Outcome of Carpal Tunnel Release and the Relation With Depression

Sleep quality as a mediator of the relation between depression and chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain and depression represent two global health problems with considerable economic consequences. Although existing literature reports on the relation between depression and pain conditions, meta-analytic evidence backing the mediating role of sleep disturbance as one of the main symptoms of depression is scarce. To examine the extent to which sleep disturbance mediates the depression-chronic pain association, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the associations of chronic pain, depression, and sleep quality.

METHODS

We systematically searched for literature in MEDLINE and other relevant databases and identified cohort and case-control studies on depression, sleep disturbance, and chronic pain. Forty-nine studies were eligible, with a total population of 120 489 individuals. We obtained direct and indirect path coefficients via two-stage meta-analytic structural equation modelling, examined heterogeneity via subgroup analyses, and evaluated primary studies quality.

RESULTS

We found a significant, partial mediation effect of sleep disturbance on the relation between depression and chronic pain. The pooled path coefficient (coef.) of the indirect effect was 0.03 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01-0.05) and accounted for 12.5% of the total effect of depression on chronic pain. This indirect effect also existed for cohort studies (coef. 0.02; 95% CI: 0.002-0.04), European studies (coef. 0.03; 95% CI: 0.004-0.05), and studies that adjusted for confounders (coef. 0.04; 95% CI: 0.01-0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

Sleep disturbance partially mediates the association between depression and pain. Although plausible mechanisms could explain this mediation effect, other explanations, including reverse causation, must be further explored.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL

PROSPERO CRD42022338201.

Effects of Cognitive and Mental Health Factors on the Outcomes Following Carpal Tunnel Release: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of the cognitive and mental health factors on the outcomes after carpal tunnel release (CTR).

DATA SOURCES

Embase, PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from inception to August 14, 2021.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials and observational studies of patients with CTR were included. The included studies aimed to determine the effect of the cognitive (catastrophic thinking, kinesiophobia, self-efficacy) or mental health factors (symptoms of anxiety and depression) on the outcomes at least 3 months post CTR.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and assessed the risk of bias. Data were extracted using a standardized protocol and reporting forms. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies risk-of-bias tool. Random-effects models were used for meta-analysis.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A total of 15 studies involving 2599 patients were included in this systematic review. The majority of studies indicate a significant association between the cognitive or mental health factors and outcomes after CTR. Quantitative analysis showed a moderate association of symptoms of depression on symptom severity (n=531; r=0.347; 95% CI, 0.205-0.475; P≤.0001), function (n=386; r=0.307; 95% CI, 0.132-0.464; P=.0008), and pain (n=344; r=0.431; 95% CI, 0.286-0.558; P≤.0001). In general, the risk of bias in the included studies was low.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that symptoms of depression have a moderate association with symptom severity, function, and pain after CTR. Symptoms of anxiety, catastrophic thinking, and self-efficacy are also important indicators of poor postsurgery outcomes. Physicians, physical therapists, and occupational therapists should consider evaluating these variables in patients undergoing CTR.

The Effects of Patient Resilience and Catastrophizing on Carpal Tunnel Surgical Outcomes

Purpose

Outcomes following carpal tunnel release (CTR) are generally favorable. When patient satisfaction or symptom resolution is not as expected, understanding what factors contribute to that outcome could allow for strategies targeted at improving results. Our purpose was to determine if measurable mental health factors, specifically resilience and pain catastrophization, correlate with patients’ postoperative outcomes following CTR.

Methods

A prospective cohort study was performed. Ninety-four patients were recruited to take part in the study. Patients completed written consent, the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and the Brief Resilience Scale. A single surgeon, or his resident under supervision, performed an open CTR under local anesthetic. Our primary outcome measure was a repeat BCTQ at 6 months. Pearson correlation coefficients and univariate analyses were performed to assess the correlation between Pain Catastrophizing Scale and Brief Resilience Scale scores and final BCTQ scores.

Results

Forty-three and 63 participants completed the BCTQ at 3 and 6 months, respectively. This was 10% below the number needed to achieve appropriate power. Among those that responded, all participants showed improvement in their symptoms (P = .001). There was no correlation between patients’ Pain Catastrophizing Scale or Brief Resilience Scale scores and 6-month BCTQ scores or the amount of improvement in the BCTQ at final follow-up.

Conclusions

Most participants improved following CTR. Patients’ self-assessed resilience, and the degree of pain catastrophization did no correlate with the amount of improvement patients had after surgery.

Type of study/level of evidence

Prognostic II.

Patient Mindset and the Success of Carpal Tunnel Release

BACKGROUND

Depression and pain catastrophizing are aspects of the patient's mindset that have been shown to be important in relation to the outcome of carpal tunnel release. However, other factors of the patient's mindset have been understudied, such as treatment expectations and illness perceptions. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of these mindset aspects on outcome of carpal tunnel release, in addition to psychological distress and pain catastrophizing.

