Effect of Time-To-Surgery on Distal Radius Fracture Outcomes: A Systematic Review

[Treatment reality of distal radius fractures in a center]

Distal radius fractures are the third most common type of fracture in Germany after fractures of the femoral neck and peritrochanteric femoral fractures. In 2019 a total of 72,087 cases were registered with an incidence of 106 cases per 100,000 inhabitants (81,570 fractures of the femoral neck, 73,785 peritrochanteric fractures). Many of these fractures are surgically treated also in this hospital but with controversial views on the optimal treatment. Against the background of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, disappearing personnel resources and the political pressure to form centers and a switch to outpatient treatment, the authors ask the question what the treatment reality in this hospital looks like and whether the general changes in the framework conditions also have an affect in this context. This is not a strictly scientific study but a stocktaking without any claims of completeness and the retrospective evaluation of a larger data pool with all its weaknesses. On the contrary, the data provide interesting aspects that are explained in detail in the individual sections.

Impact of Socioeconomic Factors on Time to Surgery for Distal Radius Fractures

Background

Delay in care secondary to socioeconomic status (SES) and demographic factors represents an area for potential improvement. Reducing time to surgery in distal radius fracture (DRF) fixation may improve outcomes while reducing cost. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of SES on time to surgery in our study population.

Methods

Patients undergoing outpatient DRF surgery within an academic healthcare system during a 4-year period were reviewed. Time to surgery and demographic factors were analyzed. The US Census Bureau was used to determine median household income (MHI) for a patient's ZIP code; patients were stratified into three groups based on MHI.

Results

A total of 413 patients met inclusion criteria. SES (14.7 d in the low-SES group, 14.0 d in the mid-SES group, and 11.1 d in the high-SES group, P = 0.00063), insurance (11.7 d for insured versus 16.3 d for Medicaid/uninsured, P < 0.0001), race (non-White group: 15.2 d versus White group: 10.9 d, P < 0.0001), and treatment facility (16.2 d at county hospital versus 10.9 d at university hospital, P < 0.0001) were associated with time to surgery in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis found that only treatment facility was associated with time to surgery.

Conclusions

Non-White, uninsured/Medicaid individuals residing in low-SES areas may be more likely to receive care at a safety-net facility and are at greatest risk for delay in time to surgery. Measures aimed to reduce barriers to care, increase healthcare coverage, and improve patient education should be initiated to mitigate these disparities.

Timing of Olecranon Fracture Fixation Does Not Affect Early Complication or Reoperation Rates

Purpose

Surgical fixation of olecranon fractures can lead to soft-tissue complications and return to the operating room for hardware removal. While some risk factors of complications after olecranon fracture fixation have been described, the effects of fixation timing on complications and reoperation have not been evaluated. The purpose of the present study was to assess whether the timing of olecranon fracture fixation affects complication and reoperation rates.

Methods

All patients who underwent olecranon fracture open reduction and internal fixation at a single level 1 trauma center from January 2012 to February 2022 were included in the study. A retrospective review was performed to evaluate patients for inclusion and to identify patient demographic factors, medical comorbidities, concomitant injuries, mechanism of injury, and time to fixation. Operative and clinical notes were evaluated to identify fixation type and outcomes of interest. Patients were stratified into early, standard, and delayed fixation groups (0-3 days, 4-14 days, and >14 days, respectively) for independent analyses, and Fisher's exact test was used to identify differences in complications and reoperations between groups. Multivariate analysis was used to assess associations between patient demographic factors, complication rates, and time to surgery.

Results

A total of 97 patients met inclusion criteria of having an olecranon open reduction and internal fixation and had a minimum follow-up of at least 10 weeks, with an average follow-up of 7.1 months. The average time to surgery in the overall cohort was 9.3 days. There were no differences in the number of total complications and rate of reoperation among the three cohorts. Smoking was found to be significantly associated with total complications, while open fracture was significantly associated with reoperation. Polytrauma and open fracture were significantly associated with earlier operation, while smoking was significantly associated with delayed fixation.

Conclusions

The timing of fixation of displaced olecranon fractures does not significantly increase the rate of early complications or reoperation.

Type of study/level of evidence

Symptom Prevalence Study III.

Regional versus General Anesthesia in Postoperative Pain Management after Distal Radius Fracture Surgery: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Distal radius fractures are the most prevalent upper extremity fractures, posing a significant public health concern. Recent studies comparing regional and general anesthesia for postoperative pain management after these fractures have yielded conflicting results. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness of regional and general anesthesia concerning postoperative pain management and opioid consumption following distal radius fracture surgery. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases to identify relevant randomized controlled trials. Four randomized trials involving 248 participants were included in the analysis. A pooled analysis revealed that regional anesthesia led to significantly reduced postoperative pain scores at 2 h compared to general anesthesia (SMD -2.03; 95% CI -2.88--1.17). However, no significant differences in pain scores were observed between the two anesthesia types after 12 h post-surgery. Regional anesthesia was associated with lower total opioid consumption (SMD -0.76; 95% CI -1.25--0.26) and fewer occurrences of nausea and vomiting compared to the general anesthesia. Nonetheless, opioid consumption on the first day post-discharge was significantly higher in the regional anesthesia group (SMD 0.83; 95% CI 0.47-1.20). The analgesic superiority of regional anesthesia is confined to the early postoperative hours with overall lower opioid use but a notable increase in opioid consumption on the first day post-discharge, potentially attributable to rebound pain.