Volar-Ulnar Approach for Fixation of the Volar Lunate Facet Fragment in Distal Radius Fractures: A Technical Tip

Pronator quadratus preserving versus pronator quadratus dissecting approaches in volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures: a systematic review of comparative studies

PURPOSE

To compare pronator quadratus preserving (PQ-P) approaches with PQ dissecting (PQ-D) approaches in volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures (DRFs).

METHODS

Three databases were searched on March 10th, 2024. The authors adhered to the PRISMA and R-AMSTAR guidelines and Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. Data on demographics, fracture classifications, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), range of motion, radiographic parameters, and complications were extracted.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies with a total of 1007 fractures were included. Two of three studies reported lower DASH scores in the PQ-P group between 6 weeks and 3 months postoperative, however no studies reported lower scores in the PQ-P group after 3 months. Three of three studies reported significantly lower VAS scores at 6 weeks postoperative, however no studies reported significant differences after 6 months. Only one of six studies reported significantly greater flexion, extension, and pronation in the PQ-P group. One of four studies reported greater radial deviation in the PQ-P group, while there were no differences in supination or ulnar deviation. One of ten and one of six studies reported greater volar tilt and ulnar variance or radial length, respectively, in the PQ-P group.

CONCLUSION

There is not sufficient evidence supporting the utility of PQ-P approaches over conventional PQ-D approaches for volar plate fixation of DRFs, especially at long-term follow-ups (3+ months). There may be short term benefits with PQ-P approaches, specifically with regards to PROMs in the short-term (< 6 weeks), however there is limited high-quality evidence supporting these findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Management of Lunate Facet Escape after Distal Radius Fracture Volar Plating: Surgical Technique

Fractures involving the lunate facet of the distal radius (commonly called the volar ulnar corner or "critical corner") are often difficult to recognize radiographically. "Lunate facet escape" refers to the displacement of this fragment after attempted distal radius fracture closed or open reduction methods. Lunate facet escape can have severe consequences including carpal collapse with pain, instability, and arthritis. Challenges to lunate facet fixation include irregular cortical contour that makes plate fixation difficult, as well as deforming forces by inserting structures. The goal of the management of a distal radius fracture with lunate facet involvement is first identification, then adequate stabilization until osseous healing occurs. However, subsequent lunate facet escape can pose a challenging clinical and surgical dilemma. Here we discuss our preferred approach to treat lunate facet escape after distal radius fracture volar locking plating failure.

The Pitfalls of Difficult Distal Radius Fractures and Provisional Reduction

Distal radius fractures are some of the most common injuries encountered in orthopedics and require careful consideration when determining the appropriate treatment options. These fractures can be difficult injuries to treat surgically based on a large variability of fracture patterns, bone quality, and anatomy. It is important to understand the potential pitfalls associated with the treatment of difficult distal radius fractures to prevent avoidable complications. Some of these pitfalls include but are not limited to appropriate surgical exposure and soft tissue handling, provisional reduction, fixation type, and augmentation of fracture fixation.

A Cadaveric Comparison of Approaches for Exposure of the Volar Distal Radius: Is There a Utilitarian Approach?

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether exposure for planned fixation of distal radius fractrues is superior with any given approach, and whether a single utilitarian approach exists that permits reliable complete exposure of the volar distal radius.

METHODS

A cadaveric study was performed using 10 matched specimens. Group 1 consisted of 3 radially based approaches (standard flexor carpi radialis [FCR], standard FCR with radial retraction of FCR and flexor pollicis longus [FPL] tendons, extended FCR). Group 2 consisted of 2 ulnarly based approaches (volar ulnar, extended carpal tunnel). The primary outcome was total width of exposed distal radius at the watershed line. Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon rank testing was used to identify differences.

