Multifocal Neuropathy: Expanding the Scope of Double Crush Syndrome

Radial and median nerves distal peripheral tension after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric study

Background

Peripheral nerve injury is a recognized complication after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) that has mainly been studied at the level of the brachial plexus and its proximal branches. However, the impact of RSA on distal peripheral nerves and the influence of elbow and wrist position is not known. This cadaveric study aimed to analyze the effect of RSA implantation and upper limb position on tension in the distal median and radial nerves. The hypothesis was that RSA increased distal nerve tension, which could be further affected by elbow and wrist position.

Methods

12 upper limbs in 9 full fresh-frozen cadavers were dissected. Nerve tension was measured in the median nerve at the level of the proximal arm, elbow, and distal forearm, and in the radial nerve at the level of the elbow, using a customized three-point tensiometer. Measurements were carried out before and after RSA implantation, using a semi-inlay implant (Medacta, Castel San Pietro, Switzerland). Two different configurations were tested, using the smallest and largest available implant sizes. Three upper-limb key positions were considered (plexus at risk, plexus relief, and neutral), from which the effect of elbow and wrist position was further tested.

Results

RSA implantation significantly increased median and radial nerve tension throughout the upper limb. The distal nerve segments were particularly dependent on elbow and wrist position. The plexus at risk position induced the most tension in all nerve segments, especially with the large implant configuration. On the other hand, the plexus relief position induced the least amount of tension. Flexing the elbow was the most efficient way to decrease nerve tension in all tested nerve segments and key positions. Wrist flexion significantly decreased nerve tension in the median nerve, whereas wrist extension decreased tension in the radial nerve.

Conclusion

RSA significantly increases tension in the median and radial nerves and makes them more susceptible to wrist and elbow positioning. The mechanism behind distal peripheral neuropathy after RSA may thus result from increased compression of tensioned nerves against anatomical fulcrums rather than nerve elongation alone. Elbow flexion was the most effective way to decrease nerve tension, while elbow extension should be avoided when implanting the humeral component. Further studies are needed to assess the ulnar nerve.

Double entrapment neuropathy of the ulnar nerve at the elbow and the wrist : double crush syndrome?

BACKGROUND

Double crush syndrome refers to a nerve in the proximal region being compressed, affecting its proximal segment. Instances of this syndrome involving ulnar and cubital canals during ulnar neuropathy are rare. Diagnosis solely through clinical examination is challenging. Although electromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction studies (NCS) can confirm neuropathy, they do not incorporate inching tests at the wrist, hindering diagnosis confirmation. We recently encountered eight cases of suspected double compression of ulnar nerve, reporting these cases along with a literature review.

METHODS

The study included 5 males and 2 females, averaging 45.6 years old. Among them, 4 had trauma history, and preoperative McGowan stages varied. Ulnar neuropathy was confirmed in 7 cases at both cubital and ulnar canal locations. Surgery was performed for 4 cases, while conservative treatment continued for 3 cases.

RESULTS

In 4 cases with wrist involvement, 2 showed ulnar nerve compression by a fibrous band, and 1 had nodular hyperplasia. Another case displayed ulnar nerve swelling with muscle covering. Among the 4 surgery cases, 2 improved from preoperative McGowan stage IIB to postoperative stage 0, with significant improvement in subjective satisfaction. The remaining 2 cases improved from stage IIB to IIA, respectively, with moderate improvement in subjective satisfaction. In the 3 cases receiving conservative treatment, satisfaction was significant in 1 case and moderate in 2 cases. Overall, there was improvement in hand function across all 7 cases.

CONCLUSION

Typical outpatient examinations make it difficult to clearly differentiate the two sites, and EMG tests may not confirm diagnosis. Therefore, if a surgeon lacks suspicion of this condition, diagnosis becomes even more challenging. In cases with less than expected postoperative improvement in clinical symptoms of cubital tunnel syndrome, consideration of double crush syndrome is warranted. Additional tests and detailed EMG tests, including inching tests at the wrist, may be necessary. We aim to raise awareness double crush syndrome with ulnar nerve, reporting a total of 7 cases to support this concept.

Postoperative Functional Analysis of Double Crush Versus Single Peripheral Nerve Decompression: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Double crush (DC) syndrome patients presenting with C6-7 radiculopathy and median nerve compression in the carpal tunnel report greater nerve irritability and weakness postdecompression than isolated peripheral nerve decompression. We hypothesize that patient-reported outcome is inferior following release at both cervical spine and wrist versus a single site of decompression.

