Isolated Partial Intra-Articular Volar Ulnar Fractures of the Distal Radius: The Tetrahedron Variant

Management of isolated volar lunate facet fractures of the distal radius

Distal radius fractures are among the most common fractures treated globally. Consideration of the mechanism of injury and careful radiographic assessment contributes to appropriate management of these injuries in isolation or jointly with other fractures or injuries affecting the wrist joint. Treatment options can range from non-operative management to a variety of fixation techniques. Interest in the distal radius fractures was renewed as open reduction and monoblock volar locking plate fixation became the preferred contemporary treatment in the last few decades. Isolated volar lunate facet (VLF) fractures are uncommon. However, the stability of the entire carpus may be compromised with fractures of the volar marginal rim. Inadequately or improperly treated fractures of the VLF can lead to significant long-term complications. A critical approach to this unique fracture pattern's evaluation, management, and surgical fixation is paramount for successful and reproducible outcomes in stability and durability.

Management of Lunate Facet Escape after Distal Radius Fracture Volar Plating: Surgical Technique

Fractures involving the lunate facet of the distal radius (commonly called the volar ulnar corner or "critical corner") are often difficult to recognize radiographically. "Lunate facet escape" refers to the displacement of this fragment after attempted distal radius fracture closed or open reduction methods. Lunate facet escape can have severe consequences including carpal collapse with pain, instability, and arthritis. Challenges to lunate facet fixation include irregular cortical contour that makes plate fixation difficult, as well as deforming forces by inserting structures. The goal of the management of a distal radius fracture with lunate facet involvement is first identification, then adequate stabilization until osseous healing occurs. However, subsequent lunate facet escape can pose a challenging clinical and surgical dilemma. Here we discuss our preferred approach to treat lunate facet escape after distal radius fracture volar locking plating failure.

Posttraumatic Arthritis After Combined Plating of Distal Radius Fractures AO Type C: A 7-Year Follow-up of 97 Cases

BACKGROUND

Volar locking plate fixation is the most common method of operative fixation of distal radius fractures (DRFs). For more complex cases, combined plating is an option for stabilizing intra-articular fragments. The prevalence of posttraumatic arthritis (PA) after an intra-articular DRF, and its relation to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to study the prevalence of PA and its correlation to clinical outcome measures.

METHODS

We evaluated 97 consecutive patients with intra-articular DRF, operated with combined plating, 7 years postoperatively. The primary outcome measure was the prevalence of radiographic PA. Secondary outcome measures included visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, hand grip strength, wrist range of motion (ROM), Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score. Radiographic examination was performed between 1 and 7 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

The prevalence of PA was 29% at the 7-year follow-up. No correlation was found between PA and ROM, hand grip strength, PRWE, QuickDASH, VAS pain scores, or radiographic reduction. Median wrist ROM and grip strength were significantly inferior compared with the uninjured side. Hardware removal was performed in 51.5% of cases. There were 2 cases of tendon ruptures.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined plating can yield a good clinical outcome 7 years postoperatively and a low prevalence of PA. The presence of PA did not correlate to clinical outcome measures or to the accuracy of anatomical reduction 1 year postoperatively. The frequency of tendon ruptures was acceptable, but the high frequency of hardware removal is a concern.

Volar Locking Plate Compared With Combined Plating of AO Type C Distal Radius Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Study of 150 Cases

PURPOSE

The optimal way to stabilize intra-articular distal radius fractures is unclear despite recent advances in surgical management. Volar plating is the most common treatment but may not be sufficient for more complex intra-articular AO type C fractures. The purpose of this randomized controlled study was to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes following surgical treatment of AO type C distal radius fractures, comparing volar with combined plating.

METHODS

In this study, 150 patients were randomized to volar locking plate (n = 75) or combined plating (n = 75) following a distal radius fracture AO type C. The 1-year follow-up included radiographic outcome (Batra score), visual analog scale pain score, hand grip strength, wrist range of motion, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score.

RESULTS

Overall, 147 patients (median age 61 years) completed the 1-year follow-up (73 patients with volar plate and 74 with combined plating). No difference was found in radiographic outcome between the treatment groups. The volar plate group had significantly better Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation scores, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, hand grip strength, visual analog scale scores during activity, and flexion, extension, ulnar and radial deviation than the combined plate group. Hardware removal was performed in 10% in the volar plate group and in 31% in the combined plate group. There was no postoperative infection in the volar plate group but 3 cases in the combined plate group.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with complex AO type C intra-articular fractures, volar and combined plating yielded the same radiographic result. The differences in Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores between the groups did not reach the thresholds for minimal clinically important differences, suggesting similar clinical outcome. The combined plating group had a considerably higher frequency of hardware removal and postoperative infections.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic I.

