1
|
Humble KA, Vatsia SK, Monahan PF, Taylor KF. Cannabis-Related Disorders Are Associated with Increased Early Postoperative Opioid Prescriptions and Delayed Emergency Department Visits Following Open Carpal Tunnel Release. Hand (N Y) 2024:15589447241284788. [PMID: 39431650 PMCID: PMC11559794 DOI: 10.1177/15589447241284788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of cannabis on pain management following open carpal tunnel release (CTR) surgery is unknown. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes for patients with cannabis-related disorder (CRD) undergoing open CTR to a propensity-matched cohort of patients without CRD (no cannabis-related disorder [NCRD]). METHODS The TriNetX Research Network was queried to identify patients undergoing primary open CTR between January 2010 and December 2022. Patients with CRD were propensity matched to a NCRD cohort in a 1:1 ratio based on 7 characteristics. Rates of postoperative opioid prescriptions, emergency department (ED) services, and outpatient appointments were reported at 0-2, 2-6, and 6-12 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS A total of 925 CRD patients were propensity matched to 925 NCRD patients undergoing open CTR. Within 0-2 weeks postoperatively, CRD patients received significantly greater rates of opioid prescriptions compared to NCRD patients (30.9% and 25.6%, P = .011). No cannabis-related disorder (NCRD) patients presented for outpatient follow-up at significantly higher rates than CRD patients within 6 weeks postoperatively. CRD patients presented to the ED at significantly higher rates between 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively (11.0% vs. 8.0%, respectively, P = .027). CONCLUSIONS Cannabis-related disorder (CRD) is associated with lower rates of outpatient follow-up but higher rates of postoperative opioid prescriptions and ED presentations following open CTR compared to a propensity-matched cohort of NCRD patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Cohort Study; Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirstin A. Humble
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Sohrab K. Vatsia
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | | | - Kenneth F. Taylor
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Maskal S, Foreman JM, Ellis RC, Phillips S, Messer N, Melland-Smith M, Beffa LRA, Petro CC, Prabhu AS, Rosen MJ, Miller BT. Cannabis smoking and abdominal wall reconstruction outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis. Hernia 2024; 28:847-855. [PMID: 38386125 PMCID: PMC11249614 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-02976-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite increasing use of cannabis, literature on perioperative effects is lagging. We compared active cannabis-smokers versus non-smokers and postoperative wound morbidity and reoperations following open abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). METHODS Patients who underwent open, clean, AWR with transversus abdominis release and retromuscular synthetic mesh placement at our institution between January 2014 and May 2022 were identified using the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database. Active cannabis-smokers were 1:3 propensity matched to non-smokers based on demographics and comorbidities. Wound complications, 30 day morbidity, pain (PROMIS 3a-Pain Intensity), and hernia-specific quality of life (HerQles) were compared. RESULTS Seventy-two cannabis-smokers were matched to 216 non-smokers. SSO (18% vs 17% p = 0.86), SSI (11.1% vs 9.3%, p = 0.65), SSOPI (12% vs 12%, p = 0.92), and all postoperative complications (46% vs 43%, p = 0.63) were similar between cannabis-smokers and non-smokers. Reoperations were more common in the cannabis-smoker group (8.3% vs 2.8%, p = 0.041), driven by major wound complications (6.9% vs 3.2%, p = 0.004). No mesh excisions occurred. HerQles scores were similar at baseline (22 [11, 41] vs 35 [14, 55], p = 0.06), and were worse for cannabis-smokers compared to non-smokers at 30 days (30 [12, 50] vs 38 [20, 67], p = 0.032), but not significantly different at 1 year postoperatively (72 [53, 90] vs 78 [57, 92], p = 0.39). Pain scores were worse for cannabis-smokers compared to non-smokers at 30 days postoperatively (52 [46, 58] vs 49 [44, 54], p = 0.01), but there were no differences at 6 months or 1 year postoperatively (p > 0.05 for all). CONCLUSION Cannabis smokers will likely experience similar complication rates after clean, open AWR, but should be counseled that despite similar wound complication rates, the severity of their wound complications may be greater than non-smokers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Maskal
- General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 E 100th St, Desk A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
| | - J M Foreman
- General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 E 100th St, Desk A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - R C Ellis
- General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 E 100th St, Desk A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - S Phillips
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - N Messer
- General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 E 100th St, Desk A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - M Melland-Smith
- General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 E 100th St, Desk A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - L R A Beffa
- General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 E 100th St, Desk A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - C C Petro
- General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 E 100th St, Desk A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - A S Prabhu
- General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 E 100th St, Desk A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - M J Rosen
- General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 E 100th St, Desk A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - B T Miller
