Caring for Children With Congenital Upper Extremity Differences

"As a parent, I want to do more for my child": A phenomenological approach to understanding the experiences of parents involved in surgical decision-making for children with congenital hand anomalies

BACKGROUND

A congenital anomaly of the hand can affect both function and appearance, and places a stressful psychological burden on the family, especially parents. Surgery during infancy may prevent later disabilities, but little is known of the importance of parents' involvement in these decisions in terms of psychological adjustment or treatment satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE

To understand parents' perceptions of involvement in their child's surgery for limb anomaly, and their preferences for the support of healthcare professionals. Results should lead to recommended interventions to improve familial adjustment to the child's condition.

METHODS

Qualitative data was collected from semi-structured confidential self-reported interviews of 35 parents (65.7 % mothers) of children who had received reconstructive surgery for congenital hand anomaly (at age 24.89 ± 9.26 months); interviews were coincident with the 1-month postoperative follow-up. The parents ranged in age, gender, educational background, economic status, and type of anomaly. Data analysis referenced Colaizzi's phenomenological approach.

RESULTS

The concerns of the parents were consolidated into three themes: attitudes toward Parental involvement in surgical decision-making; status of parental involvement in Surgical decision-making; and need for help and support.

CONCLUSION

Some parents were comfortable leaving surgical decisions entirely to the medical staff, but most preferred active participation and were disappointed at their lack of inclusion. The maximum benefit from surgery for congenital abnormalities in infancy is achieved when the parents and extended families have access to the expertise, skills, encouragement, and psychological support of healthcare providers.

Mental health and psychosocial support for children with upper limb musculoskeletal conditions

This study describes mental health and psychosocial screening processes, access to care and interventions provided to children with upper limb musculoskeletal conditions. A cross-sectional e-survey study was conducted of 107 healthcare professionals who work with children with congenital hand and upper limb differences and brachial plexus birth injuries. Of them, 41 (38%) reported that they routinely screen for mental health and psychosocial concerns. Few (12%) reported the use of standardized outcome measures. In total, 51 (48%) healthcare professionals reported that there was a waiting list for mental health services at their institution. Collectively, healthcare professionals were unsatisfied with the staffing, access to care and types of interventions available. Reported barriers to care included the growing need for mental health support, lack of resources and poor continuity of care after referrals. Future research should focus on identifying and validating a mental health screening tool and investigating the processes affecting access to mental health care.Level of evidence: IV.

Congenital Upper-Limb Differences: A 6-Year Literature Review

➤ The Oberg-Manske-Tonkin (OMT) classification of congenital hand and upper-limb anomalies continues to be refined as our understanding of the genetic and embryonic etiology of limb anomalies improves.➤ We have conducted an evaluation of graft and graftless techniques for syndactyly reconstruction; strengths and drawbacks exist for each technique.➤ Treatment for radial longitudinal deficiency remains controversial; however, radialization has shown promise in early follow-up for severe deformities.➤ Recent emphasis on psychosocial aspects of care has demonstrated that children with congenital upper-limb differences demonstrate good peer relationships and marked adaptability.

Introduction to Limb Deficiency for the Pediatrician

Owing to the lack of trained professionals in amputee care, the pediatrician is often required to assist in the care of children with limb deficiencies. An overview of the causes and epidemiology of limb deficiency is provided, as well as an evaluation and diagnostic workup. Important considerations for surgical interventions are discussed and an introduction to prosthetic prescribing and care of the amputee is described. Common overuse syndromes and mental health issues are also reviewed. Finally, resources for funding of prosthetic devices, as well as support and education for clinicians and families are provided.

Zurich Appearance Score for Hands: Development and Validation of an Instrument for Assessing Hand Appearance in Congenital Upper Limb Differences

PURPOSE

The appearance of the hand is relevant to individual activity and participation. Improving appearance is often one of the essential goals of hand surgery. The aim of this study was to describe and validate an instrument for quantitatively assessing hand appearance in congenital upper limb differences (CULD).

METHODS

The Zurich Appearance Score for Hands (ZASH) was developed as a summed score of 6 items: 1 for overall appearance and 5 specific items for the skin, proportions of the hand, the number of digits, the shape of fingers and the thumb, and the position of the thumb. Each item can be rated on an 11-point Likert scale. Here, 448 participants (age, 14-83 years) were asked to rate the images of 17 hands, including standardized 3-dimensional photorealistic computer graphics and photographs of children's hands with or without CULDs, some after surgical correction. The sociodemographic characteristics of the participants were measured using a short questionnaire.

RESULTS

The ZASH score for all CULDs was significantly lower than the ZASH score for normal hands. Correlations for overall appearance and the ZASH score were high (r = 0.77-0.87). The internal consistency of all ZASH scores was good to excellent (Cronbach α = 0.82-0.94). The test-retest reliability in a subgroup of 54 participants was good (r = 0.53-0.79). The interrater reliability of the ZASH score was moderate (intraclass correlation = 0.47).

CONCLUSIONS

The ZASH is a valid and moderately reliable instrument for assessing hand appearance in children with CULDs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Achieving the best possible appearance is the one of the most relevant goals of hand surgery. Assessment with validated instruments provides evidence on how to approach this goal. Further studies may clarify whether the ZASH can be recommended for all hand conditions and to what extent observers' sociocultural and professional backgrounds affect perception.