Early Cup Loosening After Metal-on-Metal Total Joint Replacement of the Trapeziometacarpal Joint: A Retrieval Study

[Translated article] Experience in major complications with total trapezometacarpal prostheses

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of rhizarthrosis using trapeziometacarpal prostheses (TMP) is increasing. Complications may lead to loss of the implant and result in salvage surgery. Our aim was to assess major complications with the use of some TMP models and their rescue.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Retrospective study on TMP implanted between 2006 and 2021. Models studied: Arpe®, Elektra®, Ivory®, Maïa®, Isis® and Touch®. Demographic data were assessed, implant placement by radiographic study, technical data, complications, salvage surgeries and final survival.

RESULTS

Review of 224 TMP, 45 Arpe® (95.5% survival, rate follow-up [R] 6-16 years), 5 Elektra® (80% survival, R 13-14), 14 Ivory® (92.8% survival, R 9-11), 7 Maïa® (100% survival, R 8-9), 115 Isis® (99.1% survival, R 1-8), 38 Touch® (100% survival, R 1-4). The medial angle of the dome with the proximal articular surface of the trapezium in the lateral plane, was: Arpe®: 8.85°, Elektra®: not assessable, Ivory®: 6.6°, Maïa®: 14.4°, Isis®: 3.8°, and Touch®: 5.95°. The Isis® was placed 100% with scopic guidance presenting a significantly lower angle respect to the medial angle of the dome with the proximal articular surface of the trapezium. As main complications, we observed 3.5% of dislocations and 4% of mobilisations, with the Elektra® being responsible for 47% of these. Nineteen salvage surgeries were performed, with 3% of the implants being lost.

CONCLUSIONS

Dislocation and mobilisation are the most observed complications, the Elektra® responsible for almost half of them. Correct placement and implant design appear to be crucial to avoid them in the short and long term.

Experience in major complications with total trapezometacarpal prostheses

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of rhizarthrosis using trapeziometacarpal prostheses (TMP) is increasing. Complications may lead to loss of the implant and result in salvage surgery. Our aim was to assess major complications with the use of some TMP models and their rescue.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Retrospective study on TMP implanted between 2006 and 2021. Models studied: Arpe®, Elektra®, Ivory®, Maïa®, Isis® and Touch®. Demographic data were assessed, implant placement by radiographic study, technical data, complications, salvage surgeries and final survival.

RESULTS

Review of 224 TMP, 45 Arpe® (95.5% survival, rate follow-up [R] 6-16 years), 5 Elektra® (80% survival, R 13-14), 14 Ivory® (92.8% survival, R 9-11), 7 Maïa® (100% survival, R 8-9), 115 Isis® (99.1% survival, R 1-8), 38 Touch® (100% survival, R 1-4). The medial angle of the dome with the proximal articular surface of the trapezium in the lateral plane, was: Arpe®: 8.85°, Elektra®: not assessable, Ivory®: 6.6°, Maïa®: 14.4°, Isis®: 3.8°, and Touch®: 5.95°. The Isis® was placed 100% with scopic guidance presenting a significantly lower angle respect to the medial angle of the dome with the proximal articular surface of the trapezium. As main complications, we observed 3.5% of dislocations and 4% of mobilisations, with the Elektra® being responsible for 47% of these. Nineteen salvage surgeries were performed, with 3% of the implants being lost.

CONCLUSIONS

Dislocation and mobilisation are the most observed complications, the Elektra® responsible for almost half of them. Correct placement and implant design appear to be crucial to avoid them in the short and long term.

A review of wear debris in thumb base joint implants

AIM

Polymers and metals, such as polyethylene (PE) and cobalt chrome (CoCr), are common materials used in thumb-based joint implants, also known as CMC (Carpometacarpal) arthroplasty. The purpose of this review was to investigate the reported failure modes related to wear debris from these type of materials in CMC implants. The impact of wear debris on clinical outcomes of CMC implants was also examined. Potential adverse wear conditions and inflammatory particle characteristics were also considered.

METHOD

A literature search was performed using PRISMA guidelines and 55 studies were reviewed including 49 cohort studies and 6 case studies. Of the 55 studies, 38/55 (69%) focused on metal-on-polyethylene devices, followed by metal-on-metal (35%), and metal-on-bone (4%).

RESULTS

The summarized data was used to determine the frequency of failure modes potentially related to wear debris from metals and/or polymers. The most commonly reported incidents potentially relating to debris were implant loosening (7.1%), osteolysis (1.2%) and metallosis (0.6%). Interestingly the reported mechanisms behind osteolysis and loosening greatly varied. Inflammatory reactions, while rare, were generally attributed to metallic debris from metal-on-metal devices. Mechanisms of adverse wear conditions included implant malpositioning, over-tensioning, high loading for active patients, third-body debris, and polyethylene wear-through. No specific examination of debris particle characterization was found, pointing to a gap in the literature.

CONCLUSION

This review underscores the types of failure modes associated with wear debris in CMC implants. It was found that failure rates and adverse wear conditions of CMC implants of any design are low and the exact relationship between wear debris and implant incidences, such as osteolysis and loosening remains uncertain. The authors note that further research and specific characterization is required to understand the relationship between debris and implant failure.

