46.633, P = .003), and self-care ability (OR_unable/able = 3.858, 95% CI: 1.244-11.961, P = .019). Factors independently associated with anxiety are elbow flexion (OR_{per 1° loss} = 1.031, 95% CI: 1.009-1.052, P = .005), elbow pain on movement (OR_{per 1 point increase} = 1.212, 95% CI: 1.003-1.465, P = .047), and clinically significant heterotopic ossification around elbow (OR_yes/no = 2.344, 95% CI: 1.048-5.243, P = .038).

CONCLUSION

Patients with PTES exhibit significant depression and anxiety symptoms. Several sociodemographic and clinical characteristics are independently associated with depression and anxiety levels. Identifying and addressing these factors may be of particular benefit during PTES management. Future research might address whether depression and anxiety affect the outcome after stiff elbow surgery.

Magnitude and factors associated with preoperative depression among elective surgical patients at University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital, North West Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study

Background

Depression one of the world's prevalent mental illnesses is a leading cause of major public health problems globally and its frequency has been increasing, particularly in low and middle-income countries. Little is known about the magnitude and contributing factors of preoperative depression among elective surgical inpatients in the country and in the study area as well. The aim of the current study was to assess the magnitude and factors associated with preoperative depression among elective surgical inpatients.

Method

A cross-sectional study was conducted from May 01, 2021 to June 30, 2021 among preoperative surgical inpatients at University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital. Non probability sampling was used. A nine-item questionnaire screening tool was used to assess depression. We computed the bi-variable and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses. Crude and adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence interval were used.

Result

The magnitude of depression was 28.3%. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis female (AOR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.15, 4.5), being widowed (AOR = 3.271, 95% CI: 1.25, 8.56), divorced (AOR = 3.41, 95% CI: 1.13, 10.26), length of hospital stay of 7–14 days (AOR = 2.7, 95%CI: 1, 7.2) and more than 14 days (AOR = 3.19, 95% CI: 1.3, 7.8), having co-existing diseases (AOR = 2.78, 95%CI: 1.28, 6.02), current history of pain (AOR = 3.12, 95%CI: 1.6, 5.7), admission to orthopedics (AOR = 3.28, 95%CI: 1.55, 6.95) and gynecology ward (AOR = 2.43, 95% CI: 1.03, 5.7) and poor social support AOR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.1, 4.6) were significantly associated with depression.

Conclusion

The magnitude of pre-operation depression was 28.3%. Female, Widowed, being divorced, length of hospital stays, coexisting chronic illness, current history of pain, admission at orthopedic and gynecology wards and poor social support were factors significantly associated with depression. We recommend strengthening the linkage of the psychiatric department with preoperative patients to provide psychotherapy behavioral modification.

•

Depression is one of the world's mental illnesses problem.

•

Little is known about prevalence and its contributing factors of preoperative depression.

•

Surgical patients with Preoperative depression have major post-operative complications.

•

The prevalence of preoperative depression among surgical inpatient was 28.3%.

The Association Between Psychological Factors and Outcomes After Distal Radius Fracture

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to identify psychological factors associated with pain intensity and disability following distal radius fracture.

METHODS

We prospectively followed 216 adult patients with distal radius fracture for 9 months. Demographics, injury and treatment details, and psychological measures (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score [HADS], Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Civilian, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Illness Perception Questionnaire Brief [IPQB], General Self-Efficacy Scale, and Recovery Locus of Control [RLOC]) were collected at enrollment. Multivariable linear regression was used to identify factors associated with Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and Likert pain scores.

RESULTS

Higher 10-week DASH scores were associated with increased age, the presence of a nerve pathology, increased HADS Depression subscale scores, increased IPQB scores, and lower RLOC scores. Higher 9-month DASH scores were associated with increased age, increased deprivation scores, increased numbers of medical comorbidities, a greater degree of radial shortening, increased HADS Depression subscale scores, and lower RLOC scores. A higher 10-week pain score was associated with increased deprivation and IPQB scores. A higher pain score at 9 months was associated with an increased number of medical comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychosocial factors measured early after fracture are associated with pain and disability up to 9 months after distal radius fracture. Illness perception is a potentially modifiable psychological construct not previously studied in hand conditions. It may provide a suitable target for psychological interventions that could enhance recovery.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic II.

Magnitude and factors associated with postoperative depression among adult orthopedics patients during COVID-19 pandemics: A multi-center cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative depression is one of the devastating problems and important health concerns in adult orthopedics surgical patients. It is often under-diagnosed and appropriate perioperative management of patients is recommended. This study aimed to determine the magnitude and factors associated with postoperative depression among orthopedics patients in Ethiopia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multi-center cross-sectional study was conducted on 443 adult post-orthopedics surgical patients. All the data were entered and analyzed with SPSS version 25. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the associated factors with the outcome variable. P-values <0.05 were taken as statistically significant with 95% CI. Data were collected after distributing 9-item standard patient health questionnaires and the Oslo-3 item social support scale tool.

RESULT

Based on our study result, the magnitude of postoperative depression among adult orthopedics surgical patients was 61.8% (95% CI: 56.8-65.7). Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, factors which had an association with postoperative depression were female in gender, Farmer in occupation, having a history of previous substance use, history of anxiety, Patients who had moderate to poor social support, BMI <18.5 kg/m², and patients who had an open fracture.

CONCLUSION

The magnitude of postoperative depression was high. Due emphasis needs to be given to screening and treatment of postoperative depression, especially among patients of the female gender, farmer occupation, moderate to poor social support, history of substance use and anxiety, low BMI, and open fracture.