METHODS

A total of 307 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome who visited outpatient hand surgery clinics and who completed online questionnaires regarding demographic and psychosocial characteristics and carpal tunnel syndrome severity were included. The patient mindset was measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire-4, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, the Credibility Expectancy Questionnaire, and the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire. Hierarchical linear regression models were used to examine the relation between self-reported severity 6 months after carpal tunnel release, as measured with the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, and psychosocial aspects of mindset, adjusting for preoperative Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire score, patient characteristics, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Independent associations with better self-reported outcome were found for higher treatment expectations (β = -0.202; p < 0.001) and illness comprehensibility (β = -0.223; p < 0.001). The additional explained variance in Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire scores by the patient's mindset was 13.2 percent (psychological distress and pain catastrophizing together, 2.1 percent; treatment expectations and illness perceptions together, 11.1 percent).

CONCLUSION

Treatment outcome expectations and comprehensibility of illness are both independently associated with the outcome of carpal tunnel release, showing the importance of these aspects of the patient's mindset for the outcome of carpal tunnel release.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Somatosensory and psychological phenotypes associated with neuropathic pain in entrapment neuropathy

ABSTRACT

It currently remains unclear why some patients with entrapment neuropathies develop neuropathic pain (neuP), whereas others have non-neuP, presumably of nociceptive character. Studying patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), this cross-sectional cohort study investigated changes in somatosensory structure and function as well as emotional well-being specific to the presence and severity of neuP. Patients with CTS (n = 108) were subgrouped by the DN4 questionnaire into those without and with neuP. The latter group was further subdivided into mild and moderate/severe neuP using a pain visual analogue scale. N = 32 participants served as healthy controls. All participants underwent a clinical examination, quantitative sensory testing, electrodiagnostic testing (EDT), and skin biopsy to determine the structural integrity of dermal and intraepidermal nerve fibres. Patients also completed questionnaires evaluating symptom severity and functional deficits, pain distribution, sleep quality, and emotional well-being. The overall prevalence of neuP in patients with CTS was 80%, of which 63% had mild neuP. Symptom severity and functional deficits as well as somatosensory dysfunction was more pronounced with the presence and increasing severity of neuP. No difference was identified among patient groups for EDT and nerve fibre integrity on biopsies. The severity of neuP was accompanied by more pronounced deficits in emotional well-being and sleep quality. Intriguingly, extraterritorial spread of symptoms was more prevalent in patients with moderate/severe neuP, indicating the presence of central mechanisms. NeuP is common in patients with CTS, and its severity is related to the extent of somatosensory dysfunction and a compromise of emotional well-being.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Surgery: What You Should Know

Carpal tunnel release (CTR) surgery continues to evolve. Carpal tunnel syndrome remains a primarily clinical diagnosis, although ultrasound has supplemented electrodiagnostic testing as a confirmatory tool. Magnetic resonance imaging of the carpal tunnel has also showed some promise as an alternative method for the examination of the median nerve. Open CTR surgery remains the traditional, and most popular, method of CTR. Wide-Awake, with Local Anesthesia only, and No Tourniquet CTR has emerged as a means to decrease cost and improve pain control and convenience for patients. Endoscopic CTR is increasing in popularity due to its more rapid recovery. The safety profile of endoscopic CTR has improved, and recent studies show similar rates of major complications between open and endoscopic techniques. Nonsurgeon operated ultrasound-guided techniques for release of the transverse carpal ligament have emerged. While promising in early studies, the current evidence in their favor is limited in terms of patient numbers and direct comparison with other techniques. The outcomes of CTR continue to be excellent. Recent research has demonstrated that nerve conduction continues to recover postoperatively over a longer period of time than previously believed. Patient psychological factors play a significant role in outcomes after surgery but do not appear to limit the improvement provided by intervention.

Comparison of mental and physical health between patients with primary and secondary Raynaud's phenomenon Category: Article

OBJECTIVE

To compare anxiety, depression, physical health and quality of life in patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon (PRP) and patients with secondary Raynaud's phenomenon (SRP).

METHOD

Adult patients with Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) were assessed for the severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms, physical health and quality of life by using the General Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the 12-item Short Form Health Survey: Physical Component Scale (PCS-12), and the Raynaud Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ), respectively. Patients with PRP and SRP were recruited for comparison at a single clinical center in Debrecen, Hungary from September to December 2017.

RESULTS

In total, 60 primary and 41 secondary patients with RP were studied. Gender distribution, family status, employment status and smoking were similar in the two groups. Significantly more patients with SRP had anxiety and depressive symptoms than patients with PRP. Patients with SRP had significantly higher GAD-7 and BDI; and lower overall PCS-12 and RQLQ scores than patients with PRP.

CONCLUSION

Anxiety and depression is more common in patients with SRP than in patients with PRP. Patients with SRP have a lower physical health condition and RP specific quality of life than patients with PRP. Anxiety, depression and quality of life impairments should be taken into account when managing all patients with RP. Further study is needed to assess whether appropriately designed interventions have the potential to reduce the mental and physical health burdens of RP on quality of life (QOL), especially in patients with SRP.