Thumb Reconstruction With Thin Proximal Ulnar Perforator Free Flap

One-stage secondary debulking procedure: A unique technique to restore the differential contour of digit after groin flap reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Pedicled groin flap is a reliable reconstructive method for digits. However, problems with the contour, mobility, and sensation, especially while providing strict thin skin coverage still exist.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 17 cases with 36 digits injured by trauma were identified. One-stage secondary debulking procedure was adopted for flap revision. The skin over the flap was harvested as a full-thickness graft. At the dorsal side of the reconstructed digit, the subcutaneous tissue and fat were debulked till the deep fascial layer. At the volar side, the flap was debulked till the superficial fascial layer. The skin was then re-grafted. The outcomes were reviewed after 12 months follow-up.

RESULTS

The average timing for debulking procedure after flap reconstruction was 116 days. After removal of bolster dressing 7 days after debulking, all the grafted skin took well. A mean length of 2.5 cm of digit was preserved for the non-replantable digits. The reconstructed digits achieved comparable diameter and contour with that of the contralateral side. The two-point discrimination of the injured digits of adults was 10.4 ± 1.6 mm. Using a 5-point Likert scale, post-debulking digits showed statistically significant improvement compared to pre-debulking digits. The evaluation of the patients' satisfactory outcomes of the reconstructed digits was judged as "very satisfying" in 12 patients (75 %) and "good" in 4 patients (25 %).

CONCLUSIONS

One-stage secondary debulking procedure resulted in excellent functional and esthetic outcomes for digits according to different structures of the dorsal and volar sides.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, Retrospective.

Coverage of Big Toe Defects After Wraparound Flap Transfer With a Second-Toe Medial-Side Adjacent Toe Flap

PURPOSE

In finger reconstruction, big-toe wraparound flap (WAF) transfer provides excellent results. However, difficulty in healing and impaired function at the donor site are common. We aimed to explore an ideal method to address these complications.

METHODS

This retrospective study involved 22 patients who were treated with big toe WAF transfer for finger reconstruction between 2016 and 2020. Patients were categorized into cohorts by donor site repair method: second-toe medial-side adjacent toe flap and skin graft (cohort 1) and skin graft alone (cohort 2). Functional outcomes, aesthetic appearance, and complications at the donor site were compared. Functional outcomes were assessed according to the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) for hallux metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal score, Foot Function Index-Verbal Rating Scales (FFI-5 pt), and visual analog scale for pain. Aesthetic appearance was evaluated according to the adjusted question 28 in the Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire.

RESULTS

The mean pain scores in AOFAS and FFI-5 pt were 38.00 ± 4.22 and 3.75 ± 2.37, and 32.50 ± 4.52 and 6.60 ± 2.14 in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively, which showed no significant differences. The method in cohort 1 can reduce the level of pain. This was further confirmed by visual analog scale scores of 3.40 ± 0.84 and 6.42 ± 7.93 in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. The mean functional scores in AOFAS and FFI-5 pt were 38.40 ± 2.37 and 1.25 ± 1.62, and 37.92 ± 2.15 and 1.56 ± 2.11 in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively, which showed no significant differences. Eight patients developed complications: 1 patient (1/10 [10%]) in cohort 1 developed a superficial infection, and in cohort 2, 7 patients (7/12, 58.30%) developed complications, including 2 short-term complications with partial necrosis and 1 delayed healing. Long-term complications included the following: scar discomfort (2 cases), pain discomfort (1 case), and skin ulceration due to repeated wear and tear (1 case). Cohort 2 had significantly more complications than cohort 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Second-toe medial-side adjacent toe flap combined with skin graft had better aesthetic appearance, less complications, and less pain compared with skin graft alone. Hence, it can be a reliable technique for repairing the donor site after big-toe WAF transfer.

Reconstruction of Digital Defects with the Free Proximal Ulnar Artery Perforator Flap

The aim of post-traumatic digital reconstruction is to restore form and function, allowing early rehabilitation. In the absence of feasible local options, free tissue transfer can be a versatile and reliable alternative. The aim of this study was to describe our experience with the use of the free proximal ulnar artery perforator flap (PUPF).

