A Review of Lymphedema for the Hand and Upper-Extremity Surgeon

Is the Absence of Manual Lymphatic Drainage-Based Treatment in Lymphedema after Breast Cancer Harmful? A Randomized Crossover Study

(1) Background: Manual lymphatic drainage (MLD), included within the complex decongestive therapy, as a therapy for the treatment of lymphedema has raised controversy about its benefits for lymphedema after breast cancer. The aim of this research is to test the effects of MLD on lymphedema after breast cancer during the treatment maintenance phase. (2) Methods: A randomized, single-blinded, controlled crossover trial was conducted to analyze the effects of a manual lymphatic drainage intervention compared to a control group without MLD intervention for the treatment of lymphedema. Arm volume measured by circumference measurement, subcutaneous tissue thickness measured by ultrasound, and the sensation of pain, heaviness, and swelling were evaluated as outcome measures. (3) Results: For the control group, an increase in volume was found in some of the circumference and subcutaneous tissue thickness measurements, in addition to a worsening of arm pain, swelling and heaviness. (4) Conclusion: The absence of treatment based on MLD in lymphedema after breast cancer worsens volume measurements, as well as arm heaviness. Therefore, it would be advisable to carry out this type of therapy as part of the maintenance treatment for lymphedema in breast cancer.

Ultrasonography as an instrument to evaluate lymphedema secondary to breast cancer: systematic review

Lymphedema is a chronic and progressive disease characterized by fluid accumulation, causing tissue edema as a result of a compromised lymphatic system. Diagnostic ultrasound (DUS) is a method capable of assessing soft tissue characteristics that can be used reliably to diagnose lymphedema as well as for measuring tissue compliance in a clinical setting. This is a systematic review, aiming to evaluate articles that made use of DUS in management of lymphedema secondary to breast cancer. A total of 570 articles were selected, exported to the Rayyan QCRI review program, and then screened by two researchers. From this search, 25 articles were selected after the authors reached consensus and were catalogued as to their main results. Diagnostic ultrasound was identified as an advantageous method that is safe, minimally invasive, low cost, and radiation free and is useful for evaluating the efficacy of therapies used in lymphedema treatment.

Optimizing Outcomes in Lymphedema Reconstruction

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Describe current surgical techniques for treating primary and secondary lymphedema. 2. Optimize the surgical care of patients with lymphedema.

SUMMARY

Over the past decade, significant advances have been made in the surgical treatment of lymphedema. The most notable changes have been the reintroduction and evolution of physiologic techniques, including lymphovenous bypass-sometimes referred to as lymphovenous anastomosis in the literature-and vascularized lymph node transplant. These surgical modalities are now often used as first-line surgical options or may be combined with nonphysiologic approaches, including direct excision and suction-assisted lipectomy. Surgeons continue to debate the most appropriate sequence and combination of surgical treatment, particularly for patients at both extremes of the severity spectrum. Furthermore, debate remains around the need to apply different treatment approaches for patients with upper versus lower extremity involvement and primary versus secondary cause. In this article, we provide a summary of the surgical techniques currently used for both primary and secondary lymphedema and provide our recommendations for optimizing the surgical care of patients with lymphedema.

Use of fluorescence imaging during lymphatic surgery: A Delphi survey of experts worldwide

BACKGROUND

Fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green is increasingly used during lymphedema patient management. However, to date, no guidelines exist on when it should and should not be used or how it should be performed. Our objective was to have an international panel of experts identify areas of consensus and nonconsensus in current attitudes and practices in fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green use during lymphedema surgery patient management.

METHODS

A 2-round Delphi study was conducted involving 18 experts in the use of fluorescence imaging during lymphatic surgery, all asked to vote on 49 statements on patient preparation and contraindications (n = 7 statements), indocyanine green dosing and administration (n = 10), fluorescence imaging uses and potential advantages (n = 16), and potential disadvantages and training needs (n = 16).

RESULTS

Consensus ultimately was reached on 40/49 statements, including consistent consensus regarding the value of fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green in almost all facets of lymphedema patient management, including early detection, assessing disease extent, preoperative work-up, surgical planning, intraoperative guidance, monitoring short- and longer-term outcomes, quality control, and resident training. All experts felt it was very safe, while 94% felt it should be part of routine care and that indocyanine green was superior to colored dyes and ultrasound. Nonetheless, there also was consensus that limited high-quality evidence remains a barrier to its widespread use and that patients should still be provided with specific information and asked to sign specific consent for both fluorescence imaging and indocyanine green.