A Threshold QuickDASH Score for Estimating a Diagnosis of Major Depression in Patients With Fingertip Injuries in the American and Dutch Population

BACKGROUND

The aim was to determine the threshold Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score that estimates a diagnosis of major depression in patients with fingertip injuries in American and Dutch patients.

METHODS

In this observational cross-sectional study, 112 patients with a recent fingertip injury measured symptoms of depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire and upper extremity disability with the QuickDASH.

RESULTS

In the US cohort, 8 of 56 patients had an estimated diagnosis of major depression. A threshold value of QuickDASH of 50 showed a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 81%, with a negative predicting value (NPV) of 95% for an estimated diagnosis of major depression. In the Dutch cohort, 7 of 56 patients had an estimated diagnosis of major depression. The same threshold score of 50 had a sensitivity of 71%, a specificity of 63%, and an NPV of 94%.

CONCLUSIONS

We have found a correlation between experienced loss of function and an estimated diagnosis of major depression in patients with a fingertip injury. Referral to the primary care physician for further evaluation of depression in these patients is advised.

Prognostic Factors Affecting Long-Term Outcomes After Elbow Dislocation: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

Purpose

To describe patient-reported outcomes following simple elbow dislocation and to identify the baseline factors that predict outcomes.

Methods

Adult patients treated with a closed reduction for a simple elbow dislocation with or without minor fracture (coronoid avulsion, radial head fracture, or epicondyle avulsion) from 2000 to 2018 completed outcome instruments including Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) via Research Electronic Data Capture. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Univariate followed by multivariate Tobit regression models were used to determine factors associated with clinical outcomes on QuickDASH. Social deprivation was measured using the Area Deprivation Index. Patients with additional upper-extremity injuries or associated major fractures (Monteggia or terrible triad injuries, distal humerus fractures, etc) were excluded.

Results

At a mean follow-up of 67.5 months, 95% (38/40) of patients reported satisfaction with treatment, and clinical outcomes were good (QuickDASH 9.0 ± 14.8). Univariate analysis showed that higher Area Deprivation Index, older age, female sex, high-energy mechanism of injury, and worker’s compensation (WC) or Medicare insurance status (vs commercial) was associated with significantly worse QuickDASH scores at follow-up. Early therapy, dominant elbow involvement, presence of minor fractures (minimally displaced radial head, coronoid tip, or epicondylar avulsion fractures), race, and treating service did not influence outcomes in univariate analyses. Multivariate analysis demonstrated a significant association between increased social deprivation, WC insurance, and Medicare insurance and worse QuickDASH scores while controlling for new upper-extremity injury, age, sex, and mechanism of injury.

Conclusions

Outcomes and treatment satisfaction following simple elbow dislocation are generally good but are significantly worse for the patients with greater levels of social deprivation and WC or Medicare insurance. Although surgeons should be aware of the possibility that specific subsets of patients may benefit from early therapy, this factor did not appear to influence long-term outcomes in this small cohort.

Type of study/level of evidence

Prognostic III.

The impact of Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities on patient outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty

AIMS

To investigate the impact of the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices on patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) following shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS

Patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), or hemiarthroplasty (HA) from 2016 to 2018 were identified, along with the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities listed as their secondary diagnoses in the electronic medical records. Patients were matched to our institution's registry to obtain their PROMs, including shoulder-specific (American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) and Shoulder Activity Scale (SAS)) and general health scales (12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Pain Interference). Linear regression models adjusting for age and sex were used to evaluate the association between increasing number of comorbidities and PROM scores. A total of 1,817 shoulder arthroplasties were performed: 1,017 (56%) TSA, 726 (40%) RSA, and 74 (4%) HA. The mean age was 67 years (SD 10), and 936 (52%) of the patients were female.

RESULTS

The most common comorbidities were obesity (1,256, 69%) and hypertension (990, 55%). Patients with more comorbidities had lower ASES and SAS scores at baseline (p < 0.001). Elixhauser comorbidities continued to negatively impact ASES and SAS scores at one year (p = 0.002) and two-year follow-up (p = 0.002). Patients with more comorbidities reported greater pain interference on PROMIS at baseline (p = 0.007), but not at two years. Higher number of Charlson comorbidities were associated with lower scores on the SF-12 mental component at baseline (p < 0.001) and two years (p = 0.020). Higher number of Elixhauser comorbidities were associated with lower SF-12 physical component scores at baseline (p < 0.001) and two years (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Higher number of comorbidities was associated with lower baseline scores and worse outcomes on both shoulder-specific and general health PROMs. The presence of specific comorbidities may be used during shared decision-making to manage expectations for patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(5):964-970.

