Promoting Gender Equity in the #MeToo Era

Diversity in Hand Surgery Leadership: The Impact of Mentorship and Bias

BACKGROUND

Diversity in leadership drives innovation. However, underrepresented minorities may face barriers. The aim of this study is to understand the impact of gender and race on the experience of leaders in hand surgery.

METHODS

An anonymous survey was sent to leaders in hand surgery who attained the position of national society president, head of a division/department, or hand fellowship director. The survey assessed demographic information, grit, mentorship, and bias.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-one leaders responded for a response rate of 60.5%. Men represented 81.0% and women 19.0%. Most respondents were white (87.6%) with 7% Asian and 6% any other race. Ninety-one percent of female respondents lived in a dual career household, compared with 53.7% of male respondents (odds ratio [OR] 0.15, P = .017). Female respondents had significantly higher grit compared with male respondents (4.3 vs 4.0, P = .050). Male respondents were more likely to have a male mentor/sponsor than women (95% vs 76%, respectively, P = .001). White respondents were more likely to have a white mentor/sponsor than nonwhite respondents (91% vs 61%, respectively, P = .009). Ninety-five percent of women reported experiencing bias compared with 27% of men (P < .001). Specifically, women reported bias in salary, promotion, nomination, sponsorship, networking, and clinical resources. Nonwhite respondents were significantly more likely to experience bias in promotion (P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

Women and racial minorities face bias and barriers to leadership within hand surgery.

The Concerning Disaggregation of Gender and Racial/Ethnicity Disparity Investigation at Recent ASCO Annual Meetings

OBJECTIVES

There has been a recent emphasis in the peer-reviewed oncology literature on examining disparities by gender. Such emphasis provides an excellent opportunity to simultaneously examine race/ethnicity disparities in the same cohort. The degree to which gender disparities research has been performed concomitantly with racial disparities research at prominent oncologic societies has yet to be investigated.

METHODS

ABSTRACTs presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meeting were reviewed. Abstracts selected for the oral abstract or clinical science symposium sessions at the 2020, 2021, and 2022 annual meetings were evaluated to determine the amount of gender disparities research presented. Such research was further assessed to determine whether racial/ethnicity disparities were examined simultaneously.

RESULTS

From 2020 to 2022, 1219 abstracts were presented at the ASCO annual meetings, oral abstract or clinical science symposium sessions. Of these, 7 involved gender disparities examination, of which only 2 (29%) concomitantly examined race/ethnicity. No study since 2020 concomitantly examined gender and racial disparities.

CONCLUSIONS

More than 70% of gender disparities work presented at ASCO has been disaggregated from concomitant racial disparities examination, with complete disaggregation since 2021. Gender disparities work remains a miniscule aspect of the overall research landscape. Future work in examining gender disparities may be best aggregated with racial/ethnicity disparities to optimize timely solutions in both areas; such work could potentially be incentivized from the inclusion criteria of future funding mechanisms.

Gender equality challenges in orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Several studies have examined gender-equality challenges and ways to improve women's representation and management. Orthopaedic surgeons and patients are less gender equitable than them of other surgical disciplines. This systematic review summarizes these findings and highlights orthopaedic surgery gender inequality.

METHODS

Search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was carried out to extract human studies investigating the gender gap in orthopaedics, trying to highlight the equality challenges orthopaedic surgery faces. Studies incorporating patients with comorbidities in which gender is a proven risk factor, and pregnant women were excluded.

RESULTS

This systematic review included 59 studies involving 692,435 people (mean females/males ratio: 4.44), spanning the years 1987-2023. Regarding the targeted population, 35 (59.32%) studies focused on patients, while 24 (40.68%) on physicians. Orthopaedic surgery is described as an unfriendly career field for women as surgeons or sports leading physicians while women are generally under represented in the academic field of orthopaedics. Regarding patients, female gender consists both a risk and prognostic factor influencing the prevalence of degenerative disease and the outcome of the operative treatment in reconstructive orthopaedics. Female gender is a risk factor for multiple sports injuries and influences the pathogenetic mechanisms resulting in ACL reconstruction. Regarding spine surgery, women are less likely to have surgery suggested, and such suggestion underlines severe disease's progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Gender differences affect orthopaedic patient-physician-healthcare system interactions. Recognizing biases and their patterns is useful to improve the actual situation. By preventing those an unbiased, tolerant, and egalitarian workplace for physicians and a healthcare system that provides the best treatment to patients could be created.

Workplace bullying and sexual harassment among general surgery residents in Colombia

INTRODUCTION

Workplace bullying and sexual harassment are concerns among general surgery residents in Colombia.

OBJETIVE

To explore the prevalence and impact of workplace bullying and sexual harassment incidents among general surgery residents in Colombia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This nationwide study was conducted in 2020. Residents selfrated their exposure to workplace bullying and to sexual harassment in the forms of gender harassment, unwanted sexual attention, and sexual coercion. We analyzed demographic variables, perpetrator’s characteristics, and differences between victims and non-victims.

RESULTS

The study included 302 residents. It found that 49% of general surgery residents in Colombia suffered from workplace bullying and 14.9% experienced sexual harassment. The main forms of sexual harassment were gender harassment (47%) and unwanted sexual attention (47%). Women reported significantly higher rates of being sexually harassed. Surgeons were the main perpetrators of sexual harassment.

CONCLUSIONS

Workplace bullying and sexual harassment are frequent events in general surgery residency in Colombia. These findings suggest the need for interventions to improve the educational culture of surgical departments and decrease the prevalence of these behaviors.