Orthogonal Plate Fixation With Corrective Osteotomy for Treatment of Distal Radius Fracture Malunion

Comparative Analysis of Radial Corrective Osteotomy and Sauvé-Kapandji Procedure for Malunited Distal Radius Fractures in Older Adults

PURPOSE

Malunited distal radius fractures frequently occur in the older population, posing a dilemma in selecting ideal management for symptomatic patients. Radial corrective osteotomy (RCO) and the Sauvé-Kapandji procedure (SK) have been used to treat this challenging condition. However, it remains unknown which approach is better for the older population. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of RCO with those of SK for the treatment of symptomatic distal radius malunion in older adults.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients aged ≥60 years, with malunited distal radius fractures, were randomized to be treated with either RCO or SK and followed for a minimum of 2 years. The primary evaluation parameter was grip strength, and secondary outcome parameters were surgical time, range of motion of the wrist, exercise-related wrist pain assessment using visual analog scale scores, radiographic results, patient-reported outcomes evaluated using the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), and Patient-Related Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores.

RESULTS

The average follow-up duration was 36.7 ± 10.2 months. The grip strength was significantly higher in the RCO group. The surgical time was shorter in the SK group than in the RCO group. The postoperative wrist range of motion and visual analog scale scores for exercise-related pain alleviation were similar in both groups. The ulnar variance decreased in both groups and was similar when compared with the postoperative images. The DASH and PRWE scores were similar between the RCO and SK groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Radial corrective osteotomy and SK surgeries have similar clinical and functional outcomes in patients aged ≥60 years. Grip strength is higher in the RCO group than in the SK group. However, the operating time to accomplish SK is shorter than RCO.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic II.

Functional outcome of 2-D- and 3-D-guided corrective forearm osteotomies: a systematic review

We performed a systematic review to compare conventional (2-D) versus 3-D-guided corrective osteotomies regarding intraoperative results, patient-reported outcome measures, range of motion, incidence of complications and pain score. PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched, and 53 articles were included, reporting 1257 patients undergoing forearm corrective osteotomies between 2010 and 2022. 3-D-guided surgery resulted in a greater improvement in median Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score (28, SD 7 vs. 35, SD 5) and fewer complications (12% vs. 6%). Pain scores and range of motion were similar between 3-D-guided and conventional surgery. 3-D-guided corrective osteotomy surgery appears to improve patient-reported outcomes and reduce complications compared to conventional methods. However, due to the limited number of comparative studies and the heterogeneity of the studies, a large randomized controlled trial is needed to draw definitive conclusions.Level of evidence: III.

Managing the Extra-Articular Distal Radius Malunion

Distal radius fractures are common injuries. Satisfactory outcomes are typically achieved with appropriate nonoperative or operative treatment. A proportion of these injuries develop symptomatic malunions, which may be treated surgically with distal radius corrective osteotomy. A thorough understanding of the anatomy, biomechanics, radiographic parameters, and indications is needed to provide appropriate treatment. Factors, including surgical approach, osteotomy type, use of bone graft, fixation construct, management of associated tendon and/or nerve conditions, soft tissue contracture releases, and need for ulnar-sided procedures, should be considered. A comprehensive evaluation is necessary to guide understanding for when salvage procedures may be preferred.

Current Concepts: Corrective Osteotomy for Extra-Articular Deformity Following a Distal Radius Fracture

Fracture malunion alters wrist and distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) biomechanics, resulting in incongruence and instability of the DRUJ. Selected patients with painful functional limitation and significant deformity of the radius, but without advanced degenerative joint disease, may benefit from corrective distal radial osteotomy. Non-union and complications arising from metalwork are the most common reasons for reoperation. Surgeons should have a good understanding of risks and complications in order to fully inform their patients and manage expectations. This article reviews the biomechanical effects of radial malunion and the current concepts for treatment. Distal radial osteotomy is suitable for symptomatic patients with angular radial deformity and shortening. Evidence supports a volar approach without bone grafts for modest corrections. Bone grafts or synthetic bone substitutes are appropriate for larger corrections. Functional improvements are reported regardless of technique. Despite a high complication rate, patient satisfaction with the corrective radial osteotomy is high.

The malunion of distal radius fracture: Corrective osteotomy through planning with prototyping in 3D printing

INTRODUCTION

Distal radius fractures (DRF) are among the most frequent in the body. About one third of these fractures can result in malunion with restriction of movement and pain in the wrist, the treatment in these cases consists of corrective osteotomy of the deformity. Due to its three-dimensional (3D) complexity, careful preoperative planning is a fundamental step in correction. The prototyping from the 3D reconstruction of the computed tomography of the affected wrist, allows the real understanding of the deformity.

METHODS

Patients with malunion of the distal radius with indication for surgical treatment, from December 2019, were included in the group of corrective osteotomies through planning with prototyping in 3D printing. The postoperative functional outcome was assessed by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (DASH) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Radiographic data including radial inclination, volar tilt and joint step were recorded from standard posteroanterior and lateral radiographic views.

RESULTS

A total of 9 patients were included. The mean age was 47 years. The average postoperative DASH value of the patients was 24.9 and VAS was 3.6. Radiographically, the palmar tilt had an average improvement of 25.22°, and the radial inclination had an average improvement of 2°.

CONCLUSION

Corrective osteotomy through planning with prototyping in 3D printing is an effective method of treating symptomatic distal radius malunions. The possibility of performing the osteotomy in a 3D model, simulating the surgery, making the procedure more predictable.

Instability in the Setting of Distal Radius Fractures: Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment

Distal radius fractures with severe displacement or concomitant triangular fibrocartilage complex tears may be accompanied by distal radioulnar joint instability. Clinicians should examine the distal radioulnar joint closely when managing wrist fractures and treat coexisting instability appropriately. Chronic instability from distal radius malunion may require osteotomy or radioulnar ligament reconstruction. With proper management, most patients recover forearm stability and rotational motion after distal radius fracture.

Computer-Assisted Three-Dimensional Corrective Osteotomy for Malunited Fractures of the Distal Radius Using Prefabricated Bone Graft Substitute

BACKGROUND

Three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) imaging has enabled more accurate preoperative planning. The purpose of this study was to investigate the results of a novel, computer-assisted, 3D corrective osteotomy using prefabricated bone graft substitute to treat malunited fractures of the distal radius.

METHODS

We investigated 19 patients who underwent the computer-assisted 3D corrective osteotomy for a malunited fracture of the distal radius after the operation was stimulated with CT data. A prefabricated bone graft substitute corresponding to the patient's bone defect was implanted and internal fixation was performed using a plate and screws. We compared postoperative radiographic parameters of the patient's operated side with their sound side and analyzed clinical outcomes using Mayo wrist score.

RESULTS

All patients achieved bone union on X-ray imaging at final follow-up. The mean differences of palmar tilt, radial inclination and ulnar variance between the operation side and the sound side were 4.3°, 2.3° and 1.2 mm, respectively. The Mayo wrist score was fair in 4 patients and poor in 15 patients before surgery. At the final follow-up after surgery, the scores improved to excellent in 3 patients, good in 11 patients and fair in 5 patients. There were two patients with correction loss at the final follow-up, but no patient complained of hand joint pain.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that computer-assisted 3D corrective osteotomy using prefabricated bone graft substitute achieved good results because it worked as a guide to the accurate angle.