RESULTS

The standard FCR approach exposed 29 mm (90%), leaving on average 3 mm (10%) of the ulnar corner unexposed. Retracting the FCR and FPL tendons radially allows for an extra 1 mm of volar ulnar corner exposure. Finally, converting to an extended FCR approach provided 100% exposure in all specimens. The volar ulnar exposure however provided exposure to only 9 mm (37%), leaving 20 mm (62.5%) left unexposed radially. The extended carpal tunnel provided exposure to 21 mm (65%), leaving 11 mm (35%) radially unexposed. Differences between each group were statistically significant (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The extended FCR approach exposed 100% of the volar distal radius in our study and may serve as a utilitarian volar surgical approach for exposure and fixation of distal radius fractures. Additional knowledge of the limitations of alternative approaches can be helpful in surgical planning.

Enhanced Approaches to the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures

Distal radius fractures are among the most common fractures treated by orthopedic surgeons. Various classification systems have been described which can help in deciding the approach for fixation. In some cases, a computed tomography scan can provide better understanding of the fracture fragments and displacement for surgical planning. Plating through the volar approach is the most common approach for fractures meeting operative criteria. Several additional approaches can be used for specific fracture patterns. These approaches can be used in isolation or in conjunction with other approaches to aid in visualization and fixation.

Single Incision, Dual Window Approach for a Comminuted Distal Radius Fracture

Introduction  Complex distal radius fractures often involve a fragment of the volar-ulnar articular surface and the radial styloid. The volar ulnar corner of the distal radius is an important constraint to volar translation of the carpus and thus requires stable fixation to prevent wrist displacement. The traditional volar Henry approach often requires undue tension on the median nerve while retracting for access to the ulnar aspect of the radius. To protect the median nerve from iatrogenic injury and to improve exposure of the surgical site, we propose a single incision, dual window approach to the distal radius for complex bi-columnar fractures. Methods  This technique combines the trans-Flexor Carpi Radialis (FCR) approach with a subcutaneous dissection to the ulnar aspect of the wrist. This window utilizes the interval between the ulnar neurovascular bundle and the carpal tunnel contents. Results  This technique allows the surgeon to work through either window and thus visualize and directly fixate the various fracture fragments. We have treated complex articular distal radius fractures associated with ulnar communition with this novel technique and it has provided direct reduction with improved fragment access. The surgical technique, a case presentation and results are detailed in this report. Conclusion  This case report has demonstrated that complex bi-columnar fractures of the distal radius can be effectively approached and fixated with a single incision dual window approach.

Volar versus combined dorsal and volar plate fixation of complex intraarticular distal radius fractures with small dorsoulnar fragment - a biomechanical study

Complex intraarticular distal radius fractures (DRFs), commonly managed with volar locking plates, are challenging. Combined volar and dorsal plating is frequently applied for treatment, however, biomechanical investigations are scant. The aim of this biomechanical study was to investigate volar plating versus double plating in DRFs with different degrees of lunate facet comminution.Thirty artificial radii with simulated AO/OTA 23-C2.1 and C3.1 DRFs, including dorsal defect and lunate facet comminution, were assigned to 3 groups: Group 1 with two equally-sized lunate facet fragments; Group 2 with small dorsal and large volar fragment; Group 3 with three equally-sized fragments. The specimens underwent volar and double locked plating and non-destructive ramped loading in 0° neutral position, 40° flexion and 40° extension.In each tested position, stiffness: (1) did not significantly differ among groups with same fixation method (p ≥ 0.15); (2) increased significantly after supplemental dorsal plating in Group 2 and Group 3 (p ≤ 0.02).Interfragmentary displacements between styloid process and lunate facet in neutral position were below 0.5 mm, being not significantly different among groups and plating techniques (p ≥ 0.63).Following volar plating, angular displacement of the lunate facet to radius shaft was significantly lower in Group 1 versus both Group 2 and Group 3 (p < 0.01). It decreased significantly after supplemental dorsal plating in Group 2 and Group 3 (p < 0.01), but not in Group 1 (p ≥ 0.13), and did not differ significantly among the three groups after double plating (p ≥ 0.74).Comminution of the lunate facet within its dorsal third significantly affected the biomechanical outcomes related to complex intraarticular DRFs treated with volar and double locked plates.Double plating demonstrates superior stability versus volar plating only for lunate facet comminution within its dorsal third. In contrast, volar plating could achieve stability comparable with double plating when the dorsal third of the lunate facet is not separated by the fracture pattern. Both fixation methods indicated achievable absolute stability between the articular fragments.

