Sensory Outcome in Children Following Microsurgery for Brachial Plexus Birth Injury

Association of Parity and Previous Birth Outcome With Brachial Plexus Birth Injury Risk

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of maternal delivery history with a brachial plexus birth injury risk in subsequent deliveries and to estimate the effect of subsequent delivery method on brachial plexus birth injury risk.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all live-birth deliveries occurring in California-licensed hospitals from 1996 to 2012. The primary outcome was recurrent brachial plexus birth injury in a subsequent pregnancy. The exposure was delivery history (parity, shoulder dystocia in a previous delivery, or previously delivering a neonate with brachial plexus birth injury). Multiple logistic regression was used to model adjusted associations of delivery history with brachial plexus birth injury in a subsequent pregnancy. The adjusted risk and adjusted risk difference for brachial plexus birth injury between vaginal and cesarean deliveries in subsequent pregnancies were determined, stratified by delivery history, and the number of cesarean deliveries needed to prevent one brachial plexus birth injury was determined.

RESULTS

Of 6,286,324 neonates delivered by 4,104,825 individuals, 7,762 (0.12%) were diagnosed with a brachial plexus birth injury. Higher parity was associated with a 5.7% decrease in brachial plexus birth injury risk with each subsequent delivery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.97). Shoulder dystocia or brachial plexus birth injury in a previous delivery was associated with fivefold (0.58% vs 0.11%, aOR 5.39, 95% CI 4.10-7.08) and 17-fold (1.58% vs 0.11%, aOR 17.22, 95% CI 13.31-22.27) increases in brachial plexus birth injury risk, respectively. Among individuals with a history of delivering a neonate with a brachial plexus birth injury, cesarean delivery was associated with a 73.0% decrease in brachial plexus birth injury risk (0.60% vs 2.21%, aOR 0.27, 95% CI 0.13-0.55) compared with an 87.9% decrease in brachial plexus birth injury risk (0.02% vs 0.15%, aOR 0.12, 95% CI 0.10-0.15) in individuals without this history. Among individuals with a history of brachial plexus birth injury, 48.1 cesarean deliveries are needed to prevent one brachial plexus birth injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Parity, previous shoulder dystocia, and previously delivering a neonate with brachial plexus birth injury are associated with future brachial plexus birth injury risk. These factors are identifiable prenatally and can inform discussions with pregnant individuals regarding brachial plexus birth injury risk and planned mode of delivery.

Recent Advances in the Treatment of Brachial Plexus Birth Injury

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Describe methods of clinical evaluation for neurologic recovery in brachial plexus birth injury. 2. Understand the role of different diagnostic imaging modalities to evaluate the upper limb. 3. List nonsurgical strategies and surgical procedures to manage shoulder abnormality. 4. Explain the advantages and disadvantages of microsurgical nerve reconstruction and distal nerve transfers in brachial plexus birth injury. 5. Recognize the prevalence of pain in this population and the need for greater sensory outcomes evaluation.

SUMMARY

Brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) results from closed traction injury to the brachial plexus in the neck during an infant's vertex passage through the birth canal. Although spontaneous upper limb recovery occurs in most instances of BPBI, some infants do not demonstrate adequate motor recovery within an acceptable timeline and require surgical intervention to restore upper limb function. This article reviews major advances in the management of BPBI in the past decade that include improved understanding of shoulder pathology and its impact on observed motor recovery, novel surgical techniques, new insights in sensory function and pain, and global efforts to develop standardized outcomes assessment scales.

Self-biting behavior in patients with neonatal brachial plexus palsy

PURPOSE

Self-biting behavior in patients with neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP) has been associated with finger amputation. Our objective is to describe the incidence of this complication, risk factors, and clinical management.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 612 patients with NBPP. There were 303 males and 309 females. 51.8% of patients had C5-C6 lesions, 28.9% had C5-C7, 18.9% had C5-T1, and 0.3 had C7-T1 involvement.

RESULTS

We identified 15 patients with self-biting behavior (2.5%). Ten patients had C5-T1 lesions, and five had C5-C7 lesions. Eight patents were submitted to brachial plexus surgery and seven were not. This behavior appeared between 8 and 46 months of life (mean 23.5), and it was always temporary. There was no difference between operated and non-operated patients (p > 0.05), and no correlation between age at surgery and age of appearance of self-biting behavior (p > 0.05). Physical restriction was effective in treating this complication and we had no case of finger amputation.