Relevance of Diagnosed Depression and Antidepressants to PROMIS Depression Scores Among Hand Surgical Patients

PURPOSE

We aimed to test the utility of screening for depressive symptoms in the hand surgical office focusing on chances of heightened depressive symptoms in patients with no history of diagnosed depression and by quantifying ongoing depressive symptoms among patients diagnosed with depression accounting for antidepressant use. The clinical importance of this study was predicated on the documented negative association between depressive symptoms and hand surgical outcomes.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study analyzed 351 patients presenting to a tertiary hand center between April 21, 2016, and November 22, 2017. Adult patients completed self-administered Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression computer adaptive tests at registration. Health records were examined for a past medical history of diagnosed depression and whether patients reported current use of prescription antidepressants. Mean PROMIS Depression scores were compared by analysis of variance (groups: no diagnosed depression, depression without medication, depression with medication). Four points represented a clinically relevant difference in PROMIS Depression scores between groups and Depression scores greater than 59.9 were categorized as having heightened depressive symptoms.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients (18%) had been diagnosed with depression. Thirty-four of these patients (55%) reported taking antidepressant medications. The PROMIS Depression scores indicated greater current depressive symptoms among patients with a history of diagnosed depression when not taking antidepressants (11 points worse than unaffected) and also among patients taking antidepressants (7 points worse than unaffected). Heightened depressive symptoms were detected in all groups but were more prevalent among those diagnosed with depression (36% with no medication, 29% with antidepressant medication) compared with unaffected patients (7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Depression screening for heightened depressive symptoms identifies 1 in 14 patients without diagnosed depression and 1 in 3 patients diagnosed with depression as having currently heightened depressive symptoms. Hand surgeons can use PROMIS Depression screening in all patients and using this to guide referrals for depression treatment to ameliorate one confounder of hand surgical outcomes.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Symptom prevalence study II.

Upper Extremity Function, Peer Relationships, and Pain Interference: Evaluating the Biopsychosocial Model in a Pediatric Hand Surgery Population Using PROMIS

PURPOSE

The relationship between biopsychosocial factors and patient-reported function is less clear in pediatric than in adult hand surgery patients. Our primary hypothesis was that pain interference (PI) and peer relationships (PR) would demonstrate association with upper extremity function. Secondarily, we hypothesized that the magnitude of this effect would increase with age.

METHODS

Patients aged 5 to 17 years presenting to a tertiary academic clinic between October 2017 and January 2019 were included. The parent/guardian was administered the following instruments after indicating they, rather than the patient, were answering the questions on a tablet computer: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity (UE) Parent Proxy (PP) Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) v2.0, PROMIS PI PP CAT v2.0, and the PROMIS PR PP CAT v2.0. Ceiling/floor effects and Spearman correlations were calculated. Multivariable Tobit modeling was performed to determine whether biopsychosocial factors and upper extremity function were associated. Multivariable regression coefficients were compared between age cohorts using a separate multivariable model to evaluate the interaction between age and other predictors.

RESULTS

Of 139 included participants, the mean age was 11.7 ± 3.7 years and 50% were female. For patients 11 years of age or younger, UE was weakly correlated with PI (coefficient, -0.34; 95% confidence interval, -0.56 to -0.08) and was not correlated with PR. For patients older than 11 years, UE had moderate correlation with PI (coefficient, -0.60; 95% confidence interval, -0.72 to -0.45) and was not correlated with PR. Multivariable analysis demonstrated a significant negative association between PI and UE, with a significantly larger magnitude of effect for patients older than 11 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS

The biopsychosocial model applies to pediatric hand surgery patients. The association between greater pain interference and worse patient-reported upper extremity function, as assessed using parent proxy instruments, was significantly stronger for patients older than 11 years than those 11 years old or younger.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study suggests that the biopsychosocial model applies to pediatric hand patients.

Patient-Reported Outcomes following Surgical Treatment of Symptomatic Digital Neuromas

BACKGROUND

Many surgical techniques are used to treat symptomatic neuroma, but options are limited for digital neuromas because of a paucity of soft-tissue coverage and/or the absence of the terminal nerve end. The authors assessed factors that influence patient-reported outcomes after surgery for symptomatic digital neuroma.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively identified 29 patients with 33 symptomatic digital neuromas that were treated surgically. Patients completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity and Pain Interference scales, a numeric rating scale for pain, and the PROMIS Depression scale at a median follow-up of 7.6 years postoperatively (range, 3.2 to 16.8 years). Surgical treatment for neuroma included excision with nerve repair/reconstruction (n =13; 39 percent), neuroma excision alone (n =10; 30 percent), and excision and implantation (n =10; 30 percent). Multivariable linear regression was performed to identify the factors that independently influenced patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative PROMIS Upper Extremity score was 45.2 ± 11.2, the mean Pain Interference score was 54.3 ± 10.7, and the mean numeric rating scale pain score was 3 (interquartile range, 1 to 5). Compared with other treatment techniques, neuroma excision with nerve repair/reconstruction was associated with lower numeric rating scale pain scores; lower Pain Interference scores, corresponding to less daily impact of pain; and higher Upper Extremity scores, reflecting better upper extremity function. Older age and higher Depression scores were associated with lower Upper Extremity scores and higher Pain Interference scores. Smoking was associated with higher Pain Interference and numeric rating scale pain scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Neuroma excision followed by nerve repair/reconstruction resulted in better outcomes compared with neuroma excision alone with or without implantation. Patient age and psychosocial factors influenced patient-reported outcomes.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

The Prognostic Value of Preoperative Patient-Reported Function and Psychological Characteristics on Early Outcomes Following Trapeziectomy With Ligament Reconstruction Tendon Interposition for Treatment of Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

Biopsychosocial factors are associated with patient-reported upper extremity disability; however, their impact on postoperative outcomes remains less clear. Our purpose was to test the hypothesis that high levels of preoperative patient-reported upper extremity and psychological disability are associated with lower magnitudes of improvement following trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction tendon interposition (LRTI).