CONCLUSION

Fluorescence imaging with or without indocyanine green appears to have several roles in lymphedema prevention, diagnosis, assessment, and treatment.

Influence of age and lymphedema on the postural balance of women undergoing breast cancer treatment

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer affects women of different ages, and comorbidities resulting from treatment can affect postural stability. The study aimed to evaluate the influence of age and lymphedema on the postural balance of women undergoing breast cancer treatment.

METHODS

The study included 77 women undergoing breast cancer treatment, divided into different groups: 37 young adult women divided into 17 with lymphedema (GYL) and 20 young adults without lymphedema (GY); 40 elderly women, 20 elderly women with lymphedema (GEL) and 20 elderly women without lymphedema (GE). Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini BESTest) and Falls Efficacy Scale - International (FES-I) were used.

RESULTS

Mini BESTest and FES-I between the groups showed that GE and GEL had a significant difference to GY. Mini BESTest Total and Time Up and Go TUG-Double Task showed that GE has a significant difference to GYL, with GE and GEL having lower scores. Moderate negative correlation in the GEL between FES-I and Mini BESTest. In the age correlation between the Mini BESTest, FES-I, TUG, and double task TUG, a moderate positive correlation was observed for TUG. GEL showed a moderate positive correlation for FES-I and double-task TUG, strong for TUG, and moderate negative correlation with Mini BESTest. Correlation of the volume difference between the limb affected and not affected by lymphedema and the FES-I, Mini BESTest, TUG, and TUG double task, GYL showed moderate negative correlation for TUG.

CONCLUSION

Age and lymphedema influenced the dynamic postural balance of women undergoing breast cancer treatment.

Low-Energy Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy as a Therapeutic Option for Patients with a Secondary Late-Stage Fibro-Lymphedema After Breast Cancer Therapy: A Pilot Study

Background: Secondary lymphedema (LE) can occur after breast cancer (BC) therapy with axillary lymph node surgery and/or radiotherapy. Reported incidence varies around 20%. The aim of this study was to see whether low-energy extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is a therapeutic option in end-stage secondary upper limb fibro-LE. Methods and Results: A pilot study was performed on 10 adult patients who presented with an end-stage LE after BC treatment. They were all treated with usual physical therapy and all had lymphatic surgery before. Eight sessions of ESWT were applied, 2600 shocks at 0.1 mJ/mm², 2/week during 4 weeks. Upper limb volume decreased nonsignificantly, from 3086.4 ± 539.47 to 2909.1 ± 471.60 mL. Mean circumference of the upper limb was significantly decreased from 32.3 ± 3.01 to 31.4 ± 2.71 cm at the height of the upper arm, from 29.1 ± 2.89 to 28.1 ± 2.71 cm at the height of the elbow, and from 27.5 ± 4.08 to 26.8 ± 3.75 cm at the height of the forearm. Subjective measurements by visual analog scale showed significant decrease in both hardness from 57.3 ± 15.84 to 24.4 ± 21.89 mm and subjective feeling of edema from 44.2 ± 16.90 to 23.2 ± 21.16 mm. No adverse features were reported. Conclusion: We added some evidence that low-energy ESWT is well supported and has additional benefits also in longstanding fibro-lipo-LE on swelling of the arm leading to more subjective comfort for the patients.

Lipoaspiration and Controlled Compressive Therapy in Lymphedema of the Upper Extremity: A Comprehensive Systematic Review

Lipoaspiration followed by controlled compression therapy has been used to treat lymphedema of the upper extremity. We aimed to describe the studies reporting on outcomes of this procedure, in addition to reporting the differences with patients that were treated only with compressive therapy. The PubMed database was queried for studies that evaluated the use of lipoaspiration for upper extremity lymphedema. The keywords “aspiration lipectomy” AND “lymphedema” and synonyms in different combinations were used for the search. From a total of 129 articles, 13 met inclusion criteria. Ten studies reported outcomes of patients treated with lipoaspiration followed by compressive therapy, and three studies compared this procedure with patients that had only compressive therapy. A complete reduction of the edema in the affected limb was found in all the studies. Better results were found in patients who had undergone both procedures. This systematic review suggests that lipoaspiration is recommended for patients with upper extremity lymphedema of any cause in stage two after a long period of compressive therapy that did not produce additional edema reduction.