Outcomes of Arthroscopic-Assisted Distal Radius Fracture Volar Plating: A Meta-Analysis

Examining the role of ChatGPT in the management of distal radius fractures: insights into its accuracy and consistency

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of distal radius fractures remains a challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. The emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Large Language Models (LLMs), especially ChatGPT, affords significant potential in improving healthcare and research. This study aims to assess the accuracy and consistency of ChatGPT's knowledge in managing distal radius fractures, with a focus on its capability to provide information for patients and assist in the decision-making processes of orthopaedic clinicians.

METHODS

We presented ChatGPT with seven questions on distal radius fracture management over two sessions, resulting in 14 responses. These questions covered a range of topics, including patient inquiries and orthopaedic clinical decision-making. We requested references for each response and involved two orthopaedic registrars and two senior orthopaedic surgeons to evaluate response accuracy and consistency.

RESULTS

All 14 responses contained a mix of both correct and incorrect information. Among the 47 cited references, 13% were accurate, 28% appeared to be fabricated, 57% were incorrect, and 2% were correct but deemed inappropriate. Consistency was observed in 71% of the responses.

CONCLUSION

ChatGPT demonstrates significant limitations in accuracy and consistency when providing information on distal radius fractures. In its current format, it offers limited utility for patient education and clinical decision-making.

Technique for Minimally Invasive, Arthroscopic-assisted Distal Radius Fracture Fixation

Distal radius fractures are common injuries that often require surgical intervention. Commonly, these fractures are fixed using open reduction internal fixation with plating and screws. This often requires a more extensive soft tissue dissection and exposure. In contrast for certain cases, percutaneous headless compression screws may be appropriate. We present a technique for minimally invasive arthroscopic-assisted reduction and percutaneous screw fixation with an extremity traction device. A case is provided to demonstrate the technique as a viable option for the treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures.

Volar Intra-articular Extended Window Approach for Intra-articular Distal Radius Fractures

Distal radius fractures are one of the most common injuries seen globally with increasing use of use of volar plating for surgical treatment. Although it is common to directly visualize the articular surface for most other periarticular fractures, during volar plating of the distal radius the joint is typically not visualized. This is due to concern for carpal instability from disruption of the volar carpal ligaments. When direct visualization of the articular surface is deemed necessary, either to reduce articular fragments or to confirm the quality of reduction, current options include a separate dorsal arthrotomy or arthroscopic assistance. However, biomechanical evidence supports safely performing a volar capsulotomy to visualize the articular surface. We describe the Volar Intra-Articular Extended Window approach, which allows direct visualization of the articular surface through the volar approach to treat distal radius fractures.

Adjuvant Arthroscopy Does Not Improve the Functional Outcome of Volar Locking Plate for Distal Radius Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of adding arthroscopy to osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures (DRF) with volar locking plate (VLP), by Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) 1 year after surgery.

METHODS

In total, 186 functionally independent adult patients who met the inclusion criteria (DRF and a clinical decision for surgery with a VLP) were randomized to arthroscopic assistance or not. Primary outcome was PRWE questionnaire results 1 year after surgery. For the main variable, PRWE, we obtained the minimal clinically important difference based on a distribution-based method. Secondary outcomes included Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaires, range of motion, strength, radiographic measures, and presence of joint step-offs by computed tomography. Data were collected preoperatively and at +1 and +4 weeks, +3 and +6 months, and +1 year after surgery. Complications were recorded throughout the study.

RESULTS

In total, 180 patients (mean age: 59.0 ± 14.9 years; 76% women) were analyzed by modified intention to treat. A total of 82% of the fractures were intra-articular (AO type C). No significant difference between arthroscopic (AG) and control (CG) groups in median PRWE was found at +1 year (median AG: 5.0, median CG: 7.5, difference in medians 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.0, 7.0, P = .328). The proportion of patients who exceeded the minimal clinically important difference of 12.81 points in the AG and CG was 86.4% vs 85.1%, P = .819, respectively. Percentage of associated injuries and step-offs reduction maneuvers was greater with arthroscopy (mean differences: 17.1 95% CI -0.1, 26.1, P < .001) and 17.4 (95% CI 5.0, 29.7, P = .007). The difference in percentage of residual joint step-offs at the postsurgical computed tomography in radioulnar, radioscaphoid, and radiolunate joints was not significant (P = .990, P = .538, and P = .063). Complications were similar between groups (16.9% vs 20.9%, P = .842).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant arthroscopy did not significantly improve PRWE score +1 year after surgery for DRF with VLP, although the statistical power of the study is below the initially estimated to detect the expected difference.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, randomized controlled trial.