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing LRTI by fellowship-trained hand surgeons between February 2014 and March 2017 were considered for inclusion. Patient-reported outcomes were collected by tablet computer, including the shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference (PI) Computer Adaptive Test (CAT), PROMIS Depression CAT, and PROMIS Anxiety CAT. Univariate and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with QuickDASH improvement.

RESULTS

Of 119 included patients, the mean age was 62.7 ± 7.2 years and 74% were women. At a mean of 14 weeks after surgery, the QuickDASH improved by a mean of -10 ± 20 points. The QuickDASH improvement was significantly greater for patients with preoperative QuickDASH scores greater than the median (score change, -19 ± 20) versus those at or below the median (-2 ± 16), and for patients with preoperative PI CAT scores greater than the median (-17 ± 21) versus at or below the median (-4 ± 17). No differences were observed between groups when Anxiety or Depression CAT baseline scores were similarly dichotomized. Multivariable modelling revealed that higher preoperative QuickDASH scores were associated with greater improvement on the QuickDASH; however, no association was observed for preoperative PI CAT, Depression CAT, and Anxiety CAT scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with higher levels of preoperative upper extremity disability experienced more improvement in the early postoperative period following LRTI. Baseline pain interference, depression, and anxiety were not associated with early outcomes. These findings may be useful when identifying patients who may experience the most functional improvement in the immediate postoperative period following LRTI.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic IV.

Operative Treatment is Not Associated with More Relief of Depression Symptoms than Nonoperative Treatment in Patients with Common Hand Illness

BACKGROUND

Depression symptoms are prevalent in the general population, and as many as one in eight patients seeing a hand surgeon may have undiagnosed major depression. It is not clear to what degree lower mood is the consequence or cause of greater symptoms and limitations. If depressive symptoms are a consequence of functional limitations, they might be expected to improve when pathophysiology and impairment are ameliorated. Because surgical treatment is often disease-modifying or salvage, surgery might have a greater impact than nonoperative treatment, which is more often palliative (symptom relieving) than disease-modifying.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) For which hand or wrist conditions are depression symptoms lower after operative compared with nonoperative treatment? (2) Among the subset of patients with the highest depression scores, are depression symptoms lower after operative treatment compared with nonoperative treatment? (3) Among the subset of patients who had nonoperative treatment, are depression symptoms lower after a corticosteroid injection compared with no specific biomedical intervention?

METHODS

At an academic orthopaedic department, 4452 patients had a new office visit for carpal tunnel syndrome, benign neoplasm, primary hand osteoarthritis, de Quervain's tendinopathy, or trigger digit. We analyzed the 1652 patients (37%) who had a return visit at least 3 months later for the same diagnosis. Patients completed the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression computerized adaptive test at every office visit (higher scores indicate more depression symptoms) and PROMIS Pain Interference (higher scores indicates greater hindrance in daily life owing to pain). Patients with a return visit were more likely to have surgical treatment and had greater Pain Interference scores at the first visit. Thirteen percent of patients (221 of 1652) had incomplete or missing scores at the initial visit and 33% (550 of 1652) had incomplete or missing scores at the final return visit. We used multiple imputations to account for missing or incomplete data (imputations = 50). In a multivariable linear regression analysis, we compared the mean change in Depression scores between patients treated operatively and those treated nonoperatively, accounting for PROMIS Pain Interference scores at the first visit, age, gender diagnosis, provider, and treatment duration. A post-hoc power analysis demonstrated that the smallest patient cohort (benign lump, n = 176) provided 99% power (α = 0.05) with eight predictor variables to detect a change of 2 points in the PROMIS Depression score (minimally important difference = 3.5).

RESULTS

After controlling for potentially confounding variables such as pain interference and age, only carpal tunnel release was associated with a slightly greater decrease in depression symptoms compared with nonoperative treatment (regression coefficient [RC] = -3 [95% confidence interval -6 to -1]; p = 0.006). In patients with the highest PROMIS Depression scores for each diagnosis, operative treatment was not associated with an improvement in depression symptoms (carpal tunnel release: RC = 5 [95% CI -7 to 16]; p = 0.44). Moreover, a corticosteroid injection was not associated with fewer depression symptoms than no biomedical treatment (carpal tunnel release: RC = -3 [95% CI -8 to 3]; p = 0.36).

CONCLUSIONS

Given that operative treatment of hand pathology is not generally associated with a decrease in depression symptoms, our results support treating comorbid depression as a separate illness rather than as a secondary effect of pain or physical limitations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic study.

Surgery for lower extremity symptomatic neuroma: Long-term outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic neuroma caused by injuries or surgery can result in neuropathic pain, functional impairment, and psychological distress, which has an impact on quality of life. The aim of this study was to identify the factors related to successful treatment of symptomatic lower extremity symptomatic neuromas using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

METHODS

Thirty-two patients with 48 symptomatic neuromas completed the PROMIS mobility, PROMIS pain interference (PI), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain (0-10) for both pre- and post-operative pain, and the PROMIS depression at a mean of 8.9±4.5 years following neuroma surgery. Neuromas were located around the foot and ankle (n=18, 38%), leg (n=14, 29%), around the knee (n=13, 27%), and in the thigh (n=3, 6.3%). Surgical treatment included neuroma excision and implantation (n=29, 60%) followed by neuroma excision alone or excision with placement in the subcutaneous tissue (n=12, 25%). We performed multivariable analysis to identify the factors influencing the PROMs.