METHODS

Patients that underwent either anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) for C6-C7 radiculopathy, carpal tunnel release (CTR), or both within 5 years (DC) were identified. A total of 477 patients were analyzed (157 DC, 203 CTR, and 117 ACDF). Post-operative outcome Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), Neck Disability Index, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were collected at an average of 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

QuickDASH scores were higher in the DC group versus CTR group (36 vs 22, P < .0002). Postoperative disability in the ACDF group was significantly higher than the DC group (50 vs 36, P < .017). There were no differences between ACDF and DC groups in arm pain intensity, but the CTR group demonstrated significantly greater arm pain intensity than the DC group (5.7 vs 3.6, 10-point scale, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing ACDF and CTR have greater postoperative disability than those undergoing CTR alone, but less postoperative functional disability and pain than ACDF alone, indicating cervical radiculopathy may contribute a greater proportion of long-term disability postoperatively. Additionally, CTR had greater postoperative arm pain than DC patients, potentially indicating high rates of undiagnosed cervical radiculopathy or other sources of arm pain in these patients.

Assessment, patient selection, and rehabilitation of nerve transfers

Peripheral nerve injuries are common and can have a devastating effect on physical, psychological, and socioeconomic wellbeing. Peripheral nerve transfers have become the standard of care for many types of peripheral nerve injury due to their superior outcomes relative to conventional techniques. As the indications for, and use of, nerve transfers expand, the importance of pre-operative assessment and post-operative optimization increases. There are two principal advantages of nerve transfers: (1) their ability to shorten the time to reinnervation of muscles undergoing denervation because of peripheral nerve injury; and (2) their specificity in ensuring proximal motor and sensory axons are directed towards appropriate motor and sensory targets. Compared to conventional nerve grafting, nerve transfers offer opportunities to reinnervate muscles affected by cervical spinal cord injury and to augment natural reinnervation potential for very proximal injuries. This article provides a narrative review of the current scientific knowledge and clinical understanding of nerve transfers including peripheral nerve injury assessment and pre- and post-operative electrodiagnostic testing, adjuvant therapies, and post-operative rehabilitation for optimizing nerve transfer outcomes.

Management of Failed Carpal and Cubital Tunnel Release: An Evidence-Based Guide to Success

Carpal tunnel and cubital tunnel syndromes are the most common compressive neuropathies of the upper extremity with surgical treatment having high success rates for both conditions. Although uncommon, persistent or recurrent carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome presents a challenge for patients and providers. Diagnosis of persistence versus recurrence of the pathology is key in establishing an appropriate treatment plan to provide the best possible patient outcomes. After an established diagnosis, a wide array of treatment options exist which varies based on previous procedures performed. This review discusses relevant anatomy, etiology, and clinical presentations of persistent and recurrent carpal and cubital tunnel syndromes. The range of treatment options is presented based on history and diagnostic findings. Treatment options span from revision of nerve decompression to the use of soft tissue rearrangement procedures. Some specific treatment options discussed include simple revision nerve decompression, external neurolysis, soft tissue rearrangement, such as the hypothenar fat flap or various transposition techniques, and the use of nerve wraps. Included is an evidence-based management guide for diagnosis and treatment of persistent versus recurrent carpal and cubital tunnel syndromes.

Ulnar Nerve Compression at the Elbow Secondary to Intramuscular Lipoma of the Flexor Carpi Ulnaris: A Case Report

CASE

A 62-year-old right-hand-dominant woman presented with 1 year of persistent radiating pain, weakness, and paresthesias in her left forearm and hand. Electromyography findings were significant for ulnar neuropathy distal to the branch innervating the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU), without superimposed cervical radiculopathy or other focal entrapment neuropathy. During open ulnar nerve neurolysis, an intramuscular lipoma was encountered within the FCU. Lipoma excision and cubital tunnel release with ulnar nerve transposition were performed with complete relief of neuropraxia.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate full neurologic recovery after intramuscular lipoma excision and cubital tunnel release. Although rare, anomalous anatomy and tissue overgrowth should remain on the differential for patients presenting with atypical neuropraxia.

