Cost Assessment of Plating Versus Tension Band Wiring Constructs for Treating Mayo Type 2A Olecranon Fractures

Fixation of Olecranon Fractures Using a Hybrid Intramedullary Screw and Tension Band Construct

Introduction

Olecranon fractures are common injuries that require surgical intervention for optimal outcomes. Various fixation methods have been described in the literature, including the use of intramedullary proximal ulna screws in combination with tension band augmentation. Limited research has compared this hybrid technique to other established methods of fixation. This study compared complication and reoperation rates between multiple groups.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted on patients with olecranon fractures who underwent internal fixation at a level 1 trauma center between January 1st, 2013, and April 22nd, 2023. Data was collected using CPT codes, and patients were categorized into five groups based on the method of fixation received: no implant, tension band only, locking olecranon plate, intramedullary screw and tension band hybrid, and others. Variables such as patient demographics, Mayo fracture classification, open vs. closed injury, implant type, reoperation rates, and postoperative complications were recorded.

Results

A total of 217 patients were included in the study. No difference was found with implant choice and reoperation rate (p = 0.461). There was a significant difference found with reoperation and fracture type (p = 0.027) and open fracture (p = 0.002).

Conclusion

The primary findings of this study indicate no significant difference in implant choice and reoperation rates among the various fixation methods used for olecranon fractures. These findings suggest that the hybrid fixation technique, utilizing intramedullary proximal ulna screws in combination with tension band augmentation, is a viable and comparable treatment option when evaluated against other well-documented methods of fixation. This study also reiterates that severity of initial injury is often the most important factor related to poorer outcomes. Further discussion and analysis of the data will provide a comprehensive understanding of implications and recommendations for olecranon fracture fixation.

Factors Associated With 30-Day Morbidity and Mortality Following the Surgical Treatment of Olecranon Fractures

The objective of this study was to identify factors independently associated with complications, hospital readmission, reoperation, and death in the 30-day period after surgical treatment of isolated olecranon fractures. A retrospective case-control study was performed using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database by querying the Current Procedural Terminology code for patients who underwent surgical treatment of isolated olecranon fractures from 2011 to 2020. A total of 4404 patients were included. The main study outcomes were 30-day medical or wound complications, hospital readmission, reoperation, and death. A bivariate screen was performed for explanatory variables associated with our outcome variables, and variables with P<.1 in the bivariate screen were included in multivariable regression models. Of the 4404 patients in our cohort, 29 patients (0.7%) developed medical or wound complications, 157 patients (3.6%) were readmitted, 123 patients (2.8%) underwent reoperation, and 12 patients (0.3%) died during the 30-day postoperative period. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that older age, smoking, bleeding disorders, and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification were associated with readmission; that older age, bleeding disorders, and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification were associated with reoperation; and that bleeding disorders were associated with mortality. No identifiable factors were independently associated with medical or wound complications. In this National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database study of olecranon fractures treated surgically during a recent 10-year period, we identified demographic and comorbid factors independently associated with 30-day postoperative readmission, reoperation, and mortality. Our findings are relevant for preoperative risk stratification and counseling. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(5):e310-e316.].

Olecranon Fractures: A Critical Analysis Review

»

Olecranon fractures account for 10% of all elbow fractures and are more likely to result from a low-energy injury. A displaced fracture with a stable ulnohumeral joint (Mayo type 2) is the most common type of injury.

»

The management of an isolated olecranon fracture is based on patient factors (age, functional demand, and if medically fit to undergo surgery) and fracture characteristics including displacement, fragmentation, and elbow stability.

»

Nonoperative management can be successfully used in undisplaced fractures (Mayo type 1) and in displaced fractures (Mayo type 2) in frail patients with lower functional demands.

»

Patients with displaced olecranon fractures with a stable ulnohumeral joint without significant articular surface fragmentation (Mayo type 2A) can be managed with tension band wiring, plate osteosynthesis (PO), intramedullary fixation, or suture repair.

»

PO is advocated for multifragmentary fractures and fractures that are associated with ulnohumeral instability. It is essential to consider the variable anatomy of the proximal ulna during surgery.