RESULTS

Patients reported significant reduction in mean NRS pain after surgery (7.3 vs 4.9, p=0.0013). Higher PROMIS depression scores were independently associated with inferior PROMIS mobility scores (β=-0.38, p=0.001), higher PROMIS PI scores (β=0.68, p<0.001), and higher NRS pain scores (β=0.1, p=0.001). Additionally, smoking was independently associated with higher NRS pain scores (β=1.59, p=0.049) CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment of symptomatic neuromas of the lower extremity provides a long-term improvement in 59% of patients, but 19% of patients still reported severe persistent pain despite surgical treatment. Smoking and negative mood have negative effects on patient-reported outcomes after neuroma surgery.

Effects of Baseline Opioid Medication Use on Patient-Reported Functional and Psychological Impairment Among Hand Clinic Patients

PURPOSE

To test the null hypothesis that baseline opioid use is not associated with functional or psychological impairment among new hand surgery clinic patients, as measured by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments.

METHODS

New adult (≥ 18 years) patient visits to a tertiary academic orthopedic nonshoulder hand and upper extremity clinic between February 2014 and April 2018 were eligible. Collected outcomes include the question, "Are you currently taking narcotic pain medications?", the PROMIS Upper Extremity (UE) computerized adaptive testing (CAT), abbreviated version of the Disorders of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), PROMIS Physical Function (PF) CAT, PROMIS Pain Interference (PI) CAT, PROMIS Depression CAT, and PROMIS Anxiety CAT. Patients responding to the opioid question, plus the UE CAT or QuickDASH, were included. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression modelling were used to assess factors associated with baseline scores.

RESULTS

Of 5997 included patients, 1,046 (17.4%) reported baseline opioid use. Patients in the opioid group demonstrated significantly worse scores on all patient-reported outcomes, and a significantly greater proportion of patients with PROMIS Depression CAT scores exceeding 60 (associated with a clinical diagnosis of depression; 29.5% vs 15.5%). Lower functional scores were observed in the opioid group after controlling for age, sex, other activity-limiting comorbidities, and either depression (UE CAT -7.0; QuickDASH +18.1; and PF CAT -6.6 points), anxiety (UE CAT -6.3; QuickDASH +16.4; PF CAT -6.3), or PI (UE CAT -3.7; QuickDASH +9.5; and PF CAT -4.2 points). Pain interference was greater among opiate users when controlling for age, sex, other activity-limiting comorbidities, and baseline function or psychological status: PI was 2.5, 5.0, or 4.3 points greater when controlling for the PROMIS UE CAT, Depression CAT, or Anxiety CAT.

CONCLUSIONS

New patients presenting to a hand surgery clinic who endorse use of opioid medications at baseline report significantly decreased physical function, increased psychological burden, and greater levels of pain interference than nonusers.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic III.

Depression and Anxiety among Patients with Atraumatic Lateral Epicondylitis and Ulnar-Sided Wrist Pain

Background  Ulnar-sided wrist pain (UWP) and lateral epicondylitis (LE) are common disorders that can be difficult to treat. Depression and anxiety have been shown to modify patient symptoms, disability and pain. Questions/Purposes  The purpose of our study was to quantify the prevalence of depression and anxiety among patients with LE or UWP. A secondary aim was to determine if these patients report higher levels of pain upon presentation and if they are more likely to require occupational therapy. Patients and Methods  A retrospective chart review was conducted, and patients included those with LE or UWP, atraumatic in origin, ages 18 and over, and ongoing use of noninvasive treatment of LE or UWP. Results  Our final analysis included 97 patients of which 57 had LE, 34 had UWP, and 6 had both. The prevalence of a mood disorder was 34.0%. Anxiety and/or depression was more prevalent in patients with LE compared to UWP. The most common medication was alprazolam. Pain scores averaged 1.2 points higher in subjects with a history of a mental health disorder. After adjusting for age and sex, there was no significant association between prevalence of depression and/or anxiety and utilization of physical or occupational therapy. Conclusions  Patients with either LE, UWP or both along with depression and/or anxiety may be less likely to improve with traditional treatments. Future investigations are warranted focusing on the value of a multidisciplinary team consisting of a hand surgeon, behavioral therapist, or psychologist to optimize treatment response. Level of Evidence  This is a Level IV, case series study.

What is the Impact of Social Deprivation on Physical and Mental Health in Orthopaedic Patients?

BACKGROUND

The complex interrelationship among physical health, mental health, and social health has gained the attention of the medical community in recent years. Poor social health, also called social deprivation, has been linked to more disease and a more-negative impact from disease across a wide variety of health conditions. However, it remains unknown how social deprivation is related to physical and mental health in patients presenting for orthopaedic care.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Do patients living in zip codes with higher social deprivation report lower levels of physical function and higher levels of pain interference, depression, and anxiety as measured by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) at initial presentation to an orthopaedic provider than those from less deprived areas; and if so, is this relationship independent of other potentially confounding factors such as age, sex, and race? (2) Does the relationship between the level of social deprivation of a patient's community and that patient's physical function, pain interference, depression, and anxiety, as measured by PROMIS remain consistent across all orthopaedic subspecialties? (3) Are there differences in the proportion of individuals from areas of high and low levels of social deprivation seen by the various orthopaedic subspecialties at one large, tertiary orthopaedic referral center?