Arthroscopic Assistance in Surgical Management of Distal Radius Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background  Wrist arthroscopy has become a commonly used tool for the management of adults with distal radius fractures (DRFs), although its implementation requires technical competence. This systematic review and meta-analysis appraised the available evidence concerning the contribution of wrist arthroscopy to the functional and radiological outcomes of patients with DRFs operated with arthroscopic assistance. Methods  Randomized control trials were identified through five principal electronic databases on May 31, 2022: Web of Science, Scopus, EBSCO, Embase, and PubMed. Two authors independently performed the search and data extraction and assessed risk of bias (RoB) using the Cochrane RoB tool. Results  A total of 1,780 relevant abstracts and citations were extracted in the preliminary search, which yielded 6 trials that met the eligibility criteria, and 3 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. The overall pooled mean difference (MD) estimate showed no significant difference in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores between surgical groups with and without arthroscopic assistance (MD = 0.77 points, 95% confidence interval = -6.58 to 5.03, p  = 0.79), with substantial heterogeneity (I 2  = 85%). Conclusion  There was low-quality evidence that wrist arthroscopy conveyed not clinically or statistically significant difference to functional outcomes of patients with DRFs. However, our findings are limited by the numbers of studies included and lack of long-term follow-up, although they do provide a good starting point for future quality research.

Editorial Commentary: Supplemental Wrist Arthroscopy May Not Be the Key to Improving Outcomes in Surgical Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures

For decades, the surgical treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures has relied on indirect reduction. The goal is to mitigate the articular stepoff that has been associated with radiographic progression of arthritic changes. Continued advances in wrist arthroscopy give us the opportunity for direct visualization of these reductions, direct assessment of intra-articular screws, and diagnosis and treatment of concomitant soft tissue pathology, including those to the scapholunate interosseous ligament, lunotriquetral interosseous ligament, and the triangular fibrocartilage complex. Despite this, however, supplemental wrist arthroscopy does not appear to improve outcomes at 1 year in patients with distal radius fractures treated with volar locking plates.

Enhanced Approaches to the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures

Distal radius fractures are among the most common fractures treated by orthopedic surgeons. Various classification systems have been described which can help in deciding the approach for fixation. In some cases, a computed tomography scan can provide better understanding of the fracture fragments and displacement for surgical planning. Plating through the volar approach is the most common approach for fractures meeting operative criteria. Several additional approaches can be used for specific fracture patterns. These approaches can be used in isolation or in conjunction with other approaches to aid in visualization and fixation.

Arthroscopic-Assisted Fracture Treatment in the Wrist

Wrist arthroscopy in the setting of wrist fracture affords direct visualization of reduction and identification of associated cartilage and soft tissue injuries. Further, mitigating soft tissue insult in the setting of perilunate injuries may decrease postoperative pain and stiffness while attaining outcomes equivalent to open techniques in appropriately selected patients. Technical proficiency of the surgeon continues to be a limitation of the technique. Randomized controlled studies are needed to better understand outcomes.

Periarticular distal radius fractures and complex ligamentous injury: The role of arthroscopic evaluation

Purpose

Distal radius fractures are associated with a high incidence of concomitant soft tissue injuries, including lesions of the triangular fibrocartilage complex and intercarpal ligaments. While advanced imaging has allowed for greater identification of such tears, discerning which lesions pose a functional consequence remains a challenge for the hand surgeon. A review and guideline for arthroscopic evaluation of suspected combined injuries is presented.

Results

Arthroscopic evaluation of distal radius fractures provides several unique advantages in such instances. Articular reduction can be performed via direct visualization with improvement in step-off and gapping. Furthermore, ligamentous injuries and carpal alignment can be directly assessed and treated.

Conclusions

Subtle features of combined ligamentous trauma may be overlooked in the presence of more obvious fracture patterns. Wrist arthroscopy allows not only for a gold-standard method of evaluating of these soft tissue injuries, but also a means of treatment.