Testing of Novel Total Elbow Prostheses Using Active Motion Experimental Setup

Static Stability of Elbow Interposition Arthroplasty Stabilized With Novel Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of interposition arthroplasty for treatment of elbow arthritis are highly dependent on elbow stability. The purpose of this study was to determine whether interposition arthroplasty with a novel bidirectional ligament reconstruction technique could adequately restore the static stability of the native elbow.

METHODS

Static varus and valgus elbow stability was tested in 7 cadaver elbows with intact ligaments and capsule at 5 flexion angles (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120°). At each angle, the distance between fixed reference points across the elbow was measured both medially and laterally. The elbows were then destabilized and an interposition arthroplasty with ligament reconstruction was performed. Static elbow stability was reassessed by comparing postoperative deflection measurements with those of the native state. Graft slippage or loosening was visually assessed following testing.

RESULTS

Interposition arthroplasty was performed in 7 cadaver specimens. Following ligament reconstruction, specimens reproduced the flexion angle-dependent static stability of native elbows to both varus and valgus stress. The greatest deflection changes between native elbows and elbows after interposition arthroplasty were 2.7% (P = .13) medially and 2.3% (P = .42) laterally, which were not significant. There was no loosening or slippage of either the interposition graft or the ligament reconstruction grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

Cadaveric elbow specimens underwent interposition arthroplasty with a novel technique for bidirectional ligament reconstruction. Static stability was maintained at varying degrees of elbow flexion, comparable to that of the native elbow. Interposition and ligament reconstruction grafts maintained secure fixation following static biomechanical testing.

Polyethylene wear testing of a nonmechanically linked total elbow replacement

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to perform a polyethylene wear test on a nonmechanically linked total elbow arthroplasty implant using a clinically relevant in-vitro elbow wear test methodology that simulated 10 years of use in the light to moderate activity of daily living range.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The test protocol applied an 80° arc of ulnohumeral motion beginning at 30° shy of full extension and progressing to 110° of flexion. Force was applied at 7° to recreate a valgus load on the elbow. A variable joint load profile at a frequency of 0.5 Hz was employed. The implants were tested for 5 million cycles (mc) in a bovine serum lubricant. Implant component failure was characterized and polyethylene wear was determined gravimetrically.

RESULTS

After 5 mc, the small polyethylene bushing wear rate was 0.56 mg/mc. The medium size wear rate was 0.28 mg/mc. Three large sizes were tested and the average wear rate was 0.39 ± 0.07 mg/mc. No implant failure was identified.

CONCLUSION

The test recreated an in vivo loading environment and measured polyethylene wear rates at specified cycle counts. The test demonstrated less wear than other joint replacements. Further clinical evaluation is necessary to determine if this translates into reduced complications of total elbow replacement associated with wear.

Active Motion Laboratory Test Apparatus for Evaluation of Total Elbow Prostheses

Purpose

The goal of this study was to develop a dynamic elbow testing apparatus that reproduces active joint motion at different shoulder positions to quantify the capabilities of total elbow arthroplasty designs.

Methods

We designed a testing apparatus to create active cyclic elbow joint motion in human cadaveric and sawbones composite upper extremities. Two pneumatic actuators recreated humerus-originating muscles while rubber bands simulated forearm muscle action. Arthroplasty durability was quantified through laxity assessment at predetermined cyclic loading intervals.

Results

Humeral forces were recorded in three specimens to generate active elbow motion at different degrees of shoulder abduction. The laxity in varus and valgus was measured as deflection between two fixed markers.

Conclusions

In vitro simulation of elbow biomechanics through active cyclic elbow motion at different degrees of shoulder abduction may characterize in vivo performance of total elbow arthroplasty.

Clinical relevance

Quantifying total elbow arthroplasty stability after cyclic loading in different shoulder positions may assist preclinical evaluation of arthroplasty designs.

Static stability of novel uncemented elbow hemiarthroplasty stabilized with ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to create a model to simulate treatment of unreconstructable distal humerus fractures with hemiarthroplasty. Stability was restored with a latest plate-system that simultaneously tensions medial and lateral collateral ligament grafts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Static varus and valgus elbow stability was tested in 11 cadaver elbows with intact ligaments and capsule at 5 flexion angles (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, 120°). The elbows were then destabilized via release of all ligaments and capsular attachments. The distal humerus articular cartilage was excised and replaced with an uncemented hemiarthroplasty. Ligament reconstruction was subsequently performed, and elbow stability was measured and compared to the native state. Dimensions of the hemiarthroplasty component were compared to native elbow dimensions to assess and quantify any existing relationship to elbow stability.

RESULTS

A hemiarthroplasty was implanted in all specimens. A size mismatch occurred between the distal humerus trochlea and the olecranon fossa in all specimens and averaged 6.3 mm. Following ligament reconstruction, specimens reproduced the flexion angle-dependent stability of native elbows to both varus and valgus stress. On the medial side, elbow joint stability in mid-flexion was approximately 7% tighter after hemiarthroplasty. Laterally, the elbow was approximately 15% tighter after hemiarthroplasty and demonstrated peak stability in full flexion. The 3 assessed hemiarthroplasty components and bony dimensions did not exhibit any relationship between implant-bone mismatch and elbow stability after ligamentous reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

Cadaveric elbow specimens underwent uncemented hemiarthroplasty with soft tissue stabilization with a novel technique for ligament reconstruction. Following hemiarthroplasty and ligament reconstruction, these specimens maintained secure fixation between ligament and bone. Static stability was maintained at varying degrees of elbow flexion regardless of variable mismatch between the hemiarthroplasty component and the native olecranon fossa.