The Effect of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tear on Wrist Proprioception

Normative values and the influence of sex, hand dominance, and direction of movement on active wrist joint position sense in young healthy adults

BACKGROUND

Active wrist joint position sense (JPS) is a feasible method for determining wrist proprioception. However, the normative values and factors affecting wrist JPS are not known.

OBJECTIVES

To identify normative values of active wrist JPS in young healthy adults and explore the influence of sex, hand dominance and direction of wrist movement.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHOD

JPS of 100 individuals aged 18-40 years, (male: female = 51:49) were measured at two wrist positions (20° flexion/extension) using the active wrist JPS test. Absolute error (in degrees) was calculated and summarized using descriptive measures. Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance was performed to determine the differences in JPS error based on sex, dominance and direction of wrist movement.

RESULTS

Mean absolute JPS flexion error on the dominant side was 3.47°(SD = 3.91°), and non-dominant side was 3.26°(SD = 3.23°). Mean absolute JPS extension error on the dominant side was 3.35°(SD = 3.43°), and non-dominant side was 4.59°(SD = 4.82°). Compared to males, females had more absolute error for flexion and extension on the dominant side. No significant difference was found in the absolute error between the dominant and non-dominant sides or between flexion and extension.

CONCLUSION

These normative values of active JPS in young healthy adults can help clinicians while assessing proprioceptive impairments of the wrist. Differences in JPS errors due to sex were found, but not due to dominance or direction of movement. These findings can guide future research on mechanisms involved in wrist JPS.

Wrist proprioception-An update on scientific insights and clinical implications in rehabilitation of the wrist

The field of wrist proprioception, as it relates to rehabilitation and surgery, has gone through a period of intense growth in the past decade. From being primarily focused on the function of the joint and ligaments in patients with wrist trauma or after wrist surgery, the understanding is now that of a greater complexity in treating not just the wrist but the hand and arm as a whole. Proprioception is derived from the Latin words "proprius" - belonging to (oneself) and "-ception" to sense. In other words, how to sense ourselves. To have a complete sense of self, multiple sensory afferents originating from joints, ligaments, muscles, tendons, nerves, skin, vision, and hearing work together to orchestrate a balanced integration of sensorimotor functions, with the true goal to perceive and adapt to the physical world around us. In this update on wrist proprioception, we review current developments in the understanding of proprioception, with an implication for our everyday work as hand therapists and hand surgeons. Each contributing sense-joint, ligaments, muscles, skin, and brain-will be reviewed, and the clinical relevance will be discussed. An updated wrist rehabilitation protocol is proposed where the therapist is guided to rehabilitate a patient after wrist trauma and/or surgery in 4 stages: (1) basic hand and wrist rehabilitation with a focus on reducing edema, pain, and scar formation; (2) proprioception awareness to improve the sense of joint motion and position; (3) conscious neuromuscular rehabilitation where isometric exercises of muscles that are beneficial for a particular injury are promoted, whereas others that are potentially harmful are avoided; and (4) unconscious neuromuscular rehabilitation with training of the reflex and joint protective senses.

Current rehabilitation recommendations following primary triangular fibrocartilage complex foveal repair surgery: A survey of Australian hand therapists

BACKGROUND

Following injury to the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex (TFCC), foveal repair surgery may be indicated to restore joint stability and function. Protection of the repaired ligament is a clinical consideration during post-surgical rehabilitation, although no "gold standard" rehabilitation protocol currently exists.

PURPOSE

To describe the professional opinions of Accredited Hand Therapists (AHT) regarding post-operative rehabilitation recommendations following TFCC foveal repair surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional descriptive study.

METHODS

All Australian AHTs were invited to complete a quantitative, online, 10-item survey between December 2019 and March 2020. The survey included questions regarding clinical recommendations for wrist and forearm immobilization, range of motion and exercise methods, and timeframes. AHT characteristics and experience of patients sustaining a TFCC re-rupture were also collected. Categorical and nominal survey responses were reported descriptively and effects of AHT characteristics on survey responses were assessed using Pearson Chi2, with significance set to <0.05.

RESULTS

Survey responses were received from 135 AHTs or approximately 37% of the available population at the time of completion (March 2020). Recommendations for post-surgery immobilization ranged from "not required" to 8 weeks, 6 weeks representing the most common answer. Wrist and forearm range of motion commencement time ranged from "immediately" to "later than 8 weeks," with 6 weeks also the most common answer. When asked whether post-surgery rupture had been experienced in their respective patient groups, 15 therapists (11%) indicated "Yes." The most recommended thermoplastic orthosis was a Sugartong orthosis (41%) followed by a Muenster orthosis (30%), both of which immobilizes the wrist and forearm.