- General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 E 100th St, Desk A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chung J, Mahmoud Y, Ramtin S, Uhler G, Ilyas AM, Greis A. Understanding the Orthopedic Conditions for Which Patients Are Seeking Medical Cannabis Certification. Cureus 2024; 16:e52829. [PMID: 38406133 PMCID: PMC10884623 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.52829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Amid the ongoing national crisis of opioid misuse in the United States, medical cannabis (MC) has emerged as a potential alternative for chronic pain conditions. This study was performed to understand which orthopedic conditions patients are seeking MC certification for. METHODS This prospective study was conducted at the Department of Medical Cannabis, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA. It included consecutive patients with chronic musculoskeletal noncancer pain who were certified for MC, following the Pennsylvania state certification process. Data collected included demographic data, diagnoses, anatomic site of pain, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) global health scale. The outcome measures from the PROMIS global health scale were used to generate Global Physical Health (GPH) quality of life (QoL) T scores and Global Mental Health (GMH) QoL T scores. RESULTS A total of 78 patients were available for analysis following initial MC certification, with 50 (64%) being female and 28 (36%) male. The average age was 63 years with 60% of patients in the 65+ age group. Ethnically, 73 (92%) identified as White, and 70 (90%) were not of Hispanic or Latino origin. The most common reason for seeking MC certification was low back pain (56%), followed by neck pain (21%) and then extremity complaints. The mean GPH QoL T score was 43.71 with a standard deviation of ± 9.86 (p-value = 0.001), while the mean GMH QoL T score was 46.85 with a standard deviation of 8.28 (p-value = 0.0015). CONCLUSION MC cannabis certification was more often sought by women than men and most common for spinal complaints, specifically lower back followed by cervical spine concerns.. This cohort of patients had lower GPH QoL and GMH QoL T scores compared the US general population, representing a significant reduction in the overall physical and mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliet Chung
- Orthopaedic Surgery, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, USA
- Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute Foundation for Opioid Research & Education, Rothman Opioid Foundation, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Yusuf Mahmoud
- Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute Foundation for Opioid Research & Education, Rothman Opioid Foundation, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Sina Ramtin
- Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute Foundation for Opioid Research & Education, Rothman Opioid Foundation, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Gianna Uhler
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Asif M Ilyas
- Orthopaedics, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Rothman Opioid Foundation, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Ari Greis
- Department of Medical Cannabis, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Carlisle C, Polley K, Panda C, Barron K, Hamrock M, Dominique A, Metzger B, Le Brun-Blashka S, Komarnytsky S. Alleviation of Pain, PAIN Interference, and Oxidative Stress by a Novel Combination of Hemp Oil, Calamari Oil, and Broccoli: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Nutrients 2023; 15:2654. [PMID: 37375558 DOI: 10.3390/nu15122654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic pain is a critical health issue in the US that is routinely managed pharmacologically with diminishing results. The widespread misuse and abuse of prescription opioid pain medications have caused both healthcare providers and patients to seek alternative therapeutic options. Several dietary ingredients have been traditionally used for pain relief and are known to have potential analgesic properties. This double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial aimed to test whether a novel combination of full spectrum hemp oil (phytocannabinoids), calamari oil (omega-3 fatty acids), and broccoli (glucosinolates) could reduce chronic pain and attenuate damage from oxidative stress in adults seeking chiropractic care. Participants (average age = 54.8 ± 13.6 years old) were randomly assigned to consume a whole-food, multi-ingredient supplement (n = 12, intervention and standard chiropractic care) or placebo (n = 13, mineral oil and standard chiropractic care) daily for 12 weeks. The subjects' self-reported perceived pain, pain interference, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) status in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were quantified at baseline, mid-checkpoint, and postintervention. The intervention was positively associated with a 52% decrease in pain intensity and several parameters of pain interference, including quality of sleep. Decreases in the markers of oxidative stress were also observed in the participants from the intervention group (29.4% decrease in PMBC ROS). Our findings indicated that supplementation with a novel combination of hemp oil, calamari oil, and broccoli has the potential to manage chronic pain when combined with standard chiropractic care, as suggested by its effects on pain intensity and oxidative stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina Carlisle
- Nutrition Innovation Center, Standard Process Inc., 150 N Research Campus Drive, Kannapolis, NC 28081, USA
| | - Kristine Polley
- Nutrition Innovation Center, Standard Process Inc., 150 N Research Campus Drive, Kannapolis, NC 28081, USA
| | - Chinmayee Panda
- Nutrition Innovation Center, Standard Process Inc., 150 N Research Campus Drive, Kannapolis, NC 28081, USA
| | - Keri Barron
- Nutrition Innovation Center, Standard Process Inc., 150 N Research Campus Drive, Kannapolis, NC 28081, USA
| | - Meghan Hamrock
- Nutrition Innovation Center, Standard Process Inc., 150 N Research Campus Drive, Kannapolis, NC 28081, USA
| | - Ashley Dominique
- Nutrition Innovation Center, Standard Process Inc., 150 N Research Campus Drive, Kannapolis, NC 28081, USA
| | - Brandon Metzger
- Nutrition Innovation Center, Standard Process Inc., 150 N Research Campus Drive, Kannapolis, NC 28081, USA
| | - Sara Le Brun-Blashka
- Nutrition Innovation Center, Standard Process Inc., 150 N Research Campus Drive, Kannapolis, NC 28081, USA
| | - Slavko Komarnytsky
- Plants for Human Health Institute, North Carolina State University, 600 Laureate Way, Kannapolis, NC 28081, USA
- Department of Food, Bioprocessing, and Nutrition Sciences, North Carolina State University, 400 Dan Allen Drive, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
| |
Collapse
|