Functional Outcome and Inflammatory Response of Patients with Extra-Articular Distal Humeral Fractures following Implantation of Anatomically Precontoured Locking Compression Plates through a Posterior Approach

Distal humeral fractures are challenging injuries to surgically correct and account for up to 2% of all adult fractures. Surgical management of extra-articular distal humeral fractures is challenging considering surgical approach, implant selection, and position of the implant owing to the availability of different precontoured implants and plate configurations. Anatomically precontoured locking compression plates (APLCPs) allow the placement of angular stable screws right underneath the reduced joint surface fragments. To date, there is a lack of evidence supporting its superiority to conventional locking plate osteosynthesis (LPO) in treating extra-articular distal humeral fractures. The objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of APLCPs in the treatment of extra-articular distal humeral fractures. A total of 100 patients diagnosed with humeral fractures and receiving treatments in our hospital between May 2018 and May 2020 fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria and were randomly assigned to LPO and APLCP groups according to the odd-even of the order of hospital admission, 50 cases per groups. Clinical endpoints were assessed including operation time; in-bed time; length of hospital stay; volume of intraoperative blood loss; VSA scores before and 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery; MEPS scores before and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery; range of motion, flexion, and extension of the elbow; serum levels of CK, CRP, and IL-6; and incidence of complications after surgery. It was found that the APLCP group exhibited shortened operation time and in-bed time, decreased length of hospital stay, and reduced volume of intraoperative blood loss compared to the LPO group (all P < 0.001). The two groups had declined VSA scores concomitant with increased MEPS scores after surgery in a time-dependent manner (P < 0.001). Notably, the VSA scores in the APLCP group were all lower than those in the LPO group at indicated time points (24, 48, and 72 h) after surgery (P < 0.001). Besides, the MEPS scores in the APLCP group were all higher than those in the LPO group at indicated time points (3, 6, and 12 months) after surgery (P < 0.001). It was revealed that the patients receiving extra-articular distal humeral APLCP through posterior approaches exhibited greater ranges of motion, flexion, and extension of the elbow than those receiving LPO after surgery (P < 0.001). The patients receiving extra-articular distal humeral APLCP through posterior approaches exhibited lower serum levels of IL-6, CRP, and CK than those receiving LPO after surgery (IL-6: P=0.007, CRP: P=0.001, CK: P=0.001). The APLCP had a lower total incidence rate of complication than the LPO group (48.00% vs. 18.00%, P=0.003). In conclusion, these data support the notion that the implantation of anatomically precontoured APLCP through a posterior approach allows for improved functional outcomes and attenuated inflammatory response and prevents the incidence of postoperative complications compared to conventional LPO for internal fixation of extra-articular distal humeral fractures.

Volar plate fixation in intra-articular distal radius fractures with a volar lunate facet fragment

The aims of the study were to determine whether a volar lunate facet fragment is present in 67 displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures and to investigate which factors are associated with reduction loss after treatment with a volar plate and locking screws. The fractures were analyzed preoperatively with three-dimensional computed tomography. The volar lunate facet fragment was present in 42 fractures. Reduction loss occurred in five wrists and in two of those, the carpus was subluxated. Loss of reduction was associated with a short palmar cortex (9mm or less) of the volar lunate facet fragment. This study has shown that measuring the length of the palmar cortex of a volar lunate facet fracture fragment may be useful for identifying distal radius fractures that have a higher risk of displacement after treatment with a standard volar plate and locking screws.

Involvement of the palmar lunate facet in intra-articular distal radius fractures

BACKGROUND

Small fracture fragments of the palmar lunate facet of the distal radius can be difficult to stabilize and may cause loss of reduction and even subluxation of the radiocarpal joint.

MATERIAL & METHODS

The aims of the study were to investigate fracture patterns of the intermediate column in 101 intra-articular distal radius fractures with three-dimensional computed tomography, and to determine the prevalence of palmar lunate facet fracture fragments. The size of the fragments was measured to find out how many fragments were small.

RESULTS

The palmar lunate facet fragment was present in 61 fractures. Mean length of the palmar cortex measured 13.5mm (range: 3 to 26.9) and mean area of the lunate facet 115 mm² (range: 31 to 267). Seventeen percent of intra-articular distal radius fractures had a palmar lunate facet fragment with a short palmar cortex.

CONCLUSION

With accurate analysis of the preoperative computed tomography scans the typical fracture patterns of the palmar lunate facet are recognisable and adequate fixation technique can be chosen to avoid loss of reduction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.