Complications and Reoperation Following Surgery for Concurrent Carpal Tunnel and Cervical Spine Compression

BACKGROUND

Patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) may also have cervical radiculopathy (CR) or vice versa, potentially requiring carpal tunnel release (CTR) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). This study evaluates whether there is an increased risk of complications following CTR or ACDF in patients with concurrent CTS and CR (CTS-CR) compared with those with only CTS or CR.

METHODS

A multipayer database was used to identify patients with CTS-CR. From this cohort, patients who underwent CTR and/or ACDF were identified. Patients with CTS-CR undergoing surgery were compared with those undergoing surgery with only CTS or CR. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare matched populations to assess postoperative complications and risk of undergoing both procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 110 379 patients with CTS-CR were identified. Carpal tunnel release was performed in 21 152 patients (19.2%) with CTS-CR, from which 835 (0.76%) underwent ACDF. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion was performed in 6960 patients (6.31%) with CTS-CR followed by CTR in 1098 patients (0.99%). Patients with CTS-CR were at greater risk of reoperation and complex regional pain syndrome following CTR. In ACDF, patients with CTS-CR were at greater risk of reoperation. Obesity and tobacco use were significant risk factors in patients with CTS-CR who underwent both CTR and ACDF rather than a single surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Examination of more than 100 000 patients with CTS-CR found a greater likelihood of reoperation and perioperative complications following surgery than those without concurrent diagnoses. Obesity and smoking increased the risk for patients undergoing both procedures. Patients presenting with CTS-CR are high risk and should be counseled on risk of complication and reoperation and optimized to reduce risk of undergoing both CTR and ACDF.

Conservative Treatments for Lumbar Disc Herniation at L3-4 or L4-5 Were More Likely to Fail When Ipsilateral Foraminal Stenosis Was Present at the Caudally Adjacent Segment

BACKGROUND

Conservative treatments are important in lumbar disc herniation (LDH), but predictors for poor outcomes are unclear.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with unilateral single-level LDH at L3-4 or L4-5 were enrolled. Baseline clinical data were collected, and lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging was evaluated. Foraminal stenosis was evaluated using Lee's approach and further categorized as absence (grade 0 and 1) or presence (grade 2 or 3). Each patient underwent conservative treatments (oral meloxicam and dexamethasone, corset, back extension exercise, physiotherapy, and manual therapy) for 6 weeks. Conservative treatments were defined as failed if a patient underwent surgery within 6 weeks or reported poor recovery at 6-week follow-up. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to examine the associations of failed conservative treatments with baseline characteristics and magnetic resonance imaging findings.

RESULTS

The study included 222 patients (mean age 45.5 ± 9.8 years). Of patients, 48 (21.6%) had concurrent ipsilateral foraminal stenosis at the caudal segment, and conservative treatments failed in 39 (17.6%). At baseline, patients with LDH and caudal foraminal stenosis were older (50.79 ± 6.14 years vs. 44.10 ± 10.13 years, P < 0.001), had greater leg pain (7.06 ± 1.17 vs. 6.39 ± 1.40, P = 0.003), and had a higher rate of positive straight leg raising test (54.2% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.008) than patients without caudal foraminal stenosis. In multivariate regression, failure of conservative treatments was associated with positive straight leg raising test (odds ratio 2.26, P = 0.046), and caudal foraminal stenosis (odds ratio 3.20, P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

In the presence of caudal foraminal stenosis and positive SLR test, conservative treatments were more likely to fail in patients with LDH.

Chronic pain and local pain in usually painless conditions including neuroma may be due to compressive proximal neural lesion

