Intermediate-Term Outcome of 3-Dimensional Corrective Osteotomy for Malunited Distal Radius Fractures With a Mean Follow-Up of 6 Years

Functional outcome of 2-D- and 3-D-guided corrective forearm osteotomies: a systematic review

We performed a systematic review to compare conventional (2-D) versus 3-D-guided corrective osteotomies regarding intraoperative results, patient-reported outcome measures, range of motion, incidence of complications and pain score. PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched, and 53 articles were included, reporting 1257 patients undergoing forearm corrective osteotomies between 2010 and 2022. 3-D-guided surgery resulted in a greater improvement in median Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score (28, SD 7 vs. 35, SD 5) and fewer complications (12% vs. 6%). Pain scores and range of motion were similar between 3-D-guided and conventional surgery. 3-D-guided corrective osteotomy surgery appears to improve patient-reported outcomes and reduce complications compared to conventional methods. However, due to the limited number of comparative studies and the heterogeneity of the studies, a large randomized controlled trial is needed to draw definitive conclusions.Level of evidence: III.

Three-Dimensionally Planned and Printed Patient-Tailored Plates for Corrective Osteotomies of the Distal Radius and Forearm

PURPOSE

We evaluated the 1-year postoperative clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients who had a 3-dimensional planned corrective osteotomy of their distal radius, radial shaft, or ulnar shaft using a printed, anatomical, patient-tailored plate to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of this methodology.

METHODS

Simulations in computer-assisted preoperative planning of corrective osteotomies resulted in 3-dimensionally printed surgical guides, surgical models, and anatomically customized plates for application at the distal radius and forearm. Patients with malunions of the distal radius or forearm who underwent fixation with the custom-made plates were documented in our registry. Grip strength and range of motion assessments were made before surgery (baseline), as well as at 6 weeks and 3 and 12 months. Additionally, patients rated their wrist-related pain and disability using the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients underwent corrective surgery, and the 1-year follow-up data of 14 patients with a median age of 56 years (interquartile range, 24-64 years) were available for analysis. The median baseline Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score improved from 47 to 7 after 1 year. The flexion-extension arc of motion of the wrist increased from 90° at baseline to 130° at 1 year and the pronation-supination arc of motion of the wrist increased from 135° to 160° in the same time period. Differences in radiological measurements for palmar and radial inclinations, as well as for ulnar variance between the affected and contralateral wrists, were reduced with the osteotomy. In 1 case, the plate was removed 11 months after the osteotomy. No severe adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensionally planned and printed patient-tailored plates offer a reliable method for correcting even complex malunions of the distal radius and forearm.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Role of Three-Dimensional Guides in Management of Forearm and Wrist Malunions

Although its precise added value and cost-effectiveness need to be determined, three-dimensional (3D) planning and intraoperative guidance facilitate restoration of normal anatomy. The use of 3D computer planning and patient-specific intraoperative guides leads to more accurate and reproducible correction of forearm and wrist malunion. Its value augments with increasing complexity of deformities. Combined deformities and complex intra-articular malunions of the forearm and wrist benefit the most from the use of 3D techniques. New technical developments, including lower-dose scanning technology, software improvement, artificial intelligence, and in-hospital printing, may lower the associated costs and make its application more accessible.

3D-assisted corrective osteotomies of the distal radius: a comparison of pre-contoured conventional implants versus patient-specific implants

PURPOSE

There is a debate whether corrective osteotomies of the distal radius should be performed using a 3D work-up with pre-contoured conventional implants (i.e., of-the-shelf) or patient-specific implants (i.e., custom-made). This study aims to assess the postoperative accuracy of 3D-assisted correction osteotomy of the distal radius using either implant.

METHODS

Twenty corrective osteotomies of the distal radius were planned using 3D technologies and performed on Thiel embalmed human cadavers. Our workflow consisted of virtual surgical planning and 3D printed guides for osteotomy and repositioning. Subsequently, left radii were fixated with patient-specific implants, and right radii were fixated with pre-contoured conventional implants. The accuracy of the corrections was assessed through measurement of rotation, dorsal and radial angulation and translations with postoperative CT scans in comparison to their preoperative virtual plan.

RESULTS

Twenty corrective osteotomies were executed according to their plan. The median differences between the preoperative plan and postoperative results were 2.6° (IQR: 1.6-3.9°) for rotation, 1.4° (IQR: 0.6-2.9°) for dorsal angulation, 4.7° (IQR: 2.9-5.7°) for radial angulation, and 2.4 mm (IQR: 1.3-2.9 mm) for translation of the distal radius, thus sufficient for application in clinical practice. There was no significant difference in accuracy of correction when comparing pre-contoured conventional implants with patient-specific implants.

CONCLUSION

3D-assisted corrective osteotomy of the distal radius with either pre-contoured conventional implants or patient-specific implants results in accurate corrections. The choice of implant type should not solely depend on accuracy of the correction, but also be based on other considerations like the availability of resources and the preoperative assessment of implant fitting.

[Malunion of the distal radius: 3D planning and performance of intra- and extra-articular corrective osteotomy]

OBJECTIVE

Restoration of the original anatomy with reduction of both current symptoms and risk of posttraumatic osteoarthritis.

INDICATIONS

Symptomatic intra- or extra-articular malunion due to limitation of movement and/or painful function, intra-articular step of > 1 mm, instability of the distal radioulnar joint.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Minimal deformity. Pre-existing osteoarthritis Knirk and Jupiter II or higher. Simpler surgical alternative, e.g., ulna shortening osteotomy. Smoking or advanced age are not contraindications.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Preoperative assessment and performance of a bilateral computed tomography (CT). Three-dimensional (3D) malposition analysis and calculation of the correction. Planning of the corrective osteotomy on the 3D model and creation of patient-specific drilling and sawing guides. Performing the 3D-guided osteotomy.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Early functional unloaded mobilization with the splint for 8 weeks until consolidation control with CT.

RESULTS

Significant reduction of the step to < 1 mm (p ≤ 0.05) can be achieved with intra-articular corrections. In extra-articular corrective osteotomies, a mean residual rotational malalignment error of 2.0° (± 2.2°) and a translational malalignment error of 0.6 mm (± 0.2 mm) is achieved. Single-cut osteotomies in the shaft region can be performed to within a few degrees for rotation (e.g., pronation/supination 4.9°) and for translation (e.g., proximal/distal, 0.8 mm). After surgery, a mean residual 3D angle of 5.8° (SD 3.6°) was measured. Furthermore, surgical time for 3D-assisted surgery is significantly reduced compared to the conventional technique (140 ± 37 vs 108 ± 26 min; p < 0.05). Thus, the progression of osteoarthritis can be reduced in the medium term and improved mobility and grip strength are achieved. The clinical outcome parameters based on patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) scores are roughly comparable.