METHODS

This cross-sectional evaluation analyzed 7500 new adult patients presenting to an orthopaedic center between August 1, 2016 and December 15, 2016. Patients completed PROMIS Physical Function-v1.2, Pain Interference-v1.1, Depression-v1.0, and Anxiety-v1.0 Computer Adaptive Tests. The Area Deprivation Index, a composite measure of community-level social deprivation, based on multiple census metrics such as income, education level, and housing type for a given nine-digit zip code was used to estimate individual social deprivation. Statistical analysis determined the effect of disparate area deprivation (based on most- and least-deprived national quartiles) for the entire sample as well as for patients categorized by the orthopaedic subspecialty providing care. Comparisons of PROMIS scores among these groups were based on an MCID of 5 points for each PROMIS domain (Effect size 0.5).

RESULTS

Patients living in zip codes with the highest levels of social deprivation had worse mean scores across all four PROMIS domains when compared with those living in the least-deprived quartile (physical function 38 +/- 9 versus 43 +/- 9, mean difference 4, 95% CI, 3.7-5.0; p < 0.001; pain interference 64 +/- 8 versus 60+/-8, mean difference -4, 95% CI, -4.8 to -3.7; p < 0.001; depression 50+/-11 versus 45+/-8, mean difference -5, 95% CI, -6.0 to -4.5; p < 0.001; anxiety 56+/-11 versus 50 +/-10, mean difference -6, 95% CI, -6.9 to -5.4; p < 0.001). There were no differences in physical function, pain interference, depression, or anxiety PROMIS scores between patients from the most- and least-deprived quartiles who presented to the subspecialties of spine (physical function, mean 35+/-7 versus 35+/-7; p = 0.872; pain interference, 67+/-7 versus 66+/-7; p = 0.562; depression, 54+/-12 versus 51 +/-10; p = 0.085; and anxiety, 60+/-11 versus 58 +/-9; p = 0.163), oncology (physical function, mean 33+/-9 versus 38 +/-13; p = 0.105; pain interference, 68+/-9 versus 64+/-10; p = 0.144; depression, 51+/-10 versus 52+/-13; p = 0.832; anxiety, 59+/-11 versus 59+/-10 p = 0.947); and trauma (physical function, 35+/-11 versus 32+/-10; p = 0.268; pain interference, 66+/-7 versus 67+/-6; p = 0.566; depression, 52+/-12 versus 53+/-11; p = 0.637; and anxiety, 59+/-12 versus 60+/-9 versus; p = 0.800). The social deprivation-based differences in all PROMIS domains remained for the subspecialties of foot/ankle, where mean differences ranged from 3 to 6 points on the PROMIS domains (p < 0.001 for all four domains), joint reconstruction where mean differences ranged from 4 to 7 points on the PROMIS domains (p < 0.001 for all four domains), sports medicine where mean differences in PROMIS scores ranged from 3 to 5 between quartiles (p < 0.001 for all four domains), and finally upper extremity where mean differences in PROMIS scores between the most- and least-deprived quartiles were five points for each PROMIS domain (p < 0.001 for all four domains). The proportion of individuals from the most- and least-deprived quartiles was distinct when looking across all seven subspecialty categories; only 11% of patients presenting to sports medicine providers and 17% of patients presenting to upper extremity providers were from the most-deprived quartile, while 39% of trauma patients were from the most-deprived quartile (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Orthopaedic patients must be considered within the context of their social environment because it influences patient-reported physical and mental health as well as has potential implications for treatment and prognosis. Social deprivation may need to be considered when using patient-reported outcomes to judge the value of care delivered between practices or across specialties. Further studies should examine potential interventions to improve the perceived health of patients residing in communities with greater social deprivation and to determine how social health influences ultimate orthopaedic treatment outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prognostic study.

The Effect of the Content of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures on Patient Perceived Empathy and Satisfaction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine whether positively or negatively phrased Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) prior to a visit with the hand surgeon affect patient perceived empathy and patient satisfaction (Patient-Reported Experience Measures [PREMs]).

METHODS

Between June 2017 and July 2017, we enrolled 134 patients who presented to 3 hand surgeons at 2 outpatient offices. They were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: completion of negatively framed questionnaires (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-2], Pain Catastrophizing Scale [PCS-4], and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] depression Computer Adaptive Test [CAT]) or completion of positively framed questionnaires (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire [PSEQ-2]) prior to the visit. At the end of the visit, all patients completed questionnaires on patient-perceived physician empathy and patient satisfaction. Five patients were excluded from the analysis after randomization.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant differences between groups on patient-perceived physician empathy and patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the content of psychological questionnaires completed prior to the visit does not affect patient satisfaction and perceived empathy recorded after the visit.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Given the degree to which PROMs are influenced by psychosocial factors, and prior evidence that PROMs are primed by negatively framed questionnaires, it is reassuring that negatively framed PROMs did not affect PREMs, but more research is merited.

High pain intensity after total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

As reimbursement becomes increasingly tied to quality and patient experience, there is growing interest in alleviation of postoperative pain combined with optimal opioid stewardship. We characterized predictors of severe inpatient pain after elective total shoulder arthroplasty and evaluated its association with opioid use, operative time, hospital length of stay, discharge disposition, and cost.

METHODS

We identified 415 patients undergoing elective primary total shoulder arthroplasty between 2016 and 2017 from our registry. Severe postoperative pain was defined as peak pain intensity ≥75th percentile. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to determine preoperative characteristics associated with severe pain, including demographics, emotional health, comorbidities, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. Opioid consumption was expressed as oral morphine equivalents (OMEs). Costs were calculated using time-driven activity-based costing.

