A Comparison Between Robotic-Assisted Scaphoid Screw Fixation and a Freehand Technique for Acute Scaphoid Fracture: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Surgical Treatment of Scaphoid Fractures: Recommendations for Management

Background: Several operative treatments exist for scaphoid fractures, varying by approach (e.g., ercutaneous, volar, or dorsal), implant type (e.g., screw or Kirschner wire), and bone raft choice (e.g., none, nonvascularized, or vascularized). Many previous systematic eviews and meta-analyses have investigated outcomes following different surgicalÚpproaches, the use of vascularized versus nonvascularized bone graft for scaphoidßracture nonunions, and treatment for specific fracture patterns. However, given the advancements n scaphoid fracture treatment in recent years, there is a need for updated treatment recommendations hat would be beneficial to hand surgeons. Purpose: We present a comprehensive review of the operative treatment of scaphoid fractures based on recent literature and propose a unified treatment algorithm for managing these fractures. Methods: The English-language literature was searched from 2002 to 2023 for high evidence level (e.g., randomized trials), review, and meta-analysis articles with the following search terms: "scaphoid, "u8220"scaphoid" AND "nonunion, " and "scaphoid" AND "malunion. " Each article was creened by the authors to determine the scaphoid fracture scenario addressed and ubsequent treatment recommendations. The findings from article reviews were then rganized by scaphoid fracture types in this manuscript. Results: A total of 95 pertinent articles were ultimately selected and used as the basis for reviewing different scaphoid fracture scenarios. A treatment algorithm was then proposed based on literature review. Conclusion: This summary of the recent literature can guide hand surgeons in addressing scaphoidßractures. Future research in scaphoid fracture treatment, particularly for nonunions, would be most beneficial n the form of systematic review, meta-analysis, or multicenter prospective randomized clinical trials. Level of Evidence: IV.

A comparative cadaveric study for percutaneous scaphoid fixation: robotic vs freehand

PURPOSES

To compare the robotic-assisted and the traditional freehand percutaneous scaphoid fixation in number of guidewire attempts, duration of fluoroscopy time, amount of radiation dose, and screw centrality.

METHODS

Twenty cadaveric specimens were randomized into either the robotic or freehand group. The scaphoids in both groups were fixed by either the same attending or resident from our hand surgery department. The operation duration, amount of radiation from intraoperative fluoroscopy, total fluoroscopy time, and the number of guidewire attempts were documented and compared. Postoperatively, all the specimens had a computed tomography (CT) scan performed, and the difference in the final position of the screw and the central axis of the scaphoid was examined.

RESULTS

In the robotic group, all the guide wires were satisfactorily positioned within a single attempt, while the median number of attempts in the traditional freehand group was 18 (quaternion 14-65). This also meant that the surgeon in the robotic group experienced significantly lower radiation exposure dose and time as compared to the freehand group. There were no significant differences in the final screw position as compared to the central axis of the scaphoid in both groups. Although there was no difference in surgeon performance in the robotic group, the operative time for the attending was significantly lower as compared to the resident in the freehand group.

CONCLUSION

Robotic-assisted surgery for scaphoid fracture fixation is superior to the traditional freehand method as it facilitates accurate screw placement with lower radiation exposure and fewer guide wire attempts.

Arthroscopic Bone Grafting and Robot-assisted Fixation for Scaphoid Nonunion

OBJECTIVES

Scaphoid nonunion remains a challenging problem to manage with no general consensus on its treatment recommendations. We propose a novel minimally invasive (MIS) technique of arthroscopic bone grafting (ABG) with robot-assisted fixation for the treatment of scaphoid nonunions.

METHODS

Patients with radiographically proven scaphoid nonunion treated by this novel surgical technique were included. Following arthroscopic debridement and iliac crest bone grafting, the scaphoid was fixed percutaneously using either multiple Kirschner (K)-wires or a headless compression screw using a robotic navigation system.

RESULTS

Six male patients with an average age of 29.2 years were enrolled. Four patients had scaphoid waist fractures, and the other two were proximal pole fractures. During wrist arthroscopy, punctate bleeding of the proximal scaphoid fragment was observed in four out of the six patients. Half of the patients were fixed using a headless compression screw and the other half using multiple K-wires. All the guidewires were placed with a single-attempt using the robotic navigation system. Postoperatively, all the scaphoid fractures had complete radiographic union by 16 weeks. At a mean follow-up of 18.3 months, there were significant improvements in wrist range of motion, grip strength, and patient-rated outcomes. No intraoperative or early postoperative complications were encountered in any of our patients.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic bone grafting with robot-assisted fixation is a feasible and promising therapeutic option for scaphoid nonunions, regardless of the vascularity of the proximal pole fragment. This novel technique allows for anatomic restoration of the scaphoid alignment and accurate, targeted placement of implants into the scaphoid nonunion site within a single-attempt using a robotic navigation system.

[Scaphoid fractures : Current diagnostic and treatment concepts]

Scaphoid fractures are by far the most frequent fractures of the carpal bones of the hand and often lead to problematic healing processes if the diagnostics and treatment are inadequate. The main complication of a scaphoid fracture is pseudarthrosis, which leads to carpal collapse and degenerative arthritis of the wrist if left untreated. Early diagnosis and individualized differentiated treatment aim to achieve bony healing with restoration of the scaphoid shape and preservation of the function of the wrist. The anatomical and biomechanical characteristics of the scaphoid can impede bony healing after a fracture and, in contrast to the diagnostics and treatment, cannot be influenced. A history of trauma and typical clinical signs of a scaphoid fracture should lead to systematic imaging diagnostics with obligatory computed tomography. Only by determining the exact fracture morphology can an appropriate treatment concept be established. Conservative treatment should be restricted to stable fractures without relevant displacement. Fractures of the proximal scaphoid pole are considered unstable even if they are not displaced. Operative treatment is indicated for all unstable fractures. The favored surgical procedure is osteosynthesis with a cannulated double-threaded screw, which can be used in a retrograde or antegrade manner and in a minimally invasive or open technique, depending on the fracture type. Surgical treatment results in earlier bony healing and quicker restoration of function but can be associated with a higher complication rate. Posttraumatic osteoarthritis after healing in malalignment is usually asymptomatic.