CONCLUSION

Self-biting behavior is a rare complication of NBPP, and it is usually associated with severe motor involvement. The behavior duration is limited to a few months. This condition can be effectively treated with physical restriction to prevent hand biting.

Long-Term Hand Function Outcomes of the Surgical Management of Complete Brachial Plexus Birth Injury

PURPOSE

Hand function outcomes of primary nerve reconstruction for total brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) are confounded by nerve roots left in continuity, inclusion of secondary procedures, and no assessment of the ability to perform activities of daily living. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term hand function outcomes in a cohort of patients with a complete BPBI who had no nerve root in continuity prior to primary nerve reconstruction targeting the lower trunk.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective case series of complete BPBI included patients who underwent primary nerve reconstruction. The outcomes were assessed using the active movement scale (AMS) and brachial plexus outcome measure preoperatively and at the age of 4 and 8 years.

RESULTS

Fifty patients with a complete BPBI, of whom 82% (41/50) had an avulsion of C8-T1, underwent primary nerve reconstruction at a mean age of 4.1 months. Compared with the preoperative AMS scores, a statistically significant increase of AMS scores was observed at 4 and 8 years of age for all movements except forearm pronation. Between 4 and 8 years of age, there was a statistically significant improvement of external rotation of the shoulder and elbow flexion as well as diminution of thumb flexion. In the brachial plexus outcome measure assessment, there were 83% (24/29) at 4 years and 81% (21/26) at 8 years who had sufficient functional movement to perform wrist, finger, and thumb activities.

CONCLUSIONS

Functional hand outcome was restored to sufficiently perform bimanual activity tasks in 81% (21/26) of patients with a complete BPBI at 8 years of age. This affirmed that primary nerve reconstruction reinnervating the lower trunk can result in a functional extremity.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

C5-8 neonatal brachial plexus palsy. Operative findings, reconstructive strategy and outcome

From 1998 to 2014, we performed primary brachial plexus repair in 260 children with neonatal brachial plexus palsy. Thirty-three presented with a C5-8 palsy and 24 were reviewed for this study. The surgical strategy was to focus on repairing the upper trunk. Secondary surgical procedures were performed in 21 patients, mainly for shoulder external rotation deficit or weak wrist extension. After a mean follow-up of 9.7 years (range 3 to 19), the median Mallet score for the shoulder was 9.5 and the mean Raimondi score for the hand was 3.3. Median active movement scale was 5, 7 and 5.5 for the deltoid, biceps and triceps, respectively. We conclude that primary C5-8 brachial plexus reconstruction provides restoration of elbow flexion and most patients have a sensitive and functional hand. We also found that secondary surgery to improve shoulder and wrist function is often necessary, which should initially be explained to the family.Level of evidence: IV.

Repair Method for Complete High Ulnar Nerve Injury Based on Nerve Magnified Regeneration

PURPOSE

Complete high ulnar nerve injury can cause serious sequelae, including residual sensation and loss of movement and especially dysfunction of the intrinsic muscles of the hand. As a solution to treat complete high ulnar nerve injury, we proposed a new repair method for ulnar nerve injury based on nerve-magnified regeneration.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with complete division of the ulnar nerve at a high level who were treated from May 2013 to December 2016 were divided into two groups. The proposed repair method for complete high ulnar nerve injury was performed in group I (11 patients), while the traditional repair method, ie, repair of the original injury site of the ulnar nerve, was used in group II (11 patients).

RESULTS

The results showed no significant difference in the mean sensory scores assigned by the Highet-Zachary scheme (the Highet Scale) between the two groups. The mean Highet Scale score of muscle strength for the first dorsal interosseus muscle was significantly better in group I than that in group II (p=0.010). In group I, 10 of 11 patients were graded as M4 or M5. Grip strength, pinch strength, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score were significantly better in group I than those in group II (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Therefore, this method for complete high ulnar nerve injury based on nerve-magnified regeneration can shorten the path of motor nerve regeneration, effectively reduce atrophy of the intrinsic muscles of the hand, and provide better hand function.