The Effects of Medicaid Expansion on Triage and Regional Transfer After Upper-Extremity Trauma

Health Disparities in Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery: A Scoping Review

PURPOSE

Social determinants of health (SDOH) are linked to poor health care outcomes across the different medical specialties. We conducted a scoping review to understand the existing literature and identify further areas of research to address disparities within hand surgery.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane was conducted. Inclusion criteria were English studies examining health disparities in hand surgery. The following were assessed: the main SDOH, study design/phase/theme, and main disease/injury/procedure. A previously described health disparities research framework was used to determine study phase: detecting (identifying risk factors), understanding (analyzing risk factors), and reducing (assessing interventions). Studies were categorized according to themes outlined at the National Institute of Health and American College of Surgeons: Summit on Surgical Disparities.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 446 articles, with 49 articles included in final analysis. The majority were detecting-type (31/49, 63%) or understanding-type (12/49, 24%) studies, with few reducing-type studies (6/49, 12%). Patient factors (31/49, 63%) and systemic/access factors (16/49, 33%) were the most frequently studied themes, with few investigating clinical care/quality factors (4/49, 8%), clinician factors (3/49, 6%), and postoperative/rehabilitation factors (1/49, 2%). The most commonly studied SDOH include insurance status (13/49, 27%), health literacy (10/49, 20%), and social deprivation (6/49, 12%). Carpal tunnel syndrome (9/49, 18%), upper extremity trauma (9/49, 18%), and amputations (5/49, 10%) were frequently assessed. Most investigations involved retrospective or database designs (29/49, 59%), while few were prospective, cross-sectional, or mixed-methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite an encouraging upward trend in health disparities research, existing studies are in the early phases of investigation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Most of the literature focuses on patient factors and systemic/access factors in regard to insurance status. Further work with prospective, cross-sectional, and mixed-method studies is needed to better understand health disparities in hand surgery, which will inform future interventions.

Hand Call Practices and Satisfaction: Survey Results From Hand Surgeons in the United States

PURPOSE

To describe current hand call practices in the United States (US) and identify aspects of call practices that lead to surgeon satisfaction.

METHODS

An anonymous survey was administered to practicing members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand, and responses were filtered to US surgeons taking hand call. Hand call was considered: (A) hand-specific call including replantation or microvascular services or (B) hand-specific call without replantation or microvascular responsibilities. Data were collected pertaining to practices, compensation, assistance, frequency, and satisfaction. Descriptive analyses were performed and regionally subdivided. Pearson correlations were used to determine aspects of a call that influenced surgeon satisfaction.

RESULTS

A total of 662 US hand surgeons from 49 states responded. Among the respondents, 38% (251) participate in replantation or microvascular call, 34% (225) participate in hand-specific call excluding replantation, and 28% (186) do not participate in hand-specific call. Of those practicing hand call (476), 60% take 6 or fewer days of call per month, 62% have assistance with staffing consultations, 65% have assistance with surgical procedures, and 49% are financially incentivized to take call. More than half (51%) reported that they have a protected time for call aside from their elective practice, and 10% of the surgeons reported that they have a dedicated operating room (OR) time after a call to care for cases. Two percent reported that the day following call is free from clinical duties. Only 46% of the surgeons were satisfied with their call schedule, with the top concerns among unsatisfied respondents relating to pay, OR availability, and burnout. The factors correlating to surgeon satisfaction included less frequent call, assistance with performing consultations and surgery, pay for call, and OR availability.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of US hand surgeons are not satisfied with their current call practices, with frequent concerns relating to pay, OR availability, and burnout.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These findings may promote awareness regarding aspects of hand call that correlate with surgeon satisfaction and highlight practice patterns that may reduce burnout.

The Curtis Hand Injury Matrix Score: Determining the Need for Specialized Upper Extremity Care

PURPOSE

Given the limited impact of transfer guidelines and the lack of comparative metrics for upper extremity trauma, we introduced the Curtis Hand Injury Matrix (CHIM) score to evaluate upper extremity injury acuity from the specialist perspective. Our goal was to evaluate the CHIM score as an indicator of complexity and specialist need by correlating the score with arrival mode, length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and procedure location.

METHODS

We identified all hand and upper extremity emergency room visits at our institution in 2018 and 2019. On initial evaluation, our institution's hand surgery team assigned each patient an alphanumeric score with a number (1-5) and letter (A-H) corresponding to injury severity and pathology, respectively. Patients were divided into 5 groups (1-5) with lower scores indicating greater severity. We compared age, LOS, discharge disposition, procedure location, transfer status, and arrival mode between groups and assessed the relationships between matrix scores and discharge disposition, procedure performed, and LOS.

RESULTS

There were 3,822 patients that accounted for 4,026 upper extremity evaluations. There were significant differences in LOS, discharge dispositions, procedure locations, transfer status, and arrival modes between groups. Patients with more severe scores had higher rates of admission and more operating room procedures. Higher percentages of patients who arrived via helicopter, ambulance, or transfer had more severe scores. Patients with more severe scores were significantly more likely to have a procedure, hospital admission, and longer hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

The CHIM score provides a framework to catalog the care and resources required when covering specialized hand and upper extremity calls and accepting transfers. This clinical validation supports considering broader use.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic IV.

The Affordable Care Act and Its Impact on Plastic and Gender-Affirmation Surgery

SUMMARY

The Affordable Care Act's provisions have affected and will continue to affect plastic surgeons and their patients, and an understanding of its influence on the current American health care system is essential. The law's impact on pediatric plastic surgery, craniofacial surgery, and breast reconstruction is well documented. In addition, gender-affirmation surgery has seen exponential growth, largely because of expanded insurance coverage through the protections afforded to transgender individuals by the Affordable Care Act. As gender-affirming surgery continues to grow, plastic surgeons have the opportunity to adapt and diversify their practices.