A randomized controlled trial comparing two modern total wrist arthroplasties : improved function with stable implants, but high complication rates in non-rheumatoid wrists at two years

AIMS

To analyze the short-term outcome of two types of total wrist arthroplasty (TWA) in terms of wrist function, migration, and periprosthetic bone behaviour.

METHODS

A total of 40 patients suffering from non-rheumatoid wrist arthritis were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial comparing the ReMotion and Motec TWAs. Patient-rated and functional outcomes, radiological changes, blood metal ion levels, migration measured by model-based radiostereometric analysis (RSA), bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), complications, loosening, and revision rates at two years were compared.

RESULTS

Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) scores, abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire scores, and pain improved similarly and significantly in both groups. Wrist motion improved significantly in the Motec group only, and forearm rotation in the ReMotion group only. Cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr) blood ion levels were significantly higher in the metal-on-metal (MoM) Motec group than in the metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) ReMotion group. Mean total translation was 0.65 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26 to 1.12) and 0.27 mm (95% CI 0.14 to 0.47) for the ReMotion carpal and radial components, and 0.32 mm (95% CI 0.22 to 0.45) and 0.26 mm (95% CI 0.20 to 0.34) for the Motec metacarpal and radial components, respectively. Apart from dorsal and volar tilts, which were significantly higher for the radial ReMotion than for the Motec component, no significant differences in absolute migration occurred. BMD around the radial components never returned to baseline. Almost one-third of patients required reoperation due to complications. Two ReMotion implants were revised to Motec TWAs due to carpal component loosening, and three Motec MoM articulations were revised to metal-on-polyether ether ketone due to painful synovitis.

CONCLUSION

Both implants provided matched function and were stable at short-term follow-up, but with a high complication rate. This procedure should be restricted to specialist centres undertaking prospective analysis until its role is clarified.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(10):1132-1141.

Initial survival of the Isis® total trapeziometacarpal prosthesis with conical trunk threaded cups

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis through the implantation of total trapeziometacarpal prostheses is in continuous expansion. The Isis® prosthesis is a trunk-conical threaded anchorage prosthesis. Our objective was to assess the functional results and survival of this implant for at least one year of follow-up.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Prospective study on 53 Isis® prosthesis, implanted from april 2014 to january 2019. The Van Cappelle functional test, pain, strength, mobility, return to previous activity, radiological variables and placement of the trapezial component were evaluated. The surgical technique was performed with a guide wirefocused on the trapezius and control of the scopia. Observed complications were recorded and statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Fifty-one implants (49 patients) were reviewed. Mean follow-up was 2.1 years (1-5.7). Van Cappelle's test, pain, mobility, and grip and clamp strength improved significantly, as did the distance between the metacarpal head and the trapezius base; 96% of the patients returned in less than 6 months to their activities. Minor complications, 3 De Quervain's tendinopathy and 2 intra-operative metacarpal and 2 trapezium fractures were recorded, and one carpal tunnel syndrome. There was no dislocation, mobilization, or implant infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The functional results of the Isis® prosthesis are excellent in the short term, far exceeding the first year of 100% of survival. The complications that arose were minor and few. The anchorage and placement of the trapezial component guided by scopia seem to be crucial for the good result.

Primary endoprosthetic replacement of the arthritic CMC-1 joint

OBJECTIVE

Osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal (CMC)-1 joint is a common condition that can cause significant pain and functional problems. When nonoperative management fails, surgery may be indicated. Resection of the trapezium, often combined with soft tissue stabilization, is still considered the gold standard. But recovery time is often prolonged and a significant number of patients remain unsatisfied in the long term. Knowing that total endoprosthetic joint replacement is one of the most successful achievements of orthopedic surgery, many attempts have been made to produce a replacement for the CMC‑1 joint that provides a better outcome than trapeziectomy.

INDICATIONS

Eaton-Glickel stage 2-3 CMC‑1 osteoarthritis.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Symptomatic pan-trapezial osteoarthritis (Eaton-Glickel stage 4), infection, young manual worker, poor bone quality or insufficient trapezium size.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

A dorsoradial approach to the CMC‑1 joint is used. Minimal resection of the trapezial and metacarpal articular surfaces, including osteophytes and loose bodies. Reaming of the trapezium and broaching of the metacarpal stem with dedicated instruments. Implantation of the endoprosthetic components. Selection of the correct neck length to ensure a stable joint. Closure of the capsule and skin.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Immobilization of thumb for 2 weeks in a splint. Followed by a removable thumb CMC brace for 4 weeks, starting with gentle mobilization exercises. No forceful gripping or pinching the first 6 weeks.

RESULTS

A specific design-the uncemented, ball in socket, metal on polyethylene total joint replacement-has stood the test of time and successful long-term clinical and radiographic outcome results have been published. Recent comparative trials have shown better pinch strength, better pain relief and faster functional recovery, when compared to trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition. The incidence of complications such as dislocation, polyethylene wear and cup loosening is acceptable.