Volar hook plate stabilization of volar marginal fragments in intra-articular distal radius fractures

BACKGROUND

In the setting of intra-articular distal radius fractures, the volar lunate facet (VLF) is the only articular segment that resists volar carpal subluxation. So, it is important to achieve a stable fixation of this key fragment. The VLF, when small (also called as volar marginal fragment, VMF) is located distal to the watershed line making fixation with the conventional volar locking plates difficult or impossible.

METHODS

18 patients with either an AO: 2R3B3 or a C3 fracture consisting of a VMF underwent surgical repair through a volar approach. The VMF was stabilised using a anatomical volar hook plate. Remaining fracture components were stabilised using 2.4/ 2.0 mm locked plates. Fracture healing, ability of the hook plate to maintain reduction of the VMF and complications were assessed during follow up. Functional outcome was evaluated using Mayo score and patient rated wrist evaluation questionnaires.

RESULTS

All fractures united at follow up. Reduction of the VMF was maintained through healing with a stable radiocarpal and distal radioulnar joint. The mean flexion - extension wrist arc was 105° ± 10.2° The mean grip strength reached 74.6 ± 6% of the opposite side. The mean Mayo wrist score was 75 ± 5.3 and the mean patient rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) score was 15.2 ± 4.3 indicating recovery of wrist function.

CONCLUSION

It is important to identify VMFs in intra-articular distal radius fractures. Anatomically designed volar hook plate achieves excellent low-profile stable fixation of this key fragment to allow early mobilisation without fearing loss of reduction and volar carpal subluxation.

Plate coverage predicts failure for volarly unstable distal radius fractures with volar lunate facet fragments

INTRODUCTION

Loss of reduction after operative fixation of volarly unstable distal radius fractures with a volar lunate facet fragment (VLF) is considered problematic because it results in carpal subluxation or dislocation and subsequent impaired function. We hypothesized that the indicator of loss of reduction of the VLF after fixation is plate coverage of the bony fragment. We investigated the relationship between the plate coverage of the VLF and loss of reduction after fixation, and calculated the plate coverage that was associated with failure of fixation of the VLF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review. We included patients with surgically treated volarly unstable distal radius fractures with VLF with a volar locking plate who had a minimum follow-up of 6 months. A total of 33 patients (35 wrists) met criteria for inclusion into the study. The patients were divided into a displacement group and a non-displacement group. We calculated and compared longitudinal dimension and plate coverage of the VLF between the two groups to reveal the risk factors for loss of reduction.

RESULTS

At final follow-up, 25 fractures maintained radiographic alignment and 10 (28.6%) lost reduction. Univariate analysis between the two groups showed that plate coverage against the transverse and longitudinal dimension of the VLF was correlated with loss of reduction after operative fixation. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, only plate coverage against the longitudinal dimension of the VLF remained a significant predictor of failure. With 64.7% as the cut-off point for plate coverage against the longitudinal dimension of the VLF, the sensitivity and specificity of the prediction were 96% and 80%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The predictor of loss of reduction after fixation of volarly unstable distal radius fractures with a VLF was plate coverage against the longitudinal dimension of the VLF.