It has been unexplained why chronic pain does not invariably accompany chronic pain-prone disorders. This question-driven, hypothesis-based article suggests that the reason may be varying occurrence of concomitant peripheral compressive proximal neural lesion (cPNL), e.g., radiculopathy and entrapment plexopathies. Transition of acute to chronic pain may involve development or aggravation of cPNL. Nociceptive hypersensitivity induced and/or maintained by cPNL may be responsible for all types of general chronic pain as well as for pain in isolated tissue conditions that are usually painless, e.g., neuroma, scar, and Dupuytren's fibromatosis. Compressive PNL induces focal neuroinflammation, which can maintain dorsal root ganglion neuron (DRGn) hyperexcitability (i.e., peripheral sensitization) and thus fuel central sensitization (i.e., hyperexcitability of central nociceptive pathways) and a vicious cycle of chronic pain. DRGn hyperexcitability and cPNL may reciprocally maintain each other, because cPNL can result from reflexive myospasm-induced myofascial tension, muscle weakness, and consequent muscle imbalance- and/or pain-provoked compensatory overuse. Because of pain and motor fiber damage, cPNL can worsen the causative musculoskeletal dysfunction, which further accounts for the reciprocity between the latter two factors. Sensitization increases nerve vulnerability and thus catalyzes this cycle. Because of these mechanisms and relatively greater number of neurons involved, cPNL is more likely to maintain DRGn hyperexcitability in comparison to distal neural and non-neural lesions. Compressive PNL is associated with restricted neural mobility. Intermittent (dynamic) nature of cPNL may be essential in chronic pain, because healed (i.e., fibrotic) lesions are physiologically silent and, consequently, cannot provide nociceptive input. Not all patients may be equally susceptible to develop cPNL, because occurrence of cPNL may vary as vary patients' predisposition to musculoskeletal impairment. Sensitization is accompanied by pressure pain threshold decrease and consequent mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia, which can cause unusual local pain via natural pressure exerted by space occupying lesions or by their examination. Worsening of local pain is similarly explainable. Neuroma pain may be due to cPNL-induced axonal mechanical sensitivity and hypersensitivity of the nociceptive nervi nervorum of the nerve trunk and its stump. Intermittence and symptomatic complexity of cPNL may be the cause of frequent misdiagnosis of chronic pain.

Neuropathic upper extremity pain: A double-crush scenario

ABSTRACT

Neuropathic upper extremity pain has many causes. Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common compressive peripheral neuropathy after carpal tunnel syndrome. Entrapment, or compression, of the ulnar nerve at the elbow classically presents with elbow pain, numbness in the ulnar nerve distribution, and weakness in the hand. C8 radiculopathy and various brachial plexopathies can mimic cubital and carpal tunnel syndromes. Neoplastic brachial plexopathy typically is caused by local extension of a primary or metastatic tumor into the brachial plexus. Double-crush syndrome further complicates neuropathic upper extremity pain. This case report describes a patient with a double-crush lesion involving the ulnar nerve at the elbow and a metastatic mass involving the lower trunk of the brachial plexus. Because of overlapping symptoms and presentations of several upper extremity nerve conditions, clinicians must perform a thorough history and physical examination and understand the sensory and motor innervation of the upper extremity to arrive at a timely and accurate diagnosis.

Nerve Decompression and Distal Transtibial Amputation

Approximately 20% of patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) endorse painful sensations such as prickling, stabbing, and burning pain that reflect small-fiber involvement. Although glycemic control is crucial to delay the onset and progression of DPN, there have been many reports on the use of decompression nerve surgery to aid in the treatment of DPN.

The Pathological Links between Adiposity and the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

An association between obesity and carpal tunnel syndrome is found in many epidemiological studies. Therefore, there is a need to evaluate the physiopathological links that could explain the association between these two entities. Ectopic adipose tissue is responsible for metabolic syndrome and inflammation, and is a major risk factor for diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Taking these elements into consideration, we conducted an extensive literature revision of the subject, considering as ectopic fat-related mechanisms the following: (a) the direct compression and the association with the metabolic syndrome of the fat deposition around the wrist, (b) the insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, inflammatory, and oxidative mechanisms related to the central deposition of the fat, (c) the impaired muscle contraction and metabolism related to myosteatosis. Each section presents the cellular pathways which are modified by the ectopic deposition of the adipose tissue and the impact in the pathogeny of the carpal tunnel syndrome. In conclusion, the experimental and clinical data support the epidemiological findings. Efforts to reduce the obesity epidemics will improve not only cardio-metabolic health but will reduce the burden of the disability-free life expectancy due to the carpal tunnel syndrome.

Role of electromyography and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of double crush lumbar radiculopathy and common fibular injury: illustrative cases

BACKGROUND

Double crush syndrome consists of two compression sites along a peripheral nerve and is rare in the lower extremities. Electrodiagnostic and ultrasound (US) studies may be helpful in evaluating foot drop involving overlapping pathologies.

