Passive Mobilization With Place and Hold Versus Active Motion Therapy After Flexor Tendon Repair: A Randomized Trial

Flexor Tendon Zone II Repair

Background

Flexor-tendon injury is a historically challenging problem for orthopaedic surgeons. Much research has been dedicated to finding solutions that offer balance in terms of the strength and ease of the repair versus the rate of complications such as adhesions. The number of core sutures, distance from the tendon edge, and use of an epitendinous stitch have been shown to affect repair strength1-4. A number of configurations have been described for the placement of the suture; however, none has been identified as a clear gold standard5. This article will highlight the preferred tendon repair technique of the senior author (R.J.S.), the Strickland repair with a simple running epitendinous stitch. Relevant anatomy, indications, operative technique, and postoperative management will be discussed.

Description

The flexor tendon is typically accessed via extension of the laceration that caused the initial injury. After the neurovascular structures and pulleys are assessed, the tendon is cleaned and prepared for repair. A 3-0 braided nylon suture is utilized for the 4-core strand repair and placed in the Strickland fashion. A 5-0 polypropylene suture is then utilized for the simple running epitendinous stitch.

Alternatives

Multiple alternative techniques have been described. These vary in the number of core strands, the repair configuration, the suture caliber, and the use of an epitendinous or other suture. Nonoperative treatment is typically reserved for partial flexor-tendon laceration, as complete tendon discontinuity will not heal and requires surgical intervention.

Rationale

The 4-core strand configuration has been well established to increase the strength of the repair as compared with 2-core strand configurations, while also being easier to accomplish and with less suture burden than other techniques1. The presently described technique has excellent repair strength and can allow for early active range of motion, which is critical to reduce the risk of postoperative adhesions and stiffness.

Expected Outcomes

Excellent outcomes have been demonstrated for primary flexor-tendon repair if performed soon after the injury1,2,6,7. Delayed repair may lead to adhesions and poor tendon healing8. Early postoperative rehabilitation is vital for success9. There are advocates for either active or passive protocols10-12. The protocol at our institution is to begin early active place-and-hold therapy at 3 to 5 days postoperatively, which has been shown in the literature to provide improved finger motion as compared with passive-motion therapy13-16.Important Tips:: The proximal end of the tendon may need to be retrieved via a separate incision if it is not accessible through the flexor-tendon sheath.The proximal end of the tendon may be held in place with a 25-gauge needle in order to best place sutures into both ends of the tendon.The epitendinous suture is run around the back wall before the core sutures are tied down, in order to prevent the tendon and repair from bunching up and becoming overly bulky.The entire A4 pulley and the distal A2 pulley can be divided for exposure if necessary.Up to 2 cm of the flexor-tendon sheath can be divided.If there are concomitant digital nerve injuries, repair these after the tendon, in order to avoid damaging the more delicate nerve repair while manipulating the tendon for repair.The most common major complications following tendon repair are formation of adhesions and rerupture. Acronyms and Abbreviations:: FDS = flexor digitorum superficialisFDP = flexor digitorum profundusMCP = metacarpophalangealPIP = proximal interphalangealDIP = distal interphalangeal.

Safety and efficacy of ultrasonography of tension after zone II flexor tendon repair: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Primary flexor tendon repairs of lacerations in zone II of the hand are fraught with problems. Traditionally, exercise (active and passive), orthoses, and physical agents are common interventions for the rehabilitation of patients experiencing these issues. One area of focus in this field is how to safely utilize tension to lengthen gliding distance following zone II injury. Finding effective solutions in this area is a key priority for improving patient outcomes and quality of life.

PURPOSE

To identify the optimal immobilization position that meets safety standards for tension and is the most efficient, and consequently, to validate our clinical effectiveness.

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional study was adopted for the first part of the research (Research 1). A prospective, parallel, 2-group, randomized trial was conducted with concealed allocation and single blinding in the second part of the research (Research 2).

METHODS

A total of 60 healthy adults were recruited to select the best-fit protective immobilization position in Research 1, which was confirmed by tendon tension (via Young's modulus) and excursion (via gliding distance). We then randomly assigned 45 patients after zone II flexor tendon repair into two groups in Research 2 to compare functional outcomes. The control group underwent the conventional modified Duran protocol with early passive motion, while the experimental group received the protocol (optimized by Research 1) with early active motion. Ultrasonography was used to measure the tension and excursion of the flexor tendons. The outcomes measured at 16 weeks post-repair included total active motion, strength, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, and Strickland scores.

RESULTS

Three participants were unable to participate in Research 2 due to medical issues and poor attendance. The investigation found that the safe tendon threshold was 345.09 ± 87.74 kPa for partial active digital motion among the 60 participants. The optimal immobilization position requires the wrist to be neutral with a flexion angle of 30° at the metacarpophalangeal joint. The grip strengths (p = 0.012), ratio of grip strength (p = 0.015), the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (p = 0.036), and total active motion (p = 0.023) differed significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Protective immobilization of the wrist in a neutral flexion position and with the metacarpophalangeal joint flexed at 30° can secure the repaired flexor tendon safely and efficiently. The effects of an early active motion ‎protocol may improve the grip strength and upper limb mobility of individuals after zone II flexor tendon repair.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2000030592.

Rehabilitation following flexor tendon injury in Zone 2: a randomized controlled study

The aim of this study was to compare an early active motion (EAM) regimen to a modified Kleinert passive motion therapy in Zone 2 flexor tendon injuries with regards to range of motion (ROM), grip strength and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Seventy-two patients were included. At 3 months postoperatively, we found no difference in total active motion (TAM) between the EAM and the Kleinert groups (median 195.5°, range 115°-273° versus median 191.5°, range 113°-260°), but a significantly better grip strength (median 76%, range 44%-99% versus median 54%, range 19%-101%; p < 0.0005) in the EAM group. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score as well as patient-reported weakness, cold intolerance and problems in daily activities also favoured the EAM group. At 12 months postoperatively, there was no difference in TAM, grip strength or any of the PROMs used. We conclude that EAM leads to a quicker recovery in terms of grip strength and PROMs, but that both regimens lead to similar results at 12 months.Level of evidence: I.

Flexor Tendon Repair: Avoidance and Management of Complications

The proper technique for flexor tendon repair has been well established through numerous bench science and clinical studies. However, less is known about strategies to avoid and manage postoperative complications. This article discusses the common complications after flexor tendon repair, such as repair site rupture and adhesion formation. This article also addresses strategies to prevent and manage these complications. The foundation for preventing many of these complications is ensuring a strong repair without gapping at time zero, which will enable the accrual of tensile strength through early initiation of motion.