The proximal ulnar perforator flap (PUPF) for hand digital reconstruction: an anatomical study

Degloving injuries of the fingers represent a reconstructive challenge. Even if poorly described in literature, the proximal ulnar perforator flap (PUPF), based on perforator of the anterior ulnar recurrent artery or directly on a perforator branch of the ulnar artery, meets the requested criteria for the ideal coverage. We performed a cadaveric study in order to clarify the anatomical basis and vascularization of the PUPF flap. Eight injected upper limb specimens were dissected for this study: perforators were followed down to their origin and classified in terms of number, length, diameters and distances between their emergence and specific pre-determined landmarks as the medial humeral epicondyle. At least one ulnar perforator in the proximal third of the forearm was identified in all the specimens. In 50% of the upper limbs, the perforator branch came directly from the ulnar artery, while in the 87.5% a perforator branch came from the anterior recurrent ulnar artery; in 3 out of 8 cases both perforator branches were described. Mean lengths of the perforator branch were 57.9 mm and 44.3 mm, respectively and the mean diameters measured at their origin were 0.99 mm and 1.17 mm respectively. Our data illustrate the consistency of at least one perforator branch from the proximal third of the ulnar artery, most commonly coming from the anterior recurrent ulnar artery. Considering our results, the PUPF could be a good alternative to the classical free flaps for the resurfacing of the finger defects.

Arterial grafts for proper palmar digital artery reconstruction: An anatomical study

Digital ischemia due to arterial defects need urgent surgical management. The traditional treatment consists of vascular reconstruction using a reversed autologous venous graft as a bypass. Very few studies have described the use of arterial grafts for digital artery reconstruction. This cadaver study characterized the forearm perforator arteries to assess the potential feasibility of using them as donor grafts for digital artery reconstruction. Eleven forearms and twenty hands were dissected from freshly injected cadavers. All clinically significant perforators (>0.5 mm) derived from radial or ulnar arteries and digital arteries were evaluated. The digital palmar arteries were measured at three points: metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint, and distal interphalangeal (PIP) joint. In the 11 forearms analyzed, 5.5 ± 1.3 perforators from radial or ulnar arteries with a diameter of at least 0.5 mm were found per dissection. The mean diameters were 0.9 ± 0.18 mm proximally and 0.8 ± 0.15 mm distally; the mean length was 35.6 ± 11.35 mm. The mean diameters for the dominant and non-dominant arteries were 1.5 and 1.3 mm at the MCP, 1.3 and 1.0 mm at the PIP, 0.8 and 0.7 mm at the DIP, respectively. The forearms are good donor sites as they have large-diameter arteries of suitable length for arterial grafting. These new arterial grafts may be suitable for vascular reconstruction of digital arteries starting from the PIP joint.

Anatomical Study and Clinical Application of Ulnar Artery Proximal Perforator Flaps

BACKGROUND

 The purpose of this study is to document the vascular anatomy of the free ulnar artery proximal perforator flap and to highlight the possibility of harvesting it based on the perforators originating from the posterior ulnar recurrent artery (PURA), to spare both the main axis of vascular supply to the hand. In addition, we present a case series of five patients treated for soft tissue defects of the hand with free ulnar artery proximal perforator flaps.

METHODS

 Ten specimens of anterior forearm were dissected in this study to register number and characteristics of ulnar perforators. The dissection was focused on the perforators originating from the larger branch of the ulnar artery, the PURA, at the proximal third of anteromedial forearm. The anatomical dissections were evaluated in relationship with clinical dissections performed during flap harvesting in five patients.

RESULTS

 In three of the specimens dissected, the proximal perforator originated from the PURA, and in the other seven specimens, it originated directly from the ulnar artery. Five cases of reconstruction of the hand were performed with success using the free ulnar artery proximal perforator flap, and in two cases, the perforator from the PURA was found and it was possible to raise the flap based on this branch of the ulnar artery.

CONCLUSION

 The free ulnar artery proximal perforator flap can be harvested in two different manners for the same skin island of the forearm. When possible, harvesting it form the PURA allows lengthening of the pedicle. In our experience, this flap presents many advantages such as thinness and hairlessness; it allows preservation of the ulnar neurovascular bundle with an acceptable donor site morbidity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.