OBSERVATIONS

Case 1 involved a man who presented with left dorsiflexor weakness and left foot numbness. Electromyography (EMG) revealed a left common fibular nerve entrapment neuropathy and left L5 radiculopathy. US and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a large cystic lesion of the left common fibular nerve treated by cyst removal. The left foot drop persisted postoperatively. Lumbar computed tomography myelography revealed severe left foraminal stenosis at L5–S1. Multilevel lumbar laminectomies and facetectomies with an L5–S1 fusion were performed. Within 1 month postoperatively, the left foot drop had improved. Case 2 involved a man who developed a right foot drop caused by right lumbar foraminal stenosis at L4–5 and L5–S1. EMG and US of the right common fibular neuropathy showed large fascicles involving the right common fibular nerve. MRI revealed a hyperintense signal of the right common fibular nerve. Spontaneous improvement occurred within 6 months without surgery.

LESSONS

Spine surgeons should recognize double crush in the lower extremities. EMG and US are valuable in detecting peripheral nerve abnormalities, especially in cases with overlapping lumbar pathology.

Concomitant Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Ipsilateral Carpal Tunnel Release: Is it Safe?

PURPOSE

Symptomatic carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with advanced ipsilateral glenohumeral arthritis requiring total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) may be easily overlooked. Even when diagnosed beforehand, most upper extremity surgeons have historically chosen to perform TSA and carpal tunnel release (CTR) separately. We hypothesized that combined single-stage TSA and CTR is feasible and yields results comparable with those when the 2 procedures are performed separately, while avoiding 2 surgeries.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent single-stage primary TSA and ipsilateral CTR between 2015 and 2019. The shoulder outcomes included pain, range of motion, and validated quality of life (QoL) questionnaires: Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) and Penn Shoulder Score. The CTR outcomes included pain, grip, pinch, VR-12, shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH), and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. The time to the initiation of rehabilitation and complications were also analyzed. The comparison group consisted of patients who underwent independent TSA or CTR during the same period.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients underwent concomitant TSA and CTR, 248 underwent isolated TSA, and 154 underwent isolated CTR. The shoulder outcomes of patients who underwent the combined procedure were similar to those of patients who underwent isolated TSA in terms of pain, range of motion, general QoL (VR-12), and shoulder-specific QoL (Penn Shoulder Score). The outcomes of patients who underwent the combined procedure were similar to those of patients who underwent isolated CTR in terms of pain, grip and pinch, general QoL (VR-12), QuickDASH, and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. The time to the initiation of rehabilitation was also comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant CTR and TSA are feasible. The functional outcomes and QoL of patients who underwent the concomitant treatment were comparable with those of patients who underwent the 2 procedures separately.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Double Crush Syndrome of the Upper Extremity

»

The double crush hypothesis originally proposed that compression of a peripheral nerve at a proximal site increases its susceptibility to additional distal lesions.

»

The etiology of double crush syndrome is likely multifactorial as mechanical, systemic, pharmacologic, or environmental factors may increase a patient's susceptibility to this syndrome.

»

To date, there remains no standardized definition of double crush syndrome, and there is no consensus on its exact pathophysiology or diagnostic criteria.

»

Patients with double crush syndrome should be counseled that surgical repair may produce inferior outcomes compared with those who are treated for isolated entrapment neuropathies.

The characteristics, disabilities, and spinal alignment of women with double crush syndrome: a case-control study

AIMS

Double crush syndrome is a clinical condition composed of neurological dysfunction due to compressive pathology at multiple sites along a single peripheral nerve. The aims were to investigate the characteristics and disabilities of women with double crush syndrome, to compare the spinal alignment to healthy women, and to determine the cut-offs for the spinal alignment characteristics.

METHODS

Twenty women with double crush syndrome (age: 49.50 ± 8.64 years) and 21 asymptomatic healthy controls (age: 44.76 ± 7.82 years) were included in the study. The physical characteristics, pain intensity, and symptoms were questioned. Disability with Disability of Arm and Shoulder Questionnaire and Neck Disability Index and spinal alignment with Spinal Mouse^® (Idiag, Fehraltorf, Switzerland) were assessed.

RESULTS

The pain intensity at rest, night, and during activity was 3.70 ± 3.25, 6.01 ± 2.77, and 7.15 ± 2.68 cm, respectively. The most bothersome symptom was numbness (65%). The symptoms were seen in hands and/or fingers (55%), arms (15%), shoulder blade (15%), and neck (15%). The Disability of Arm and Shoulder Questionnaire and Neck Disability Index scores were 58.64 ± 15.41 and 19.55 ± 6.37, respectively. The sagittal thoracic curvature (p: .011) and lumbar curvature (p: .049) increased, and the overall spine mobility (p<.001) decreased in the double crush syndrome patients. The cut-off points were detected as 54.5° (area under the curve: 0.680, p: .049, 40% sensitivity, 99.9% specificity) for the thoracic spinal curvature, and 113.5° (area under the curve: 0.667, p<.000, 65% sensitivity, 99.9% specificity) for the overall spine mobility.

