Evaluating the Impact of Social Deprivation on Mid-Term Outcomes Following Distal Radius Open Reduction Internal Fixation

A Nationwide Analysis of the Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Complications and Health Care Utilizations After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the Area Deprivation Index: Consideration of the Disadvantaged Patient

BACKGROUND

Socioeconomic status has been demonstrated to be an important prognostic risk factor among patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. We evaluated patients living near neighborhoods with higher socioeconomic risk undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and if they were associated with differences in the following: (1) medical complications; (2) emergency department (ED) utilizations; (3) readmissions; and (4) costs of care.

METHODS

A query of a national database from 2010 to 2020 was performed for primary TKAs. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) is a weighted index comprised of 17 census-based markers of material deprivation and poverty. Higher numbers indicate a greater disadvantage. Patients undergoing TKA in zip codes associated with high ADI (90%+) were 1:1 propensity-matched to a comparison group by age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. This yielded 225,038 total patients, evenly matched between cohorts. Outcomes studied included complications, ED utilizations, readmission rates, and 90-day costs. Logistic regression models computed the odds ratios (OR) of ADI on the dependent variables. P values less than .003 were significant.

RESULTS

High ADI led to higher rates and odds of any medical complications (11.7 versus 11.0%; OR: 1.05, P = .0006), respiratory failures (0.4 versus 0.3%; OR: 1.28, P = .001), and acute kidney injuries (1.7 versus 1.5%; OR: 1.15, P < .0001). Despite lower readmission rates (2.9 versus 3.5%), high ADI patients had greater 90-day ED visits (4.2 versus 4.0%; OR: 1.07, P = .0008). The 90-day expenditures ($15,066 versus $12,459; P < .0001) were higher in patients who have a high ADI.

CONCLUSIONS

Socioeconomically disadvantaged patients have increased complications and ED utilizations. Neighborhood disadvantage may inform health care policy and improve postdischarge care. The socioeconomic status metrics, including ADI (which captures community effects), should be used to adequately risk-adjust or risk-stratify patients so that access to care for deprived regions and patients is not lost.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The impact of social deprivation on rotator cuff repair outcomes

BACKGROUND

Rotator cuff tears are a common orthopedic injury, and the role of social determinants of health (SDoH) in surgical outcomes remains underexplored. The goal of this study was to investigate the correlation between social deprivation, measured by the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), and outcomes following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review on patients undergoing primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair at a level 1 academic center between 2006 and 2019. Patient demographics (age, gender, race), comorbidities, ADIs, range of motion, visual analog pain scores, and patient-reported outcomes (Simple Shoulder Test [SST], American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form [ASES], and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire [QuickDASH]) were collected. Patients were stratified into terciles based on their relative level of deprivation. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance, t tests, χ2 tests, and univariate or multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 322 patients were included in this study. The most deprived group had a higher prevalence of diabetes compared to the least and intermediately deprived group (P < .001). Massive tear occurrence was greater in the least deprived group (P = .003) compared to the most deprived group. There was no difference in objective outcomes between groups. Patient-reported outcomes (SST, ASES, and QuickDASH scores) were worse in the most deprived group compared with the least and intermediate deprived groups.

CONCLUSION

Social deprivation significantly affects patient-reported outcomes in rotator cuff repair surgery. Although clinician-reported outcomes were consistent, patients' perceptions varied based on social determinants. Integrating SDoH considerations in orthopedic care is a promising next step in securing equitable approaches. However, more research is needed to validate and expand these findings.

The Effect of Social Deprivation on Hospital Utilization Following Distal Radius Fracture Treatment

Purpose

Social determinants of health disparities have been shown to adversely impact outcomes following distal radius fracture (DRF) treatment. Identifying risk factors for increased hospital use following DRF has been historically difficult; however, it is of utmost concern to orthopedic surgeons to improve outcomes and decrease the total cost of care. The effect of social deprivation following DRF has yet to be fully investigated.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort analysis of a single institution's experience in treating DRF with either an operative or nonsurgical modality between 2005 and 2020. Patient demographic information and health care utilization (hospital readmission, emergency department [ED] visitation, office visits, and telephone use) were collected from within 90 days of treatment. Area Deprivation Index (ADI) national percentiles were recorded. Patients were stratified into terciles based on their relative level of deprivation, and their outcomes were compared. Secondary analyses included stratifying patients based on treatment modality, race, and legal sex.

