First Carpometacarpal Joint Denervation: A Systematic Review

Innervation of thumb carpometacarpal joint: implications for diagnostic block and denervation procedures

INTRODUCTION

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint is a common disorder that negatively impacts hand function. Denervation of the thumb CMC joint has emerged as a viable treatment option. However, the innervation pattern of the thumb CMC joint is controversial. Therefore, the objective of this study was to identify the articular branches supplying the thumb CMC joint and to document their relationship to anatomical landmarks to provide the foundation for image-guided diagnostic block and denervation procedures.

METHODS

In 10 formalin-embalmed upper limb specimens articular branches supplying the thumb CMC joint were dissected from their origin to termination. A frequency map documenting the number of articular branches was generated. The frequency map enabled visualization and comparison of the relative area of innervation of the thumb CMC joint by each articular branch.

RESULTS

The thumb CMC joint received innervation from six nerves. These were the deep branch of ulnar nerve (DBUN), dorsal articular nerve (DAN) of the first interosseus space, thenar branch of median nerve (TBMN), palmar cutaneous branch of median nerve (PCBMN), lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LACN) and superficial branch of the radial nerve (SBRN) and/or their branches. Each nerve was found to innervate different aspects of the joint. The DBUN and DAN were found to innervate the posteromedial aspect of the thumb CMC joint, the TBMN and PCBMN anterior/anteromedial aspects, LACN posterolateral/lateral/anterior aspects and SBRN posterolateral/anterolateral aspects.

CONCLUSIONS

The thumb CMC joint was innervated by articular branches originating from the SBRN, DAN, LACN, PCBMN, TBMN and DBUN. The documented anatomical relationships provide the foundation to inform selective diagnostic block and denervation of the thumb CMC joint. Further investigations are needed to assess the clinical implications of the current study.

Small Joint Denervation of the Hand and Thumb Base: History, Anatomy, Technique, and Outcomes

Painful arthritis of the small joints of the hand is a common condition affecting older adults, with distal interphalangeal joint and thumb carpometacarpal joint being the two most common locations. Younger adults may also develop painful arthritis after trauma and with inflammatory arthropathy. Traditional surgical approaches address the structure of the joints with either arthrodesis or arthroplasty with or without an implant. In recent decades, denervation has been reported as an alternative treatment for painful small joints that are mobile and stable. Publications on denervation often report faster surgery and recovery times than traditional surgeries that manipulate the small joint bony structures. This article reviews the history, anatomy, surgical techniques, and outcomes of denervation of the small joints of the hand.

A new magnetic internal distractor: cadaveric study of changes in trapeziometacarpal joint forces

Distraction is a new treatment for trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to test the efficiency of magnetic distraction using a new internal distractor in cadavers. The distractor consists of two magnets embedded inside titanium capsules that are implanted on either side of the trapeziometacarpal joint with the same poles facing each other, so that the force between the magnets distracts the joint. Intra-articular forces were recorded pre-implantation, immediately after implantation and again 10 minutes later. We also studied the changes in the forces before and after the procedure in different thumb positions. Our findings show that the trapeziometacarpal joint could be offloaded in all the studied trapeziometacarpal positions.

Effectiveness of Arthroscopic Debridement, Trapeziectomy, and Joint Replacement for Trapeziometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis: A Meta-Analysis of Pre and Postoperative Pain Scores

Trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis (TMJO) affects up to 33% of postmenopausal women, leading to pain, reduced mobility, and grip strength, with initial treatments focusing on non-surgical options like injections, orthoses, and exercises before considering surgery. A major challenge in managing TMJO involves selecting the optimal surgical strategy that is customized to individual clinical conditions. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of three common surgical interventions for TMJO in relieving pain, including arthroscopic debridement (AD), trapeziectomy (TRAP), and joint replacement (JR). PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and MEDLINE databases were queried according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for studies that presented pain outcomes following intervention for TMJO. Pain scores were reported preoperatively and postoperatively using the visual analog scale (VAS). Inclusion criteria included studies published in Q1 and Q2 journals and those with a follow-up of > six months. The final selection comprised 18 studies with 763 patients treated with AD (n = 102, 13%), TRAP (n = 428, 56%), and JR (n = 233, 31%) between 2010 and 2023, with a mean follow-up period of 38 ± 28 months. The studies included a total of 24 groups, five of which received AD, 13 of which received TRAP, and six of which received JR. The mean preoperative VAS was 6.7 ± 1.7, and the mean postoperative VAS was 1.7 ± 1.3 for all groups (P < 0.001). The meta-analysis demonstrated a mean preoperative pain score of 5.8 (95% CI, 4.1-7.5) for AD, 6.6 (95% CI, 5.7-7.5) for TRAP, and 7.8 (95% CI, 7.0-8.7) for JR. Postoperatively, there was a mean pain score of 2.2 (95% CI, 0.1-4.2) for AD, 1.4 (95% CI, 1.1-1.7) for TRAP, and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.6-1.2) for JR. This study showed that, if appropriately indicated, joint preservation with AD may be as effective as TRAP and JR for reducing pain associated with TMJO in the short term. However, the rate of conversion or revision should be assessed in future studies.