CONCLUSIONS

The double crush syndrome patients had moderate to severe pain and disability, increased thoracic and lumbar curvature, and decreased spine mobility. The cut-off values were found as 54.5° for thoracic curvature and 113.5° for spine mobility.

Improved neck posture and reduced neck muscle activity when using a novel camera based workstation for manual precision inspection tasks

PURPOSE

This study investigates the effects of the usage of a novel camera system compared to a conventional lens system for manual precision tasks. Utilizing the novel camera system aims to improve neck posture, reduce neck muscle tension and thereby minimize the risk of neck pain.

METHODS

Camera and lens systems were compared by assessing the craniovertebral angle (CVA), electromyographic activity of the M.trapezius and perceived exertion. 16 healthy participants (n = 8 female, 24 ± 2 years; n = 8 male, 30 ± 5 years) performed manual precision tasks in a cross-over design using both systems in sitting and standing positions.

RESULTS

Analyses showed that using the camera system improved the CVA in sitting [28.4° (22.8°-33.9°) to 42.5° (38.9°-46.1°); p < 0.01] and decreased the M.trapezius activity in standing [13.1% (7.7%-18.6%) to 8.65% (5.49%-11.81%)]. Additionally, overall and neck specific perceived exertion decreased when using the camera system in standing.

CONCLUSIONS

The camera system may prevent neck pain in workers performing manual precision tasks in sitting and standing postures.

Double crush syndrome: Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment results

BACKGROUND

Double Crush Syndrome (DCS) is a clinical condition that involves multiple compression sites along a single peripheral nerve. The present study aims to describe the epidemiology of DCS and surgical results.

METHODS

A retrospective observational analytic study included patients with clinical diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy and carpal tunnel syndrome who underwent surgery between January 2009 and January 2019. General demographic characteristics were noted, and 3 groups were distinguished: spinal surgery, carpal tunnel release, and bimodal decompression (BD); statistical differences were analyzed between them.

RESULTS

The sample comprised 32 patients. DCS prevalence was 10.29%. Mean age at presentation was 59.25±10.98 years. There was female predominance (75%). Paresthesia was the main symptom (65.6%). Post-surgical results of BD showed significant improvement in sensory nerve conduction velocity, motor nerve conduction velocity (both P=0.008), and disability on Douleur Neuropathique 4 questions, Neck Disability Index, and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (P=0.001, 0.004, 0.008, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosis and management of DCS are a challenge. It is necessary to determine the site with maximal compression and risk of complications to decide on treatment. If first-line surgery is adequate, proximal and distal symptomatology can be improved. To maximize success, we recommend BD, according to the present results.

Neuralgic amyotrophy: a paradigm shift in diagnosis and treatment

Neuralgic amyotrophy (NA), also known as Parsonage-Turner syndrome, is characterised by sudden pain attacks, followed by patchy muscle paresis in the upper extremity. Recent reports have shown that incidence is much higher than previously assumed and that the majority of patients never achieve full recovery. Traditionally, the diagnosis was mainly based on clinical observations and treatment options were confined to application of corticosteroids and symptomatic management, without proven positive effects on long-term outcomes. These views, however, have been challenged in the last years. Improved imaging methods in MRI and high-resolution ultrasound have led to the identification of structural peripheral nerve pathologies in NA, most notably hourglass-like constrictions. These pathognomonic findings have paved the way for more accurate diagnosis through high-resolution imaging. Furthermore, surgery has shown to improve clinical outcomes in such cases, indicating the viability of peripheral nerve surgery as a valuable treatment option in NA. In this review, we present an update on the current knowledge on this disease, including pathophysiology and clinical presentation, moving on to diagnostic and treatment paradigms with a focus on recent radiological findings and surgical reports. Finally, we present a surgical treatment algorithm to support clinical decision making, with the aim to encourage translation into day-to-day practice.

Chiropractic Management of a Patient With Radial Nerve Entrapment Symptoms: A Case Study

Objective

This report describes the case of a patient with chronic radial nerve entrapment symptoms managed with chiropractic care. We propose a complementary functional neurologic assessment of muscle function in different positions that could reveal muscle dysfunctions absent with standard test position.

