K-wire Pull-Out Force After Multiple Redirection Attempts

Pull-out resistance of connected K-wires for osteosynthesis: development of a numerical model

A predictive finite element model was developed to investigate the best configuration of a fixation pins system consisting of two K-wires inserted in a synthetic model (Sawbones®) at different angles and secured to a connecting rod. Two key parameters were considered to determine the best configuration delivering the higher pull-out strength and lower pull-out length: the diameter and insertion angle. Results show that as the diameter and insertion angle increased, the pull-out force increased, while the pull-out length decreased. Results are successfully compared with available experimental data in literature. This model can be used as an alternative to experimental study.

Application of Kirschner wire placement guided technology in paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures

BACKGROUND

To analyze the clinical efficacy of K-wire placement guided technology in paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in 105 patients who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning surgeries in our hospital from June 2019 to August 2022. 54 patients treated with a assisted reduction fixation device to assist in closed reduction and percutaneous K-wire cross-fixation were allocated into the Non-guided group, and 51 patients with K-wire placement guided technology to guide K-wire placement were assigned into the Guided group. The operation duration, number of disposable K-wire placement, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, Baumann angle, carrying angle, fracture healing time and Flynn score of elbow joint function at the final follow-up were compared between two groups. The postoperative complications of two groups were recorded.

RESULTS

There were significant differences between two groups in terms of operation duration, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, and disposable K-wire placement rate (p < 0. 05), while no significant differences of Baumann angle, carrying angle and the fracture healing time between two groups were observed (p > 0. 05). In the control group, ulnar nerve injury in 2 case, pin site infection in 4 cases, mild cubitus varus in 2 cases and loss of reduction in 4 cases were detected. In the study group, ulnar nerve injury in 1 case, pin site infection in 2 cases and loss of reduction in 1 case was observed. There was no significant difference in Flynn scores between two groups.

CONCLUSION

K-wire placement guided technology is simple and convenient. The application of K-wire placement guided technology could relatively improved disposable K-wire placement rate, shorten the intraoperative fluoroscopy frequencies and reduce complication rates.

Pullout strength of connected pins in hand surgery: Effect of pin diameter and insertion angle

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of insertion angles on the pullout strength of connected pins using a synthetic model simulating a hand bone.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The material consisted of Sawbones® (20 mm×20 mm × 60 mm), fixation pins secured to a connecting rod much like an external fixator, an electric drill (speed 1,290 rpm) and a tensile testing machine. The Sawbones® were drilled with different pin diameters (1.2 mm, 1.5 mm, and 1.8 mm) and insertion angles (100°, 110° and 120°). A vertical displacement of 1 mm/min was applied until the pins were extracted (maximum force).

RESULTS

The pullout strength increased with the insertion angle of the connected pins. It also increased with their diameter. Regardless of the pin diameter, the load-displacement curve during the pullout test had 4 sections (peak 1, ascending slope, peak 2, descending slope) that corresponded to the combined frictional force and contact force between the pins and Sawbones®.

DISCUSSION

Our study findings showed that, theoretically, for wrist or hand fractures treated with connected pins, the larger the diameter and insertion angle, the better the mechanical holding power of the pins.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I, experimental study.

Analysis of the location and trajectory of the Kirschner wires in the fixation of extension-type supracondylar fracture of the humerus by 3D computational simulation

BACKGROUND

Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning is still a preference for the treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures in children. However, no reports have shown the pin trajectory and the characteristics of the entry point so far. So we established a computational simulation model of the elbow to observe the trajectory of pinning for supracondylar humerus fractures.

METHODS

We reconstructed an adult elbow computationally and simulated pin placement through lateral and medial pinning. Pin trajectories were traced after placement and after the addition of the skin profile; the relative entry points of the pins were determined. We used the center of the dorsal olecranon inflection as an anatomic reference for the entry points of lateral pinning. Four quadrants were established based on the center of the dorsal olecranon inflection: upper medial quadrant, upper lateral quadrant, lower medial quadrant, and lower lateral quadrant (LLQ).

RESULTS

The maximum angle of pinning through the lateral column was 64° ± 3°. The minimum angles of pinning through the lateral column and middle column were 37° ± 3° and 20° ± 2°, respectively. The range of safe angle pinning through the medial column was between 18° ± 2° and 57° ± 3° to avoid penetration of the olecranon fossa and the cortex of the medial column. The entry points of lateral pinning were within the lateral half of the LLQ, and the lateral one-third of the LLQ contained all entry points of the pins through the lateral column and minor points of the pins through the middle column. The exit points of the medial pinning were within the lateral fringe of the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction region; entering from the inferior two-thirds of the medial epicondyle could lead to the exit points in the proximal half of the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction region laterally.

DISCUSSION

For lateral pinning, the entry points would be within the lateral half of the LLQ. For the pins through the lateral column, the entry points should be within the lateral one-third of the LLQ. For medial pinning, entering from the inferior two-thirds of the medial epicondyle would lead to a more proximal exit.