RESULTS

In decreasing order of magnitude, the predictors of severe postoperative pain were greater number of self-reported allergies, preoperative chronic opioid use, lower American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and depression. Patients reporting severe pain took more opioids (202 vs. 84 mg OMEs), stayed longer in the hospital (2.9 vs. 2.0 days), used postacute inpatient rehabilitation services more frequently (28% vs. 10%), and were more likely to be high-cost patients (23% vs. 5%; all P < .001), but they did not have longer operations (166 vs. 165 minutes, P = .86).

CONCLUSIONS

Efforts to address psychological and social determinants of health might do as much or more than technical improvements to alleviate pain, limit opioid use, and contain costs after shoulder arthroplasty. These findings are important in the redesign of care pathways and bundling initiatives.

Relative Prevalence of Anxiety and Depression in Patients With Upper Extremity Conditions

PURPOSE

Prior research regarding the impact of mental health on upper extremity musculoskeletal function and recovery has frequently grouped catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression. This study was designed to define the relative prevalence of heightened anxiety versus depressive symptoms among a patient population seeking upper extremity care and to determine if those prevalences varied according to the symptomatic condition.

METHODS

All adult patients presenting to a tertiary upper extremity orthopedic center between June 1, 2016 and November 30, 2016 (n = 3,315) completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety and Depression Computer Adaptive Tests. Descriptive statistics and multivariable linear regression assessed differences in average PROMIS scores between demographic and diagnostic groups. Patients were also analyzed according to crossing thresholds for heightened anxiety and depression scores based on established linkage tables with the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Depression scales, respectively. Pearson chi-square analysis and binary logistic regression were performed to determine if the proportion of patients crossing these thresholds varied according to the primary symptomatic condition while accounting for patient age, sex, and race.

RESULTS

African American patients and those with carpal tunnel syndrome, trapeziometacarpal arthritis, or shoulder conditions reported significantly higher PROMIS Anxiety scores. Higher PROMIS Depression scores varied only by diagnosis. Seventeen percent of patients exceeded the Anxiety symptoms score threshold and 10% of patients exceeded the Depression symptom threshold. In logistic regression modeling, the likelihood of exceeding the Anxiety threshold varied by diagnosis and was increased in African American patients and females. African American race was associated with exceeding the Depression threshold while accounting for sex and diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with upper extremity conditions more frequently report heightened anxiety than heightened depression. Patient race and diagnosis are independent predictors of anxiety among patients seeking care for upper extremity conditions.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic II.

Floor Effect of PROMIS Depression CAT Associated With Hasty Completion in Orthopaedic Surgery Patients

BACKGROUND

The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was developed to provide valid, reliable, and standardized measures to gather patient-reported outcomes for many health domains, including depression, independent of patient condition. Most studies confirming the performance of these measures were conducted with a consented, volunteer study population for testing. Using a study population that has undergone the process of informed consent may be differentiated from the validation group because they are educated specifically as to the purpose of the questions and they will not have answers recorded in their permanent health record.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) When given as part of routine practice to an orthopaedic population, do PROMIS Physical Function and Depression item banks produce score distributions different than those produced by the populations used to calibrate and validate the item banks? (2) Does the presence of a nonnormal distribution in the PROMIS Depression scores in a clinical population reflect a deliberately hasty answering of questions by patients? (3) Are patients who are reporting minimal depressive symptoms by scoring the minimum score on the PROMIS Depression Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) distinct from other patients according to demographic data or their scores on other PROMIS assessments?

METHODS

Univariate descriptive statistics and graphic histograms were used to describe the frequency distribution of scores for the Physical Function and Depression item banks for all orthopaedic patients 18 years or older who had an outpatient visit between June 2015 and December 2016. The study population was then broken into two groups based on whether they indicated a lack of depressive symptoms and scored the minimum score (34.2) on the Depression CAT assessment (Floor Group) or not (Standard Group). The distribution of Physical Function CAT scores was compared between the two groups. Finally, a time-per-question value was calculated for both the Physical Function and Depression CATs and was compared between assessments within each group as well as between the two groups. Bivariate statistics compared the demographic data between the two groups.

RESULTS

Physical Function CAT scores in musculoskeletal patients were normally distributed like the distribution calibration population; however, the score distribution of the Depression CAT in musculoskeletal patients was nonnormal with a spike in the floor score. After excluding the floor spike, the distribution of the Depression CAT scores was not different from the population control group. Patients who scored the floor score on the Depression CAT took slightly less time per question for Physical Function CAT when compared with other musculoskeletal patients (floor patients: 11 ± 9 seconds; normally distributed patients: 12 ± 10 seconds; mean difference: 1 second [0.8-1.1]; p < 0.001 but not clinically relevant). They spent a substantially shorter amount of time per question on the Depression CAT (Floor Group: 4 ± 3 seconds; Standard Group: 7 ± 7 seconds; mean difference: 3 [2.9-3.2]; p < 0.001). Patients who scored the minimum score on the PROMIS Depression CAT were younger than other patients (Floor Group: 50 ± 18 SD; Standard Group: 55 ± 16 SD; mean difference: 4.5 [4.2-4.7]; p < 0.001) with a larger percentage of men (Floor Group: 48.8%; Standard Group 40.0%; odds ratio 0.6 [0.6-0.7]; p < 0.001) and minor differences in racial breakdown (Floor Group: white 85.2%, black 11.9%, other 0.03%; Standard Group: white 83.9%, black 13.7%, other 0.02%).