Clinical Features

A 45-year-old man presented to a private chiropractic clinic with a throbbing pain 5 cm above the right lateral elbow epicondyle radiating onto the back of the lower arm and increasing after using a mouse when working on a computer. A Mill test and a Cozen test created pain near the lateral epicondylitis. The use of complementary functional neurologic assessment for radial nerve entrapment showed changes in manual muscle testing after tests were done in different positions to increase the compression on the nerve.

Intervention and Outcome

Chiropractic management was performed, including myofascial therapy, spinal and proximal radioulnar joint adjustments, neural mobilization, and the use of a splint. After 7 days (2 treatments), the patient showed no elbow pain even if he worked on his computer using a mouse. After a 2-year follow-up, no recurrence was reported.

Conclusion

In this case of radial nerve entrapment symptoms, the patient benefited from chiropractic management using standard chiropractic, applied kinesiology, and neural mobilization techniques. The complementary functional neurologic assessment of radial nerve entrapment proposed revealed muscles dysfunctions absent with the standard test position. These changes in manual muscle testing were useful to determine the possible sites of entrapment in order to direct the therapeutic efforts to these locations.

Influences of Neck and/or Wrist Pain on Hand Grip Strength of Industrial Quality Proofing Workers

Background

The aim of this study was to analyze the interaction between neck and/or wrist pain and hand grip strength (HGS) and to investigate factors (age, sex, neck disorders, and carpal tunnel syndrome) influencing the HGS of industrial quality proofing workers (N = 145).

Methods

Standardized questionnaires [Neck Disability Index (NDI), Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire] were used to evaluate existing neck and/or wrist pain. HGS measurements were performed in different wrist positions.

Results

Significant differences between participants with and without neck pain were found in different wrist positions, in neutral wrist position right [without neck pain (n = 48) 46.34 (43.39 - 49.30); with neck pain (n = 97) 38.46 (36.20 - 40.72), F _(1,144)  = 16.82, p < 0.001, ŋ _p ² = 0.11] and left [without neck pain 44.06 (41.19 - 46.94); with neck pain 37.36 (35.13 - 39.58), F _(1,144)  = 12.70, p < 0.001, ŋ _p ² = 0.08]. A significant difference between participants with and without wrist pain was found for neutral wrist position right [without wrist pain (n = 105) 42.53 (40.37 - 44.70); with wrist pain (n = 40) 37.24 (33.56 - 40.91), F _(1,144)  = 6.41, p = 0.01, ŋ _p ² = 0.04]. Regression analysis showed significant results especially for steps two (age and weight, NDI) and three (age and weight, NDI, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire) for neutral position right (R² = 0.355, R² = 0.357, respectively).

Conclusion

Neck pain has an impact on HGS but should be evaluated in consideration of age and sex.

Management of Root-Level Double Crush: Case Report with Technical Notes on Contralateral Interlaminar Foraminotomy with Full Endoscopic Uniportal Approach

BACKGROUND

Double crush of a nerve at the root level is not common. We describe here a double crush of the right L4 nerve with foramina to far lateral disk (ventral) and extraforaminal (dorsal) compression. The double crush was managed by endoscopy with a contralateral uniportal approach from the left interlaminar space. Right lateral recess stenosis at the same level was subsequently managed with the same approach.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 79-year-old lady presented to our clinic with a low backache, right leg pain, and weakness. On her right side, the straight leg raise test was 70 degrees, great toe dorsiflexion was grade 3/5, and hypoesthesia was present in the L4 dermatome. Her preoperative visual analog scale score was 9. Magnetic resonance imaging showed right lateral recess stenosis and a double compression of L4 nerve root from the dorsal and ventral sides. A diagnosis of right lateral recess stenosis with double crush of the right L4 nerve root was made. The patient was managed with percutaneous endoscopic contralateral interlaminar foraminotomy from the left interlaminar approach. She got relief for the symptoms and her postoperative visual analog scale score was 2. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography showed nerve root decompression and well-preserved facet joints.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the management of double crush at the nerve root level with interlaminar contralateral approach endoscopy (percutaneous endoscopic contralateral interlaminar foraminotomy) can deal with the issue effectively with facet joint preservation and other benefits of the minimally invasive spine procedure.