Hospital Admission Profile Due to Osteoarthritis: An Ecological Study

Background Osteoarthritis (OA) is also known as degenerative joint disease and is considered the major cause of joint pain and disability. Furthermore, OA is the most common, costly, and disabling form of joint diseases. The objective of this study is to explore the hospital admission profile due to OA between the period 1999 and 2019 in England and Wales. Method This is an ecological study that used health care data in the United Kingdom. Patients who were hospitalized for OA in England and Wales between 1999 and 2019 formed the study population. The Hospital Episode Statistics in England and the Patient Episode Database for Wales databases were used in this study. The difference in the admission rate during the study period was estimated using the chi-squared test. Results The admission rate during the study period increased by 112.1% for all hospital admission related to OA. The most common type of admission was related to gonarthrosis, which accounted for 46.7% of the total number of admissions for OA. The increase in admission rate across different types of admissions related to OA was not consistent. The highest increase in the admission rate was observed for polyarthrosis (604.6%). Admission rates related to OA were observed to be directly related to age. The highest increase in the admission rate during the study period was for the age group of 15-59 years (102.1%). Admission rate due to OA was higher among females compared to males. Conclusion The increase in admission rates for the various OA-related admissions was not consistent. This study found that the age range of 15 to 59 years experienced the greatest increase in admission rates. Female gender is a high risk factor for OA, especially in women around menopause.

A Prospective Clinical Trial Comparing Denervation With Suspension Arthroplasty for Treatment of Carpometacarpal Arthritis of the Thumb

PURPOSE

Trapeziectomy with suspensionplasty is the most popular treatment for thumb carpometacarpal arthritis. However, carpometacarpal denervation has recently shown promise as an alternative treatment option. This study was designed to compare functional outcomes, pain reduction, and quality of life between denervation and suspension arthroplasty in patients treated for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective clinical trial between June 2020 and December 2021. Preoperative and postoperative evaluations were conducted on patients, including the evaluation of functional outcomes via the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, pain with the visual analog score, quality of life with the EuroQol-5D, and the evaluation of time to return to function. Outcomes and complications were compared between patients undergoing denervation versus arthroplasty.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were included in the study, 34 of whom underwent denervation and 14 underwent suspension arthroplasty of the thumb carpometacarpal joint. Patients in the denervation group were younger, with an average age of 59 years compared with 67 years in the arthroplasty group. All other patient characteristics were similar. Pain reduction, functional outcomes, and quality of life scores showed equal improvement in both groups. Denervation patients had a reduced time to return to function (3.3 weeks vs 4.5 months in the arthroplasty group).

CONCLUSIONS

Carpometacarpal denervation appears to provide similar short-term outcomes as suspension arthroplasty for the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal arthritis. Treatment with denervation may offer a quicker return to function. The long-term outcomes of denervation remain unknown.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Denervation of the thumb carpometacarpal joint for symptomatic osteoarthritis in 46 patients

We investigated the effect of an extended denervation procedure in the thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint in patients suffering from CMC osteoarthritis. Between 2006 and 2018, 46 patients underwent the procedure in our clinic and were included in this retrospective study. Pain, strength, range of motion, DASH score, complications and overall satisfaction were determined. Assessment showed a significant decrease in pain and excellent physical function at a median 5 years' follow-up. Twelve patients needed secondary surgery due to persistent pain. Overall, 28 of the 46 patients were satisfied with the results of the denervation. Even though the results of CMC denervation are poorer than with simple trapeziectomy, considerable pain relief can be achieved in selected young, physically active patients by exclusively soft-tissue surgery, conserving the biomechanical properties of the joint. In case of failure of the procedure, all other options remain available.