CONCLUSIONS

In an orthopaedic surgery population that is given PROMIS CAT as part of routine practice, the Physical Function item bank had a normal performance, but there is a group of patients who hastily complete Depression questions producing a strong floor effect and calling into question the validity of those floor scores that indicate minimal depression.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, diagnostic study.

Leading the Way to Solutions to the Opioid Epidemic: AOA Critical Issues

BACKGROUND

In the past 2 decades, overdoses and deaths from prescription opioids have reached epidemic proportions in the United States. The widespread use of opioids complicates management of the orthopaedic surgery patient in the acute and chronic settings. Orthopaedic surgeons are some of the top prescribers of opioids in the complex setting of chronic use, abuse, and diversion.

METHODS

The literature regarding the basic science of pharmacologic options for pain management (e.g., opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), the impact of strategies on bone and soft-tissue healing, and pain relief are summarized as they relate to the management of orthopaedic injuries and conditions. Additionally, a section on designing solutions to address the current opioid crisis is presented.

RESULTS

The mechanism of action of different classes of analgesic medications is discussed, as well as the basic scientific evidence regarding the impact of narcotic and nonnarcotic analgesic medications on bone-healing and on other organ systems. Differences between pain and nociception, various treatment strategies, and clinical comparisons of the effectiveness of various analgesics compared with opioids are summarized. Finally, options for addressing the opioid crisis, including the description of a large system-wide intervention to impact prescriber behavior at the point of care using health-information solutions, are presented.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthopaedic leaders, armed with information and strategies, can help lead the way to solutions to the opioid epidemic in their respective communities, institutions, and subspecialty societies. Through leadership and education, orthopaedic surgeons can help shape the solution for this critical public health issue.

Association of Physical Function, Anxiety, and Pain Interference in Nonshoulder Upper Extremity Patients Using the PROMIS Platform

PURPOSE

The relationship between psychosocial factors and self-reported physical function among hand and upper extremity patients is complex. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) platform has attempted to create a variety of specifically targeted metrics that can be administered using computer adaptive testing (CAT). Three metrics measuring self-reported physical function (herein referred to in combination as "functional" metrics) include the PROMIS Physical Function (PF) CAT, PROMIS Upper Extremity (UE) CAT, and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH). Two metrics assessing psychosocial factors include the PROMIS Anxiety and Pain Interference (PI) CATs ("nonfunctional" metrics). This study evaluates whether the functional metrics were correlated with nonfunctional metrics.

METHODS

The 5 questionnaires were administered prospectively on a tablet computer to all consecutive adult patients presenting to an outpatient hand and upper extremity (nonshoulder) clinic at a tertiary academic medical center from January 1 to November 1, 2014. For patients with multiple visits during the study period, only the first was included. Data were evaluated retrospectively to assess the relationship between functional and nonfunctional measures, with Pearson correlation coefficients to understand the relationship between continuous variables, and 1-way analysis of variance to examine for differences in outcome measures across demographic groups. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine factors predicting functional disability.

RESULTS

We included 1,299 patients: mean age was 46.8 years, 53% were female, and 23% were unemployed or on disability. The PROMIS PF CAT, PROMIS UE CAT, and QuickDASH scores were all significantly correlated with PROMIS Anxiety CAT (Pearson correlation coefficients, -0.46, -0.48, and 0.53, respectively) and PROMIS PI CAT (-0.60, -0.65, and 0.76, respectively) scores. Multivariable regression analyses demonstrated that increased PROMIS Anxiety and PI CAT scores each independently and adversely influenced PROMIS PF CAT, PROMIS UE CAT, and QuickDASH scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing levels of patient anxiety and pain interference are independently associated with decreased patient-reported upper extremity function.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study provides further support of the biopsychosocial model by highlighting that increased anxiety is associated with decreased self-reported function using the PROMIS platform.

Depression and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have found that depression is associated with increased pain and impairment following lower-extremity arthroplasty; however, this association has not been investigated for total shoulder arthroplasty. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between depression and patient-reported outcomes following total shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS

A prospectively collected institutional registry was queried for consecutive patients who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis from 2007 to 2013 with baseline and minimum 2-year postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores. Revision procedures and total shoulder arthroplasty for diagnoses other than osteoarthritis were excluded. Patients with a preoperative diagnosis of depression (n = 88) formed the study cohort; control patients without a diagnosis of depression were matched to the study patients by age and sex in a 2:1 ratio (n = 176). Baseline characteristics and patient-reported outcome measures were compared between groups, as were minimum 2-year patient-reported outcomes and change in patient-reported outcomes. A multivariable regression was performed to investigate the independent effect of depression on improvement in ASES scores.

RESULTS

Except for the Short Form-12 Mental Component Summary (SF-12 MCS) scores, there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in baseline characteristics between study patients and controls. There was a significant improvement in the ASES score for patients with depression (p < 0.0001) and controls (p < 0.0001). Patients with depression had significantly lower final ASES scores (p = 0.001) and less improvement in ASES scores (p = 0.001) and SF-12 Physical Component Summary scores (p = 0.006) as well as lower satisfaction levels at 2 years; however, the latter difference did not reach clinical importance. Depression (p = 0.018) was an independent predictor of less improvement in ASES scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a diagnosis of depression should be counseled that they will experience a significant clinical improvement from baseline after total shoulder arthroplasty. A preoperative diagnosis of depression is an independent predictor of significantly less improvement in ASES scores following total shoulder arthroplasty; however, this difference does not reach clinical importance and should not discourage patients with a clinical diagnosis of depression from undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.