Functional Outcomes in Volar-Displaced Distal Radius Fractures Patients with Marginal Rim Fragment Treated by Volar Distal Locking Plates

Background Treatment of volar-displaced distal radius fractures (DRF) accompanied by marginal rim fragment has recently been actively discussed. It is difficult to obtain a sufficient buttress effect on this fragment. Therefore, we actively apply a distal volar locking plate (DVLP) to fractures with this fragment. Here, we report the treatment outcomes and caveats of surgery of fractures with this fragment. Materials and Methods The subjects were 32 patients (male: 11, female: 21, and mean age: 59.4 years) with volar dislocated DRF accompanied by the marginal rim fragment treated using DVLP. The fracture type of AO classification was B3 in 6 patients, C1 in 12, C2 in 6, and C3 in 8. Results The mean duration of follow-up was 13.8 (12-30) months. The plate could be covered with the pronator quadratus muscle in surgery in all patients. On the final follow-up, visual analog scale score was 1.4/10, quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand score was 9.2/100, and the Mayo wrist score was 93.7/100. No complication was observed in the soft tissue, such as the nerves and flexor tendons. Conclusion The factor determining retention of the reduction position of the marginal rim fragment is a sufficient buttress effect, and DVLP is a useful implant in terms of this point.

The efficacy of using 3D printing models in the treatment of fractures: a randomised clinical trial

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the use of three-dimensional (3D) printing models for preoperative planning in cases of complex fracture.

Methods

In total, 48 patients with AO type C fractures of the distal radius were enrolled in the study between January 2014 and January 2015. They were divided randomly into 3D model (n = 23) and routine treatment (n = 25) groups. A 3D digital model of each distal radius fracture in the former group was constructed. The model was exported to a 3D printer for construction of a full solid model. During each operation, the operative time, amount of blood loss, and frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy were recorded, which were regarded as primary outcome measures. Patients were followed to evaluate surgical outcomes by Gartland–Werley scores, radiological evaluation, and range of motion of wrist, and these were regarded as the secondary outcome measures. In addition, we invited surgeons and patients to complete questionnaires.

Results

The treatment of complex fractures using the 3D printing approach reduced the frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy, blood loss volume, and operative time, but did not improve postoperative function compared with routine treatment. The patients wanted the doctor to use the 3D model to describe the condition and introduce the operative plan because it facilitated their understanding. The orthopaedic surgeons thought that the 3D model was useful for communication with patients, but were much less satisfied with its use in preoperative planning.

Conclusion

Our study revealed that 3D printing models effectively help the doctors plan and perform the operation and provide more effective communication between doctors and patients, but can not improve postoperative function compared with routine treatment.

Trial Registration

This trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on May 9, 2017 (ChiCTR-IRP-17011343, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=19264).

Treatment of Die-Punch Fractures with 3D Printing Technology

PURPOSE

We evaluated the feasibility, accuracy and effectiveness of applying three-dimensional (3D) printing technology for preoperative planning for die-punch fractures.

METHODS

A total of 107 patients who underwent die-punch fracture surgery were enrolled in the study. They were randomly divided into two groups: 52 cases in the 3D model group and 55 cases in the routine group. A 3D digital model of each die-punch fracture was reconstructed in the 3D group. The 3D digital model was imported to a 3D printer to build the full solid model. The operation time, blood loss volume, and the number of intraoperative fluoroscopy were recorded. Follow-up was performed to evaluate the patients' surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

Treatment of die-punch fractures using the 3D printing approach reduced the number of intraoperative fluoroscopy, blood loss volume, and operation time, but did not improve wrist function compared to those in the routine group. The patients wanted the doctor to use the 3D model to introduce the condition and operative plan because it was easier for them to understand. The orthopedic surgeons thought that the 3D model was useful for communicating with their patients, but their satisfaction with the preoperative plan was much lower than the benefit of using the 3D model to communicate with their patients.

CONCLUSIONS

3D printing technology produced more accurate morphometric information for orthopedists to provide personalized surgical planning and communicate better with their patients. However, it is difficult to use widely in the department of orthopedics.