CONCLUSIONS

Rehabilitation varied widely between AHTs. Further prospective research is recommended to explore whether patient-related or rehabilitation factors influence outcomes following TFCC repair.

Wrist and forearm range of motion commencement time following primary triangular fibrocartilage complex foveal repair surgery: A scoping review

STUDY DESIGN

Scoping review.

BACKGROUND

Rehabilitation guidelines following triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) foveal repair surgery have been inconsistently reported in the published literature, with no consensus regarding wrist or forearm range of motion (ROM) commencement time.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

To scope the available literature to identify the extent and strength of the evidence supporting the clinical guidelines for wrist and forearm ROM commencement time following primary TFCC foveal repair surgery.

METHODS

A systematic search produced 26 studies (3 retrospective cohort studies, 1 prospective cohort study, 1 retrospective comparative study, and 21 retrospective case series) that described specific rehabilitation protocols following TFCC foveal repair surgery.

RESULTS

No supporting evidence was identified regarding rehabilitation protocol recommendations across all the included studies. Postsurgery wrist ROM commencement ranged from 2 to 8 weeks; forearm ROM commencement ranged from 2 to 12 weeks. ROM commencement times did not appear to systematically influence the rate of adverse events, although adverse events were poorly reported.

CONCLUSIONS

TFCC rehabilitation protocols were poorly reported and varied widely between the included studies. Additional research is recommended to comprehensively evaluate the association between wrist and/or forearm ROM and the rate of adverse events for this complex and multifaceted condition.

SMoC-Wrist: a sensorimotor control-based exercise program for patients with chronic wrist pain

STUDY DESIGN

This is a narrative review.

INTRODUCTION

Chronic wrist pain is a common disorder that can lead to considerable disability in performing activities in daily living and at work. Patients with nonspecific chronic wrist pain are regularly referred to a physiotherapist/hand therapist. Immobilization, avoiding excessive wrist load, steroid injections, and various physical therapy methods predominantly focus on the pain itself. However, these methods often do not result in a satisfactory long-term pain relief.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

In this article, we will describe the principles behind and content of a sensorimotor control-based exercise program as introduced by Videler et al., modified and substantiated by current insights into sensorimotor control training and wrist kinetics.

METHODS

Both structure and content of the modified exercise program (SMoC-wrist) are substantiated by recent scientific literature.

RESULTS

A clear 4-level exercise model based on sensorimotor principles is presented, that is, proprioceptive level, conscious static/isometric level, conscious dynamic level, and unconscious dynamic level. The content of each level and the transition toward the next level are described in detail.

DISCUSSION

Besides the substantiation of the exercise program, possible outcome measures for joint position sense and kinesthesia of the wrist are discussed.

CONCLUSION

We modified and substantiated a widely used exercise program for patients with nonspecific chronic wrist pain based on recent insights into sensorimotor control principles and wrist kinematics. The presented exercise program (SMoC-wrist) is not primarily focused on reducing pain but on functional reeducation and strengthening of the neuromusculoskeletal system on the basis of sensorimotor control principles.

Postoperative Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures Using Sensorimotor Rehabilitation

Background  Sensorimotor and specifically proprioception sense has been used in rehabilitation to treat neurological and joint injuries. These feedback loops are not well understood or implemented in wrist treatment. We observed a temporary sensorimotor loss, following distal radius fractures (DRF) that should be addressed postsurgery. Purpose  The purpose of this prospective therapeutic study was to compare the outcomes of patients following surgery for DRF treated using a sensorimotor treatment protocol with those patients treated according to the postoperative standard of care. Patients and Methods  Patients following surgery for DRF sent for hand therapy were eligible for the study. Both the evaluation and treatment protocols included a comprehensive sensorimotor panel. Patients were randomized into standard and standard plus sensorimotor postoperative therapy and were evaluated a few days following surgery, at 6 weeks, and 3 months postsurgery. Results  Sixty patients following surgery were randomized into the two treatment regimens. The initial evaluation was similar for both groups and both demonstrated significant sensorimotor deficits, following surgery for DRF. There was documented sensorimotor and functional improvement in both groups with treatment. The clinical results were better in the group treated with the sensorimotor-proprioception protocol mostly in the wrist; however, not all of the differences were significant. Conclusion  Patients after surgery for DRF demonstrate significant sensorimotor deficits which may improve faster when utilizing a comprehensive sensorimotor treatment protocol. However, we did not demonstrate efficacy of the protocol in treating proprioceptive deficits. Further study should include refinement of functional outcome evaluation, studying of the treatment protocol, and establishment of sensorimotor therapeutic guidelines for other conditions. Level of Evidence This is a level II, therapeutic study.