Results

In total, 2,149 patients were included. The least, intermediate, and most deprived groups consisted of 552, 1,067, and 530 patients, respectively. Risk factors for hospital readmission included higher levels of relative deprivation. Identifying as Black or African American and nonsurgical management were risk factors for increased ED visitation. No differences in rate of hospital readmission, ED visitation, office visitation, or telephone use were seen based on deprivation level.

Conclusions

High levels of social deprivation, treatment modality, race, and legal sex disparities may influence the amount of hospital resource utilization following DRF treatment. Understanding and identifying risk factors for greater resource utilization can help to mitigate inappropriate use and decrease health care costs. We hope to use these findings to guide clinical decision making, educate patient populations, and optimize outcomes following DRF treatment.

Type of Study/Level of Evidence

Therapeutic III.

Race and Area of Deprivation Index Predict Outcomes of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Chronic Sinusitis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to characterize the presentation, outcomes, and barriers to care for White and non-White patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS).

BACKGROUND

ESS is often successful in providing long-term relief for patients suffering from chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Literature that uses robust measures of socioeconomic status (SES) and barriers to care to assess ESS outcomes is limited.

METHODS

A retrospective matched cohort study of patients who underwent ESS for CRS between 1/1/2015 and 6/1/2021 at a single tertiary care academic center was conducted. White and non-White patients were matched 1-to-1 by sex and age (± 5 years). SES was evaluated using the area of deprivation index (ADI).

RESULTS

Of the 298 patients included in the study, 149 are White and 149 are non-White, 111 (37.2%) have CRS with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP), 141 (47.3%) had allergic rhinitis, 90 (30.2%) had asthma and 22 (7.4%) required revision ESS. Non-White patients were 3.62 times more likely to present with CRSwNP (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2-5.96) and had 2.87 times increased odds for requiring revision ESS than age and sex-matched White patients (95% CI 1.090-7.545). The median ADI for non-White (6.00) patients was higher than for White patients (3.00) (P < .001) and 21.5% more non-White patients presented with Medicaid (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Non-White patients undergoing ESS for CRS are more likely to present from areas with fewer resources and be underinsured. Using robust measures of SES, such as ADI, may allow for care to be tailored to patients with barriers to care.

Missed Short-term Follow-up After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Surgery: Analysis of Surgical and Demographic Factors

INTRODUCTION

Few current studies have examined loss to follow-up after rotator cuff-related shoulder arthroscopy. Understanding the demographic and surgical factors for missed follow-up would help identify patients most at risk and potentially mitigate the onset of complications while maximizing clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review of consecutive rotator cuff arthroscopic procedures with a minimum of 12-month follow-up done by a single, fellowship-trained surgeon was undertaken from February 2016 through January 2022. Demographic patient and surgical data, including age, sex, marital status, self-identified race, and body mass index, were collected. Follow-up at ≤3, 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months was determined. Patient-related and surgical predictors for missed short-term follow-up, defined as nonattendance at the 6 and 12-month postoperative visits, were identified.

RESULTS

There were 449 cases included, of which 248 (55%) were women. The median age was 57 years (interquartile range [IQR], 51 to 62). Patients with commercial insurance (odds ratio [OR], 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.64; P < 0.001) or workers' compensation (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.43; P < 0.001) were less likely to miss the 6-month follow-up compared with patients with Medicare, whereas increased socioeconomic deprivation (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.97, P = 0.015) was associated with decreased odds of missing that visit. Patients who missed the ≤3 weeks (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.14 to 2.74, P = 0.010) and 3-month (OR, 8.55; 95% CI, 4.33 to 16.86; P < 0.001) follow-ups were more likely to miss the 6-month follow-up. Use of a patient contact system (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.87, P = 0.01) and increased number of preoperative visits (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84 to 0.99, P = 0.033) were associated with decreased odds of missing the 12-month follow-up. Patients who missed the 6-month follow-up were more likely to miss the 12-month follow-up (OR, 5.38; 95% CI, 3.45 to 8.40; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Implementing an electronic patient contact system while increasing focus on patients with few preoperative visits and who miss the 6-month follow-up can reduce the risk of missed follow-up at 12 months after shoulder arthroscopy.